Kompleks Problem Çözme Üzerine R Programı ile Bir Bibliyometrik Analiz

Özellikle gelecekteki eğitim ve çalışma hayatı üzerine son yıllarda yapılan çalışmalarda kompleks problem çözme önemli yer edinmektedir. Dünya Ekonomik Forumu raporuna göre önümüzdeki beş yıl içinde talep edilecek beceriler listesinde kompleks problem çözme dikkat çekmektedir. Türkiye'nin listesinde ise kompleks problem çözme beşinci sırada değerlendirilmektedir. Rapora göre önümüzdeki dönemde hem akademik alanda hem de çalışma yaşamında bu konunun gündemde olacağı belirtilmektedir. Sistematik yazın taramaları araştırma alanı ya da konusu ile ilgili önemli değişkenleri keşfetmek, yapılması gerekenleri yapılanlardan ayırt etmek ve dahası araştırmacılar için önerilerin belirlenmesinde önemli fayda sağlayan yöntemlerdendir. Bu bağlamda bu çalışmada sistematik yazın tarama yöntemlerinden birisi olan bibliyometri kullanılarak kompleks problem çözme üzerine bir sistematik yazın taraması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma, Scopus veri tabanında yer alan dergilerde 1999-2018 yılları arasında yayınlan “complex problem solving” anahtar kelimelerini içeren 166 makalenin R programlama dilini kullanarak bibliyometrik analizini yapmaktadır. Aynı zamanda kompleks problem çözme alt alanları ile zamanda gelişimi arasındaki ilişkileri göstermek için içerik analizi kullanılmaktadır. Çalışma daha çok kaynak etkileri, eşdizimlilik ağı, ortak atıf, yazar iş birliği üzerine odaklanmaktadır. Araştırma sonuçlarının kompleks problem çözme ile ilgili gelecekteki çalışmalara ışık tutacağı öngörülmektedir.

A Bibliometric Analysis employing the R Program of Complex Problem Solving

Complex problem solving has gained a significant place especially in the studies conducted concerning education and working life in the future, According to the report of World Economic Forum, complex problem solving in the list of skills to be demanded in the next five years is noteworthy. In Turkey's list of complex problem solving is considered the fifth. According to the report, it is stated that this issue will be on the agenda both in academic and working life in the upcoming period. Systematic literature surveys are important methods to discover important variables related to the field or to the subject of research, to distinguish what should be done from what is done, and, moreover, to determine recommendations for researchers. In this study, a systematic literature survey on complex problem solving was conducted using bibliometry, which is a method of systematic survey of the literature. The study uses bibliometric analysis of 166 articles recording complex problem solving keywords published the journals published on the Scopus database between 1999-2018. Content analysis is also used to demonstrate the relationship between complex problem solving sub-areas and the development of complex problem solving research over time. This study largely focuses upon resource impacts, colloboration network, citation, and author collaboration. It is intended that the results of this research will cast a light on future studies concerning complex problem solving.

___

  • Aria M. & Cuccurullo C. (2017). “Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis”. Journal of Informetrics 11/4 (2017) 959-975. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  • Baggen Y., Mainert J., Lans T., Biemans H. J. A., Greiff S. & Mulder M. (2015). “Linking Complex Problem Solving to Opportunity Identification Competence Within the Context of Entrepreneurship”. International Journal of Lifelong Education 34/4 (2015) 412-429. doi:10.1080/02601370.2015.1060029
  • Beckmann J. F., Birney D. P. & Goode N. (2017). “Beyond Psychometrics: The Difference Between Difficult Problem Solving and Complex Problem Solving”. Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017) 1739- 1751. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01739
  • Beckmann J. F. & Guthke J. (1995). “Complex Problem Solving, Intelligence and Learning Ability”. Ed. P. A. Frensch & J. Funke. Complex problem solving: the European perspective (1995) 177-200. New York.
  • Börner K., Chen C. & Boyack K. W. (2005). “Visualizing Knowledge Domains”. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37/1 (2005) 179-255. doi: 10.1002/aris.1440370106
  • Caner T., Cohen S. K. & Pil F. (2017). “Firm Heterogeneity in Complex Problem Solving: A KnowledgeBased Look at Invention”. Strategic Management Journal 38/9 (2017) 1791-1811. doi:10.1002/smj.2615
  • Care E., Scoular C. & Griffin P. (2016). “Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving in Education Environments”. Applied Measurement in Education 29/4 (2016) 250-264. doi:10.1080/ 08957347.2016.1209204
  • Cobo M. J., López-Herrera A. G. Herrera-Viedma E. & Herrera F. (2011). “Science Mapping Software Tools: Review, Analysis and Cooperative Study Among Tools”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62/7 (2011) 1382-1402. doi: 10.1002/asi.21525
  • Conley S. N., Foley R. W., Gorman M. E., Denham J. & Coleman K. (2017). “Acquisition of T-shaped Expertise: An Exploratory Study”. Social Epistemology 31/2 (2017) 165-183. doi:10.1080/ 02691728.2016.1249435
  • Crane D. (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago 1972.
  • Danner D., Hagemann D., Schankin A., Hager M. & Funke J. (2011). “Beyond IQ: A Latent State-Trait Analysis of General Intelligence, Dynamic Decision Making and Implicit Learning”. Intelligence 39/5 (2011) 323-334. doi:10.1016/J.INTELL.2011.06.004
  • de Bellis N. (2014). “History and Evolution of Biblio (metrics)”. Ed. B. Cronin & C. R. Sugimoto. Beyond Bibliometrics :Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact (2014) 23-44.
  • Dörner D. & Kreuzig H. W. (1983). “Problem Solving Ability and Intelligence”. Psychologische Rundschau 34/4 (1983) 185-192.
  • Dörner D. & Güss C. D. (2013). “PSI: A Computational Architecture of Cognition, Motivation, and Emotion”. Review of General Psychology 17/3 (2013) 297-317. doi:10.1037/a0032947
  • Dörner D. & Reither, F. (1978). “Über das Problemlösen in Sehr Komplexen Realitätsbereichen”. Zeitschrift Für Experimentelle Und Angewandte Psychologie : Organ Der Deutschen Gesellschaft Für Psychologie 4 (1978) 527-551.
  • Ederer P., Nedelkoska L., Patt A. & Castellazzi S. (2015). “What Do Employers Pay For Employees’ Complex Problem Solving Skills?”. International Journal of Lifelong Education 34/4 (2015) 430- 447. doi:10.1080/02601370.2015.1060026
  • Fischer A., Greiff S. & Funke J. (2012). “The Process of Solving Complex Problems”. The Journal of Problem Solving 4/1 (2012) 19-42. doi:10.7771/1932-6246.1118
  • Fischer A., Greiff S., Wüstenberg S., Fleischer J., Buchwald F. & Funke J. (2015). “Assessing Analytic and Interactive Aspects of Problem Solving Competency”. Learning and Individual Differences 39 (2015) 172-179. doi:10.1016/J.LINDIF.2015.02.008
  • Fischer A., Holt D. V. & Funke J. (2015). “Promoting the Growing Field of Dynamic Decision Making”. Journal of Dynamic Decision Making 1/1 (2015) 1-3. doi:10.11588/jddm.2015.1.23807
  • Frischkorn G. T., Greiff S. & Wüstenberg S. (2014). “The Development of Complex Problem Solving in Adolescence: A Latent Growth Curve Analysis”. Journal of Educational Psychology 106/4 (2014) 1007-1020. doi:10.1037/a0037114
  • Funke J. (1991). “Solving Complex Problems: Exploration and Control of Complex Systems”. Ed. R. J. Sternberg & P. A. Frensch. Complex Problem Solving: Principles and Mechanisms, (1991) 185-222. New York.
  • Funke J. (2001). “Dynamic Systems As Tools For Analysing Human Judgement”. Thinking and Reasoning 7/1 (2001) 69-89. doi:10.1080/13546780042000046
  • Funke J. (2010). “Complex Problem Solving: A Case for Complex Cognition?”. Cognitive Processing 11/2 (2010) 133-142. doi:10.1007/s10339-009-0345-0
  • Greiff S., Fischer A., Wüstenberg S., Sonnleitner P., Brunner M. & Martin R. (2013). “A Multitrait– Multimethod Study of Assessment Instruments for Complex Problem Solving”. Intelligence 41/5 (2013) 579-596. doi:10.1016/J.INTELL.2013.07.012
  • Greiff S., Holt D. V. & Funke J. (2013). “Perspectives on Problem Solving in Educational Assessment: Analytical, Interactive and Collaborative Problem Solving”. The Journal of Problem Solving 5/2 (2013) 71-91. doi:10.7771/1932-6246.1153
  • Greiff S., Stadler M., Sonnleitner P., Wolff C. & Martin R. (2015). “Sometimes Less is More: Comparing the Validity of Complex Problem Solving Measures”. Intelligence 50 (2015) 100-113. doi:10.1016/J.INTELL.2015.02.007
  • Greiff S., Wüstenberg S., Csapó B., Demetriou A., Hautamäki J., Graesser A. C. & Martin R. (2014). “Domain-General Problem Solving Skills and Education in the 21st Century”. Educational Research Review 13 (2014) 74-83. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.10.002
  • Güss C. D., Tuason M. T. & Gerhard C. (2009). “Cross-National Comparisons of Complex ProblemSolving Strategies in Two Microworlds”. Cognitive Science 34/3 (2009) 489-520. doi:10.1111/j.1551- 6709.2009.01087.x
  • Güss C. D. (2011). “Fire and Ice: Testing a Model on Culture and Complex Problem Solving”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 42/7 (2011) 1279-1298. doi:10.1177/0022022110383320
  • Hagemann N. & Kirschke S. (2017). “Key Issues of Interdisciplinary NEXUS Governance Analyses: Lessons Learned from Research on Integrated Water Resources Management”. Resources 6/1 (2017) 9-16. doi:10.3390/resources6010009
  • Hagemann V. & Kluge A. (2017). “Complex Problem Solving in Teams: The Impact of Collective Orientation on Team Process Demands”. Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017) 1730-1748. doi:10.3389/ fpsyg.2017.01730
  • Huber O. (1994). “Decision Behavior in a Multistage Investment Task”. Acta Psychologica 85/2 (1994) 139-154. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(94)90029-9
  • Kirschke S., Newig J., Völker J. & Borchardt D. (2017). “Does Problem Complexity Matter for Environmental Policy Delivery? How Public Authorities Address Problems of Water Governance”. Journal of Environmental Management 196 (2017) 1-7. doi:10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2017.02.068
  • Kröner S., Plass J. L. & Leutner D. (2005). “Intelligence Assessment with Computer Simulations”. Intelligence 33/4 (2005) 347-368. doi:10.1016/J.INTELL.2005.03.002
  • Marshall S. P. (2009). “Re-Imagining Specialized STEM Academies: Igniting And Nurturing Decidedly Different Minds, by Design”. Roeper Review 32/1 (2009) 48-60. doi:10.1080/02783190903386884
  • Merton R. K. (1957). “Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science”. American Sociological Review 6 (1957) 635–659. doi:10.2307/2089193
  • Nair K. U. & Ramnarayan S. (2000). “Individual Differences in Need for Cognition and Complex Problem Solving”. Journal of Research in Personality 34/3 (2000) 305-328. doi:10.1006/JRPE.1999.2274
  • “PISA 2015”. (2019, April 15) Kaynak: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf
  • Schoppek W. & Fischer A. (2017). “Common Process Demands of Two Complex Dynamic Control Tasks: Transfer is Mediated by Comprehensive Strategies”. Frontiers in Psychology (2017) 8 2145- 2157. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02145
  • Schult J., Stadler M., Becker N., Greiff S. & Sparfeldt J. R. (2017). “Home Alone: Complex Problem Solving Performance Benefits from Individual Online Assessment”. Computers in Human Behavior 68 (2017) 513-519. doi:10.1016/J.CHB.2016.11.054
  • Schweizer F., Wüstenberg S. & Greiff S. (2013). “Validity of the MicroDYN Approach: Complex Problem Solving Predicts School Grades Beyond Working Memory Capacity”. Learning and Individual Differences 24 (2013) 42-52. doi:10.1016/J.LINDIF.2012.12.011
  • Sinnott J., Tobin E., Chrzanowska E. & Hilton S. (2017). “The Relationship between Attachment Style and Postformal Thought”. Journal of Adult Development 24/4 (2017) 239-251. doi:10.1007/s10804-017- 9262-0
  • Sonnleitner P., Brunner M., Keller U. & Martin R. (2014). “Differential Relations between Facets of Complex Problem Solving and Students’ Immigration Background”. Journal of Educational Psychology 106/3 (2014) 681-695. doi:10.1037/a0035506
  • Steiner G. & Posch A. (2006). “Higher Education for Sustainability by means of Transdisciplinary Case Studies: An Innovative Approach for Solving Complex, Real-World Problems”. Journal of Cleaner Production 14/9-11 (2006) 877-890. doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2005.11.054
  • “The Future of Jobs Report 2018 Insight Report Centre for the New Economy and Society”. (2019, April 15). Kaynak: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2018.pdf
  • Weigelt C. & Sarkar M. (2012). “Performance Implications of Outsourcing for Technological Innovations: Managing the Efficiency and Adaptability Trade-Off”. Strategic Management Journal 33/2 (2012) 189- 216. doi:10.1002/smj.951
  • Wenke D., Frensch P. A. & Funke J. (2005). “Complex Problem Solving and Intelligence: Empirical Relation and Causal Direction”. Ed. R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Pretz. Cognition and Intelligence: Identifying the Mechanisms of the Mind (2005) 160-187. New York.
  • Wüstenberg S., Stadler M., Hautamäki J. & Greiff S. (2014). “The Role of Strategy Knowledge for the Application of Strategies in Complex Problem Solving Tasks”. Technology, Knowledge and Learning 19/1-2 (2014) 127-146. doi:10.1007/s10758-014-9222-8