“Delilik Başka Yerde”: Rainer Maria Rilke’nin Orpheus Sonelerinin Marcuse Perspektifinden Okuması

Bu makalenin amacı, Rainer Maria Rilke’nin Orpheus’a Soneler (Sonette an Orpheus) eserini Marcuse’nin bakış açısıyla değerlendirmektir. Bu makale beş bölüme ayrılmıştır: İlk bölüm, Rilke’nin sone döngüsünde Orpheus’un temsiline ve Marcuse’nin Prometheus, Orpheus ve Narcissus mitleri hakkındaki yorumuna odaklanmaktadır. İkinci bölüm, Orpheus’a Soneler ve Marcuse’nin çalışmalarında alıcılık ve saldırmazlık ile karakterize edilen yeni bir duyarlılık kavramına dikkat çekiyor. Üçüncü bölüm Rilke’yi ve Marcuse’nin narsisizm hakkındaki görüşlerini incelemektedir. Dördüncü bölüm, Rilke’nin sone döngüsü ile Marcuse’nin ekoeleştirel fikirler üzerine çalışmaları arasındaki ilişkilere dikkat çekiyor. Beşinci kısım, iki yazarın, toplumda şiirin işlevi hakkındaki fikirlerini incelemektedir. Final paragrafı makalenin önceki beş bölümden çıkarılan sonuçları özetler.

“Madness is Somewhere Else”: A Marcusian Reading of Rainer Maria Rilke’s Sonnets to Orpheus

The aim of this article is to read Rainer Maria Rilke’s Sonnets to Orpheus (Sonette an Orpheus) from a Marcusian perspective. This article is divided into five parts: The first part focuses on the representation of Orpheus in Rilke’s sonnet cycle and on Marcuse’s interpretation of the myths of Prometheus, Orpheus and Narcissus. The second part draws attention to the notion of a new sensibility characterized by receptivity and nonviolence in Sonnets to Orpheus and Marcuse’s works. The third part explores Rilke’s and Marcuse’s views on narcissism. The fourth part points out affinities between Rilke’s sonnet cycle and Marcuse’s works with ecocritical ideas. The fifth part discusses the two writers’ ideas on the function of poetry in society. A final paragraph sums up the conclusions drawn in the previous five parts of this article.

PDF

___

Andreas-Salomé L. (1928). Rainer Maria Rilke. Leipzig 1928.
Bernstock J. E. (1991). Under the Spell of Orpheus: The Persistence of a Myth in Twentieth-Century Art. Illinois 1991. Eldridge H. V. (2014). “Figuring Finitude: Rilke’s Sonnets to Orpheus”. H. V. Eldridge, Lyric Orientations: Hölderlin, Rilke, and the Poetics of Community (2014) 156-192. Ithaca.
Freud S. (1961). Civilization and Its Discontents. Translated and edited by J. Strachey. New York 1961.
Hass R. (1989). “Introduction”. Translated and edited by S. Mitchell, The Selected Poetry of Rainer Maria Rilke (1989) xi-xliv. New York.
Kleinbart D. (1993). “Woman Within: Developments Leading to The Sonnets to Orpheus and the Completion of the Duino Elegies”. D. Kleinbart. The Beginning of Terror: A Psychological Study of Rainer Maria Rilke’s Life and Work (1993) 128-149. New York.
Komar K. L. (2010). “The Duino Elegies”. Eds. K. Leeder & R. Vilain, The Cambridge Companion to Rilke (2010) 80-94. Cambridge.
Marcuse H. (1969). An Essay On Liberation. Boston 1969.
Marcuse H. (1998). Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry Into Freud. London 1998.
Marcuse H. (1991). One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston 1991.
Martinec T. (2010). “The Sonnets to Orpheus”. Eds. K. Leeder & R. Vilain, The Cambridge Companion to Rilke (2010) 95-110. Cambridge.
Nietzsche F. (2000). The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings. Cambridge 2000.
Rilke R. M. (1964). Sonnets to Orpheus. Translated by C. F. MacIntyre. Berkeley 1964.
Rilke R. M. (1982). The Selected Poetry of Rainer Maria Rilke. Edited and translated by S. Mitchell. New York 1982.
Rueckert W. (1996). “Literature and Ecology: An Experiment in Ecocriticism”. Eds. C. Glotfelty & H. Fromm, The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology (1996) 105-123. Georgia.
Ryan J. (1999). Rilke, Modernism and Poetic Tradition. Cambridge 1999.
Webb E. (1975). “The One and the Many: The Ambiguous Challenge of Being in the Poetry of Yeats and Rilke”. E. Webb, The Dark Dove: The Sacred and Secular in Modern Literature (1975) 54-67. Seattle.
Young D. (1987). “Introduction”. R. M. Rilke, Sonnets to Orpheus (1987). Translated by D. Young, 7-11. Connecticut.