Çapraz Evlilikler ve Gruplar Arası İlişkiler

Bu makale, farklı kimlik ve kültürel gruplardan bireyler arasında gerçekleşen çapraz evlilik alanındaki çalışmaların önemini göstermeyi amaçlamaktadır. Özellikle ayrıştırıcı toplumsal kategoriler üzerinden konumlanan gruplardan bireylerin evlilik gibi yakın bir ilişkiye girmesi bireylerin ve grupların kimlik algılarını ve ilişkilerini değiştirip temas kurmalarını sağlayabilmektedir. Uluslararası araştırmaların gösterdiği gibi bu evlilikler grup sınırlarının dönüşümüne ve ön yargıların azalmasına da katkı sağlamaktadır. Bu makalede çapraz evlilik araştırmalarının dönüştürücü ve olumlu potansiyelleri, uluslararası ve ulusal literatür gözden geçirilerek tartışılmaktadır

Intermarriages and Relations Between Groups

This article aims to demonstrate the significance of intermarriages between individuals from different cultural and identity groups. Specifically, close interactions such as intermarriages between individuals from groups constituted by excluding social categories, that may allow individuals and groups to build contact through changing their perceptions and relations. As international research shows, these marriages contribute to the transformation of group boundaries and diminishing prejudices. In this article, the transformative and positive potentials of intermarriages are discussed by means of an overview of the national and international literature

___

  • Alba R. & Nee V. (2003). Remaking the American Mainstream. Cambridge 2003.
  • Altuntek S. (2001). "Türkiye Üzerine Yapılmış Evlilik ve Akrabalık Araştırmalarının Bir Değerlendirilmesi". Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 18/ 2 (2001) 17-28.
  • Aytaç A. M. (2012). "Türkiye'de Ailenin Tarihsel Dönüşümü: 1925-2010" . Eds. F. Alpkaya & B. Duru. 1920'den Günümüze Türkiye'de Toplumsal Yapı ve Değişim (2012) 299-322. Ankara.
  • Aytav E. T. (2012). Alevi-Sünni Evlilikler: Sevdim Seni Bir Kere. İstanbul 2012.
  • Balkanlıoğlu M. A. (2012). "Alevi-Sünni Evliliklerinin Aile İlişkileri ile Çocuk Yetiştirme Üzerine Etkileri ve Sosyal Damgalama". Türk Kültürü ve Hacı Bektaş Veli Araştırma Dergisi 62 (2012) 163-182.
  • Bergmann W. (2002). "Exclusionary Riots: Some Theoretical Considerations". Eds: C. Hoffmann, W. Bergmann & H. W. Smith. Exclusionary Violence (2002) 161-185. Michigan.
  • Bowen J. R. (1996). "The Myth of Global Ethnic Conflict". Journal of Democracy 7/4 (1996) 3-14.
  • Bramlett M. D. & Mosher W. D. (2002). Cohabitation, Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage in the United States. Vol. 23. Hyattsville 2002.
  • Brewer M. (1996). "When Contact is not Enough: Social Identity and Intergroup Cooperation". International Journal of Intercultural Relations 20/3-4 (1996) 291-303.
  • Brubaker R. (2004). Ethnicity Without Groups. Cambridge 2004.
  • Dovidio J. F. & Gaertner S. L. (1997). "Extending the Benefits of Recategorization: Evaluations, Self- Disclosure, and Helping". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 33 (1997) 401-420.
  • Duben A. & Behar C. (1996). İstanbul Haneleri: Evlilik, Aile ve Doğurganlık 1880-1940. İstanbul 1996.
  • Feliciano C. (2001). "Assimilation or Enduring Racial Boundaries? Generational Differences in Intermarriage Among Asians and Latinos in the United States". Race and Society 4 (2001) 27-45.
  • Fincham F. D. (2003). "Marital Conflict: Correlates, Structure and Context". Current Directions in Psychological Science 12/1(2003) 23-27.
  • Foeman A. & Nance T. (2010). "Building New Cultures, Reframing Old Images: Success Strategies of Interracial Couples". Howard Journal of Communications 13/3 (2010) 237-249.
  • Forbes H. D. (1997). Ethnic Conflict: Commerce, Culture and the Contact Hypothesis. New Haven 1997.
  • Gaines S. O. Jr. & Ickes W. (1997). "Perspectives on Interracial Relationships". Ed. S. Duck. Handbook of Personal Relationships: Theory, Research and Interventions (1997) 197-220. Chichester.
  • Gültekin M. N. (2012). "Debates on Inter-Ethnic Marriages: Assimilation or Integration?". The Turkish Perspective Papers 97/1 (2012) 151-166.
  • Gündüz-Hoşgör A. & Smits J. (2002). "Intermarriage Between Turks and Kurds in Contemporary Turkey: Inter-Ethnic Relations in an Urbanizing Environment". European Sociological Review 18/4 (2002) 417-432.
  • Hall S. (1996). "Introduction Who Needs Identity". Eds. S. Hall & P. Gay. Cultural Identity (1996) 1-17. London, New Delhi.
  • Henderson D. A. (2000). "Racial/Ethnic Intermarries Couples and Marital Interaction: Marital Issues and Problem Solving". Sociological Focus 33/ 4 (2000) 421-438.
  • Hogg M. A. & Abrams D. (1988). Social Identification: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London, New York 1988.
  • Hogg M. A. (1996). "Intragroup Processes, Group Structure and Social Identity". Ed. W. P. Robinson. Social Groups and Identities: Developing the Legacy of Henri Tajfel (1996) 65-94. Oxford.
  • Ilcan S. M. (1994). "Marriage Regulation and the Rhetoric of Alliance in Northwestern Turkey". Ethnology 33/4 (1994) 273-296.
  • Kalmijn M. (1991). "Shifting Boundaries: Trends in Religious and Educational Homogamy". American Sociological Review 56/6 (1991) 786-800.
  • Kalmijn M. (1998). "Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends". Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1998) 395-421.
  • Kang Fu V. & Wolfinger N. H. (2011). "Broken Boundaries or Broken Marriages? Racial Intermarriage and Divorce in the United States". Social Science Quarterly 92/4 (2011) 1096-1117.
  • Lee M. S. & Fernandez M. (1998). "Trends in Asian American Racial/Ethnic Intermarriage: A Comparison of 1980 and 1990 Census Data". Sociological Perspectives 41/2 (1998) 323-342.
  • Luke C. & Luke A. (1998). "Interracial Families: Difference Within Difference". Ethnic and Racial Studies 21/4 (1998) 728-754.
  • Monden C. W. S. & Smits J. (2005). "Ethnic Intermarriage in Times of Social Change: The Case of Latvia". Demography 42/2 (2005) 323-345.
  • Olzak S. (1994). The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflicts. Stanford 1994.
  • Özateşler G. (2014). Gypsy Stigma and Exclusion in Turkey, 1970: The Social Dynamics of Exclusionary Violence. New York 2014.
  • Özbay F. (1998). "Türkiye'de Aile ve Hane Yapısı: Dün, Bugün, Yarın". Ed. A. B. Hacımirzaoğlu. 75 Yılda Kadınlar ve Erkekler (1998) 155-172. İstanbul.
  • Rosenfeld M. J. (2002). "Measures of Assimilation in the Marriage Market: Mexican Americans 1970- 1990". Journal of Marriage and Family 64 (2002) 152-162.
  • Qian Z. & Lichter D. T. (2007). "Social Boundaries and Marital Assimilation: Interpreting Trends in Racial and Ethnic Marriage". American Sociological Review 72 (2007) 68-94.
  • Seshadri G. & Knudson-Martin C. (2013). "How Couples Manage Interracial and Intercultural Difference: Implications for Clinical Practice". Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 39/1 (2013) 43-58.
  • Smits J. (2010). "Ethnic Intermarriage and Social Cohesion. What Can We Learn from Yugoslavia?". Social Indicators Research 96/3 (2010) 417-432.
  • Steinberg S. (1989). The Ethnic Myth: Race, Ethnicity and Class in America. Boston 1989.
  • Stephan C. W. & Stephan W. G. (1989). "After Intermarriage: Ethnic Identity Among Mixed Heritage Japanese-Americans and Hispanics". Journal of Marriage and Family 51 (1989) 507-519.
  • T24 Bağımsız İnternet Gazetesi (2010, Aralık 14). Türk ve Kürt Evliliği Bitiyor mu? Kaynak: http://t24.com.tr/haber/kurt-ve-turk-evliligi-bitiyor-mu,116721. Erişim Tarihi: 08 Aralık 2014.
  • Taluy N. & Sunal A. B. (2012). "Yakın İlişkilerde Michelangelo Olgusu: İdeal Benliğin Heykeltıraşı Olarak Partner Onaylaması". Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 15/29 (2012) 57- 65.
  • Van Arkel D. (2009). The Drawing of the Mark of Cain: A Socio-Historical Analysis of the Growth of Anti-Jewish Stereotypes. Amsterdam 2009.
  • Zhang Y. & Van Hook J. (2009). "Marital Dissolution Among Interracial Couples". Journal of Marriage and Family 71 (2009) 95-107.