Uyum Performansı Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Uyum performansı, çalışanın değişen iş yapılarına, koşullarına ve iş rollerine uygun şekilde; öngörülen ya da gerçekleşen değişiklikleri esas alarak davranışlarını değiştirebilme becerisidir. Değişim ve dönüşümlerin hızı göz önünde bulundurulduğunda uyum ve uyum performansı kavramının önemi herkesçe bilinmesine rağen kavramın literatürde görece az çalışıldığı söylenebilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Charbonnier-Voirin ve Roussel (2012) tarafından geliştirilmiş olan uyum performansı ölçeğinin Türkçe uyarlamasının yapılmasıdır. Uyum performansı kavramına ilişkin ayrıntılı bir literatür taraması sunarak; yönetici ve uygulayıcıları alternatif ve yeni bir performans değerleme kriteri ile tanıştırmak araştırmanın diğer amaçları arasında yer almaktadır. Araştırmada kullanılan veriler Kayseri organize sanayi bölgesi imalat sanayinde faaliyet gösteren iki özel işletmede görev yapan 192 çalışandan elde edilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde açımlayıcı faktör analizi (AFA), doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA), yapı geçerlilik analizi ve iç tutarlılık analizleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda Charbonnier-Voirin ve Roussel’in (2012) geliştirdiği ve orijinal ölçekte acil durum adaptasyonu, kişilerarası uyum, yaratıcılık, eğitim çabaları ve strese uyum alt boyutlarından oluşan uyum performansı ölçeğinin; bu çalışma ile acil durum adaptasyonu, kişilerarası uyum, yaratıcılık, eğitim çabaları olarak dört boyutlu yapısı doğrulanmıştır. Bu anlamda dört boyutlu uyum performansı ölçeğinin Türkiye’de gelecekte yapılacak çalışmalarda kullanılabilecek güvenilir ve geçerli bir ölçüm aracı olduğu ortaya konulmuştur.

Adaptation of The Adaptive Performance Scale to Turkish: A Validity And Reability Study

Adaptive performance is the ability of the employee to change his/her behavior in line with changing business structures, conditions and job roles, based on predicted or actual changes. Considering the speed of changes and transformations, although the importance of the concept of adaptation and adaptive performance is known to all, it is possible to say that the concept has been studied relatively little in the literature. The aim of this study is to make Turkish adaptation of the adaptive performance scale developed by Charbonnier-Voirin and Roussel (2012). Presenting a detailed literature review on the concept of adaptive performance, so introducing managers and practitioners to an alternative and new performance evaluation criteria are among the other aims of the research. The data used in the study were obtained from 192 employees working in two private enterprises operating in the manufacturing industry of Kayseri Organized Industrial Zone. In the analysis of the data, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), construct validity analysis and internal consistency analyzes were used. As a result of the research, the adaptive performance scale developed by Charbonnier-Voirin and Roussel (2012) that originally consists the emergency adaptation, interpersonal adjustment, creativity, training efforts, and stress adaptation sub-dimensions, the four-dimensional structure of the scale (emergency adaptation, interpersonal adaptation, creativity and training efforts) has been confirmed in the study. In this sense, the four-dimensional adaptive performance scale has been demonstrated to be a reliable and valid measurement tool that can be used in future studies in Turkey.

___

  • Açıkgöz, A. (2015). Bilişim endüstrisinde adaptasyon ve ürün başarısı: Çok katmanlı bir çalışma. İstanbul University Journal of the School of Business, 44(2), 39-55.
  • Ahmad, S. and Schroeder, R. G. (2003). The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance: Recognizing country and industry differences. Journal of Operations Management, 21(1), 19-43.
  • Allen, R. C., Fontaine, J. J., Pope, L. K. and Garmestani, S. A. (2011). Adaptive management for a turbulent future. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(5), 1339-1345.
  • Allworth, E. and Hesketh, B. (1999). Construct‐oriented biodata: Capturing change‐related and contextually relevant future performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7 (2), 97-111.
  • Baard, K. S. Rench, A. T. and Kozlowski W. J. S. (2014). Performance adaptation: A theoretical ıntegration and review, Journal of Management, 40(1), 48-99.
  • Borman, C. W. and Stephen J. M. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Schmitt W. C. and Borman W. C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco, Jossey Bass: CA.
  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
  • Brown, A. T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis: For applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Browne, W. Michael W. and Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Bollen K. A. and Long J. S. (Eds.), Testing structure equation models (p. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2003). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • Champbell, P. J. (1999). The definition and measurement of performance. Ilgen, D. R. and Pulakos, E. D. (Eds.), The changing nature of performance (p. 399-429).San Francisco: Josey-Bass Publishers.
  • Charbonnier-Voirin, A., Assâad El A. and Vandenberghe C. (2010). A multilevel model of transformational leadership and adaptive performance and the moderating role of climate for innovation. Group and Organization Management, 35(6), 699-726.
  • Charbonnier-Voirin, A. and Roussel, P. (2012). Adaptive performance: A new scale to measure individual performance in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 29(3), 280-293.
  • Chen, G., Brian, T. and Wallace C. J. (2005). A multilevel examination of the relationships among training outcomes, mediating regulatory processes, and adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 827-841.
  • Conway, J. M. and Huffcutt, I. A. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational research methods, 6(2), 147-168.
  • Çetinkaya, F. ve Gülbahar, H. (2019). Stratejik yönetim ve inovasyon ilişkisi: Kobi’ler üzerine bir araştırma. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 367-349.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  • Didin, K. (2017). The mediating roles of trust and value congruence on the relationship between transformational leadership and adaptive performance. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 64(4), 126-132.
  • Drewery, D., Nevison, C., Pretti, T. J. and Pennaforte, A. (2017). Lifelong learning characteristics, adjustment and extra-role performance in cooperative education. Journal of Education And Work, 30(3), 299-313.
  • Griffin, B. and Hesketh, B. (2003). Adaptable behaviours for successful work and career adjustment. Australian Journal of psychology, 55(2), 65-73.
  • Grotto, A. R., Hyland, P. K., Caputo, A. W. and Semedo, C. (2017). Employee turnover and strategies for retention. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Recruitment, Selection and Employee Retention, 443-472.
  • Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Han, T. Y. and Williams, K. J. (2008). Multilevel investigation of adaptive performance: Individual-and team-level relationships. Group and Organization Management, 33(6), 657-684.
  • Hesketh, B. and Neal, A. (1999). Techonology and performance. Ilgen, R. D. ve Pulakos, D. E. (Ed.), The changing nature of performance (p.21-55). San Francisco: Josey-Bass Publishers.
  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Huang, J. L., Ryan, A. M., Zabel, K. L. and Palmer, A. (2014). Personality and adaptive performance at work: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 162-179.
  • Ilgen, R. D. and Pulakos, D. E. (1999). Employee performance in today’s organizations. Ilgen, D. R. and E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The Changing nature of performance. San Francisco: Josey-Bass Publishers.
  • Jawahar, I. M., and Carr, D. (2007). Conscientiousness and contextual performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(4), 330-349.
  • Jong, A. D., and De Ruyter, K. (2004). Adaptive versus proactive behavior in service recovery: The role of self‐managing teams. Decision Sciences, 35(3), 457-491.
  • Joung, W., Hesketh, B., and Neal, A. (2006). Using “war stories” to train for adaptive performance: Is it better to learn from error or success?. Applied psychology, 55(2), 282-302.
  • Jundt, D. K., Shoss, M. K., and Huang, J. L. (2015). Individual adaptive performance in organizations: A review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 53-71.
  • Kim, J. O., and Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis: statistical methods and practical issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Kline, B. R. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equations modeling. New York: Guilford.
  • Kommers, P., Stoyanov, S., Mileva, N. and Mediano, C. M. (2008). The effect of adaptive performance support system on learning achievements of students. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 18(3), 351-365.
  • Koopmans, L. (2014). Measuring individual work performance. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856-866. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318226a763.
  • Kozlowski, S. W. and Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. Handbook of psychology, 333-375.
  • Kozlowskı, S. W., Gully, S. M., Brown, K. G., Salas, E., Smith, E. M. and Nason, E. R. (2001). Effects of training goals and goal orientation traits on multidimensional training outcomes And performance adaptability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(1), 1-31.
  • Lepine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A., and Erez, A. (2000). Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel psychology, 53(3), 563-593.
  • Lim, D. H., Yoo, M. H., Kim, J., and Brickell, S. A. (2017). Learning agility: The nexus between learning organization, transformative learning, and adaptive performance. Adult Education
  • Research Conference, https://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.com/Andhttpsre dir=1Andarticle=3873Andcontext=aerc
  • Maccallum, R. C., Browne, M. W. and Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological methods, 1(2), 130-149.
  • Marsh, H. W. and Hocevar, D. (1988). A new, more powerful approach to multitrait-multimethod analyses: Application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(1), 107-117.
  • Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R. and Mcdonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 391-410.
  • Monteiro, A. (2015). The impact of job insecurity on adaptive performance via burnout. Doctoral dissertation. School of Business And Economics.
  • Nunnally, C. J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Oliver, T. and Lievens, F. (2014). Conceptualizing and assessing interpersonal adaptability: Towards a functional framework. In Individual adaptability to changes at work (p. 78-98). Routledge.
  • Oolders, T., Chernyshenko, O. S. and Stark, S. (2008). Cultural intelligence as a mediator of relationships between openness to experience and adaptive performance. Handbook of cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement, And applications, 145-158.
  • Özdemir H. (2019). Konaklama işletmelerinde çalışan personelin örgütsel bağlılıklarının çeşitli açılardan incelenmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 250-237.
  • Ployhart, R. E. and Blaese, P. D. (2006). Individual adaptability (I-ADAPT) theory: Conceptualizing the antecedents, consequences, and measurement of individual differences in adaptability. In UnderstAnding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments. (p.3-39). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Pulakos, E. D. (2009). Performance management: A new approach for driving business results. John Wiley and Sons.
  • Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A. and Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of applied psychology, 85(4), 612-624.
  • Pulakos, E. D., Dorsey, D. W. and White, S. S. (2006). Adaptability in the workplace: Selecting an adaptive workforce. In UnderstAnding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.41-71.
  • Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D. W., Arad, S., Borman, W. C. and Hedge, J. W. (2002). Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability. Human performance, 15(4), 299-323.
  • Robbins, S. and Judge, A. T. (2012). Örgütsel Davranış. Erdem. İ (Ed.), İstanbul: Nobel.
  • Sezgin, F. (2003). Kriz yönetimi. Manas Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4 (8), 181-195.
  • Shoss, M. K., Witt, L. A. and Vera, D. (2012). When does adaptive performance lead to higher task performance?. Journal of organizational behavior, 33(7), 910-924.
  • Sonnentag, S., Volmer, J. and Spychala, A. (2008). Job performance. The Sage Handbook Of Organizational behavior, 1, 427-447.
  • Stokes, C. K., Schneider, T. R. and Lyons, J. B. (2008). Predicting adaptive performance in multicultural teams: a causal model (No. RTO-MP-HFM-142). Wrıght State Univ Dayton Oh.
  • Stokes, C. K., Schneider, T. R. and Lyons, J. B. (2010). Adaptive performance: A criterion problem. Team Performance Management: An International Journal. 16, 3/4 212-230.
  • Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3 (6): 49-74.
  • Şahin, F. ve Gürbüz, S. (2014). Cultural intelligence as a predictor of individuals’ adaptive performance: A study in a multicultural environment. International Area Studies Review, 17(4), 394-413.
  • Şimşek, M. Ş. ve Çelik, A. (2011). Yönetim ve organizasyon. Eğitim Kitabevi.
  • Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks.
  • Tabachnick, G. B. and Fidell, S. L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
  • Çelik, M., Turunç, Ö., ve Demirkaya, H. (2011). Çalışanların adalet algılarının iş performansına etkisinde kişi örgüt uyumunun aracılık rolü: Turizm sektöründe görgül bir çalışma. Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi, 8(2), 40-57.
  • Uyargil, C. (2013). Performans değerlendirme. İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, 7, 211-266.
  • Uyargil, C., Adal, Z., Ataay, İ. D., Acar, A. C., Özçelik, A. O. Dündar, G. Ö. Sadullah ve Tüzüner, L. (2009). İnsan kaynakları yönetimi. 4. Baskı. Beta Basım: İstanbul.
  • Yüksel, Ö. (2006), Davranış bilimleri. Gazi Kitabevi: Ankara.