Epistemik Merakın Eğitimdeki Rolü

Öğrenenin öğrenme isteği, bilinçli veya bilinçsiz bir şekilde gerçekleşebilmektedir. Bu süreçte öğrenenin özellikle belli bir içeriğe yoğunlaşarak öğrenme çabasına girmesi ve öğrenme çabasının arkasındaki nedenlerin alan yazınında farklı bakış açılarla incelendiği anlaşılmaktadır. Psikolojik çerçevede öğrenenin öğrenme çabası merak olarak incelenmiştir ve meraka yönelik çeşitli tanımlamalarla birlikte birtakım teoriler öne sürülmüştür. Bu çalışma, epistemik merakın öğrenme açısından kavramsal ve teorik arka planının öğretme ve öğrenme süreçleri açısından açıklamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, epistemik merak konusunda gerçekleştirilecek bilimsel araştırmalar ve eğitim programı geliştirme çalışmaları için araştırmacılara, uzmanlara ve uygulayıcılara eleştirel bir teorik çerçeve sunmaktadır. Ayrıca, epistemik merakın öğrenme ve öğretme süreçlerine ne gibi katkılarının olabileceğini sunma açısından çalışmanın önemli olduğu düşünülmektedir. Sonuç olarak, epistemik merak, insanın bilişsel yapısı ve kişilik faktörleriyle birlikte öğrenme ve öğretme sürecine birçok açıdan bağlantılı olduğu anlaşılmaktadır. Ayrıca, epistemik merakın öğrenme sürecine bağlı değişkenlerle arabulucu bir rol üstlendiği ve öğrenme- öğretme sürecini kapsayan bir yapı haline geldiği anlaşılmaktadır. Epistemik merakın öğrenme sürecindeki rolüne aracılık eden değişkenlerin neler olabileceğinin, gerçekleştirilecek araştırmalarla, sorgulanması önerilmektedir.

The Role of Epistemic Curiosity in Education

The learning desire of the learner can be realized consciously or unconsciously. In this process, it is understood that the learner's efforts to learn especially by concentrating on a certain content and the reasons behind the learning effort are examined from different perspectives in the literature. In the psychological framework, the learning effort of the learner has been investigated as curiosity and some theories have been put forward along with various definitions for curiosity. This study aims to explain the conceptual and theoretical background of epistemic curiosity in terms of teaching and learning processes. For this purpose, it provides a critical theoretical framework to researchers, experts and practitioners for scientific research and curriculum development studies on epistemic curiosity. In addition, it is thought to be important to present what kind of contribution epistemic curiosity can contribute to learning and teaching processes. As a result, it is understood that epistemic curiosity is related to human cognitive structure and personality factors as well as learning and teaching process in many aspects. Also, it is understood that epistemic curiosity plays a mediator role with the variables related to the learning process and has become a structure that covers the learning-teaching process. It is suggested that the variables that mediate the role of epistemic curiosity in the learning process can be questioned through the researches to be conducted.

___

  • Augustine, St. (1943). The confessions of St. Augustine (J. G. Pilkington, Trans.). New York: Liveright.
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1954a). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 45(3), 180-191.
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1954b). An experimental study of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 45(4), 256-265.
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1957). Uncertainty and conflict: A point of contact between information-theory and behavior-theory concepts. Psychological Review, 64(6), 329–339. Doi: 10.1037/h0041135.
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company. (e-book).
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1966). Curiosity and exploration. Science, 153(3731), 25-33.
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1978). Curiosity and learning. Motivation and Emotion, 2(2), 97-175.
  • Blumenberg, H. (1985). The legitimacy of the modern age. (R.B. Wallace, Trans.) Mit Press. https://books.google.com.tr/books adresinden erişilmiştir.
  • Bümen, N. T. (2006). Program geliştirmede bir dönüm noktası: Yenilenmiş Bloom taksonomisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 31 (142), 3-14.
  • Ceylan, E., Sağırekmekçi, H., Tatar, E., ve Bilgin, İ. (2015). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin merak, tutum ve motivasyon düzeylerine göre Fen Bilgisi dersi başarılarının incelenmesi. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 39-52.
  • Cho, K. D. (2008). Curiosity according to psychoanalysis: Blumenberg, Freud, and the destiny of an affect. New German Critique, 35(2), 191-205.
  • Cyr, T. A. (1996). Arousing and sustaining intellectual curiosity: A study of course design and implementation. Doctoral dissertation. Denver University.
  • Day, H. (1968). A curious approach to creativity. Canadian Psychology, 9(4), 485.
  • Day, H.I., and Langevin, H. (1969). Curiosity and intelligence: Two necessary conditions for creativity. The Journal of Special Education, 3(3), 263-268.
  • Day, H. I., Langevın, R., Maynes, F. and Spring, M. (1972). Prior Knowledge and The Desire For Information. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 4(4), 330–337. Doi:10.1037/h0082318
  • Day, H. I. (1982). Curiosity and the interested explorer. Performance and Instruction, 21(4), 19-22. Doi:10.1002/pfi.4170210410
  • Deringöl, Y., Yaman, Y., Özsarı, İ., ve Gülten, D. Ç. (2010, Kasım). İlköğretim öğretmen adaylarının meraklılık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications konferansında sunulan bildiri içinde, Antalya. Erişim adresi: http://www.iconte.org/FileUpload/ks59689/File/109.pdf
  • Demirel, M., ve Coşkun, Y. D. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin meraklılık düzeylerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (18), 111-134.
  • Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston. MA: DC Heath.
  • Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Dilmaç, B., Karababa, A. (2016). Öğrenme ve öğretmeyle ilgili temel kavramlar. G. Ekici (ed), Öğrenme-öğretme kuramları ve uygulamadaki yansımaları. Ankara: Pegem.
  • Edelman, S. (1997). Curiosity and exploration. Retrieved May11, 2005. https://www.csun.edu/~vcpsy00h/students/explore.htm adresinden erişilmiştir.
  • Elmalı Özsaray, A. (2016). Üniversite öğrencilerinin ingilizce derslerine ilişkin başarıyla ilgili duyguları, bilgiye yönelik merakları ve ders başarısı arasındaki ilişkiler. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Abant İzzet Baysal ÜniveristesiEğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bolu.
  • Eren, A. (2009). Examining the relationship between epistemic curiosity and achievement goals. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 36, 129-144.
  • Eren, A. (2011) Prospective teachers' general epistemic curiosity and domain-specific epistemic curiosity: The mediating role of perceived ınstrumentality. In R. M. Teixeira (Ed.). Higher Education in a State of Crisis (163-183). New York, NY: Nova Publishers.
  • Eren, A. and Coskun, H. (2016) Students' level of boredom, boredom coping strategies, epistemic curiosity, and graded performance. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(6), 574-588, Doi: 10.1080/00220671.2014.999364.
  • Freud, S. (1959). On the sexual theories of children. London: Hoghart Press.
  • Fulcher, K.H. (2004). Towards measuring lifelong learning: The curiosity index. Doctoral dissertation, James Madison University.
  • Gutek, G. (2014). Eğitime Felsefi ve İdeolojik Yaklaşımlar. (Çev: N.Kale) Ütopya Yayın Evi: Ankara.
  • Güneş, F. (2012). Öğrencilerin düşünme becerilerini geliştirme. Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları, 32, 127-146.
  • Hassan, M. M., Bashir, S. and Mussel, P. (2015). Personality, learning, and the mediating role of epistemic curiosity: A case of continuing education in medical physicians. Learning and Individual Differences, 42, 83-89.
  • Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Huck, J. T., Day, E. A., Lin, L., Jorgensen, A. G., Westlin, J. and Hardy III, J. H. (2020). The role of epistemic curiosity in game-based learning: Distinguishing skill acquisition from adaptation. Simulation and Gaming, 51(2), 141-166. Doi: 1046878119895557.
  • Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. T. (1979). Conflict in the classroom: Controversy and learning. Review of Educational Research, 49(1), 51–69. Doi:10.3102/00346543049001051
  • Johnson, D. R. (2011). Using Eysenck's model of personality to predict epistemic curiosityand exploratory behavior. Doctoral dissertation. Northern Illinois University.
  • Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T. Y., and Camerer, C. F. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological science, 20(8), 963-973.
  • Kapıkıran, Ş. ve Susar Kırmızı, F. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının merak ve keşfetme algıları ile okuma alışkanlığına yönelik tutumları arasındaki ilişki. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 251-265.
  • Kashdan, T.B. and Fincham, F.D. (2002). Facilitating creativity by regulating curiosity. American Psychologist, 5, 373-374. Doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.5.373.
  • Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P. and Fincham, F. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of personality assessment, 82(3), 291-305. Doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8203_05.
  • Kaya, Z. (2007). Eğitimin psikolojik temelleri. (Ed) Ö. Demirel ve Z. Kaya. Eğitim Bilimine Giriş (2.Baskı). Ankara: Pegem A.
  • Koo, D.M., and Choi, Y.Y. (2010) Knowledge search and people with high epistemic curiosity. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 12-22.
  • Ladd, K. S. (2018). The experiences of students who ıncreased curiosity during their first year of college: A grounded theory study. Doctoral dissertation, Azusa Pacific University.
  • Lauriola, M., Litman, J. A., Mussel, P., De Santis, R., Crowson, H. M., and Hoffman, R. R. (2015). Epistemic curiosity and self-regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 202-207.
  • Lee, Y., and Kozar, K. A. (2009). Designing usable online stores: A landscape preference perspective. Information and Management, 46(1), 31-41.
  • Leherissey, B. (1971). The effects of stimulating state epistemic curiosity on state anxiety and performance in a complex computer-assisted learning task. Tech Report No. 23, Project NR 154-280 sponsored by Personnel and Training Research program s, Psychological Sciences Division, Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA.
  • Litman, J. A., and Spielberger, C. D. (2003). Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 75-86.
  • Litman, J. A., and Jimerson, T. L. (2004). The measurement of curiosity as a feeling of deprivation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(2), 147-157.
  • Litman, J. (2005) Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information, Cognition and Emotion, 19 (6), 793-814. Doi: 10.1080/02699930541000101.
  • Litman, J., Hutchins, T., and Russon, R. (2005). Epistemic curiosity, feeling-of-knowing, and exploratory behaviour. Cognition and Emotion, 19(4), 559-582.
  • Litman, J.A. and Silvia, P.J. (2006) The latent structure of trait curiosity: evidence for interest and deprivation curiosity dimensions, Journal of Personality Assessment. 86 (3), 318-328. Doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8603_07.
  • Litman, J. A. (2008). Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1585-1595.
  • Litman, J. A. (2009). Curiosity and metacognition. In C.B. Larson (Eds.) Metacognition: New Research Developments (105-116). New York, Nova Science Publishers.
  • Litman, J. A. (2010). Relationships between measures of I and D-type curiosity, ambiguity tolerance, and need for closure: An initial test of the wanting-liking model of information-seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 397-402.
  • Litman, J. A. (2012). Epistemic curiosity. Invited Chapter In: S. Norbert (Ed.) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (1162-1165). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Litman, J.A. (2018). Curiosity: Nature, dimensionality, and determinants, In K.A. Renninger and S.E. Hidi (Eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning (418-441). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Livson, N. (1967). Towards a differentiated construct of curiosity. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 111(1), 73–84. Doi:10.1080/00221325.1967.10533749.
  • Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75.
  • Lowry, N., and Johnson, D. W. (1981). Effects of controversy on epistemic curiosity, achievement, and attitudes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 115(1), 31– 43. Doi:10.1080/00224545.1981.9711985.
  • Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive science, 5(4), 333-369. Doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213(81)80017-1
  • McLeod, J. K. (2011). Digitally curious: A qualitative case study of students' demonstrations of curiosity in a technology-rich learning environment. Doctoral dissertation. University of North Texas.
  • Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L. and Bloom, P. A. (2017). The tip-of-the-tongue state and curiosity. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 31. Doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0065-4.
  • Mussel, P. (2010). Epistemic curiosity and related constructs: Lacking evidence of discriminant validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5), 506-510.
  • Palmatier, R.W., Houston, M.B. & Hulland, J. (2018). Review articles: Purpose, process, and structure. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 46, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4
  • Piper, K. C. (2011). The knowledge of others: Cosmopolitanism and modern curiosity. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison. ProQuest veri tabanından erişilmiştir.
  • Powell, C., and Nettelbeck, T. (2014). Intellectual curiosity may not incrementally predict academic success. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 7-11. Doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.045.
  • Reiro Jr, T. G., Petrosko, J. M., Wiswell, A. K., and Thongsukmag, J. (2006). The measurement and conceptualization of curiosity. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167(2), 117-135.
  • Richards, J. B., Litman, J., and Roberts, D. H. (2013). Performance characteristics of measurement ınstruments of epistemic curiosity in third-year medical students. Medical Science Educator, 23(3), 355-363.
  • Rinkevich, J. L. (2014). The relationship among student creativity, curiosity, and academic intrinsic motivation: A mixed methods phenomenological study of sixth grade students. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania. ProQuest veri tabanından erişilmiştir.
  • Ross, M. (1975). Salience of reward and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 245–254.
  • Sarışan-Tungaç, A., Bal-İncebacak, B. ve Yaman, S. (2019).Ortaokullardaki yaratıcı drama etkinliklerinin Fen merak duygusuna etkisi. Amasya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 162-184.
  • Schneider, A., Von Krogh, G., and Jäger, P. (2013). “What’s coming next?” epistemic curiosity and lurking behavior in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 293-303.
  • Seferoğlu, S. S., ve Akbıyık, C. (2006). Eleştirel düşünme ve öğretimi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(30), 193-200.
  • Slater, C. W. (2009). The measurement of an adult's cognitive curiosity and exploratory behavior. Doctorial Dissertation. Regent University.
  • Smith, K. H. (2010). Curiosity and pedagogy: A mixed-methods study of student experiences in the design studio. Doctorial Dissertation. University of Arkansas, USA.
  • Sönmez, V. (2011). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri (6. Baskı). Ankara: Anı.
  • Spielberger, C. D. (Ed.). (1966). Anxiety and behavior. Academic Press.(e-book). https://books.google.com.tr veri tabanından erişilmiştir.
  • Spielberger, C. D., Peters, R. A. and Frain, F. (1981). Curiosity and anxiety. In H. G. Voss and H. Keller (Eds.), Curiosity research: Basic concepts and results. Weinheim: Beltz.
  • Taşkın, Ç. (2016). Öğretim stratejileri. G. Ekici (ed), Öğrenme-Öğretme Kuramları ve Uygulamadaki Yansımaları. Ankara: Pegem.
  • Tutkun, Ö. F. (2012). Bloom’un yenilenmiş taksonomisi üzerine genel bir bakış. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 1(3), 14-22.
  • Von Stumm, S., Hell, B., and Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 574-588.
  • Yıldızlar, M. (2011). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri (2.Baskı). Ankara: Pegem A.
  • Zion, M. I., and Sadeh, I. (2007). Curiosity and open inquiry learning. Journal of Biological Education, 41(4), 162-169. Doi: 10.1080/00219266.2007.9656092.