Ekonomik Kompleksite ve İnsani Gelişmişlik İlişkisi: E7 Ülkeleri İçin Bir Analiz

Ülkeler için üretken bilginin girdi olarak üretime dahil edilmesi, çıktı verimliliği ve ürün çeşitliliğinin ülkelerin gelişmesinde önemli rol oynadığı ifade edilmektedir. Ekonomik kompleksite, ülkelerin sofistike mal üretimi kapsamında yetkinliğini ifade eden önemli bir kavram olarak betimlenmektedir. Çalışmada E-7 ülkeleri olarak nitelendirilen Brezilya, Çin, Endonezya, Hindistan, Meksika, Türkiye ve Rusya’ya ait 1993-2017 dönemini kapsayan veriler kullanılarak panel eşbütünleşme analizi ve panel nedensellik analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Belirtilen ülkeler ve belirtilen veri aralığı çerçevesinde çalışmada ekonomik kompleksite ile insani gelişmişlik kavramları arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda ekonomik kompleksite göstergesi olarak Atlas Media tarafından yayınlanan Ekonomik Kompleksite Endeksi, insani gelişmişlik göstergesi olarak ise UNDP (Birleşmiş Milletler Kalkınma Programı) tarafından yayınlanan İnsani Gelişmişlik Endeksi kullanılmıştır. İki değişken arasındaki uzun dönemli ilişkinin Westerlund Panel Eşbütünleşme testi ile incelendiği çalışmada ulaşılan sonuçlar analiz edildiğinde E-7 ülkelerinde ekonomik kompleksite ve insani gelişmişlik değişkenleri arasında eşbütünleşme ilişkisine rastlanamadığı gözlemlenmiştir. Daha sonra Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel nedensellik analizinin gerçekleştirildiği çalışmada insani gelişmişlik değişkeninden ekonomik kompleksite değişkenine doğru tek yönlü panel nedensellik ilişkisinin bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir.

The Relationship Between Economic Complexityand Human Development: An Analysis for E7 Countries

It is stated that inclusion of productive information as an input, output efficiency and product diversity play an important role in the development of countries.Economic complexity is described as an important concept that expresses the competence of countries in the context of sophisticated goods production. In the study described as E-7 countries Brazil, China, Indonesia, India, Mexico, Turkey and Russia panels using data from the 1993-2017 period, the panel cointegration analysis and causality analysis was performed.The study aims to investigate the relationship between economic complexity and human development concepts within the framework of the mentioned countries and the data range.For this purpose, Economic Complexity Index published by Atlas Media was used as an indicator of economic complexity and Human Development Index published by UNDP was used as an indicator of human development.When the long-term relationship between the two variables was analyzed by Westerlund Panel Cointegration test, it was observed that the cointegration relationship between economic complexity and human development variables was not found in E-7 countries.Then, in the study which carried out the Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality analysis, it was found that there was a one-way panel causality relationship from human development variable to economic complexity variable.

PDF

___

Antonietti, R. and Burlina, C. (2020). From variety to economic complexity: Empirical evidence from Italian regions, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, http://econ.geo.uu.nl/peeg/peeg1930.pdf adresinden 07.05.2020 tarihinde erişim sağlanmıştır.
Bourguignon, F. (2004). The poverty-growth-inequality triangle, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Paper, No. 125. New Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, https://ideas.repec. org/p/ind/icrier/125.html adresinden 07.05.2020 tarihinde erişim sağlanmıştır.
Britto, G., Romero, J. P., Freitas, E. and Coelho, C. (2019). The great divide: Economic complexity and development paths in Brazil and the republic of Korea. CEPAL Review, (127), 191-213.
Can, M. ve Doğan, B. (2018). Ekonomik kompleksite ve finansal gelişme ilişkisi: Türkiye örnekleminde ampirik bir analiz. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 55(638), 5-16.
Can, M., Dogan, B. and Saboori, B. (2020). Does trade matter for environmental degradation in developing countries? New evidence in the context of export product diversification. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (27), 14702–14710.
Chavez, J. C., Mosqueda, M.T. and Gomez-Zaldivar, M. (2017). Economic complexity and regional growth performance: Evidence from the Mexican economy. The Review of Regional Studies, 47(2), 201-219.
Çeştepe, H. ve Çağlar, O. (2017). Ürün sofistikasyonu ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Panel veri analizi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, (ICMEB17 Özel Sayısı), 992-1000.
Doğan, B., Saboori, B. and Can, M. (2019). Does economic complexity matter for environmental degradation? An empirical analysis for different stages of development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (26), 31900–31912.
Dogan, B., Madaleno, M., Tiwari, A.K. and Hammoudeh, S. (2020). Impacts of export quality on environmental degradation: Does income matter?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (27), 13735–13772.
Erkan, B. and E. Yıldırımcı, (2015). Economic complexity and export competitiveness: The case of Turkey. Procedia-Socialand Behavioral Sciences, (195), 524-533.
Ferraz, D., Moralles, H. F., Campoli, J. S., Oliveira, F. C. R. and Rebelatto, D. A. N. (2018). Economic complexity and human development: DEA performance measurement in Asia and Latin America. Gestão & Produção, 25(4), 839-853.
Ferraz, D., Moralles, H. F., Costa, N. and Rebelatto, D. A. N. (2019). Economic complexity and human development: Comparing traditional and slack based data envelopment analysis models. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3402211 adresinden 03.03.2020 tarihinde erişim sağlanmıştır.
Gala, P., Rocha, I. and Magacho, G. (2018). The structuralist revenge: Economic complexity as an important dimension to evaluate growth and development. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 38(2), 219-236.
Hartmann, D., Guevara, M.R., Jara-Figueroa, C., Aristaran, M. and Hidalgo, C.A. (2017). Linking economic complexity, institutions and income inequality. World Development, (93), 75-93.
Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Chung, S., Jimenez, J., Simoes, A. and Yıldırım, M. A. (2011). The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. Center for International Development at Harvard Universityand Macro Connections MIT Media Lab.
Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Stock, D. P., and Yildirim, M. A. (2014). Implied comparative advantage (Working Paper). Cambridge, MA: Center for International Development at Harvard University.
Hidalgo, C. A. and Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. PNAS, 106 (26), 10570-10575.
Hu, G., Can, M., Paramati, S. R., Doğan, B. and Fang, J. (2020). The effect of import product diversification on carbon emissions: New evidence for sustainable economic policies. Economic Analysis and Policy, (65), 198-210.
Inoua, S. (2016). A simple measure of economic complexity, http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05012 adresinden 07.05.2020 tarihinde erişim sağlanmıştır.
Khan, H., Khan, U. and Khan, M. A. (2020). Causal nexus between economic complexity and FDI: Empirical evidence from time series analysis. Chin. Econ. 2020, 1–21.
Lapatinas, A. (2016). Economic complexity and human development: Anote. Economics Bulletin, 36(3), 1441-1452.
Lapatinas, A., Garas, A., Boleti, E. and Kyriakou, A. (2019). Economic complexity and environmental performance: Evidence from a world sample. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/92833/1/MPRA_paper_92833.pdf adresinden 07.05.2020 tarihinde erişim sağlanmıştır.
Lee, K. K. and Vu, T. V. (2019). Economic complexity, human capital and income inequality: Across-country analysis. Japanese Economic Review, 1-31.
Mariani, M. S., Vidmer, A., Medo, M. and Zhang, Y. C. (2015). Measuring economic complexity of countries and products: Which metric to use? Eur. Phys. J. B., (88), 293.
Neagu O. and Teodoru, M. C. (2019). The relationship between economic complexity, energy consumption structure and green house gas emission: Heteregeneous panel evidence from the EU countries. Sustain, 2(497), 1–29.
Pietronero, L., Cristelli, M. and Tacchella, A. (2013). New metrics for economic complexity: Measuring the intangible growth potential of countries. Conference at Institute for New Economic Thinking, Hong Kong.
Ravallion, M. (2004). Pro-poorgrowth: A primer, Policy Research Working Paper, No. ID 610283, World Bank, http:// dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3242. adresinden 07.05.2020 tarihinde erişim sağlanmıştır.
Soyyiğit, S. (2018). OECD kurucu ülkelerinde ekonomik kompleksite düzeyi ile kişi başına düşen GSYİH arasındaki ilişki: Panel eşbütünleşme analizi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 21(2), 374-392.
Soyyiğit, S., Eren, E. and Akis, E. (2019). Investigation of the relationship between economic complexity level and human development level: Comparison of developed and developing countries. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 6(3), 162-174.
Stojkovski, V. and Kocarev, L. (2017). The relationship between growth and economic complexity: Evidence from Southeastern and Central Europe. MPRA Paper No: 7783, Munich Personel RePEc Archive.
Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2016). Panel veri ekonometrisi. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2017). Panel zaman serileri analizi. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
van Dam, A. and Frenken, K. (2019). Variety, complexity and economic development. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG).
Yıldız, B. ve Akbulut Yıldız, G. (2019). Ekonomik karmaşıklık ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki: Panel Bootstrap Granger nedensellik analizi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 15(2), 329-340.
Zhu, S. and Li, R. (2017). Economic complexity, human capital and economic growth: Empirical research based on cross-country panel data, Applied Economics, 49(38), 1-14.