___

• Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2005). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Zichermann, G., ve Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
• Yükseltürk, E., ve Yıldırım, Z. (2008). Investigation of interaction, online support, course structure and flexibility as the contributing factors to students’ satisfaction in an online certificate program. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 51-65.
• Uçgun, D. (2013). Practices Toward Enhancing Motivation in Turkish Language Education (Türkçe Eğitiminde Motivasyonu Arttırmaya Yönelik Uygulamalar). Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 9(4), 354-362.
• Urh, M., Vukovic, G., ve Jereb, E. (2015). The Model for Introduction of Gamification into E-learning in Higher Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 388-397.
• Thoms, B. (2011). A dynamic social feedback system to support learning and social interaction in higher education. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, 4(4), 340-352.
• Tian, S. W., Yu, A. Y., Vogel, D., ve Kwok, R. C. W. (2011). The impact of online social networking on learning: a social integration perspective. International Journal of Networking and Virtual organisations, 8(3-4), 264-280.
• Tang, S. H., ve Hall, V. C. (1995). The overjustification effect: a meta-analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 365-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350090502
• Sweetser, P., ve Wyeth, P. (2005). GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 3(3), 3-3.
• Simões, J., Redondo, R. D., ve Vilas, A. F. (2013). A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 345-353.
• Ryan, R. M., ve Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
• Raymer, R. (2011). Gamification: Using game mechanics to enhance elearning. eLearn, 2011(9), 3.
• Perry, B. (2015). Gamifying French Language Learning: A Case Study Examining a Quest-based, Augmented Reality Mobile Learning-tool. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2308- 2315.
• Pan, Y. H. (2014). Relationships among teachers’ self-efficacy and students’ motivation, atmosphere, and satisfaction in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 33(1), 68-92.
• Oliveira, R. D., Caregnato, R. C. A., ve Câmara, S. G. (2012). Burnout syndrome in senior undergraduate nursing. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 25(SPE2), 54-60.
• Myhre, M. G. (2015). Gamification in Mobile Language Learning: Improving User Satisfaction for Norwegian Immigrants (Unpublished master thesis). Department of Computer Science and Media Technology Gjøvik University College, Norway.
• Myers, S. A., Goodboy, A. K., ve Members of COMM 600. (2014). College student learning, motivation, and satisfaction as a function of effective instructor communication behaviors. Southern Communication Journal, 79(1), 14-26.
• Moore, M. G., ve Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. New York, NY: Wadsworth.
• Mills, G. E. (2000). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Prentice-Hall, Inc., One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458.
• Miles, M. B. ve Huberman. A. M. (1994).... Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world (1st ed.). New York, NY, USA: The Penguin Press.
• McDaniel, R., Lindgren, R., ve Friskics, J. (2012, October). Using badges for shaping interactions in online learning environments. In 2012 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 1-4. IEEE.
• Madonna Jr, S., ve Philpot, V. D. (2013). Motivation and learning strategies, and academic and student satisfaction in predicting self-efficacy in college seniors. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 14(3), 163.
• Lee, J. ve Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2).
• Lee, H., ve Doh, Y. Y. (2012, August). A study on the relationship between educational achievement and emotional engagement in a gameful interface for video lecture systems. In 2012 International Symposium on Ubiquitous Virtual Reality (ISUVR), 34-37. IEEE.
• Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., ve Schroder, K. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16-39.
• Kemmis, S., ve McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. K. Denzin Y. S. Lincoln(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. 567–605. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Karataş, S. (2010). The Analysis of Computer Education and Instructional Technologies Prospective Teachers’ Mind Maps Relating to Their Profession (The Case of Gazi University) [Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri (BÖTE) Öğretmen Adaylarının Mesleklerine İlişkin Zihin Haritalarının Analizi (Gazi Üniversitesi Örneği)], Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 11(1), 159-173.
• Karataş, E. (2014). Gamification in Education: Research Trends (Eğitimde Oyunlaştırma: Araştırma Eğilimleri). Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2), 316-333.
• Karadağ, E., Açıkgöz, A., Alparslan, G.B. , Ünsal, A., Kösgeroğlu, N. Kaya, Y., Güven, B. ve Yılmaz, A (2012) Association between students' satisfaction and motivation in nursery and midwifery education. HealthMED, 6(12), 4210-4216.
• Kapp, K.M. (2013). The Gamification of Learning and Instruction Fieldbook: Ideas into Practice. Pfeiffer.
• Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons.
• Jackson, S. A., ve Eklund, R. C. (2002). Assessing flow in physical activity: The flow state scale-2 and dispositional flow scale-2. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24(2), 133–150.
• Huotari, K. ve Hamari, J. (2012). Defining gamification: a service marketing perspective, In Proceedings of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference, October 3-5, 2012, Tampere, Finland, ACM, 17-22.
• Hassan, N., Malik, S. A., ve Khan, M. M. (2013). Measuring Relationship Between Students’ Satisfaction and Motivation in Secondary Schools of Pakistan. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 18(7), 907-915.
• Hanus, M. D., ve Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152-161.
• Hunter, D. ve Werbach, K. (2015). The Gamification Toolkit: Dynamics, Mechanics, and Components for the Win. Wharton Digital Press.
• Hamzah, W. M., Ali, N. H., Mohd Saman, M. Y., Yusoff, M. H., ve Yacob, A. (2014, September). Enhancement of the ARCS model for gamification of learning. In 2014 3rd International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), 287-291. IEEE.
• Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., ve Sarsa, H. (2014, January). Does gamification work?-A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 3025-3034. IEEE
• Gibson, D., Ostashewski, N., Flintoff, K., Grant, S., ve Knight, E. (2013). Digital badges in education, 1- 8. Education and Information Technologies.
• Gal, I., Ginsburg, L., ve Schau, C. (1997). Monitoring attitudes and beliefs in statistics education. In I. Gal and J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The Assessment Challenge in Statistics Education, 37- 51. Amsterdam: IOS Press and the International Statistical Institute.
• Fraenkel, J. R. ve Wallen, N. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education (4th ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill.
• Fitz-Walter, Z., Tjondronegoro, D., ve Wyeth, P. (2012, November). A gamified mobile application forengaging new students at university orientation. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, 138-141. ACM.
• Erenli, K. (2012, September). The impact of gamification: A recommendation of scenarios for education. In 2012 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 1-8. IEEE.
• Duffy, J. ve Ketchard, A. (1998). Examining the Role of Service Quality in Overall Service Satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(2), 240-255.
• Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., ve MartínezHerráiz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380-392.
• Dicheva, D., Dichev C., Agre G., ve Angelova G. (2015). Gamification in Education: A Systematic Mapping Study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75–88.
• de-Marcos, L., Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., ve Pagés, C. (2014). An empirical study comparing gamification and social networking on e-learning. Computers & Education, 75, 82-91.
• de-Jorge Moreno, J. (2012). Using social network and dropbox in blended learning: An application to university education. Business, Management and Education, 10(2), 220.
• Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., OʼHara, K., and Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Using gamedesign elements in nongaming contexts. Proc. CHI EA ‘11, ACM Press, 2425-2428, ACM 978-1-4503-0268-5/11/05.
• Deterding, S., Khaled, R., Nacke, L. E., ve Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Toward a definition. In CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop Proceedings, May 7–12, 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada, ACM 978-1- 4503-0268-5/11/05
• Decker, A., ve Lawley, E. L. (2013, March). Life's a game and the game of life: How making a game out of it can change student behavior. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 233-238. ACM.
• Davis, K., ve Singh, S. (2015). Digital badges in afterschool learning: Documenting the perspectives and experiences of students and educators. Computers & Education, 88, 72-83.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K., ve Morrison, K. R. B. (2007). Content analysis and grounded theory. Research methods in education, 475-495.
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, Harper Perennial, New York, NY.
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
• Christy, K. R., ve Fox, J. (2014). Leaderboards in academic contexts: A test of stereotype threat and social comparison explanations for women's math performance. Computers & Education, 78, 66-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.106/j.compedu.2014.05.005.
• Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B., ve Ingraffea, A. (2007). Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education, 49(2), 309-329.
• Cheok, M. L., ve Wong, S. L. (2015). Predictors of E-Learning Satisfaction in Teaching and Learning for School Teachers: A Literature Review. International Journal of Instruction, 8(1), 75-90.
• Carr, W. ve Kemmis, S. (1986) Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. Basingstoke:Falmer Press.
• Biro, G. I. (2013). Ready, Study, Share: An Inquiry Into the Didactic Approach of Gamification With a Special View to the Possible Application in Higher Education, 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference, Conference Proceedings, 2, EGALITE, European Scientific Institute Publishing.
• Bauer, M. W. (2000). Classical content analysis: A review. Qualitative researching with text, image and sound, 131-151.
• Altun, E., ve Ateş, A. (2008). The Problems and Future Concerns of Computer and Instructional Technologies Preservice Teachers (Bilgisayar ve öğretim teknolojileri öğretmen adaylarının sorunları ve geleceğe yönelik kaygıları). İlköğretim Online, 7(3), 680-692.
• Alberts, B. (2010). An education that inspires. Science, 330(6003), 427.
• Aksoy, N. (2003). Action Research: A Method for Improving and Changing Educational Practices (Eylem Araştırması: Eğitimsel Uygulamaları İyileştirme ve Değiştirmede Kullanılacak bir Yöntem). Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 9(4), 474-489.
• Abramovich, S., Schunn, C., ve Higashi, R. (2013). Are badges useful in education? It depends upon the type of badge and expertise of learner. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 217–232.