Bursa’nın Hayvansal Biyokütle Enerji Potansiyeli Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Bu çalışmada Bursa ilinin sahip olduğu potansiyel biyokütle enerjisine yer verilmiştir. Potansiyel biyokütlekaynağı olarak hayvansal biyokütle atıklarından biri olan gübre dikkate alınmıştır. Gübre biyogaz kaynağıolarak kullanılabilen bir yenilenebilir enerji kaynağıdır. Hayvansal biyokütle atığını oluşturan faktörlerbüyükbaş hayvanlar, küçükbaş hayvanlar, kanatlılar ve onların alt türleri olarak incelenmiştir. Alt türlerkültür sığır, melez sığır, yerli sığır, manda, at, deve, domuz, katır, eşek, koyun, keçi, etlik tavuk, yumurtalıktavuk, hindi, kaz ve ördektir. Hayvan sayıları, atık kütlesi ve potansiyel enerji çizelgelerde gösterilmiştir. Bualttürler içerisinde potansiyel enerjisi en fazla olanı ve biyokütle kaynaklı yeni tesisler için en uygun konumaraştırılmıştır. Çalışmada, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı tarafından yayınlananveriler kullanılmıştır. Yapılan inceleme Bursa’da hayvansal kaynaklı biyoenerji potansiyelinin % 56’sıbüyükbaş, % 40 kanatlı ve % 4 küçükbaş kaynaklıdır. Ayrıca potansiyel biyokütle enerjisi bakımından enzengin ilçeler Karacabey, Mustafakemalpaşa ve Nilüfer’dir.

An Evaluation on Animal Biomass Energy Potential of Bursa Province

In this study, the potential biomass energy of Bursa province was presented. Manure, one of the animal biomass wastes, has been taken into consideration as a potential biomass source. Manure is a renewable energy source that can be used as a biogas source. The animal biomass factors were investigated as bovine animals, sheep and goat, poultry and theirs subspecies. The subspecies are culture cattle, cross bred cattle, domestic cattle, buffalo, horse, camel, pig, mule, donkey, sheep and goat, broiler chicken, laying hen, turkey, goose and duck. Animal numbers, waste mass and energy potential were shown in tables. The most potent subspecies and the best location was investigated for new biomass plants. The data published by Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources of Turkey are used in the study. The investigation shows that energy potential according to animal waste is % 56 from bovine animals, % 40 from poultry and % 4 from sheep and goats. Additionally the most fertile towns from the point of biomass energy potential are Karacabey, Mustafakemalpaşa and Nilüfer.

PDF

___

Avcioğlu, A. O., and Türker, U., 2012. Status and potential of biogas energy from animal wastes in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 1557–1561.
Balat, M., Acici, N. and Ersoy, G., 2006. Trends in the Use of Biomass as an Energy Source. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 1, 367–378.
Balat, M,. 2005. Use of biomass sources for energy in Turkey and a view to biomass potential. Biomass&Bioenergy, 29, 32-41.
Benli, H., 2013. Potential of renewable energy in electrical energy production and sustainable energy development of Turkey: Performance and policies. Renewable Energy, 50, 33–46.
Cutz L., Haro P., Santana, D. and Johnsson F., 2016. Assessment of biomass energy sources and technologies: The case of Central America.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,58, 1411-1431.
Demirbas, A., 2008. Importance of biomass energy sources for Turkey. Energy Policy, 36, 834-842.
Erdil, A. and Erbıyık. H., 2015. Renewable Energy Sources of Turkey and Assessment of Sustainability. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 669-679.
Erdogdu, E., 2008. An expose ́ of bioenergy and its potential and utilization in Turkey. Energy Policy, 36:2182 – 2190.
Eyidogan, M., Kilic, F. C., Kaya, D., Coban V. and Cagman, S., 2016. Investigation of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) technologies in Turkey from the technical and economic point of view. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 885-895.
Hosseini, S. E., Wahid, M. A., 2016.Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: Promising green energy carrier for clean development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 850-866.
Kuang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhou, B., Li, C., Cao, Y. and Li, L., 2016. A review of renewable energy utilization in islands.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,59, 504-513.
Kumar, A., Kumar, N., Baredar, P., Ashish, S., 2015. A review on biomass energy resources, potential, conversion and policy in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 530-539.
Nematollahi, O., Hoggooghi, H., Rasti, M., Sedaghat, A., 2016. Energy demands and renewable energy resources in the Middle East. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 1172-1181.
Paiano, A. and Lagioia, G., 2016. Energy potential from residual biomass towards meeting the EU renewable energy and climate targets. The Italian case.Energy Policy, 91, 161-173.
Saracoglu, N. 2010. The Biomass Potential of Turkey for Energy Production: Part I. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 5:272–278.
Solorzano, Y. C., Sanchez, J. P P., Trashorras, A. J. G. and Bernat, J. X., 2016. The development of renewable energy resources in the State of Veracruz, Mexico.Utilities Policy, 39, 1-4.
Topal, M. and Topal, E. I. A., 2012. Determination of Potential of Biomass Energy from Crop Plants as Renewable Energy Source: The Case of Afyonkarahisar Province. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Sciences,12, 1-11.
Weldemichael, Y. and Assefa, G., 2016. Assessing the energy production and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions mitigation potential of biomass resources for Alberta. Journal of Cleaner Production,112, 425-4264.
http://www.yegm.gov.tr/anasayfa.aspx
http://bepa.yegm.gov.tr/
http://www.tuik.gov.tr