___

• [1] Sechopoulos I.,Suryanarayanan S., Vedantham S., D'Orsi C.J., Karellas A., 2008. Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study. Radiology.246(2):434-43
• [2] Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi C, Karellas A., 2007. Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. Med Phys.34(1):221-32.
• [3] Bor D., Tukel S., Olgar T., Aydin E., 2008. Variations in breast doses for an automatic mammography unit. Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 14:122-126.
• [4] Olgar T, Kahn T., Gosch D., 2012. Average Glandular Dose in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis. Fortschr . Röntgenstr. 184: 911–918 . DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1312877.
• [5] Dance D.R., 1990. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. Phys. Med. Biol., Vol. 35,No 9, 1211-1219.
• [6] Ishii R.,Yoshida A., Ishii M., Fujimoto S., Henmi N., 2011. Precision of half-value layer measurement on mammography. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi.
• 67(12):1533-9. [7] Diffey J., Cartwright L., Crocker J., Heggie J., 2014. Direct half value layer measurements in mammography - is near enough good enough?.Combined Scientific Meeting. DOI:10.1594/ranzcr2014/R-0127
• [8] Ramos M.A.P., Ferrer S., Verdu G., Padovani E., Campayo J.M., 2004. A mammographic phantom image reconstruction through Monte Carlo techniques. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, IEEE, Volume: 5 DOI: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2004.1466322
• [9] Aznar M. C., Medin J., Hemdal B., Thilander Klang A., Bøtter-Jensen L., Mattsson S., 2005. A MONTE CARLO STUDY OF THE ENERGY DEPENDENCE OF Al2O3:C CRYSTALS FOR REAL-TIME IN VIVO DOSIMETRY IN MAMMOGRAPHY. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. Vol. 114, Nos 1-3, pp. 444–449. doi:10.1093/rpd/nch560
• [10] Koutalonis M., Delis H., Spyrou G., Costaridou L., Tzanakos G., Panayiotakis G., 2007. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study. Phys. Med. Biol. 52. 3185–3199. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/11/017
• [11] Douglas E. P., Kuruvilla V., 2000. Digital mammography image simulation using Monte Carlo. Medical Physics 27, 568. doi: 10.1118/1.598896
• [12] Dance D. R., 1990. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose,’’ Phys. Med. Biol. 35, 1211– 1219.
• [13] Dance D. R., Skinner C. L., Young K. C., Beckett J. R. Kotre C. J., 2000. Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Phys. Med. Biol. 45,3225–3240.
• [14] Wu X., Gingold E. L., Barnes G. T., and Tucker D. M., 1994. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium targetrhodium filter mammography. Radiology 193, 83–89.
• [15] Paixao L., Oliviera B., Viloria C., 2015. Monte Carlo derivation of filtered tungsten anode X-ray spectra for dose computation in digital mammography. Radiol Bras. Nov/Dez;48(6):363–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0108
• [16] RSICC Computer Code Collection., 2002. MCNPX User’s manual Version 2.4.0. Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code System for Multiple and High Energy Applications.
• [17] Tekin H.O., 2016. MCNP-X Monte Carlo Code Application for Mass Attenuation Coefficients of Concrete at Different Energies by Modeling 3 × 3 Inch NaI(Tl) Detector and Comparison with XCOM and Monte Carlo Data. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations. Volume 2016, Article ID 6547318, 7 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6547318
• [18] Akkurt I., Tekin H.O., Mesbahi A., 2015. Calculation of Detection Efficiency fort he Gamma Detector using MCNP-X. Acta Physica Polonica A, 128 (2-B): 332-334. doi:10.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-332
• [19] Tekin H.O. and Kara U., 2016. Monte Carlo Simulation for Distance and Absorbed Dose Calculations in a PET-CT Facility by using MCNP-X. Journal of Communication and Computer, (13): 32-35 doi:10.17265/1548-7709/2016.01.005
• [20] Tekin H.O., Manici T., Ekmekci C., 2016. Investigation of Backscattered Dose in a Computerized Tomography (CT) Facility during Abdominal CT Scan by Considering Clinical Measurements and Application of Monte Carlo Method. Journal of Health Science 4, 131-134. doi: 10.17265/2328-7136/2016.03.004
• [21] Tekin H.O., Singh V.P., Manici T., 2017. Effects of micro-sized and nano-sized WO3 on mass attenuation coefficients of concrete by using MCNPX code. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. Vol 121, pp. 122-125. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.12.040
• [22] Verdú G., Leön A., Villaescusa J.I., Salas M.D., Cuevas M.D., Bueno F., 2000. Mammographic Dosimetry Using MCNP-4B, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 37:1, 875-879, doi:10.1080/00223131.2000.10875015
• [23] Hammerstein G.R., Miller D.W., White D.R., Masterson M.E., Woodard H.Q, Laughlin J.S., 1979. Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. Radiology, 130,pp 485-491.