Ali DUMAN, Orhan AKPINAR, Mücahit KAPÇI, Gülçin BACAKOĞLU, Kenan Ahmet TÜRKDOĞAN

ACİL SERVİSTE DEĞERLENDİRİLEN ADLİ OLGULARIN DEMOGRAFİK İNCELENMES

Amaç:Acil pratiğinde, adli olgularönemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Buçalışmada, acil serviste karşı- laşılan adli nitelikteki olgularınsosyo-demografik özelliklerininincelenmesi, konu ile ilgili ak- saklıklar ve çözüm önerilerininortaya konması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntemler: Isparta Devlet Hastanesi AcilServisine 2011 yılında başvu- ran sisteme kayıtlı adli olgularçalışmaya alındı. Hasta dosyala- rı bilgisayar tabanlı hasta kayıtsistemlerinden toplandı. Bulgular: Çalışma süresince acil servisebaşvuran toplam 115.185 has- tanın 2.094ü (%1,82) adli olguolarak tespit edildi. Olgularınerkek-kadın oranı 2,0 bulun- du. Adli olguların en fazla Eylül(%9,9) ayında (p

DEMOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF FORENSIC INVESTIGATION IN EMERGENCY SERVICE

Objective: Forensic cases have an importantplace in emergency practice. Thepurpose of this study is to reviewthe sociodemographic character- istics of forensic cases in an emer- gency service and to present solu- tion suggestions. Methods: Forensic cases of patients admit- ted to the emergency service in2011 and recorded in the systemwere included in the study. Pa- tient files were collected fromcomputer-based patient recordingsystems.Results: Of the 115.185 patients who wereadmitted to the emergency serviceduring the study, 2.094 (1.82%)were determined to be forensiccases. The male-to-female ratioof the cases was 2.0. Most of theforensic cases were admitted tothe hospital in September (9.9%;p

PDF

___

1. Beyaztas FY. Responsibilities of the physicians about forensic report. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry 2000;1(4):231-4. 2. Tugcu H, Yorulmaz C, Ceylan S, Baykal B, Celasun B, Koç S. The knowledge and ideas of the physicians who participate in emergency services about physician responsibility in emergency cases and forensic medicine problems. Gulhane Med J 2003;45(2):175-9. 3.Yavuz MF, Yavuz MS. Standardization and deficiencies of forensic reports. Turkiye Klinikleri J Surg Med Sci 2006;2(50):28-33. 4. Koç S, Çetin G, Kolusayın Ö. Acil olgularda hekimin sorumluluğu ve adli tıp sorunları. Sendrom 1994;6(5):54-9. 5. Turkçuer İ, Gozlukaya A, Serinken M, Ozen M, Aydin B. Application times of forensic cases to emergency department. JAEM 2010;2:89- 92. 6. Sunay YM, Faruk Ozguner IF. Evaluation of forensic cases applied to Emergency Department of Suleyman Demirel University Medical School Hospital between 1999-2001. J Forensic Med 2003;17(1):47-53. 7. Altun G, Azmak D, Yilmaz A, Yilmaz G. The characteristics of the cases which admitted to Emergency Department of Trakya University Medical Faculty. The Bulletin of Legal Medicine 1997;2:62-6. 8. Guven FM, Butun C, Beyaztaş FY, Eren SH, Korkmaz İ. Evaluation of forensic cases admitted to Cumhuriyet University Hospital. Journal of ADU Medical Faculty 2009;10(3):23- 8. 9. Bozkurt S, Daraoğlu V, Okumuş M, Savrun A, Karanfil R, Gök A. Evaluation of judicial reports which executing on emergency service and fixed deficiencies. J Clin Anal Med 2015;6(3):331-4. 10. Turkmen N, Akgoz S, Çoltu A, Ergin N. Evaluation of Legal cases admitted to Uludağ University Medical School Emergency Department. Uludağ Medical Journal 2005;31(1):25-9. 11. Ural G, Gün I. Epidemiological analysis of accidents which applied to emergency services of Dr. Nafiz Körez Sincan Government Hospital and Private Bayındır Hospital. Journal of Health Sciences 2008;17:31-9. 12. Arslanoğlu A, Ilhan MN, Bumin MA. The Features of forensic cases treated in the Van Military Hospital Emergency Room. Gazi Medical Journal 2007;18(1):22-5. 13. Tokdemir M, Kucuker H, Aksu A. F.Ü. Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi ne Başvuran olguların retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesi. Fırat Medical Journal 2000;2(2):151-5. 14. Polat SA, Açık Y. General Evaluation of forensic cases applied to the forensic medicine department of Elazığ Health Authority between October-December 2000. J Forensic Med 2001;15(4):7-11.