Modern paradigms in the formation of anatomy

No method of teaching anatomy can provide superiority over another. In order to consolidate and improve the training, a modernized curriculum for anatomy was developed that took advantage of the various teaching methods and maximized their benefits. This article discusses current trends in the teaching of anatomy.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

gross anatomy education; curriculum revision; undergraduate medical education; laboratory dissection; computer-assisted learning; problem-based learning; clinical correlation; peer teaching; teambased learning; anatomy models

Modern paradigms in the formation of anatomy

Keywords:

gross anatomy education; curriculum revision; undergraduate medical education; laboratory dissection; computer-assisted learning; problem-based learning; clinical correlation; peer teaching; teambased learning; anatomy models,

PDF

___

1. Ogeng'o J., Ongeti K., Misiani M., et al. Maintaining excellence in teaching of human anatomy: University of Nairobi experience. Anatomy of Africa 2013; 2:117-29.
2. Craig SJ., Tait N., Boers D., et al. Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. ANZ J Surg. 2010; 80:212-6.
3. Dupin-Bryant P.A. Teaching styles of interactive television in-structors: a descriptive study. Am J Distance Education 2004; 18:39-50
4. A. Winkelmann, “Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence,” Medical Education, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2007.
5. A. R. A. Choi, R. Tamblyn, and M. D. Stringer, “Electronic resources for surgical anatomy,”ANZ Journal of Surgery, vol. 78, no. 12, pp. 1082–1091, 2008.
6. Erkonen W.E., Albanese M.A., Smith, W.L. and Pantazis N.J..“Effec-tiveness of teaching radiologic image interpretation in gross anatomy: a long-term follow-up,”Investigative Radiology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 264–266, 1992.
7. Jafri N.F., Wu P., Stanfield L., and Slanetz P.J., “Use of radiologic imaging to enhance physical diagnosis instruction in the curriculum,”Academic Radiology, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 942–947, 2008.
8. Petersson H., Sinkvist D., Wang C., and Smedby O., “Webbased interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning,”Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 61–68, 2009.
9. Feigin D.S., Magid D., Smirniotopoulos J. G., and Car-bognin S. J..“Learning and retaining normal radiographic chest anatomy. Does preclinical exposure improve student performance?”Academic Radiology, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1137– 1142, 2007.
10. Parker L.M. Anatomical dissection: why are we cutting it out? Dissection in an undergraduate teaching. ANZ J Surg 2002; 72:910-2.