Improving the Accounting of Expected Learning Outcomes

Expected learning outcomes – indicator of the achievement of educational goals. Expected learning outcomes are specified in accordance with the content of tasks, performed exercises, answers to questions, etc. It is created in accordance with the studied content. Сompiling a daily curriculum, a modern teacher is guided by the system of educational goals in the “updated” program, which does not allow to fully take into account the content of training and its internal features. And since a general assessment cannot go beyond a specific system of goals, they cannot be the full results of study of this topic. The paper presents a model of the final assessment task of the topic “Simple fractions and receptions to them” and the planning of formative assessment with the provision of information related to the implementation of the concept of simple fraction.

Improving the Accounting of Expected Learning Outcomes

Expected learning outcomes – indicator of the achievement of educational goals. Expected learning outcomes are specified in accordance with the content of tasks, performed exercises, answers to questions, etc. It is created in accordance with the studied content. Сompiling a daily curriculum, a modern teacher is guided by the system of educational goals in the “updated” program, which does not allow to fully take into account the content of training and its internal features. And since a general assessment cannot go beyond a specific system of goals, they cannot be the full results of study of this topic. The paper presents a model of the final assessment task of the topic “Simple fractions and receptions to them” and the planning of formative assessment with the provision of information related to the implementation of the concept of simple fraction.

___

  • 1. Qoıanbaev J.B., Qoıanbaev R.M. Pedagogıka: Ýnıversıtetter stýdentterіne arnalǵan oqý quraly. – Almaty, 2002.
  • 2. Ábıev J.Á., Babaev S.B., Qudııarova A.M. Pedagogıka: Oqý quraly / Jalpy redaktsııasyn basqarǵan Qudııarova A.M. – Almaty: Daryn, 2004.
  • 3. Bıdosov Á. Orta mektepte matematıkany oqytý metodıkasy. – Almaty: Mektep, 1989. – 224 b.
  • 4. Pardała A. (2010): Methods of Mathematics Teaching vs. Distance Education. W.: Use of Elearning in the Training of Professionals in the Knowledge Society. Monograph, Scientific Editor Eugenia Smyrnova-Trybulska, University of Silesia, Studio-Noa, Cieszyn-Katowice 2010, 91-104.
  • 5. Bespalko V.P. Metodıcheskıe ýkazanııa po teoretıcheskım osnovam programmırovannogo ýpravlenııa protsesom ýchenııa. – M., 1966.
  • 6. Talyzına N.F. Teoretıcheskıe osnovy kontrolıa v ýchebnom protsesse / N.F. Talyzına. Grafoproektsııa / Z.S. Harkovskıı. Metodıcheskoe obespechenıe ýchebnogo predmeta / V.B. Lýkıanov. – M.: Znanıe, 1983. – 96 b.
  • 7. Rahymbek D., Qadіrbaeva R.I., Alımkýlova B.T. Matematıkany oqytýdaǵy mazmundy-ádіstemelіk jelіler jáne ony júzege asyrý // Bіlіm berýdegі menedjment. – Almaty, 2018. – №3(90). – S.41-47.
  • 8. Teoretıcheskıe osnovy obýchenııa matematıke v sredneı shkole: Ýchebnoe posobıe / T.A. Ivanova, E.N. Perevoıkova, T.P. Grıgoreva, L.I. Kýznetsova; Pod red. prof. T.A. Ivanovoı. – N.Novogorod: NGPÝ, 2003. – 320 s.
  • 9. Buchholtz N.F., Krosanke N., Orschulik A.B., Vorhölter K. Combining and integrating formative and summative assessment in mathematics teacher education // ZDM. – 50(4). – P.715–728, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0948-y
  • 10. Amırbekýly A., Kadırbaeva R.I., Djamankaraeva M.A., Berkımbaev K.M. Krıterıı sformırovannostı professıonalnoı kompetentnostı býdýego ýchıtelıa matematıkı. // Iasaýı ýnıversıtetіnіń Habarshysy. – Týrkestan, 2019. – №3 (113). – S.104-113.
  • 11. Roza Kadirbayeva, Aldanazar Amirbekuly, Madina Jamankarayeva, Barshagul Issabek, Almira Ibashova. The development of the informational and communication subject environment for the future mathematics teacher // Opción, Año 35, Especial No.23 (2019): 1023-1042 ISSN 1012-1587/ISSNe: 2477-9385.
  • 12. Negіzgі orta bіlіm berýdіń memlekettіk jalpyǵa mіndettі standarty. Qazaqstan Respýblıkasy Úkіmetіnіń qaýlysy 2016 jylǵy 13 mamyr №292. – Astana, Úkіmet Úıі.
  • 13. Rahymbek D. «Jańartylǵan» baǵdarlamasynyń jańalyǵy qandaı? // Egemen Qazaqstan, 14.06.2016.
  • 14. Rahymbek D. Bastaýysh mekteptіń jańa «matematıka» baǵdarlamasyna taldaý //Abaı atyndaǵy Qazaq ulttyq pedagogıkalyq ýnıversıtetіnіń habarshysy «Fızıka-matematıka ǵylymdary». – №3 (55), 2016. – B.66-72.
  • 15. Rahymbek D. Bastaýysh mekteptіń jańartylǵan «matematıka» baǵdarlamasy týraly kózqaras // Aımaqtyq ǵylymı-ádіstemelіk konferentsııa «Kásіptіk-pedagogıkalyq kadrlardy daıyndaý úshіn kіlt retіnde «Mektep – JOO» jelіlі pedagogıkalyq koǵamdastyqty damytý». – Shymkent, 2016. – B.83-92.
  • 16. Rahymbek D. Matematıkalyq bіlіm berýdі qurdymǵa jіberіp almaıyq // Egemen Qazaqstan. – 07.03.2018.
  • 17. Rahymbek D. «Negіzgі orta bіlіm berý deńgeıіnіń 5-9 synyptaryna arnalǵan «matematıka» pánіnen jańartylǵan mazmundaǵy úlgіlіk oqý baǵdarlamasy» týraly pіkіr // Ońtústіk Qazaqstan memlekettіk ınstıtýtynyń Habarshysy. – №№1, 2 (11, 12), 2017. – S. 188–199.
  • 18. Qalyptastyrýshy baǵalaýǵa arnalǵan tapsyrmalar jınaǵy. Matematıka. 5-synyp. – Astana: «Pedagogıkalyq sheberlіk ortalyǵy» JM tıpografııasy, 2017. – 92 bet.
  • 19. Aldamuratova T.A., Baısholanova Q.S., Baısholanov E.S. Matematıka: Jalpy bіlіm beretіn mekteptіń 5-synybyna arnalǵan oqýlyq. Ekі bólіmdі. 1-bólіm. / T.Aldamuratova, Q. Baısholanova, E. Baısholanov. – Almaty: Atamura, 2017. – 224 b.
  • 20. Rahymbek D. Arıfmetıka, algebra, analız bastamalaryn oqytý ádіstemesі: Oqýlyq. – Shymkent: M. Áýezov atyndaǵy OQMÝ baspa ortalyǵy, 2016. – 432 b.
  • 21. Oqýshylardyń oqý jetіstіkterіn krıterıaldy baǵalaý júıesіn engіzýdіń ádіsnamalyq jáne oqý-ádіstemelіk negіzderі: Ádіstemelіk qural. – Astana: Y.Altynsarın atyndaǵy Ulttyq bіlіm akademııasy, 2015. – 58 b.