A New Look at the Colonization of the Siberian Khanate or what the Historical Toponyms Say

The article reveals some aspects of the Russian colonization of the Siberian Khanate, which was formed in the second half of the 15th century in Western Siberia. Historical place names prove that before Yermak's detachment, the Russians did not cross the Ural Mountains, where Siberians and Turkic tribes lived for a long time. At the same time, the author considers the campaign of Yermak's detachment to be aggression and considers its use unworthy of such a force as Russia. The article notes that Kushim Khan, who fought for the independence of the Siberian Khanate until the end of his life, could not get a proper assessment of history. It was only natural that his army, armed with bows, swords and spears, would not be able to withstand guns and rifles. At the same time, Kushim Khan fought until the end of his life, and then his sons continued and stopped the process of colonization for decades. The article provides an etymological analysis of the macrotoponyms of the Siberian Khanate. The author also offers his own conclusions, referring to long-standing scientific opinions about the meaning of certain historical toponyms. Since the etymology of toponyms is revealed only in the Ugric or Turkic languages, it is known that this region has long been inhabited by the Ostyaks, Voguls and Turkic peoples. Everyone knows that Western Siberia, Eastern Siberia and the Far East were later colonized by Russia. This article can be considered a response to the inappropriate, unreasonably expressed opinions of some Russian politicians that “the northern regions of Kazakhstan (not to mention Western Siberia – the author) belonged to Russia, these lands were a “gift” to Kazakhstan”. The outstanding Russian scientist G. Potanin also, on the contrary, claims that “Siberia was a gift to Russia”.

A New Look at the Colonization of the Siberian Khanate or what the Historical Toponyms Say

The article reveals some aspects of the Russian colonization of the Siberian Khanate, which was formed in the second half of the 15th century in Western Siberia. Historical place names prove that before Yermak's detachment, the Russians did not cross the Ural Mountains, where Siberians and Turkic tribes lived for a long time. At the same time, the author considers the campaign of Yermak's detachment to be aggression and considers its use unworthy of such a force as Russia. The article notes that Kushim Khan, who fought for the independence of the Siberian Khanate until the end of his life, could not get a proper assessment of history. It was only natural that his army, armed with bows, swords and spears, would not be able to withstand guns and rifles. At the same time, Kushim Khan fought until the end of his life, and then his sons continued and stopped the process of colonization for decades. The article provides an etymological analysis of the macrotoponyms of the Siberian Khanate. The author also offers his own conclusions, referring to long-standing scientific opinions about the meaning of certain historical toponyms. Since the etymology of toponyms is revealed only in the Ugric or Turkic languages, it is known that this region has long been inhabited by the Ostyaks, Voguls and Turkic peoples. Everyone knows that Western Siberia, Eastern Siberia and the Far East were later colonized by Russia. This article can be considered a response to the inappropriate, unreasonably expressed opinions of some Russian politicians that “the northern regions of Kazakhstan (not to mention Western Siberia – the author) belonged to Russia, these lands were a “gift” to Kazakhstan”. The outstanding Russian scientist G. Potanin also, on the contrary, claims that “Siberia was a gift to Russia”.

___

  • 1. Bolshaia Rossiiskaia enciklopediia / Sibirskoe hanstvo. 30-tom [The Great Russian Encyclopedia. The Siberian Khanate]. – M.: Nauchnoe izdatel'stvo «Bolshaya Rossijskaya enciklopediya», 2015. – 767 s. [in Russian]
  • 2. Miller G.F. Opisanie Sibirskogo carstva i vseh proizoshedshih v nem del ot nachala, a osoblivo ot pokoreniia ego Rossiiskoi derzhavoi po sii vremena [Description of the Siberian kingdom and all the things that happened in it from the beginning, and especially from the conquest of it by the Russian state to these times]. – Spb., 1750. [in Russian]
  • 3. Ishakov D.M. Tiurksko-tatarskie gosudarstva XV–XVI vv. [The Turkic-Tatar states of the XV- XVI centuries.] – Kazan: Institut istorii im. Sh. Mardzhani AN RT, 2004. – 132 s. [in Russian]
  • 4. Kuzembaiuly A., Abil E.A. Istoriia Kazahstana: Uchebnik dlia vuzov. 8-e izd. pererab. i dop. [History of Kazakhstan]. – Kostanai: Kostanaiskii regionalnyi institut istoricheskih issledovanii, 2006. – 350 s. [in Russian]
  • 5. Igibaev S.K. Istoriografiia istorii Kazahstana [Historiography of the history of Kazakhstan]: Uchebnik, Izd-e 2-e, dop. – Almaty: Evero, 2019. – 404 s. [in Russian]
  • 6. Charskaia L.A. Groznaia druzhina. Povest o pokorenii Sibiri [A formidable squad. The story of the conquests of Siberia]. – M.: Artos Media, 2006. – 309 s. [in Russian]
  • 7. Shonanuly T. Zher tagdyry – el tagdyry [The fate of the land is the fate of the country]: Komekshі oqu quraly. 2-basyluy. – Almaty, Sanat, 1995. – 224 b. [in Kazakh]
  • 8. Tatishhev V.N. Istoriia Rossiiskaia [Russian History]. T. 1. Ch. pervaia. – M., 2003. – S. 325– 326. [in Russian]
  • 9. Pospelov E.M. Illiustrirovannyi atlas mira. Geografiia mira: noveishii toponimicheskii slovar [An illustrated atlas of the world. Geography of the world: the latest toponymic dictionary]. – M.: Russkie slovari, 2007. – 683 s. [in Russian]
  • 10. Murzaev E.M. Slovar narodnyh geograficheskih terminov [Dictionary of Folk Geographical Terms]. – M.: Mysl, 1984. – 653 s., il. [in Russian]
  • 11. Bazylhan B. Mongol-kazah tol. Mongolsha-qazaqsha sozdіk [Mongolian-Kazakh dictionary]. – Ulaanbaatar-Olgii, 1984. – 885 b. [in Kazakh]
  • 12. Suleimenov O.O. Tiurki v doistorii [The Turks in prehistory]. – Almaty: Atamura, 2002. – 320 s. [in Russian]
  • 13. Drevnetiurkskii slovar (DTS) [Ancient Turkic Dictionary]. – L., 1969. [in Russian]
  • 14. Rozen M.F., Maloletko A.M. Geograficheskie terminy Zapadnoi Sibiri [Geographical terms of Western Siberia]. – Tomsk: Tom. un-t, 1986. – 181 s. [in Russian]
  • 15. Baskakov N.A. Istoriko-tipologicheskaia fonologiia tiurkskih iazykov [Historical and typological phonology of the Turkic languages]. – M.: Nauka, 1988. – S. 64. [in Russian]
  • 16. Maloletko A.M. Paleotoponimika [Paleotonomics]. – Tomsk: Tom. un-t, 1992. – S. 228. [in Russian]
  • 17. Frolov N. Ob istorii geograficheskogo nazvaniia Tiumen [About the history of the geographical name Tyumen] // Sibirskoe bogatstvo. – 1999. – № 1. – S. 215–217. [in Russian]
  • 18. Belich I.V. K etimologii, semantike i istorii proishozhdeniia srednevekovogo imeni g. Tiumeni [On the etymology, semantics and history of the origin of the medieval name of Tyumen] // Vestnik arheologii, antropologii i etnografii (izdanie IPOS SO RAN). – 2007. – №7. – S. 143– 150. [in Russian]
  • 19. Koshelov D.E. Neozhidannye tiurkizmy na karte Zapadnoi Sibiri [Unexpected Turkisms on the map of Western Siberia]. V kn.: Aus Sibirien – 2019: nauchno-informacionyi sbornik. – Tiumen: Izd. Tiumenskogo gos. univ., 2020. – 168 s. [in Russian]
  • 20. Pohlebkin V.V. Tatary i Rus. 360 let otnoshenii v 1238–1598 gg. [Tatars and Rus. 360 years of relations in 1238–1598]: Spravochnik. – M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 2000. – 192 s. [in Russian]
  • 21. Remezov S.U. Sibirskie letopisi [Siberian chronicles]. – Spb, 1907. [in Russian]
  • 22. Matveev A.K. Toponimiia Urala: Monografiia [Toponymy of the Urals]. – Sverdlovsk: Ural. gos. un-t, 1986. – 208 s. [in Russian]
  • 23. Frolov N.N. Russkaia onomastika i onomastika Rossii [Russian Onomastics and Onomastics of Russia]. – M.: Shkola-Press, 1994. – 288 s. [in Russian]
  • 24. Qaiyrzhan K. Soz – sandyq: Qazaqtyn kone sozderі [Ancient Kazakh words]. – Almaty: Oner, 2013. – 480 b. [in Kazakh]