Cemre KOÇ, FUNDA YILMAZ, Kıvanç KAMBUROĞLU

KIBT’nin (Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi) endodontide kullanımı:Durum güncellemesi

KIBT, son zamanlarda endodontide medikal BT ile karşılaştırıldığında ortaya çıkan avantajları ile sıkça 5 kullanılmaktadır. Bu güncel derlemenin amacı KIBT’nin özelliklerini, endodontide teşhis ve tedavide kullanım amaçlarını ortaya koymaktır. Endodontik açıdan KIBT birçok faydalı bilgi sağlasa da olası riskleri hesaplanarak sadece direkt fayda sağlayacak endikasyonlarda kullanılmalıdır. Endodontik endikasyonlarla ilgili kriterler araştırmalar ışığında sürekli yenilenmelidir.

Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in endodontics: An update

Recently, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is commonly used in endodontics due its advantages over medical CT. This updated review aims to explain fundamentals of CBCT and show its indications in 15 diagnosis and treatment in endodontics. Although, CBCT may provide useful information in several endodontic cases it must be only used in correct indications where its usage provides direct benefits over its risks. Referral criteria for endodontics should be updated routinely in light of newer investigations.

PDF

___

1. Kamburoğlu K, Acar B, Yakar EN, Paksoy CS. Dentomaksillofasiyal Konik Isın Demetli Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Bölüm 1: Temel Prensipler. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi 2012; 6: 1125-1136.
2. Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Cone beam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 1088-1095.
3. Kamburoğlu K, Yakar EN, Acar B, Paksoy CS. Dentomaksillofasiyal Konik Isın Demetli Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Bölüm 2: Klinik Uygulamalar. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi 2012; 6: 1160-1165.
4. AAE and AAOMR Joint Position Statement: Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics 2015 Update. Special Committee to Revise the Joint AAE/AAOMR Position Statement on use of CBCT in Endodontics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015; 120: 508-512.
5. Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am A 1984; 6: 612-619.
6. Durack C, Patel S. Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Brazilian Dental Journal 2012; 23: 179- 191.
7. Hassan B, Metska ME, Ozok AR, van der Stelt P, Wesselink PR. Comparison of five computed tomography systems for the detection of vertical root fractures. J Endod 2010; 36: 126-129.
8. Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: Recognition and Avoidance. RadioGraphics 2004; 24: 1679-1691.
9. Matherne PR, Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC, Tira D. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. J Endod 2008; 1: 87-89.
10. Low KMT, Dula K, Bürgin W, von Arx T. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam tomography in posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. J Endod 2008; 34: 557-562.
11. Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, Mannocci F. The detection of periapical pathosis using periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography- part1: preoperative status. Int Endod J 2012; 8: 702-710.
12. Ozen T, Kamburoğlu K, Cebeci AR, Yüksel SP, Paksoy CS. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 426-432.
13. Uraba S, Ebihara A, Komatsu K, Ohbayashi N, Okiji T. Ability of cone-beam computed tomography to detect periapical lesions that were not detected by periapical radiography: a retrospective asessment according to tooth group. J Endod 2016; 42: 1186-1190.
14. Leonardi Dutra K, Haas L, Porporatti AL, Flores-Mir C, Nascimento Santos J, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Conventional Radiography on Apical Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Endod 2016; 42: 356-364.
15. Kamburoglu K, Kilic C, Ozen T, Horasan S. Accuacy of chemically created periapical lesion measurements using limited cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 2010; 39: 95-99.
16. Ahlowalia MS, Patel S, Anwar HM. Accuracy of CBCT for volumetric measurement of simulated periapical lesions. Int Endod J 2013; 46: 538-546.
17. Matherne RP, Angelopoulos C, Kulild J, Tira D. Use of computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. J Endod 2008; 30: 1-7.
18. Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 265-273.
19. Mirmohammadi H, Mahdi L, Partovi P, Khademi A, Shemesh H, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in the detection of a second mesiobuccal root canal in endodontically treated teeth: an ex vivo study. J Endod 2015; 41: 1678-1681.
20. van der Borden WG, Wang X, Wu MK, Shemesh H. Area and threee dimensional volumetric changes of periapical lesions after root canal treatments. J Endod 2013; 39: 1245-1249.
21. Bornstein MM, Lauber R, Sendi P, von Arx T. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam computed tomography in mandibular molars for analysis of anatomical landmarks before apical surgery. J Endod 2011; 37: 151-157.
22. Kim D, Ku H, Nam T, Yoon T, Lee C, et al. Influence of size and volume of periapical lesions on the outcome of endodontic microsurgery: 3-dimensional analysis using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2016; 42: 1196-1201.
23. Grimard BA, Hoidal MJ, Mills. Comparison of clinical, periapical radigraph, and cone-beam volume tomography measurement techniques for assessing bone level changes following regenerative periodontal theraphy. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 48-55.
24. Rigolone M, Pasqualini D, Bianchi L. Vestibular surgical access to the palatine root of the superior first molar: “low-dose cone-beam” CT analysis of the pathway and its anatomic variations. J Endod 2003; 11: 773-775.
25. Wang P, Yan XB, Liu D-G. Evaluation of dental root fracture using cone-beam computed tomography. Chin J Dent Res 2010; 1: 31-35.
26. Kamburoglu K, Onder B, Murat S, Avsever H, Yüksel S, et al. Radiographic detection of artificially created horizontal root fracture using different cone beam CT units with small fields of view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 20120261.
27. Fuzz Z, Lusting J, Kazz A, Tamse A. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertical root fractured teeth: impact of operative procedures. J Endod 2001; 13: 84-94.
28. Talwar S, Utneja S, Nawal RR, Kaushik A, Srivastava D, et al. Role of cone-beam computed tomography in diagnosis of vertical root fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2016; 42: 12-24.
29. Pinto MGO, Rabelo KA, Sousa Melo SL, Campos PSF, Oliveira LSAF, et al. Influence of exposure parameters on the detection of simulated root fractures in the presence of various intracanal materials. Int Endod J 2017; 50: 586- 594.
30. Hassan B, Metska ME, Ozok AR, van der Stelt P, Wesselink PR. Detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth by a cone beam computed tomography scan. J Endod 2009; 35: 719-722.
31. Shemesh H, Cristescu RC, Wesselink PR, Wu M-K. The use of cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiographs to diagnose root perforations. J Endod 2011; 4: 513-516.
32. Durack C, Patel S, Davies J, Wilson R, Mannocci F. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 136-147.
33. Patel S, Dawood A, Wilson R, Horner K, Mannocci F. The detection and management of root resorption lesions using intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography- an in vivo investigation. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 831-838.
34. Kamburoğlu K, Yeta EN, Yılmaz F. An ex vivo comparison of diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in the detection of furcal perforations. J Endod 2015; 41: 696-702.
35. Rosen E, Venezia NB, Azizi H, Kamburoglu K, Meirowitz A, et al. A Comparison of Cone-beam Computed Tomography with Periapical Radiography in the Detection of Separated Instruments Retained in the Apical Third of Root Canal-filled Teeth. J Endod 2016; 42: 1035-1039.
36. Krasti G, Zehnder MS, Connert T, Weiger R, Kühl S. Guided endodontics: a novel treatment approach for teeth with pulp canal calcification and apical pathology. Dent Traumatol 2016; 32: 240-246.
37. Yılmaz F, Kamburoğlu K, Şenel B. Endodontic working length measurement using cone-beam computed tomographic images obtained at different voxel sizes and field of views, periapical radiography, and apex locator: A comparative ExVivo study. J Endod 2017; 43: 153-156.
38. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 267-271.
39. Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Sanderink G, De Smet E, Nowak B, et al. A comparison of the effective dose from scanography with periapical radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 159-163.