Farklı hayvan türlerine ait çiğ etlerin SDS-PAGE yöntemiyle belirlenmesi üzerin bir araştırma

Bu çalışmada, çeşitli hayvan türlerine ait etlerin ve bu etlere yapılan katkı seviyelerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla, bazı et proteinlerinin ayırımında Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) tekniğinin kullanılabilme imkanları araştırılmıştır. Et türlerinin ayırımında spesifıc protein bantları kullanıldı. Araştırmada çiğ sığır, domuz, koyun ve at etleri ayrı ayrı ve ağırlıklarına göre muhtelif seviyelerde ikili (0/100, 5/95, 25/75, 50/50, 75/25, 95/5, 100/0) karışımlar şeklinde hazırlanmıştır. Hazırlanan örneklerdeki tür çeşidi ve bunların yüzde nispetleri SDS-PAGE tekniği ile protein profilleri yine molekül özettikleri bilinen standart protein markerleri ile karşılaştırılarak, teşhis ve tespitler gerçekleştirilmiştir. SDS-PAGE tekniğinin, et karışımlarındaki türlerin ve bunların karışımlardaki oranlarının % 5-10'a kadar tespitinde başarı ile kullanılabileceği ortaya konmuştur.

A study with SDS-PAGE technique for the specise identification of raw meat

In this study, for evaluating the effectiveness of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) to identify the animal species in raw meat species adulteration in binary mixture was invastigated. Characteristic banding patterns of proteins for each species were used in identifying the existence of other species in a meat mixture. Electrophoretic patterns of water soluble proteins from single meat species and binary mixtures (0/100, 5/95, 25/75,50/50 75/25, 95/5, 100/0) by weight were presented. In this study, raw beef, pork, sheep and horse meat was individually prepared and mixed in various ratios based on flesh weight and then the protein patterns were compared with standart proteins markers. The species specific band decreases with decreasing the weight of flesh used in the binary mixture, and at 5% mixture, this band present in mixed samples. SDS-PAGE was an effective method to differentiate and identify species of raw meat in the binary mixture sample. Meat species adulteration at concentration as low as 5-10 % by -weight could be detected without risk.

___

  • 1-Ackermans MT, Beckers JL, Everaerts FM (1992): Determination of Sulphonamides in Pork Meat Extracts by Capillary Zone .Electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. 596 : 101-109.
  • 2-An H, Marshall MR, Otwell WS, Wei CI (1988): Electrophoretic Identification of Raw and Cooked Shrimp Using Various Protein Extraction Systems. J. Food Sci. 53: 313-318.
  • 3-Bonnefoi M, Bernard G, Labie C (1986): Gel Electrophoresis : A Qualitative Method for Detection of Duck and Goose Liver in Canned Foie Gras. J.Food Sci. 51 (5): 1362-1363.
  • 4-Chrambach A, Rodbord D (1971): Estimation of Molecular Radius Free Mobility and Valence Using Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis. Anal.Biochem. 40: 95-134.
  • 5-Coduri R J, Rand A G (1972): Vertical Plate Gel Electrophoresis for the Differentiation of Meat Species. J. Assoc. off. Anal. Chem. 461-466.
  • 6-Giovanni PB (1988): Differentiation Between Helix and Achatina Snail Meat by Gel Electrophoresis. J.Food Sci. 53 (2): 652-653.
  • 7-Heinert T, Thorson B (1980): Ticrortspeczifische Eiwei-Sdifferentzierung Protein und Enzymmuster Bei Reh (Capreolus capreulus) und Hirsch. (Cervus elephus). Fleischwirtsch. 60: 1682-1688.
  • 8-Hitchcock CHS, Crimes AD (1985): Methodology for Meat Species Identification. Meat Sci. 15:215-224.
  • 9-Hofmann K, Penny I F (1973): Methode Zur identifizierung und Quantitativen Bestimmung Von Fleisch-Und Fremdeiweus Mit Hufe Der Sds-Poly Acrylamid- Elektrophorese Aut Flachgelen. Fleischwirtsch. 20 : 252-257.
  • 10-Hofmann K (1978): Charakterisierung Der Proteine in Muskeln Und İnneren Organen Von Rind Und Schwein Mithilfe Der SDS-Polyacrylamidgel-Electrophorese. Kongrep, Bd. III,L. 2:3, Kulmbach.
  • 11-Hofmann K (1985): Principle Problems in the Identification of Meat Species of Slaughter Animals Using Electrophoretic Methods. Biochemical Identification of Meat Species (Ed. R.L.S.Patterson) Elsevier App. Sci. Pub. London.
  • 12-Hofmann K, Bluchel E (1991): Blut und Muskelforbsloff Trennung und Bestimmung Unter Anwendung Der SDS-Elektrophores. Fleischwirtsch. 71 (11): 1290-1293.
  • 13-Hofmann K (1987): Fundamental Problembs in Identifying the Animal Species of Muscle Meat Using Electrophoretic Methods. Fleischwirtsch. 67:820-828.
  • 14-Hour S (1985): Identification of Animal Species by Electrophoresis "Biochemical Identification of Meat Species" R. L. S. Patterson (Ed), Elsevier, Applied, Science, Publishers, Ldt, p. 32-36, England.
  • 15-Höyem T, Thorson B (1970): Myoglobin Electrophoretic Patterns in Identification of Meat From Different Animal Species. J.Agr. Food Chem. 18 : 737-742.
  • 16-Hvass A (1985): Species Differentiation in Minced Meat Products by Immunodiffusion. "Biochemical identification of Meat Species" R. L. S. Patterson (Ed) Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Ltd., p. 53-58, England.
  • 17-Kamber U (1996): Et Türlerinin İdentifikasyonu. Vet.Hek.Der.Derg.67(1):34-40.
  • 18-Kato T, Deki M (1977): Identification of Meat Species by Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis. Kanzei chuo Bunsek. 17: 17-21.
  • 19-Kim H, Shelef LA (1986): Characterization and Identification of Raw Beef, Pork,Chicken, And Tukey Meats by Electrophoretic Patterns of Their Sarcoplasmic Proteins. J. Food sci. 51(3): 731-735.
  • 20-Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951): Protein Measurement With Folin Henolreagent. Biol. Chem. 193- 256.
  • 21-Marshall T, Williams K (1988): High Resulotion Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis and Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis of Cheese Proteins After Rapid Solubilisation. Electrophoresis 9 : 143-14.
  • 22-McCormick RJ, Reeck GR Kroph DH (1988): Separation and Identification of Porcin Sorcoplasmic Proteins by Reversed Phose High Performance Liguid Chromotography and Palyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis. J. Agr. Food Chem. 36: 1193-1198.
  • 23-Oghshi K, Maruyama K, Yoshidomi H (1985): Changes in the Molecular Size of Connectin an Elastic Protein in Chicken Skeletal Muscle During Embriyonic and Neonatonal Development. Biomed. Res. 6 (4): 207-213.
  • 24-Parisi E, Agulari D (1985): Methods Differentiating Meats of Different Species of Animals. "Biochemical identification of Meat Species" R.L.S. Patterson (Ed). Elselvier Applied Science Publishers Ltd., p. 40-49, England.
  • 25-Rosario M, Juan I, Ascona E, Hernandez Bernabe S (1992): Immunoadsorbtions- Chromatographie Teilweise Reinigung Der Löslichen Schweinespezifischen Muskelproteine. Fleischwirtsch. 72(6):916-917.
  • 26-Ruggeberg H, Gaede W, Tschirdewahn B Booke A, Müller M (1997): Ein Methodischer Vergleich Der PCR-Analyse Der DNA-Sonden-Echnik und Der Isoelektrischen Fokussierung. Fleischwirtsch. 77 (8): 732. 734.
  • 27-Scope RK, Penny IF (1971): Subunit Size of Muscle Proteins as Determined by Sodium Dodecylsurphate Gel Electrophoresis. Biochem. Biophys Acta. 236: 409-415.
  • 28-Sherikar AT, Khot JB, Javarao BM, PiHa SE (1988): Application of Polyacrylamide-Gel Isoelectric Focusing for Identification of Species of Origin of Raw and Heat Treated Meats. Ind. J. Anim. Sci. 58 (4): 470-486.
  • 29-Sibour M, Giacconev, Parisi E (1988):Tierarbestimmung Anhand Der Proteinmuster Von LDH-Isoenzim. Fleischwirtsch. 68(3): 390-393.
  • 30-Spell E (1974): Die Elektrophoretische Unterscheidung Verschiedener Fleischarten.Fleischwirtsch., 3: 533-538.
  • 31-Switzer RL, Clark JM (1977): Experimental Biochemistry. W.H. Freeman and Company, p. 49-51, New York.
  • 32-Woadrow CM, Samy HA, Philips GS (1988): Liguid Chomatographic Identification of Meats. J.A.O.C. 71 (2): 349-403.
  • 33-Zerifi A, Labie C, Benard G (1992): SDS-PAGE Tecnique for the Species Identification of Cooked Meat. Fleischwirtschaft. 1 : 54-59.