Genç öğretim üyelerinin mesleki gelişim ihtiyaçları: Türkiye’deki bir devlet üniversitesinde tarama çalışması

Bu çalışmanın amacı bir devlet üniversitesindeki genç öğretim elemanlarınınmesleki gelişim ihtiyaçlarını ve üniversiteleri tarafından kendilerine sunulacak olan etkinliklerin zamanına, sunum formatına ve duyurulmasına ilişkintercihlerini araştırmaktır. Bir tarama çalışması olan bu çalışmaya katılan toplam 73 öğretim elemanı, "öğretim ve öğrenme", "öğrenci ile iletişim", "dersizlencesi ve müfredat tasarımı", "ölçme ve değerlendirme", "öğretim teknolojileri" ve "profesyonel gelişim" olmak üzere altı boyutu olan "ÇevrimiçiÖğretim Elemanı İhtiyaç Analizi Anketini" cevaplandırmıştır. Çalışmanınbulguları, genç öğretim elemanlarının proje temelli öğrenme, kalabalık sınıflarda ders verme, öğrenci motivasyonunu arttırma, öğrencilerde akademikdürüstlüğü teşvik etme, etkinlikleri ve ödevleri tasarlama, etkili sınav hazırlama, yapıcı geri bildirim verme, ders için web sitesi geliştirme ve atanma-terfi için hazırlanma konularında profesyonel gelişim desteğine ihtiyaç duyduklarını göstermiştir. Öğretim elemanlarının mesleki gelişim konularında sunulacak etkinliklerin akademik dönem başlamadan önce bölüm/fakülte bazında yapılacak 60 dakikalık çalıştaylar şeklinde olmasını tercih ettikleri bulunmuştur. Bu tür ihtiyaç belirleme çalışmalarının, öğretim elemanlarınındesteğe ihtiyaç duydukları profesyonel gelişim alanlarının belirlenmesinde vebu ihtiyaçların karşılanması için ne tür hizmetlerin tasarlanıp, sunulabileceğikonularında yükseköğretim kurumlarındaki karar mekanizmalarında bulunan kişilere faydalı bilgiler sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir

Professional Development Needs of Junior Faculty: A Survey Study in a Public University in Turkey

The aim of the current study was to examine professional developmentneeds of junior faculty and their preferences in relation to time, delivery format, and announcement of any professional development activity to beoffered by their institution. The study had a survey design. A total of 73 faculty responded to the “Online Faculty Needs Assessment Survey (FNAS)”.FNAS included six professional development areas as, “teaching and learning”, “relations with students”, “syllabus and curriculum design”, “assessment”, “instructional technology” and “professional development”. Theresults of the current study showed that the junior faculty expressed strongneed for training on project-based learning, teaching large classes, motivating students, encouraging students about academic integrity, designingactivities, assignments, and projects, preparing effective exams, giving constructive feedback, developing course website, integrating instructionaltechnology into courses, and preparing for tenure and promotion.Regarding the duration, time and delivery format of professional development activities, 60-minute seminars specific to departments or college heldjust before the academic semester was the most preferred one. It is believedthat such needs assessment studies would provide valuable information todecision makers at higher education institutions about the professionaldevelopment areas that faculty members may need support and differentkinds of services that could be designed and offered to meet those needs

___

  • Abebe, T., Bulver, K., Hanner, M. A., Kennedy-Hagan, K., Lee, J.,
  • Lovekamp, B., … Wyatt, D. (2010). Faculty development needs assessment survey. Eastern Illinois University. Accessed through on May 23rd, 2014.
  • Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10–20.
  • Bender, W. N. (2012). Project-based learning: Differentiating instruction for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., Wallace, M., Walker, R., McGowan, U., East, J.,
  • & James, C. (2014). Teach us how to do it properly! An Australian academic integrity student survey. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1150–1169.
  • Brophy, J. E. (2010). Motivating students to learn (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Davis, S., Kirkland, R., & Sheehan, O. (2010). 2010–2014 CORE faculty development action plan executive summary. Accessed through on October 5th, 2014.
  • Elçi, A., & Yaratan, H. (2012). Needs for professional development in teaching and learning in an international university. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 47–66.
  • Ekfli, G. (2010). An assessment of the professional development needs of English language instructors working at a state university. Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Eret, E., & Ok, A. (2014). Internet plagiarism in higher education: Tendencies, triggering factors and reasons among teacher candidates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(8), 1002–1016.
  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391.
  • Hadar, L., & Brody, D. (2010). From isolation to symphonic harmony: Building a professional development community among teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1641–1651.
  • Hahn, T. B., & Lester, J. (2012). Faculty needs and preferences for professional development. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 53(2), 82–97.
  • Kabakç›, I., & Odabafl›, H. F. (2008). The organization of the faculty development programs for research assistants: The case of education faculties in Turkey. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(3), 56–63.
  • Khan, M. N., & Sarwar, M. (2011). Needs assessment of university teachers for professional enhancement. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(2), 208–212.
  • Kitzrow, M. A. (2003). The mental health needs of today’s college students: Challenges and recommendations. NASPA Journal, 41, 165–179.
  • Koç, M., Demirbilek, M., & ‹nce, E. Y. (2015). A needs assessment for academicians’ Professional development. Education and Science, 40(177), 297–311.
  • Latchem, C., Odabafl›, F. H., & Kabakç›, I. (2006). Online professional development for university teaching in Turkey: A proposal. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(1), 20–26.
  • Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2014). Academic integrity: A review of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 339–358.
  • Matsubayaski, M., Drake, E., Shaw, A., & DeZure D. (2009). Needs assessment survey results: Faculty. Office of Faculty and Organizational Design (F&OD), Michigan State University. Accessed through on November 4th, 2014.
  • McCabe, D. L., & Pavela, G. (2004). Ten (updated) principles of academic integrity: How faculty can foster student honesty. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 36(3), 10–15.
  • Moeini, H. (2003). A need analysis study for faculty development programs in METU and structural equation modeling of faculty needs. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Middle Technical East University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Murray, J. P. (2002). Faculty development in SACS-accredited community colleges. Community College Review, 29(4), 50–66.
  • Odabafl›, H. F. (2003). Faculty point of view on faculty development. Hacettepe Üniversitesi E¤itim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24, 86–89.
  • Odabafl›, H. F. (2005). The status and need for faculty development in Turkey. International Journal for Academic Development, 10(2), 139–142.
  • OECD (2009). The professional development of teachers. In OECD, Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS (pp. 47–86). Paris: OECD.
  • Önkol, P. E. (2011). Perception of professional development at Bilkent University faculty Academic English program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Opre, A., Zaharie, M., & Opre, D. (2008). Faculty development: Teaching staff needs, knowledge, and priorities. Cognition, Brain and Behavior, 12(1), 29–43.
  • Siddiqui, Z. S. (2006). Professional development of academics. A needs assessment. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Smith, K. (2003). So, what about the professional development of teacher educators? European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(2), 201–215.
  • Speck, M., & Knipe, C. (2005). Why can't we get it right? Designing highquality professional development for standards-based schools (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Swennen, A., Jones, K., & Volman, M. (2010). Teacher educators: Their identities, sub-identities and implications for professional development. Professional Development in Education, 36(1–2), 131–148.
  • Taylor, A., & McQuiggan, C. (2008). Faculty development programming: If we built it, will they come? Educause Quarterly, 3, 28–37.
  • Upcraft, M. L., & Schuh, J. H. (1996). Assessment in student affairs: A guide for practitioners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Vajoczki, S., & Knorr, K. (2010). Faculty development information survey preliminary results. McMaster University report. Accessed through on April 28th, 2014.
  • Van Schalkwyk, S., Leibowitz, B., Herman, N., & Farmer, J. (2015). Reflections on professional learning: Choices, context and culture. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 46, 4–10.
  • Wallin, D. L., & Smith, C. L. (2005). Professional development needs of full-time faculty in technical colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 29(2), 87–108