___

• Abbasi, M. (2017). Towards Socially Sustainable Supply Chains – themes and challenges. European Business Review. 29(3), 261-302.
• Agarwala, A., Shankara, R. ve Tiwarib, M. (2006). Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: an anp-based approach. European Journal of Operational Research. 173(1), 211–225.
• Ahi,P.ve Searcy,C. (2013). A comparative literatüre analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 52, 329-341.
• Altuntaş, C., ve Türker, D. (2012). Sürdürülebilir tedarik zincirleri: sürdürülebilirlik raporlarının içerik analizi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 14(3), 39-64.
• Alzoubi, H. M. ve Yamandra, R. (2012). Investigating the mediating role of information sharing strategy on agile supply chain. Uncertain Supply Chain Management. 8, 273–284.
• Andersen, M., ve Skjoett-Larsen, T. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 14(2), 75-86.
• Apilioğulları, L. (2017). Yalın / Çevik Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi: Sektörel Yayın Dünyası: http://www.sektorel.com/yazarlar/lutfi-apiliogullari/yalin--cevik-tedarik-zinciri-yonetimi. Erişim Tarihi. Nisan 02, 2017.
• Azevedo, S. G. ve Machado, V. C. (2012-a). Influence of lean, resilient and green practices on supply chain sustainability. Latest Advances in Systems Science and Computational Intelligence. 230-235.
• Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., Duarte S. ve Machado, V. C. (2012-b). Influence of green and lean upstream supply chain management practices on business sustainability. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 59(4), 753-765.
• Baliga, R., Raut, R.D. ve Kamble, S.S. (2019), Sustainable supply chain management practices and performance: an integrated perspective from a developing economy. Management of Environmental Quality. 31 (5), 1147-1182. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-04-2019-0079
• Brandenburg, M., Govindan, K., Sarkis, J. ve Seuring, S. (2014). Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: developments and directions. European Journal of Operational Research. 233(2), 299–312.
• Büyüközkan, G. ve Berkol, Ç., (2011). Designing a sustainable supply chain using an integrated analytic network process and goal programming approach in quality function deployment. Expert Systems with Applications. 38, 13731-13748
• Büyüközkan, G:, ve Çiftçi, G., (2013)., An integrated QFD framework with multiple and incomplete preferences: a sustainable supply chain application. Applied Soft Computing. 13, 3931-3941.
• Cabral,I., Grilo, A. ve Machado, V. C., (2012). A decision making model for lean, agile, resilient and green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research. 50(17), 4830-4845, doi:10.1080/00207543.2012.657970. Erşim Tarihi: 1.12.2020
• Carter, C.R. ve Easton, P.L. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. No.41, 46-62.
• Carvalho, H., Duarte, S. ve Machado, V. C. (2011). Lean, agile, resilient and green: divergencies and synergies. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. 2(2), 151-179.
• Carvalho, H., Govindan, K., Azevedo, S.G. ve Machado, V.C. (2017). Modelling green and lean supply chains: an eco-efficiency perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 120, 75-87.
• Chavez R., Yu W., Jajja, M.S.S., Song, Y. ve Nakara, W. (2020). The relationship between internal lean practices and sustainable performance: exploring the mediating role of social performance, Production Planning & Control, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1839139
• Choi, D. ve Hwang, T. (2015). The impact of green supply chain management practices on firm performance: the role of collaborative capability. Operations Management Research. 8(3-4), 69–83.
• Chowdhury, M.M. ve Quaddus, M. A. (2016). A multi-phased QFD based optimization approach to sustainable service design. International Journal of Production Economics. 171, 165-178.
• Ciccullo, F., Pero, M., Caridi, M., Gosling, J. ve Purvis, L. (2018). Integrating the environmental and social sustainability pillars into the lean and agile supply chain management paradigms: a literature review and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production. 172, 2336-2350.
• Crowe, T. J. (1996). Using quality function deployment in manufacturing strategic planning. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 16(4), 35-48.
• Demirdöğen, O., Güzel, D. ve Avcı, S. B. (2010). Otomobil sektöründe bir kalite fonksiyon göçerimi uygulaması. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi. 13(1-2), 259-272.
• Dey, P.K., Malesios, C., De, D., Chowdhury, S. ve Abdelaziz, F.B., (2019). Could lean practices and
• process innovation enhance supply chain sustainability of small and medium‐sized enterprises?. Business Strategy Environment, 28, 582–598.
• Digalwar, A., Raut, R.D., Yadav, V.S., Narkhede, B., Gardas, B.B. ve Gotmare, A. (2020), Evaluation of critical constructs for measurement of sustainable supply chain practices in lean-agile firms of Indian origin: a hybrid ISM-ANP approach. Business Strategy and the Environment. 23 (9), 1575-1596.
• Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review. 36(2), 90–100.
• Faisal, M.N. ve Akhtar, A., (2011). Sustainable supply chains: 3BL and QFD approach. SCMS Journal of Indian Management. 8(4), 31-42.
• Geyi, D. G., Yusuf, Y., Menhat, M. S., Abubakar, T. ve Ogbuke, N. J. (2020). Agile capabilities as necessary conditions for maximising sustainable supply chain performance: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Economics. 222, 1-18.
• Green, K.W., Inman, R.A., Sower, V.E. ve Zelbst, P.J. (2019). Impact of JIT, TQM and green supply chain practices on environmental sustainability. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 30(1), 26-47.
• Harms, D., Hansen, E. G. ve Schaltegger, S. (2012). Strategies in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: An empirical ınvestigation of large german companies. John Wiley & Sons Ltd and ERP Environment
• Hines, P., Holweg, M. ve Rich, N. (2004). Learning to evolve: a review of contemporary lean thinking. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 24(10), 994-1011.
• Hsu, C.H., Chang, A.Y. ve Luo, W. (2017). Identifying key performance factors for sustainability development of SME’s-integrating QFD and fuzzy MADM methods. Journal of Cleaner Production. 161, 629-645.
• Huo, B., Gu, M. ve Wang, Z. (2019). Green or lean? A supply chain approach to sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production. 216, 152-66.
• Iranmanesh, M.; Zailani, S., Hyun, S.S.,Ali, M.H. ve Kim, K. (2019) Impact of lean manufacturing practices on firms’ sustainable performance: lean culture as a moderator. Sustainability . 11, 1112.
• İmirlioğlu, İ. (2019), Çevresel Sürdürülebilirlik terimleri. Kalkınmada Anahtar Verimlilik Dergisi, 23 Eylül. https://anahtar.sanayi.gov.tr/tr/news/cevresel-surdurulebilirlik-terimleri/113. Erişim Tarihi. 13 Mayıs 2017.
• Jia, G. ve Bai, M. (2011). An approach for manufacturing strategy development based on fuzzy-QFD. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 60(3), 445-454.
• Khodakarami, M., Shabani, A., Saen, R.F. ve Azadi, M. (2015). Developing distinctive two-stage data envelopment analysis models: an application in evaluating the sustainability of supply chain management. Measurement. 70(June), 62-74
• Killen, C. P., Walker, M. ve Hunt, R. A. (2005). Strategic planning using QFD. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 22(1), 17-29.
• Klassen, R. D. ve Vereecke, A. (2012). Social issues in supply chains: capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance. International Journal of Production Economics. 140(1), 103-115.
• Koh, S. L., Demirbag, M., Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E. ve Zaim, S. (2007). The impact of supply chain management practices on performance of SMEs. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 107(1), 103-124.
• Koplina, J., Seuring, S. ve Mesterharma, M. (2007). Incorporating sustainability into supply management in the automotive industry – the case of the Volkswagen AG. Journal of Cleaner Production. 15(11-12), 1053-1062.
• Kuş, H. T. (2012, Haziran). Sustainable Supply Chain Management application to Turkish Construction Industry. Fatih Üniversitesi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. 93s.
• Lam, J.S.L. (2015). Designing a sustainable maritime supply chain: a hybrid QFD–ANP approach. Transportation Research Part E. 78, 70-81. Lam, J.S.L. ve Dai, J. (2014). Environmental sustainability of logistics service provider: an ANP-QFD approach. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 26(2), 313-333.
• Lei, X.-R. ve Wang, D.X. (2012). Inventory management system of auto parts enterprises based on the agile supply chain. Second International Conference on Instrumentation & Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control. 859-863.
• Lina H., Wu, Z., Xiang, W., Goh, M., Xu, Z. ve Song, W., Ming, X. ve Wu, X. (2020). A novel Kano-QFD-DEMATEL approach to optimise the risk resilience solution for sustainable supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1724343. Erişim Tarihi. 10.12.2020.
• Mani, V., Agrawal, R. ve Sharma, V. (2015). Supply chain social sustainability: a comparative case analysis in indian manufacturing industries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 189, 234-251.
• Miemczyk, J. ve Luzzini, D. (2019). Achieving triple bottom line sustainability in supply chains. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 39(2), 238-259.
• Tseng, M. L., Islam, M. S., Karia, N., Fauzi, F. A. ve Afrin, S. (2019). A literature review on green supply chain management: Trends and future challenges,Resources. Conservation and Recycling. 141, 145-162.
• Morais, D. O. C. ve Barbieri, J. C. (2018). Social sustainability in supply chains: clarifications and insights. Journal of Administrative Sciences. 24(3), 1-15.
• Nath, V. ve Agrawal, R. (2020). Agility and lean practices as antecedents of supply chain social sustainability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 40(10), 1589-1611.
• Oliveira, U.R., Espindola, L.S., Silva, I.R., Silva, J. N. ve Rocha, H.M., (2018). A systematic literature review on green supply chain management: Research implications and future perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production. 187, 537-561.
• Özkan, O., Bayın, G. ve Yeşilaydın, G. (2015). Sağlık sektöründe yalın tedarik zinciri yönetimi. Online Academic Journal of Information Technology, 6(18).
• Panigrahi, S., Bahinipati, B. ve Jain, V., (2019). Sustainable supply chain management. Management of Environmental Quality. 30(5), 1001-1049.
• Parera, S., Soosay, C. ve Sandhu, S. (2014). Does agility foster sustainability: development of a framework from a supply chain perspective, Proceedings of the 12th ANZAM Operations,
• Supply Chain and Services Management Symposium, 1-19, http://docs.business.auckland.ac.nz/Doc/Perera-anzamsymposium2014_submission_128-final.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 23.11.2020
• Piercy, N. ve Rich, N. (2015). The relationship between lean operations and sustainable operations. International Journal of Operation Production Management. 35 (2), 282-315.
• Qrunfleh, S. ve Tarafdar, M. (2014). Supply chain information systems strategy: impacts on supply chain performance and firm performance. International Journal of Production and Economics. 147, 340-350.
• Reichhart, A. ve Holweg, M. (2007). Lean distribution: concepts, contributions, conflicts. International Journal of Production Research. 45(16), 3699-3722.
• Saaty, T.L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research. 48, 9-26.
• Salmona, M. Ö. ve Selam, A. A. (2009). Yeşil Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi: Bir Envanter Çalışması. ÜAS, 489-498.
• Seuring, S. (2004). Integrated chain management and supply chain management comparative analysis and illustrative cases. Journal of Cleaner Production. 8(10), 1059-1071.
• Seuring, S. ve Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699-1710.
• Sofyalıoğlu, Ç. ve Tunail, İ. (2012). Kano modelinin kalite fonksiyon göçerimi planlama matrisinde kullanımı. Ege Akademik Bakış. 12(1), 125-135.
• Sukati, I., Hamid, A. B., Baharun, R. ve Yusoff, R. M. (2012). The study of supply chain management strategy and practices on supply chain performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 40, 225-233.
• Supçiller, A. A. ve Çapraz, O. (2011). AHP-TOPSIS yöntemine dayalı tedarikçi seçimi uygulaması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi. (13), 1-22.
• Topoyan, M. (tarih yok). Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi. http://kisi.deu.edu.tr/mert.topoyan/ dosyalar/tzy10.pdf . Erişim Tarihi. Nisan 04, 2017.
• TÜSİAD (2013). 7 Adımda Sürdürülebilir Tedarik Zinciri: http://tusiad.org/tr/yayinlar/ raporlar/item/7254-7-adimda-surdurulebilir-tedarik-zinciri. Erişim tarihi: 7 Mart 2017
• Vonderembse, M. A., Uppal, M., Huang, S. H. ve Dismukes, J. P. (2006). Designing supply chains: towards theory development. International Journal of Production Economics. 100(2), 223-238.
• Walker, M. (2002). QFD tools and principles are traditionally used for product. Management Decision. 40(3), 248-256.
• WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987). Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Wolf, J. (2014), The relationship between sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Business Ethics. 119 (3), 317-328.
• Wu, Z., Zhai, S., Hong, J., Zhang, Y. ve Shi, K. (2018). Building sustainable supply chains for organizations based on QFD: A case study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 15(12), 2834.
• Yıldız, M. S. ve Baran, Z. (2011). Kalite fonksiyon göçerimi ve homojenize yoğurt üretiminde uygulaması. Ege Akademik Bakış. 11(1), 59-72.
• Zhou, Z., Cheng, S. ve Hua, B. (2000). Supply chain optimization of continuous process ındustries with sustainability considerations. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 24(2), 1151-1158.