TİCARİ AÇIKLIK ÜZERİNDE TARİFLERİN KARMAŞIKLIK DÜZEYİNİN ETKİLERİNİN BİR ANALİZ

Devletlerin, ekonomik, politik ve sosyal nedenlerden dolayı uluslararası ticarete müdahale etmesi gerekebilir. Bu çalışmada, tarifelerin uluslararası ticaret üzerindeki etkileri istatistiksel teknikler kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Test sonuçlarına göre, orta ve yüksek düzeyde tarife karmaşıklığına sahip ülkeler için ticari açıklık ortalaması eşittir. Öte yandan, tarife karmaşıklık düzeyi düşük olan ülkeler için dış ticaret açıklık puanı ortalaması, tarife karmaşıklığı orta ve yüksek olan ticari açıklık puanına sahip ülkelerden istatistiksel olarak daha yüksektir. Sonuç olarak, tarifelerin karmaşıklık seviyesinin, ticari açıklığı olumsuz yönde etkilediği, bunun uluslararası ticaret politikası tasarlanırken göz önünde bulundurulması gerektiği sonucuna varılabilir.

AN ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF COMPLEXITY LEVEL OF THE TARIFFS ON TRADE OPENNES

States may need to intervene in international trade for economic, political and socialreasons. In this study, the effects of tariffs on international trade were investigatedby using statistical techniques. According to the test results, the average of tradeopenness for countries with medium and high tariff complexity is equal. On the otherhand, for countries with low tariff complexity, the average of trade openness scoreis statistically higher than those with a commercially clear score of middle and hightariff complexity. As a result, it can be concluded that the level of complexity of tariffsadversely affects trade openness, which should be taken into account when designinginternational trade policy.

___

  • Amiti, M., Redding, S. J., & Weinstein, D. (2019). The Impact of the 2018 Trade War on US Prices and Welfare (No. w25672). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Anderson, J. E., & Neary, J. P. (1992). Trade reform with quotas, partial rent retention, and tariffs. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 57-76.
  • Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (2005). Enforcement, private political pressure, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization escape clause. The Journal of Legal Studies, 34(2), 471-513.
  • Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2001). The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity. Journal of international Economics, 53(1), 1-27.
  • Baldwin, R. (1987). Politically realistic objective functions and trade policy PROFs and tariffs. Economics Letters, 24(3), 287-290.
  • Bhagwati, J., & Ramaswami, V. K. (1963). Domestic distortions, tariffs and the theory of optimum subsidy. Journal of Political economy, 71(1), 44-50.
  • Bohara, A. K., Gawande, K., & Sanguinetti, P. (2004). Trade diversion and declining tariffs: evidence from Mercosur. Journal of International economics, 64(1), 65-88.
  • Brander, J. A., & Spencer, B. J. (1984). Trade warfare: tariffs and cartels. Journal of in- ternational Economics, 16(3-4), 227-242.
  • Brown, D. K. (1987). Tariffs, the terms of trade, and national product differentiation. Journal of Policy Modeling, 9(3), 503-526.
  • Bureau, J. C., Guimbard, H., & Jean, S. (2019). Competing liberalizations: tariffs and trade in the twenty-first century. Review of World Economics, 1-47.
  • Busch, M. L., & Reinhardt, E. (2003). Developing countries and general agreement on tariffs and trade/world trade organization dispute settlement. Journal of World Trade, 37(4), 719-735.
  • Cline, W. R. (Ed.). (1983). Trade Policy in the 1980s (Vol. 3). Peterson Institute.
  • Debaere, P., & Mostashari, S. (2010). Do tariffs matter for the extensive margin of in- ternational trade? An empirical analysis. Journal of International Economics, 81(2), 163-169.
  • Dos Santos, N. B., Farias, R., & Cunha, R. (2005). Generalized system of preferences in general agreement on tariffs and trade/World Trade Organization: History and current issues. Journal of World Trade, 39(4), 637-670.
  • Edwards, S. (1988). Terms of trade, tariffs, and labor market adjustment in developing countries. The World Bank Economic Review, 2(2), 165-186.
  • Findlay, R., & Wellisz, S. (1982). Endogenous tariffs, the political economy of trade rest- rictions, and welfare. In Import competition and response (pp. 223-244). University of Chicago Press.
  • Gatti, R. (1999). Corruption and trade tariffs, or a case for uniform tariffs. The World Bank.
  • Hoekman, B., & Nicita, A. (2008). Trade policy, trade costs, and developing country trade. The World Bank.
  • Jackson, J. H. (1967). The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade in United States Do- mestic Law. Michigan Law Review, 66(2), 249-332.
  • Jackson, J. H. (1969). World Trade and the Law of GATT (Vol. 482). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
  • Jones, R. W. (1967). International capital movements and the theory of tariffs and trade. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81(1), 1-38.
  • Jones, R. W. (1969). Tariffs and trade in general equilibrium: comment. The American Economic Review, 59(3), 418-424.
  • Lindé, J., & Pescatori, A. (2019). The macroeconomic effects of trade tariffs: Revisiting the lerner symmetry result. Journal of International Money and Finance.
  • Lipsey, R. G. (1957). The theory of customs unions: trade diversion and welfare. Econo- mica, 24(93), 40-46.
  • Metzler, L. A. (1949). Tariffs, the terms of trade, and the distribution of national income. Journal of Political Economy, 57(1), 1-29.
  • Nagurney, A., Besik, D., & Dong, J. (2019). Tariffs and quotas in world trade: A unified variational inequality framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 275(1), 347-360
  • Nam, C. H. (1987). Export-promoting subsidies, countervailing threats, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. The World Bank Economic Review, 1(4), 727-743.
  • Nye, J. V. (1991). The myth of free-trade Britain and fortress France: tariffs and trade in the nineteenth century. The Journal of Economic History, 51(1), 23-46.
  • Reitz, C. (1996). Enforcement of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. U. Pa. J. Int’l Econ. L., 17, 555.
  • Venables, A. J. (1982). Optimal tariffs for trade in monopolistically competitive commo- dities. Journal of International Economics, 12(3-4), 225-241.