PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞME İHLALİ İLE YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞI İLİŞKİSİNDE ÖRGÜTSEL SİNİZMİN ROLÜ

Bu çalışmanın amacı psikolojik sözleşme ihlali ile yenilikçi iş davranışı ilişkisinde örgütsel sinizmin rolünü araştırmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, Bitlis ilinde çalışan 240 kişiden yazılı soru sorma yoluyla veri toplanmıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, korelasyon, regresyon ve yapısal eşitlik modelleri ile değişkenler arası ilişkiler test edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, psikolojik sözleşme ihlali ile yenilikçi iş davranışı ilişkisinde örgütsel sinizm aracılık rolündedir. Çalışanlar kendilerine verilen sözler yerine getirilmediği zaman, yöneticilerinin/örgütlerinin kendilerini kandırdığı düşünceleri ile örgütlerine yönelik olumsuz tutumlar oluşturabilmektedirler. Söz konusu olumsuz tutumlar, çalışanların örgütlerine yarar sağlayacak yenilikçi iş davranışları sergilemelerine engel olabilmektedir. Örgütler açısından hayati öneme sahip yenilikçi iş davranışlarının anlaşılmasına yönelik olarak çalışmanın katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir

THE ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL CYNICISM IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT BREACH AND INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR

The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of organizational cynicism in the relationship between psychological contract breach and innovative work behavior. Accordingly, data was collected from 240 employees in Bitlis through written questionnaire. Confrmatory factor analysis, correlation, regression and structural equation models were used. According to the results, organizational cynicism has a mediating role in the relationship between psychological contract breach and innovative work behavior. Employees can create negative attitudes towards their organizations with the thoughts that their managers / organizations have deceived them when promises to them are not fulflled. These negative attitudes can prevent employees from exhibiting innovative work behaviors that will beneft their organizations. It is thought that the study will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of innovative work behaviors that are crucial for organizations.

___

  • Agarwal, U. A. (2014). “Examining the impact of social exchange relationships on innovative work behaviour”, Team Performance Management, 20(3/4), 102-120.
  • Agarwal, U. A. (2017). “Linking psychological contract breach, innovative work behaviour and collectivism: A Moderated Mediation Model”, International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(7), 1-31.
  • Ajzen, I. (1989). “Attitude structure and behavior”, Attitude Structure and Function, 241, 274.
  • Andersson, L. M. (1996). “Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework”, Human Relations, 49(11), 1395-1418.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1988). “A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
  • Ancona, D., & Caldwell, D. (1987). “Management issues facing new product teams in high technology companies”, Erişim Adresi: https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/48349/managementissues00anco.pdf?s.. (02.06.2020)
  • Andersson, L. M. (1996). “Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework”. Human Relations, 49(11): 1395-1418.
  • Awang, Z. (2012). Structural equation modeling using AMOS graphic. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi MARA.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). “The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • Bashir, S., & Nasir, M. (2013). Breach of psychological contract, organizational cynicism and union commitment: A study of hospitality industry in Pakistan, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 61-65.
  • Beugré, C. D. (2010), “Brain and human behavior in organizations: A feld of neuro-organizational behavior”, Neuroeconomics and The Firm, 289-301, Ed. Stanton A. A., Day, M. ve Welpe M. I., Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Byrne, J. A. (1991). “The fap over executive pay”, Business Week, 6(5), 90-96.
  • Bysted, R. (2013). “Innovative employee behaviour: the moderating effects of mental ınvolvement and job satisfaction on contextual variables”, European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(3), 268-284.
  • Bommer, W. H., Rich, G. A., & Rubin, R. S. (2005). “Changing attitudes about change: Longitudinal effects of transformational leader behavior on employee cynicism about organizational change”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 733-753.
  • Chaloupka, W. (1999). Everybody Knows: Cynicism in America , Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Chiaburu, D. S., Peng, A. C., Oh, I. S., Banks, G. C., & Lomeli, L. C. (2013). “Antecedents and consequences of employee organizational cynicism: A meta-analysis”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(2), 181-197.
  • Clapham, S. E. ve Cooper, R. W. (2005), “Factors of employees’ effective voice in corporate goverance”, Journal of Management & Governance, 9(3-4), 287-313.
  • Cook, W. W., & Medley, D. M. (1954). “Proposed hostility and pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 38(6), 414-418.
  • Daft, R., L. (1978), “A dual-core model of organizational innovation”, Academy of Management Review, 21, 193-210.
  • Davis, W. D., & Gardner, W. L. (2004). “Perceptions of politics and organizational cynicism: An attributional and leader–member exchange perspective”, The Leadership Quarterly, 15(4), 439-465.
  • De Jong, J. P. ve Den Hartog, D. N. (2007), “How leaders ınfuence employees’ innovative behaviour”, European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64.
  • De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). “Measuring innovative work behaviour”, Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
  • Dean, J. W., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). “Organizational cynicism”, Academy of Management Review. 23(2), 341-352.
  • Delken, M. (2004). Organizational cynicism: A study among call centers. Unpublished master thesis, University of Maastricht.
  • Dyne, L. V., Ang, Soon, B. ve Isabel C . (2003). “Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs”, Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
  • Ellonen, R., Blomqvist, K. ve Puumalainen, K. (2008). “The role of trust in organisational innovativeness”, European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(2), 160-181.
  • Eva, N., Meacham, H., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., & Tham, T. L. (2019). “Is coworker feedback more important than supervisor feedback for increasing innovative behavior?”, Human Resource Management, 58(4), 383-396.
  • Evans, W. R., Goodman, J. M., & Davis, W. D. (2010). “The impact of perceived corporate citizenship on organizational cynicism, OCB, and employee deviance”, Human Performance, 24(1), 79-97.
  • Fıroozı, M., Mokhtarı, A., & Mokhtarı, G. (2016). “The relationship between organizational cynicism and innovative behaviors of sport and youth offces in Hamedan province”, International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, 4(3), 295-303.
  • Fishman, A. A. (2016). “How generational differences will impact America’s aging workforce: Strategies for dealing with aging Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers”. Strategic HR Review. 15(6), 250-257.
  • Ford, C. (1996). “A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains”, Academy of Management Review, 21, 1112–1142. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8. Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Hair J. F., Black W. C., Babin B. J. ve Anderson R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, New Jersey, Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hippel, E. V. ve Krogh, G. V. (2003). “Open source software and the “Private-Collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science”, Organization Science, 14(2), 209-223.
  • Janssen, O. (2000), “Job demands, perceptions of effort reward fairness and ınnovative work behaviour”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
  • Janssen, O. (2003). “Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of confict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(3), 347-364.
  • Janssen, O. (2005). “The joint impact of perceived infuence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behaviour”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 573-579.
  • Johnson, J. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2003). “The effects of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: Not all social exchange violations are created equal”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 627-647.
  • Kalağan, G., & Güzeller, C. O. (2010). “Öğretmenlerin örgütsel sinizm düzeylerinin incelenmesi”, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(27), 83-97.
  • Kickul, J., & Lester, S. W. (2001). “Broken promises: Equity sensitivity as a moderator between psychological contract breach and employee attitudes and behavior”, Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(2), 191-217.
  • Knol, J., & Van Linge, R. (2009). “Innovative behaviour: The effect of structural and psychological empowerment on nurses”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(2), 359-370.
  • Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1992). “Knowledge of the frm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology”, Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.
  • Köksal, K., Eroğluer, K., & Yapar, H. (2018). “Psikolojik sözleşme ihlalinin yenilikçi davranışa etkisi: örgütsel sessizliğin rolü: Savunma sanyiinde bir uygulama”. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 17. UIK Special Issue, 687-696.
  • Li, S., & Chen, Y. (2018). “The relationship between psychological contract breach and employees’ counterproductive work behaviors: the mediating effect of organizational cynicism and work alienation”, Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1273.
  • Morrison E. W., & Robinson SL. (1997). “When employees feel betrayed: a model of how psychological contract violation develops”, Academy of Management Review, 22, 226- 256.
  • Muslu, A., & Öner, M.B. (2016). “Yenileşimci işletmeler için, birbirlerinden tamamen farklı özelliklere sahip X ve Y kuşakları arasında etkin bir iletişim sağlanmasının gerekliliği”, 15. Ulusal İşletmecilik Kongresi, 26-28 Mayıs 2016, İstanbul.
  • Navia, L. E. (1995). The philosophy of cynicism: an annotated bibliograph, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing.
  • Naus, F., Van Iterson, A., & Roe, R. (2007). “Organizational cynicism: Extending the exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect model of employees’ responses to adverse conditions in the workplace”, Human Relations, 60(5), 683-718.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, (Second ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). “Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work”, Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
  • Parzefall, M. R., Seeck, H. ve Leppänen, A. (2008), “Employee innovativeness in organizations: A review of the antecedents”, Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 2(08), 165-182.
  • Pfrombeck, J., Doden, W., Grote, G., & Feierabend, A. (2020). “A study of organizational cynicism and how it is affected by social exchange relationships at work”. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. Erişim Adresi: https://onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.12306 (05.06.2020).
  • Polshak, T. C. (2014). “Validation of the MMPI-2_RF’s RC3 cynicism scale”, Erişim Adresi: https://digitalcommons.pittstate.edu/etd/33/ (03.06.2020).
  • Radaelli, G., Lettieri, E., Mura, M., & Spiller, N. (2014). “Knowledge sharing and innovative work behaviour in healthcare: A micro-level investigation of direct and indirect effects”, Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(4), 400-414.
  • Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T. ve Sardessai, R. (2005), “Determinants of innovative work behaviour: Development and test of an ıntegrated model”, Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 142-150.
  • Robinson S. L. & Rousseau D. M. (1994). “Violating the psychological contract: not the exception but the norm”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 245-259.
  • Robinson, S. L., & Wolfe Morrison, E. (2000). “The development of psychological contract breach and violation: A longitudinal study”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 525-546.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989). “Psychological and implied contracts in organizations”, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121-139.
  • Sarikaya, M., & Kok, S. B. (2017). “The relationship between psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism”, European Scientifc Journal, 13(10), 125-142.
  • Scott, S. G. ve Bruce, R. A. (1994), “Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of ındividual ınnovation in the workplace”, Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580- 607.
  • Sezgin, O., Tolay, E., & Sürgevil, O. (2016) “Örgütsel değişim sinizmi: çalışanların değişime karşı tutumlarının incelenmesine yönelik nitel bir araştırma”, Öneri Dergisi, 12(45), 411-438.
  • Spiro, C. (2006). “Generation Y in the workplace”. Defense AT&l, 35(6), 16-19. Shahzad, A., & Mahmood, Z. (2012). “The mediating-moderating model of organizational cynicism and workplace deviant behavior: Evidence from banking sector in Pakistan”, Middle-East Journal of Scientifc Research, 12(5), 580-588.
  • Shalley, C. E. ve Gilson, Lucy L. (2004). “What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity”, The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33-53.
  • Sloterdijk, P. (1987). Critique of cynical reason. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Turgut, E. ve Begenirbaş, M. (2014). “İlişkisel sosyal sermayenin yenilikçi davranışa etkisinde örtülü bilgi paylaşımı davranışının aracılık rolü”. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 146-160.
  • Unsworth, K. L. and Clegg, C. W. (2010) “Why Do Employees Undertake Creative Action?”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 77–99.
  • Van de Ven, A. H. (1986), “Central problems in the management of innovation”, Management Science, 32(5), 590-607.
  • Vance, R. J., Brooks, S. M. & Tesluk, P. E. (1997). Organizational cynicism, cynical cultures, and organizational change. Unpublished manuscript, Center for Applied Behavioral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University.
  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T. (1994, August). Organizational cynicism: An initial study. In Academy of Management Proceedings (1994, (1), 269-273). Briarcliff Manor, New York: Academy of Management.
  • Weston, Marla J. (2006) “Integrating generational perspectives in nursing.” The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 11(2), 1-9.
  • Wilkerson, J. M., Evans, W. R., & Davis, W. D. (2008). “A test of coworkers’ infuence on organizational cynicism, badmouthing, and organizational citizenship behavior”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(9), 2273-2292.
  • Wolfe, R. A. (1994). “Organizational innovation: Review, critique and suggested research directions”, Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 405-431.
  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffn, R. W. (1993). “Toward a theory of organizational creativity”, Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.
  • Xerri, M. J., & Brunetto, Y. (2011). “Fostering the innovative behaviour of SME employees: a social capital perspective”, Research & Practice in Human Resource Management, 19(2), 43-59.
  • Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). “Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations”, Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342.
  • Zhang, Q., Sun, S., Zheng, X., & Liu, W. (2019). “The role of cynicism and personal traits in the organizational political climate and sustainable creativity”, Sustainability, 11(1), 257.
  • Zwick, T. (2002). “Employee resistance against innovations”, International Journal of Manpower. 23(6), 542-552.
Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1304-5318
  • Başlangıç: 2003
  • Yayıncı: Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

ÖRGÜT İKLİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL SİNİZM ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE LİDER - ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ARACILIK ROLÜ

Kubilay ÖZYER, Ahmet MUMCU

Marka Sayfalarına Yönelik Tutumun Marka Sayfalarındaki Reklamlara Yönelik İnançlar İle Marka Sayfalarına Üye Olma Niyeti Arasındaki İlişkideki Aracılık Rolünün İncelenmesi

Selin KÜÇÜKKANCABAŞ ESEN, Ecehan TURGUT, Çağatay AKDOĞAN

Evaluation of The Effectiveness of The Internal Control System in Hospital Business: A Case Study

İlknur ESKİN

MARKA SAYFALARINA YÖNELİK TUTUMUN MARKALARIN SOSYAL MEDYADAKİ REKLAMLARINA YÖNELİK İNANÇLAR İLE MARKA SAYFALARINA KATILMA NİYETİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDEKİ ARACILIK ROLÜ

Çağatay AKDOĞAN, Selin KÜÇÜKKANCABAŞ, Ecehan TURGUT

PROFESYONEL ESPOR OYUNCULARININ GELECEK BEKLENTİLERİNİN KARİYER PLANLAMA DAVRANIŞLARINA ETKİSİ

Ufuk BİNGÖL, Yasin Nuri ÇAKIR

PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞME İHLALİ İLE YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞI İLİŞKİSİNDE ÖRGÜTSEL SİNİZMİN ROLÜ

Oytun Boran SEZGİN, Zeki UÇAR

Tüketicilerin Alışveriş Merkezlerini Tercih Etme Nedenleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Çanakkale Örneği

Yasin GÜLTEKİN, Mustafa KAPLAN

STRATEJİK DÜŞÜNMENİN TEMEL BİLEŞENLERİ: TÜRK YÖNETİCİLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Kübranur ÇAKIR, Yunus Emre TAŞGİT

SOSYAL KAYTARMA DAVRANIŞI İLE İŞE YABANCILAŞMA ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: GÖRGÜL İNCELEME

Melahat ÖNEREN, Gülşen YURDAKUL

ÖZEL MARKALARDA ALGILANAN RİSK BOYUTLARININ SATIN ALMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ: ÖZEL MARKA İMAJININ ARACILIK ROLÜ

N. Ozan BAKIR, Emil AGHARZAYEV