Büyüme Gelişim Döneminde Maksiller Yetmezliğe Bağlı Sınıf III Bireyde Mini-Plak Ankrajlı Yüz Maskesi Uygulaması
Genellikle maksiller yetmezlikle
karakterize olan iskeletsel sınıf III anomaliler
sosyal ve çevresel faktörlerin etkisiyle bireyler
ve evebeynleri tarafından özellikle büyüme
gelişim döneminde farkedilmektedir.
Günümüzde iskelestel sınıf III anomalilerin
tedavisinde sıklıkla yüz maskesi
kullanılmaktadır. Konvansiyonel yüz maskesi
uygulaması, ankraj ünitesi ile bireyin vertikal
yönde büyümesinde istenmeyen değişimlere
neden olabilmektedir. Bu noktada istenmeyen
dentoalveolar etkileri en aza indirmek
amacıyla maksilla protraksiyonu, yüz
maskesinin iskeletsel ankraj üniteleri ile
birlikte kullanımıyla elde edilebilmektedir. Bu
olgu sunumunun amacı büyüme gelişim
döneminde olan maksiller yetmezliğe bağlı
sınıf III anomaliye sahip bireyin mini-plak
ankrajlı yüz maskesi uygulaması ile iskeletsel,
dentoalveolar ve yumuşak dokudaki
değişimlerinin sunulmasıdır.
Application of Mini-Plate Anchored Face Mask in Class III Individual Due to Maxillary Deficiency During the Period of Growth and Development
Individuals and parents are
noticed by skeletal class III anomalies, which
are typically characterized by maxillary
insufficiency, especially during the growth and
development due to the influence of social and
environmental factors. Today, in the treatment
of skeletal class III anomalies, face masks are
frequently used. Conventional application of
the face mask may cause undesirable changes
in the growth of the individual with the
anchorage unit in the vertical direction. At this
point, it is possible to achieve maxilla
protraction by using the face mask together
with skeletal anchorage units to minimize
undesired dentoalveolar effects. The aim of
this case report is to present, by applying a
face mask with mini-plate anchorage, the
skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue changes
of an individual with class III anomaly due to
maxillary insufficiency in the growth and
development period.
___
- 1. Williams S, Andreasen CE. The
Morphology of Potential Class III Skeletal
Pattern in Growing Child. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop. 1986; 89: 302-11.
- 2. Ellis E, McNamara JA Jr. Components of
Adult Class III Malocclusion. J Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 1984;42(5):295-305.
- 3. Joshi N, Hamdan AM, Fakhouri WD.
Skeletal Malocclusion: a Developmental
Disorder with a Life-long Morbidity. J Clin
Med Res. 2014;6(6):399-408.
- 4. Bernabé E, Sheiham A, de Oliveira CM.
Condition-specific Impacts on Quality of Life
Attributed to Malocclusion by Adolescents
with Normal Occlusion and Class I, II and III
Malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(6):977-
82.
- 5. Kaya D, Kocadereli I, Kan B, Tasar F.
Effects of Facemask Treatment Anchored with
Miniplates After Alternate Rapid Maxillary
Expansions and Constrictions; a pilot study.
Angle Ortho. 2011;81: 639-46.
- 6. Şar Ç, Arman-Özçırpıcı A, Uçkan S, Yazıcı
AC. Comparative Evaluation of Maxillary
Protraction with or without Skeletal
Anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2011;139: 636-49.
- 7. Vaughn GA, Mason B, Moon HB, Turley
PK. The Effects of Maxillary Protraction
Therapy with or without Rapid Palatal
Expansion: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2005;128(3):299-309.
- 8. Kilicoglu, H. and Kirlic, Y. Profile Changes
in Patients with Class III Malocclusions After
Delaire Mask Therapy. American Journal of
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.
1998; 113(4): 453-462.
- 9. Ngan, P. Early Timely Treatment of Class
III Malocclusion. Seminars in Orthodontics.
2005;11(3):140–145.
- 10. Zhou YH, Ding P, Lin Y, Qiu LX.
Facemask Therapy with Miniplate Implant
Anchorage in a Patient with Maxillary
Hypoplasia. Chin Med J. 2007;120(15):1372-
5.
- 11. Delaire J. Maxillary Development
Revisited: Relevance to the Orthopaedic
Treatment of Class III malocclusions. Eur J
Orthod. 1997;19 (3):289- 311.
- 12. Hegmann M, Rüther AK. The Grummons
Face Mask as an Early Treatment Modality
within a Class III Therapy Concept. J Orofac
Orthop. 2003;64(6):450-6.
- 13. Nanda R. Biomechanical and Clinical
Considerations of a Modified Protraction
Headgear. Am J Orthod. 1980;78(2): 125-139.