Avrupa’da Telif Haklarının İnsan Hakları Boyutlarının Yapıçözümü
Mahkemeler, insan hakları kuruluşları, hukukçu akademisyenler ve
insan haklarını savunanlar, insan haklarıyla fi krî mülkiyet arasındaki
ilişkiyi birçok farklı bakış açısıyla incelemektedirler. Telif hakkı, fi krî
mülkiyet haklarının daha geniş bütünlüğü bağlamında, insan hakları
dünyasında nasıl kavramlaştırılmaktadır? Bu çalışma, Avrupa İnsan
Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Avrupa Birliği Temel Haklar Şartı gibi bazı temel
uluslararası belgelerin satırları arasında bu soruyu yeniden ele almaktadır.
Böylece bu çalışma, ilgili insan hakları kuruluşları ve mahkemelerinin
telif haklarının insan hakları yönlerini nasıl algıladığına ve ayırt e? iğine
dair yapı çözümüne dayalı bir değerlendirmek sunmaktadır.
DECONSTRUCTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS DIMENSIONS OF COPYRIGHT IN EUROPE
Courts, human rights bodies, legal scholars and human rights advocates
have discussed the interface between human rights and intellectual
property rights through multiple lenses. How has copyright, within the
larger context of intellectual property rights, been conceptualised in the
world of human rights? This article revisits this question along the lines
of some fundamental international instruments, such as: the European
Convention on Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights
of the European Union. Thus, it provides a deconstructive assessment
on how the respective human rights bodies and courts have perceived
and identifi ed the human rights a? ributes of copyright with a new
perspective
___
- “Ashby Donald and others v France”, International Review of Intellectual
Property and Competition Law 45, no. 3, (2014): 354-360.
- ““Pirate Bay” European Convention on Human Rights, Art. 10 – Neij and
Sunde Kolmisoppi v. Sweden, 2013”’ International Review of Intellectual
Property and Competition Law 44, no. 4, (2013): 724.
- ADENEY, Elizabeth. The Moral Rights of Authors and Performes: An
International and Comparative Analysi,s (Oxford, OUP, 2006).
- ALÌ, Gabriele Spina. “Intellectual Property and Human Rights: A
Taxonomy of Their Interactions”, International Review of Intellectual
Property and Competition Law 51, no. 4, (2020): 411-445.
- ANGELOPOULOS, Christina. “MTE v Hungary: New ECtHR Judgment
on Intermediary Liability and Freedom of Expression” (March 5, 2016),
available at h? p://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2016/03/05/mte-v-hungary-newecthr-
judgment-on-intermediary-liability-and-freedom-of-expression/.
- ARAI-Takahashi, Yutaka. The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the
Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Antwerp,
Intersentia, 2002).
- BARAZZA, Stefano. “Authorship of Cinematographic Works and
Ownership of Related Rights: Who Holds the Stage? Martin Luksan v Petrus
van der Let, Case C-277/10, European Court of Justice (ECJ), 9 February
2012”, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 7, no. 6, (2012): 396.
- BEITER, Klaus. “The Right to Property and the Protection of Interests in
Intellectual Property—A Human Rights Perspective on the European Court
of Human Rights’ Decision in Anheuser-Busch Inc. v Portugal”, International
Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 39, no. 6, (2008): 714–
721.
- BROWN, Abbe E. L. Intellectual Property, Human Rights and
Competition: Access to Essential Innovation and Technology (Cheltenham,
Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012).
- BRUNNER, Lisa. “The Liability of an Online Intermediary for Third Party
Content The Watchdog Becomes the Monitor: Intermediary Liability after
Delfi v Estonia”, Human Rights Law Review 16, no. 1, (2016): 163-174,
- CARPENTER, Megan M. “Trademarks and Human Rights: Oil and Water?
Or Chocolate and Peanut Bu? er”, Trademark Reporter 99, (2009): 892–930.
- CHAPMAN, Audrey R. “Approaching Intellectual Property as a Human
Right: Obligations Related to Article 15 (1) (c)”, in Approaching Intellectual
Property as a Human Right, ed. Evgueni Guerassimov (UNESCO Publishing,
2001).
- COBAN, Ali Riza. Protection of Property Rights Within the European
Convention on Human Rights, (Ashgate Publishing, 2004).
- DAVIES, Gillian and Kevin Garne? . Moral Rights, (Sweet & Maxwell, 2010).
- DRAHOS, Peter. “Intellectual Property and Human Rights”, Intellectual
Property Quarterly 3, (1999): 361.
- EMBERLAND, Marius. The Human Rights of Companies: Exploring the
Structure of ECHR Protection, (Oxford, OUP, 2006).
- EU Focus, “ISP May Be Ordered To Block Website Infringing Copyright”,
EU Focus, no. 319, (2014): 27-28.
- GEIGER Christophe. “Constitutionalising Intellectual Property Law? - The
Infl uence of Fundamental Rights on Intellectual Property in the European
Union”, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition
Law 37, no. 4, (2006): 371–406.
- GEIGER, Christophe and Elena Izyumenko. “Copyright on the Human
Rights’ Trial: Redefi ning the Boundaries of Exclusivity Through Freedom of
Expression”, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition
Law 45, no. 3, (2014): 316–342.
- GEIGER, Christophe (ed). Research Handbook on Human Rights and
Intellectual Property, (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015).
- GEIGER, Christophe and Elena Izyumenko. “Freedom of expression as an
external limitation to copyright law in the EU: the Advocate General of the
CJEU shows the way” EIPR 41, no. 3, (2019): 131-137.
- GEIGER, Christophe and Elena Izyumenko. “Shaping Intellectual
Property Rights Through Human Rights Adjudication: The Example of the
European Court of Human Rights”, Mitchell Hamline Law Review 46, no.
3, (2020): 527-612.
- GEIGER, Christophe and Elena Izyumenko. “The Constitutionalization
of Intellectual Property Law in the EU and the Funke Medien, Pelham and
Spiegel Online Decisions of the CJEU: Progress, but Still Some Way to Go!”,
International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 51,
(2020): 282–306.
- GEIGER, Christophe. “Intellectual Property Shall Be Protected!? Article
17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: A
Mysterious Provision with An Unclear Scope”, European Intellectual
Property Review 31, no. 3, (2009): 115.
- GERVAIS, Daniel J. “Making Copyright Whole: A Principled Approach
to Copyright Exceptions and Limitation”, University of O? awa Law &
Technology Journal 5, (2008): 1
- GOEBEL, B. “Trademarks as Fundamental Rights—Europe”, Trademark
Reporter 99, (2009): 931–955; Jennifer W. Reiss, “Commercializing Human
Rights: Trademarks in Europe After Anheuser-Busch v Portugal”, Journal of
World Intellectual Property 14, no. 2, (2011): 176-201.
- GOLDSMITH, Harry. “Human Rights and Protection of Intellectual
Property”, Trademark and Copyright Journal of Research and Education
12, no. 2, (1968): 889.
- GREER, Steven. The Exceptions to Articles 8 to 11 of the European
Convention on Human Rights (Human Rights Files No 15) (Council of
Europe Publishing, 1997).
- GRIFFITHS, Jonathan and Luke McDonagh. “Fundamental Rights &
European IP law – The Case of Art 17(2)”, in Constructing European Intellectual
Property, ed. Christope Geiger (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2013), 80.
- GRIFFITHS, Jonathan and Uma Suthersanen (eds). Copyright and Free
Speech, (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005).
- GRIFFITHS, Jonathan. “Constitutionalising or Harmonising? The Court
of Justice, the Right to Property and European Copyright Law”, European
Law Review 38, no. 1, (2013): 76.
- GRIFFITHS, Jonathan. “European Union copyright law and the Charter
of Fundamental Rights—Advocate General Szpunar’s Opinions in (C-469/17)
Funke Medien, (C-476/17) Pelham GmbH and (C-516/17) Spiegel Online”,
ERA Forum 20, (2019): 35–50.
- GROSHEIDE, Willem. “Moral Rights”, in Research Handbook on the
Future of EU Copyright, ed. Estelle Derclaye (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
Publishing, 2009), 247.
- GROSHEIDE, Willem. “Intellectual Property Rights and Human Rights:
Related Origin and Development” in Intellectual Property and Human
Rights: A Paradox, ed. Willem Grosheide (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
Publishing, 2010).
- GROSHEIDE, Willem. Intellectual Property and Human Rights: A
Paradox, (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010).
- HANUZ, Bianca. “Liability implications of extending the communication
to the public right to third-party re-posting of images already freely available
online with right holder permission”, European Intellectual Property
Review 41, no. 3, (2019): 190-196.
- HELFER, Laurence R. “Toward a Human Rights Framework for
Intellectual Property”, Davis L Rev 40, (2007): 971–1020.
- HELFER, Laurence R. “The New Innovation Frontier? Intellectual
Property and the European Court of Human Rights”, in Intellectual Property
And Human Rights, Enhanced Edition Of Copyright And Human Rights,
ed. Paul L. C. Torremans (Zuidpoolsingel, Kluwer, 2008), 39.
- HELFER, Laurence R. and Graeme W. Austin. Human Rights and
Intellectual Property: Mapping the Global Interface (Cambridge, CUP, 2011).
- HÖRNLE, Julia. “On Whose Side Does the Internet Access Provider
Stand? Blocking Injunctions Against Communication Service Providers. Case
C-314/12, UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film”, Communications
Law 19, no. 3, (2014): 99-100.
- HUSOVEC, Martin. “ECtHR Rules On Liability of ISPs as A Restriction of
Freedom of Speech”, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 9, no.
2, (2014): 108-109.
- HUSOVEC, Martin. “General Monitoring of Third-Party Content:
Compatible with Freedom of Expression?” Journal of Intellectual Property
Law & Practice 11, no. 1, (2016) 17-20.
- JAMES, Steven. “Digesting Lush v Amazon and UPC Telekabel: Are We
Asking Too Much Of Online Intermediaries?”, Entertainment Law Review
25, no. 5, (2014): 175-178; Christina Angelopoulos, “Are blocking injunctions
against ISPs allowed in Europe? Copyright Enforcement in the post-Telekabel
EU Legal Landscape”, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 9, no.
10, (2014): 812-821.
- JONES, J. “Internet Pirates Walk the Plank with Article 10 Kept at Bay:
Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v Sweden”, EIPR 35, no. 11, (2013): 695–700.
- JONGSMA, Daniël “Parody After Deckmyn – A Comparative Overview of
the Approach to Parody Under Copyright Law in Belgium, France, Germany
and The Netherlands”, International Review of Intellectual Property and
Competition Law 48, (2017): 652–682.
- JÜTTE, Bernd Justin. “CJEU Permits Sampling of Phonograms under a De
Minimis Rule and the Quotation Exception”, Journal of Intellectual Property
Law & Practice 14, no. 11, (2019): 827–829.
- LEGG, Andrew. The Margin of Appreciation in International Human
Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality (Oxford, OUP, 2012).
- MACOVEI, M. Freedom of Expression: A Guide to The Implementation
of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Human Rights
Handbooks No 2) (Strasbourg, Council of Europe Publishing, 2001).
- MINERO, Gemma. “European Union: case note on “UPC Telekabel
Wien””, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition
Law 45, no. 7, (2014): 848-851.
- NEWMAN, Simon. “The Development of Copyright and Moral Rights in
the European Legal Systems”, European Intellectual Property Review 33,
no. 11, (2011): 682.
- OHLY, Ansgar. “Economic Rights”, in Research Handbook on the Future
of EU Copyright, 212–41.
- PEUKERT, Alexander. “Intellecual Property as an End in Itself?”,
European Intellectual Property Review 33, no. 2, (2011): 69.
- PEUKERT, Alexander. “The Fundamental Right to (Intellectual) Property
and the Discretion of the Legislature” in Research Handbook on Human
Rights and Intellectual Property, 135.
- RAINEY, Bernade? e, Elizabeth Wicks, and Clare Ovey. Jacobs, White & Ovey:
The European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford, OUP, 7th edn, 2017).
- ROGNSTAD, Ole-Andreas, Christophe Geiger, Marie-Christine Janssens,
Alain Strowel and Raquel Xalabarder. “The delicate scope of economic rights
in EU copyright law: opinion of the European Copyright Society in light of
case C-161/17, Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Renckhoff (Cordoba Case)”,
European Intellectual Property Review 41, no. 6, (2019): 335.
- ROSATI, Eleonora. “Just a Laughing Ma? er? Why the Decision in
Deckmyn is Broader than Parody”, Common Market Law Review 52, no. 2,
(2015): 511-529.
- ROSS, Alexander “Case C-161/17 Land Nordrhein-
Westfalen v Dirk Renckhoff - Court of Justice loses control of the concept of
communication to the public”, Entertainment Law Review 30, no. 1, (2019):
24-26.
- RUSE-KHAN, Henning Grosse. “Overlaps and Confl ict Norms in Human
Rights Law: Approaches of European Courts to Address Intersections with
Intellectual Property Rights”, in Research Handbook on Human Rights and
Intellectual Property, 76.
- SGANGA, Caterine. “A decade of fair balance doctrine, and how to fi x
it: copyright versus fundamental rights before the CJEU from Promusicae to
Funke Medien, Pelham and Spiegel Online”, EIPR 41, (2019): 682.
- SHAVER, Lea. “The Right to Science and Culture” Wisconsin Law Review
1, (2010): 121-184.
- SHAVER, Lea and Caterina Sganga, “The Right to Take Part in Cultural
Life: On Copyright and Human Rights” Wisconsin International Law
Journal 27, no. 4, (2010): 637–662.
- SINJELA, Mpasi (ed). Human Rights and Intellectual Property Rights:
Tensions and Convergences, (Leiden, Martin Nijhoff Publishers, 2007).
- SMITH, Joel, Andrew Moir and Rachel Montagnon. “ISPs And Blocking
Injunctions: UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH
and and Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft mbH (C-314/12)”, European
Intellectual Property Review 36, no. 7, (2014): 470-473.
- SNIJDERS, Thom and Stijn van Deursen. “The Road Not Taken – the CJEU
Sheds Light on the Role of Fundamental Rights in the European Copyright
Framework – a Case Note on the Pelham, Spiegel Online and Funke Medien
Decisions”, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition
Law 50, (2019): 1176–1190.
- STIRLING, Tiff any. “Do Shoot The Messenger: Site-Blocking
Injunctions Against Internet Service Providers Upheld by the CJEU
UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH and Wega
Filmproduktionsgesellschaft GmbH UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH (“UPC”)
v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH and Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft
GmbH (C-314/12) [2014] E.C.D.R. 12”, Entertainment Law Review 25, no. 6,
(2014): 219-221.
- SYNODINOU, Tatiana-Eleni. “Intermediaries’ Liability for Online
Copyright Infringement in The EU: Evolutions and Confusions”, Computer
Law & Security Review 31, (2015): 63-67.
- TORREMANS Paul L. C. (ed). Intellectual Property and Human Rights,
(Zuidpoolsingel, Kluwer Law International, 2020).
- TORREMANS, Paul L. C. “Ashby Donald and Others v France, Application
36769/08, ECtHR, 5th Section, Judgment of 10 January 2013”, Queen Mary
Journal of Intellectual Property 4, no. 1, (2014): 95–99.
- TORREMANS, Paul L. C. “Is Copyright a Human Right?”, Michigan
State Law Review, (2007): 277.
- VOORHOOF, Dirk and Eva Lievens. “Off ensive Online Comments - New
ECtHR Judgment”, (February 15, 2016), available at h? p://echrblog.blogspot.
co.uk/2016/02/off ensive-online-comments-new-ecthr.html;
- WEINERT, Eileen. “Delfi AS v Estonia: Grand Chamber of the European
Court of Human Rights Hands down Its Judgment: Website Liable for User-
Generated Comments”, Entertainment Law Review 26, no. 7, (2015): 246-250.
- WEINERT, Eileen. “MTE v Hungary: the fi rst European Court of Human
Rights ruling on liability for user comments after Delfi AS v Estonia”,
Entertainment Law Review 27, no. 4, (2016): 135-139.
- YU, Peter K. “Intellectual Property and Human Rights 2.0”, University of
Richmond Law Review 53, (2019): 1375-1453.
- YU, Peter K. “Reconceptualising Intellectual Property Interests in a
Human Rights Framework”, Davis L Rev 40, (2007): 1039–1149.
- YU, Peter K. “Ten Common Questions About Intellectual Property and
Human Rights”, Georgia State University Law Review 23, (2007): 711.