Büyük İnşaat Projelerinde Karmaşıklık Yönetimi: Faktörlerin ve Değişkenlerin Belirlenmesi

Bu çalışma, “büyük projelerde karmaşıklığın ana faktörleri nelerdir?” ve “aralarında ne tür ilişkiler vardır?” sorularına cevap vermektedir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, büyük inşaat alanlarında proje karmaşıklığının faktörlerini ve ilişkilerini belirlemektir. Yapısal, teknolojik ve çevresel karmaşıklıklar ana temalar olarak ele alınmış ve kavramsal modelin ana bileşenlerini oluşturmuştur. Araştırma stratejisi, İran'daki büyük inşaat projelerinde çoklu vaka çalışmasıdır ve araştırma yöntemi ankettir. Seçilen vakaların proje uzmanları araştırma evrenini oluşturur ve tabakalı örnekleme yöntemi örneklem seçim yöntemidir. Araştırma popülasyonuna 300 anket dağıtılmış ve son olarak 120 tamamlanmış anket yapısal modelleme kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, çevresel karmaşıklık ile proje karmaşıklığı arasında önemli bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Yani ekonomik, sosyal ve politik faktörler dâhil olmak üzere proje ortamının karmaşıklığı arttığında, projenin de karmaşıklığı artarken, 0.001 düzeyindeki hem teknolojik, hem de yapısal karmaşıklıklar proje karmaşıklığını çevreselden daha az etkilemiştir. Başka bir deyişle, İran'ın büyük projelerinde teknolojik ve yapısal karmaşıklıklar ile proje karmaşıklığı arasındaki ilişki çevresel karmaşıklıktan daha zayıftır. Dolayısıyla, son iki faktör arasındaki ilişkinin yoğunluğu literatürden biraz farklıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Karmaşıklık, Proje Karmaşıklığı, Teknolojik - Çevresel ve Yapısal Karmaşıklık, Complexity, Project Complexity, Technological - Environmental and Structural Complexity

Complexity Management in Large Construction Projects: Identifying Factors and Variables

This study answers the questions “what are the main factors of complexity in large projects?” and “what kind of relationships are there among the factors?” To answer these questions, the purpose of this research is identifying the factors of project complexity in the large construction and the relationships among them. Structural, technological, and environmental complexities considered as the main themes, and they formed the main components of the conceptual model. Research strategy is multiple case study in Iranian large construction projects, and research method is survey. The project experts of the selected cases form the research population, and stratified sampling method is the sample selection method. Accordingly, 300 questionnaires were distributed among the members, and finally 120 completed questionnaires were analyzed using structural modeling. The findings indicate that there is a significant relationship between environmental complexity and project complexity. That is, when the complexity of the project environment, including economic, social, and political factors, raise, the complexity of the project increases too, while both technological and structural complexities at the 0.001 level affect project complexity less than environmental factos. In other words, the relationships between technological and structural complexities with project complexity in Iranian large projects are weaker than environmental complexity. So, the intensity of the relationship between the last two factors is slightly different with the literature.

Keywords:

Complexity, Project Complexity, Technological - Environmental and Structural Complexity,

PDF

___

ALGEO, Chivonne (2014), “Action Research in a Project Environment”, The Sage Encyclopedia of Action Research (Eds. D. Coghlan, M. Brydon-Miller), Sage Publisher, Thousand Oaks, ss.659-661.
BACCARINI, David (1996), “The Concept of Project Complexity - A Review”, International Journal of Project Management, S.14(4), ss.201-204.
BAKHSHI, Javad, IRELAND, Vernon and GOROD, Alex (2016), “Clarifying the Project Complexity Construct: Past, Present and Future”, International Journal of Project Management, S.34(7), ss.1199-1213.
BOSCH-REKVELDT, Marian, JONGKIND, Yuri, MOOI, Herman, BAKKER, Hans and VERBRAECK, Alexander (2011), “Grasping Project Complexity in Large Engineering Projects: The TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) Framework”, International Journal of Project Management, S.29(6), ss.728-739.
BROEKEL, Tom (2017), “Measuring Technological Complexity-Current Approaches and a New Measure of Structural Complexity”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.07357, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1708.07357.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 03.08.2021).
CALVO-PORRAL, Cristina and LÉVY-MANGIN, Jean-Pierre (2020), “The Circular Economy Business Model: Examining Consumers’ Acceptance of Recycled Goods”, Administrative Sciences, S.10(2), ss.(Article 28).
CANADIAN CONSTRUCTION ASSOSIATION (2020), “The Impact of the Construction Industry is Everywhere”, Value of Industry (E-Article), https://www.cca-acc.com/about-us/value-of-industry/ (Erişim Tarihi: 03.08.2021).
CHAN, Wai-Ming (1998), “Modelling Construction Durations for Public Housing Projects in Hong Kong”, Thesis, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam (Hong Kong).
DAFT, Richard L. (1998), Organization Theory and Design, South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati – Ohio (US), 6th Edition.
DOOLEY, Kevin (2002), “Organizational Complexity”, International Encyclopedia of Business and Management, S.6, ss.5013-5022.
FLYVBJERG, Bent (2014), “What You Should Know about Megaprojects and Why: an Overview”, Project Management Journal, S.45(2), ss.6-19.
FOROUHAR, Amir ve HASANKHANI, Mahnoosh (2018), “Urban Renewal Mega Projects and Residents’ Quality of Life: Evidence from Historical Religious Center of Mashhad Metropolis”, Journal of Urban Health, S.95(2), ss.232-244.
FRANK, Jeremy and DEARDEN, Richard (2003), “Scheduling in the Face of Uncertain Resource Consumption and Utility”, International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, ss.832-836, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.9666&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 03.08.2021).
GILL, T. Grandon (2008), “Structural Complexity and Effective Informing”, Informing Science, S.11, ss.253-279.
HAIR, Joseph F., HULT, Tomas G., RINGLE, Christian M. and SARSTEDT, Marko (2017), A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Sage Publisher, Thousand Oaks, 2nd Edition.
HARRIN, Elizabeth (2014), “Three Types of Complexity”, The Money Files Blog, https://www.projectmanagement.com/blog-post/7405/3-Types-of-Complexity#:~:text=Structural%20complexity,and%20control%2C%20with%20many%20variables (Erişim Tarihi: 03.08.2021).
ISHTIAQ, Farhaj and JAHANZAIB, Mirza (2017), “Impact of Project Complexity and Environmental Factors on Project Success: A Case of Oil and Gas Sector of Pakistan”, Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, S.13, ss.351-358.
LITTLE, Todd (2005), “Context-Adaptive Agility: Managing Complexity and Uncertainty”, IEEE Software, S.22(3), ss.28-35.
MEWES, Lars and BROEKEL, Tom (2020), “Technological Complexity and Economic Growth of Regions”, Research Policy (E-Article), http://econ.geo.uu.nl/peeg/peeg2049.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 03.08.2021).
MILES, Raymond E., SNOW, Charles C. and PFEFFER, Jeffrey (1974), “Organization‐Environment: Concepts and Issues”, Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, S.13(3), ss.244-264.
PAPAIOANNOU, Maria and KOUTSELINI, Mary (2007), “An Evaluation Model of Structural Complexity in Educational Systems”, The 3rd Hellenic Observatory PhD Symposium “Contemporary Greece: Structures, Context and Challenges”, London School of Economics and Political Science Press, Londra.
REMINGTON, Kaye and POLLACK, Julien (2007), Tools for Complex Projects, Gower Publishing, Aldershot - Hampshire (UK).
REMINGTON, Kaye, ZOLIN, Roxanne and TURNER, Rodney (2009), “A Model of Project Complexity: Distinguishing Dimensions of Complexity from Severity”, The 9th International Research Network of Project Management Conference, 11-13 October 2009, Berlin (Germany), https://eprints.qut.edu.au/29011/1/c29011.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 03.08.2021).
ROBBINS, Stephen P. (1990), Organization Theory: Structures, Designs, and Applications, Pearson Education India Publisher, Londra (UK).
ROBBINS, Stephen P., DECENZO, David A. and COULTER, Mary (2005), Fundamental of Management: Essential Concepts and Applications, Pearson Publisher, New Jersey (US), 5th Edition.
SAN CRISTÓBAL, Jose R., CARRAL, Luis, DIAZ, Emma, FRAGUELA, Jose A. and IGLESIAS, Gregorio (2019), “Complexity and Project Management: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Research”, Hindawi Complexity, S.2019(Special Issue), ss.1-10.
SANTANA, Gerardo (1990), “Classification of Construction Projects by Scales of Complexity”, International Journal of Project Management, S.8(2), ss.102-104.
STATISTA (2021), “Gross Domestic Product at Basic Prices for the Construction Industry in Canada from 1997 to 2020”, Statista Corporate Web Page, https://www.statista.com/statistics/519742/gdp-for-construction-sector-in-canada/ (Erişim Tarihi: 03.08.2021).
STEFÁNSDÓTTIR, Ásta Ósk (2015), “Feasibility Studies in Construction Projects in Iceland”, Master Thesis, Reykjavík University, Menntavegur (Iceland).
TURNER, J. Rodney and COCHRANE, Robert A. (1993), “Goals-and-Methods Matrix: Coping with Projects with ill Defined Goals and/or Methods of Achieving them”, International Journal of Project Management, S.11(2), ss.93-102.
VENKATESH, Prasad Kudrekodlu and VENKATESAN, Vasugi (2017), “Delays in Construction Projects: A Review of Causes, Need & Scope for Further Research”, Malaysian Construction Research Journal, S.23(3), ss.89-113.
VIDAL, Ludovic-Alexandre and MARLE, Franck (2008), “Understanding Project Complexity: Implications on Project Management”, Kybernetes, S.37(8), ss.1094-1110.
WILLIAMS, T. Manuela (1999), “The Need for New Paradigms for Complex Projects”, International Journal of Project Management, S.17(5), ss.269-273.
XIA, Bo and CHAN, Albert P. (2012), “Measuring Complexity for Building Projects: A Delphi Study”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, S.19(1), ss.7-24.
YANOVSKI, Roy, NELSON, Peter A. and ABELSON, Avigdor (2017), “Structural Complexity in Coral Reefs: Examination of A Novel Evaluation Tool on Different Spatial Scales”, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, S.5, ss.1-9(Article 27).