İLKOKULLARDA İLGİYE DAYALI ÖĞRENME ÜZERİNE SINIF ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN GÖRÜŞLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Bu araştırmanın amacı, ilköğretim okullarında öğretmenlik yapan sınıf öğretmenlerinin sınıf ortamında ilgi temelli öğrenme yaklaşımları üzerine görüşlerini belirlemek ve değerlendirmektir. Katılımcı öğretmenlere veriyi elde etmek için üç açık uçlu soru soruldu: Öğrencilerinizin ilgilerini nasıl tespit edersiniz? “Öğrencilerinizin öğrenmeye olan ilgi ve becerilerini arttırmak için genellikle neler yapıyorsunuz?” ve “Öğrencileriniz, ilgi Alanına Dayalı Öğrenme Stratejisine karşı tutumunuza nasıl tepki gösteriyor?” Öğretmenlerin İlgi Alanına Dayalı Öğrenme stratejileri hakkındaki görüşlerini değerlendirmek ve karşılaştırmak için nitel bir araştırma yöntemi kullanıldı. Araştırma, Türkiye'deki bazı şehirlerde çeşitli ilköğretim okullarında çalışan on dokuz sınıf öğretmenin katılımı ile yürütülmüştür. Yüz yüze görüşmeler ve e-postalar yoluyla elde edilen sınıf öğretmenlerinin görüşleri öğrencilerin öğrenme konusundaki ilgilerini artırmak için ne yapmaları gerektiği konusundaki yaklaşımları ilgisiz ve devamsız öğrencilerin öğrenmeye olan ilgilerini artırabilmek için uyarlamalı öğrenme stratejileri kullanmayı, ailelerle iletişim kurmayı, öğrencilere kültürel olarak uygun materyaller ve faaliyetler içeren tercihler sağlamayı, öğrencileri çok iyi tanıyabilmek için onlara vakit ayırmayı, onlarla birebir ilgilenmeyi içermektedir. Bu çalışma, sınıf ortamında İlgi Alanına Dayalı Öğrenmenin farkındalığını artırmak için sınıf öğretmenlerinin görüş ve uygulamalarına dikkat çekmektedir.

STUDY INTO THE VIEWS OF CLASSROOM TEACHERS UPON INTEREST-BASED LEARNING IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS

The aim of this study is to determine and evaluate the views of classroom teachers teaching in primary schools over the approaches toward Interestbased Learning in classroom. We asked three open ended questions to the participant teachers to obtain the data: How do you determine the interests of your students? , “What do you usually do to promote your students’ skills and interest in learning?” and “How do your students react your attitude to Interest-based Learning Strategy?” A qualitative research method was used to evaluate and compare the views of classroom teachers on the strategies for Interest-based Learning. The research was carried out with the participation of nineteen classroom teachers working in various Primary Schools in some cities in Turkey. The views of classroom teachers obtained through face-toface interviews and e-mails suggest that their approaches toward what they do to promote the students’ interest in learning include using adaptive learning for unattended students to foster their interest in learning, communicating with families about students’ interests and skills in learning, providing children with preferences including culturally relevant materials and activities, taking the time to get to know the students and one-by one relations with the students. This paper draws attention to the views and practices of classroom teachers as a means of increasing awareness of Interest-based Learning in classroom environment.

PDF

___

YILDIRIM, A. ve ŞİMŞEK, H. (2006). Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Press.
WIGFIELD, A. & ECCLES, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
WARDRIP, P. S., ABRAMOVICH, S., BATHGATE, M. & KIM, Y. J. (2014). A School-Based Badging System and Interest-Based Learning: An exploratory case study. International Journal of Learning and Media, MIT Press.
SOUTO, M. A. M., REGINA, V. & DE OLIVEIRA, J. P. M. (2006). Modeling Learner’s Cognitive Abilities in the Context of a Web-Based Learning. EnvironmentAdvances in web-based education : personalized learning environments / George D. Magoulas and Sherry Y. Chen, editors. 2nd Chapter. Information Science Publishing, 2006, UK.
SCHRAW, G. & LEHMAN, S. (2001). Situational Interest: A Review of the Literature and Direction for Future Research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23-52, doi: 10.1023/A:1009004801455
SCHIEFELE, U. (1992). Topic Interest and Levels of Text Comprehension. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.) The Role of Interest in Learning and Development (pp. 151182). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
SAMPSON, D., KARAGIANNIDIS, C. & KINSHUK (2002). Personalised Learning: Educational, Technological and Standardisation Perspective. Interactive Educational Multimedia, number, 4, 24-39
RYAN, R. M. & DECI, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
REECE, I. & WALKER, S. (2007). A Practical Guide to Teaching, Training and Learning, Tyne and Wear. (6th edition). Wallingford: Business Education Publishers Ltd, United Kingdom.
PASSIG, D. & LEVIN, H. (2000). Gender Preferences For Multimedia Interfaces. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(1), 64-71.
PASSIG, D. & LEVIN, H. (1999). Gender Interest Differences with Multimedia Learning Interfaces. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(2), 173-183.
ÖZARSLAN, Y. (2010). Kişiselleştirilmiş Öğrenme Ortamı Olarak IPTV. Uluslararası Eğitim Teknolojileri 2010 (International Educational Technology), Oral Presentation, İstanbul.
O’TOOL, J. & BECKETT, D. (2010). Educational Research: Creative Thinking and Doing. Victoria: Oxford University Press.
NQS. (2012). National Quality Standard Professional Learning Program. NQS PLP eNewsletter No.37 2012.
LEONG, S. & HAWAMDEH, S. (1999). Gender and Learning Attitudes in Using Webbased Science Lessons. Information Research, 5(1).
KIŞLA, T. & ŞAHİN, M. (2015). Kişiselleştirilmiş (Kişiye Özgü) Öğrenme-Öğretme Yaklaşımı. Gülay Ekici (ed.), Etkinlik Örnekleriyle Güncel Öğrenme-Öğretme Yaklaşımları-II (s. 172-208. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
KAYALAR, F. (2016). Views of Teachers on the Transition and Implementation of Competency Based Education into Classroom Environment: a Cross-Cultural Perspective Proceedings of IAC-GETL in Vienna, 66-74, ISBN 978-80-906231-7-0.
KAYALAR, F. & KAYALAR, F. (2016). The Effects of Auditory Learning Strategy on Learning Skills of Language Learners (Students’ Views). IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 22(2).
KAYALAR, F. & GÜLER ARI, T. (2016). Views of Language Teachers over Positive Relationships with Language Learners for Successful Classroom Management. Proceedings of IAC-TLEl.
HIDI, S. (2006). Interest: A Unique Motivational Variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69-82. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001
HANCOCK, T. E., STOCK, W. A. & SWINDELL, L. K. (1996). Gender and Development Differences in the Academic Study Behaviors of Elementary School Children. Journal of Experimental School Education, 65(1), 18-39.
FAN, J. P. & MACREDIE, R. D. (2006). Gender Differences and Hypermedia Navigation: Principles for Adaptive Hypermedia Learning Systems. Advances in web-based education: personalized learning environments / George D. Magoulas and SherryY. Chen, editors.1st Chapter. Information Science Publishing, UK.
ECCLES, J. S., ADLER, T. F., FUTTERMAN, R., GOFF, S., KACZALA, C. M., MEECE, J. L., & MIDGLEY, C. (1983). Expectancies, Values, and Academic Behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and Achievement Motivation (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
ECCLES, J. S. & WIGFIELD, A. (2002). Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
ECCLES, J. S. (1987). Gender Roles and Women’s Achievement-Related Decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–172. doi:10.1111/j.14716402.1987.tb00781.x.
DENZIN, N. K. & LINCOLN, Y. S. (2011). Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp.1-20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DECI, E. L. & RYAN, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
BRASWELL, R. & BROWN, J. (1992). Use of interactive videodisc technology in a physical education methods class. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco (ERIC ED 348 936).
BOSCOLO, P. & MASON, L. (2003). Topic knowledge, text coherence, and interest: How they interact in learning from instructional texts. Journal of Experimental Education, 71(2), 126-148. doi: 10.1080/00220970309602060
BLOM, J. (2000). Personalization – a taxonomy. Student Posters CHI 2000.
ALEXANDER, P. A., JETTON, T. L. & KULIKOWICH, J. M. (1995). Interrelationship of knowledge, interest, and recall: Assessing a model of domain learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 559-575.