ENERJİ VERİMLİLİĞİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’nin enerji verimliliğinin belirleyicileri TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), Tobit model ve yapay sinir ağları (YSA) algoritması yöntemleri birlikte kullanılarak incelenmiştir.  Çalışma TOPSIS enerji verimlilik skorlarının hesaplanması ve yapay sinir ağları ve Tobit modelleriyle tahmin olmak üzere iki aşamada gerçekleştirilmiştir. İlk aşamada karbon emisyonu, Gayri Safi Yurtiçi Hasıla (GSYİH), yenilenebilir ve yenilenemeyen enerji tüketimi, işgücü miktarı ve sermaye stoku değişkenleri kullanılarak Türkiye’nin 1960-2013 dönemine ait yıllık enerji etkinlik skorları hesaplanmıştır. Sonraki aşamada TOPSIS yöntemiyle elde edilen etkinlik skorları YSA ve Tobit modellerinde bağımlı değişken olarak kullanılırken, karbon emisyonu, GSYİH, yenilenebilir ve yenilenemeyen enerji tüketimi, işgücü miktarı, sermaye stoku-işgücü oranı, kriz yıllarını temsil eden kukla değişkenler, doğrusal trend ve trendin karesi bağımsız değişkenler olarak kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda YSA algoritmasının tahmini değerleri ile TOPSIS enerji verimlilik skorları arasındaki korelasyon katsayısı 0.998 olarak gerçekleşmiştir.

THE DETERMINANTS OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY: THE CASE OF TURKEY

In this study, energy efficiency determinants of Turkey were investigated using TOPSIS (Technique for Order Similarity to Ideal Solution) method, Tobit model and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm. The study performed a two stage analysis: calculation of TOPSIS energy efficiency scores and estimation with artificial neural networks and Tobit models. In the first stage, Annual energy efficiency scores of Turkey for the period 1960-2013 calculated by using  carbon emissions, Gross Domestic Product (GDP), renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, labor force and capital stock variables. In the second stage, the efficiency scores obtained by the TOPSIS method used as a dependent variable in YSA and Tobit models, while carbon emissions, GDP, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, labor force, capital stock/labor ratio, dummy variables representing crisis years, deterministic trend and square of trend used as independent variables. The results exhibit that the ANN model can predict the experimental results with high correlation coefficient, 0.998.

___

  • Apergis, N., Aye, G. C., Barros, C. P., Gupta, R., & Wanke, P. (2015). Energy efficiency of selected OECD countries: A slacks based model with undesirable outputs. Energy Economics, 51, 45-53.
  • Aye, G. C., Gupta, R., & Wanke, P. (2015). Energy Efficiency Drivers in South Africa: 1965-2014 (No. 201571).
  • Azadeh, A., Amalnick, M. S., Ghaderi, S. F., & Asadzadeh, S. M. (2007). An integrated DEA PCA numerical taxonomy approach for energy efficiency assessment and consumption optimization in energy intensive manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy, 35(7), 3792-3806.
  • Bian, Y., Hu, M., Wang, Y., & Xu, H. (2016). Energy efficiency analysis of the economic system in China during 1986–2012: A parallel slacks-based measure approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 990-998.
  • Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/
  • Chang, T. P., & Hu, J. L. (2010). Total-factor energy productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change: an empirical study of China. Applied Energy, 87(10), 3262-3270.
  • Çengel, Y. A. (2011). Energy efficiency as an inexhaustible energy resource with perspectives from the US and Turkey. International Journal of Energy Research, 35(2), 153-161.
  • Deng, H., Yeh, C. H., & Willis, R. J. (2000). Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computers & Operations Research, 27(10), 963-973.
  • Energy Information Agency (EIA) (2011), https://www.iea.org/newsroom/news/2011/march/2011-03-08-.html
  • Energy Information Agency (EIA) (2017), Energy Technology. Perspectives 2017. Catalysing Energy Technology Transformations. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/EnergyTechnologyPerspectives2017ExecutiveSummaryEnglishversion.pdf
  • Gómez-Calvet, R., Conesa, D., Gómez-Calvet, A. R., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2014). Energy efficiency in the European Union: What can be learned from the joint application of directional distance functions and slacks-based measures?. Applied Energy, 132, 137-154.
  • Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Pearson Education India.
  • Grösche, P. (2009). Measuring residential energy efficiency improvements with DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 31(2), 87-94.
  • Honma, S., & Hu, J. L. (2008). Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in Japan. Energy Policy, 36(2), 821-833.
  • Hu, J. L., & Wang, S. C. (2006). Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy policy, 34(17), 3206-3217.
  • Hu, J. L., & Kao, C. H. (2007). Efficient energy-saving targets for APEC economies. Energy policy, 35(1), 373-382.
  • Yoon, K., & Hwang, C. L. (1981). TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution)–a multiple attribute decision making, w: Multiple attribute decision making–methods and applications, a state-of-the-at survey.
  • Jebali, E., Essid, H., & Khraief, N. (2017). The analysis of energy efficiency of the Mediterranean countries: A two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach. Energy.991-1000.
  • Mukherjee, K. (2008a). Energy use efficiency in US manufacturing: a nonparametric analysis. Energy Economics, 30(1), 76-96.
  • Mukherjee, K. (2008b). Energy use efficiency in the Indian manufacturing sector: an interstate analysis. Energy policy, 36(2), 662-672.
  • OECD (2011). Towards green growth. https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/48012345.pdf
  • Özkara, Y., & Atak, M. (2015). Regional total-factor energy efficiency and electricity saving potential of manufacturing industry in Turkey. Energy, 93, 495-510.
  • Pusnik, M., Al-Mansour, F., Sucic, B., & Cesen, M. (2016). Trends and prospects of energy efficiency development in Slovenian industry. Energy.
  • Ramanathan, R. (2000). A holistic approach to compare energy efficiencies of different transport modes. Energy Policy, 28(11), 743-747.
  • Ramanathan, R. (2005). An analysis of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in countries of the Middle East and North Africa. Energy, 30(15), 2831-2842.
  • Song, M. L., Zhang, L. L., Liu, W., & Fisher, R. (2013). Bootstrap-DEA analysis of BRICS’energy efficiency based on small sample data. Applied energy, 112, 1049-1055.
  • Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. CRC press.
  • T.C. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı http://www.enerji.gov.tr/File/?path=ROOT%2F1%2FDocuments%2FFaaliyet%20Raporu%2Fetkb_fr_ds_225x300mm_bask%C3%B0_d.pdf, (02.08.2017).
  • Wang, K., Lu, B., & Wei, Y. M. (2013). China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: a range-adjusted measure based analysis. Applied energy, 112, 1403-1415.
  • Wei, Y. M., Liao, H., & Fan, Y. (2007). An empirical analysis of energy efficiency in China's iron and steel sector. Energy, 32(12), 2262-2270.
  • Yu, L., Wang, S., & Lai, K. K. (2010). Foreign-exchange-rate forecasting with artificial neural networks (Vol. 107). Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Zhang, X. P., Cheng, X. M., Yuan, J. H., & Gao, X. J. (2011). Total-factor energy efficiency in developing countries. Energy Policy, 39(2), 644-650.
Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1307-9832
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2008
  • Yayıncı: Kenan ÇELİK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME METODU ÇERÇEVESİNDE ELEKTRİK ARIZA ANALİZİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Ümmü Gülsüm ERASLAN, Figen BALO, Büşra ÇETİN, Ukbe Üsame UÇAR

BÜTÜNLEŞİK ENTROPİ AĞIRLIK VE TOPSIS YÖNTEMLERİ KULLANILARAK TÜRK SİGORTA ŞİRKETLERİNİN PERFORMANSININ ÖLÇÜLMESİ

Selçuk PERÇİN, Özlem SÖNMEZ

G20 ÜLKELERİNİN YENİLENEBİLİR ENERJİ ETKİNLİĞİNİN DENGELİ PERFORMANS AĞIRLIKLARI VE VERİ ZARFLAMA ANALİZİ İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Mihraç KÜPELİ, İhsan ALP

İTHALAT VE İHRACAT ENFLASYONU ŞOKLARININ TÜRKİYE CARİ İŞLEMLER HESABI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Bige KÜÇÜKEFE, Dündar Murat DEMİRÖZ

ENERJİ TÜKETİMİ VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: BDT ÜLKELERİ ÖRNEĞİ

Esra BALLI, Çiler SİGEZE, Müge MANGA

COMPARISON OF SINGLE AND MODIFIED EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING METHODS IN THE PRESENCE OF A STRUCTURAL BREAK

İrem EFE, Esin FİRUZAN, Berhan ÇOBAN

TÜRKİYE’DE SEKTÖRLERİN ÖLÜMLÜ KAZA TÜRLERİNE GÖRE KÜMELENMESİ: İKİLİ KÜMELEME YÖNTEMİ

Ahmet KOCATÜRK, Bülent ALTUNKAYNAK, H. Hasan ÖRKCÜ

DAHA ÖNCE GELİŞTİRİLMİŞ LİKERT TİPİ BİR ÖLÇEK İLE TİP-1 VE TİP-2 BULANIK LİKERT ÖLÇEĞİNİN SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Mesut BİYAN, Hüdaverdi BİRCAN

MOBİL BANKACILIK KULLANIMINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN ARAŞTIRILMASI: ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ AKADEMİK PERSONEL ÜZERİNE BİR UYGULAMA

AYHAN KORKULU, Erkan OKTAY, Yusuf AKAN

TÜRKİYE İLE OECD ÜLKELERİ ARASINDAKİ DIŞ TİCARETİN MARSHALL-LERNER KURALI ÇERÇEVESİNDE İNCELENMESİ

Mehmet Barış ASLAN, Ş. Mustafa ERSUNGUR