___

• Aselage, J., ve Eisenberger, R. (2003). “Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts. A Theoretical Integration”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 491–509.
• Argyris, C.P. (1960). Understanding organizational behavior, Homewood, IL. Dorsey Press.
• Burrell, G., ve Morgan, G (1979). Sociology paradigms and organizational analysis. Heineman Educational Books Ltd: London.
• Burt, R.S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In R.I. Sutton & B.M. Staw (Eds), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 22. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 2000, pp. 345–423.
• Catalyst (2012). Why Diversity Matters. Catalyst, USA.
• Cheetham, G., ve Chivers, G. (2005). Professions, Competence and Informal Learning, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
• Coyle-Shapiro, J. ve Kessler, I. (2000). “Mutuality, stability and psychological contract breach. A longitudinal study”, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Canada, 04-09. Cross., R., Nohria, N ve Parker, A, (2002). Six myths about informal networks. MIT Sloan Management Review 2002, 67-75. Dabos, G.E. ve Rousseau, D.M. (2004). Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, 89, 52–72.
• Davis, L, E. ve Trist, E, L. (1972). Improving the quality of work life: Experience of the socio- technical approach. Background paper commissioned by the U. S. Department of Health, Education. and Welfare for the Work in America Project.
• De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., ve Batagelj, V. (2007). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. New York: Cambridge University Press. Eraut, M. (2007). Learning from Other People in the Workplace, Oxford Review of Education. 33(4), 403-422.
• Freese, C. ve chalk, R. (1996). “Implications of differences in psychological contracts for HRM”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Pscyhology, 5 (4), 501-509.
• Gargiulo, M ve Benassi, M. (2000). “Traped in your own network. Cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital”, Organization Science, 11 (2): 183-196.
• Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory, 201-233.
• Gulati, R. ve Gargulio, M. (1999). “Where do interorganizational networks come from?”. The American Journal of Sociology, 104 (5): 1439-1493.
• Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin F. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri (3.baskı). Ankara: Seçkin yayıncılık.
• Hackman J, R. ve Oldham G, R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance (16): 250-279.
• Hansen, M.T. (1999). The search transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (1): 82-112.
• Harlan, Anne, ve Weiss, C.L. (1982). "Sex differences in factors affecting managerial career advancement." In P. A.Wallace (ed.). Women in the Workplace: 59-100. Boston: Auburn House.
• Hill, L.A. (2004). New manager development for the 21st Century, The Academy of Management Executive, 18(3), 121-126 Ho, V.T., Rousseau, D.M ve Levesque, L.L. (2006). Social networks and the psychological contract. Human Relations, Volume 59(4): 459–481.
• Ho, V.T. (2005). Social influence on evaluations of psychological contract fulfillment. Academy of Management Review, 1, 113–128.
• Ho, V.T. ve Levesque, L.L. (2005). With a little help from my friends (and substitutes): Social referents and influence in psychological contract fulfillment. Organization Science. 16, 275–89.
• Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly,37: 422–447.
• Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
• Krackhardt, D. (1990). "Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations." Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 342-369.
• Krackhardt, D ve Stern, R.N. (1988) Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1988, 51, 123–40.
• Kotter, J. P. (1982). The general managers. New York: Free Press.
• Labovitz, S ve Fry L. (1975). "Inequities in the organizational experiences of women and men: Resources,vested interests, and discrimination," Social Forces,54: 365-381.
• Levin, Daniel Z ve Cross, Rob. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50 (11): 1477-1490.
• Lin, N.(1982). "Social resources and instrumental action." In P. V. Marsden and N. Lin. Social structure and network analysis: 131-145. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Lincoln, J.R ve Miller, J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly. 24: 181–99.
• Labovitz, S ve Fry L. (1975). "Inequities in the organizational experiences of women and men: Resources,vested interests, and discrimination, social forces. 54, 365-381.
• Marsick, V.J ve Watkins, K.E. (1997). Lessons from informal and incidental learning. Management learning: Integrating perspectives in theory and practice. Sage, London. 295-311.
• Miller, J. (1975). "Isolation in organizations: Alienation from authority, control and expressive relations," Administrative Science Quarterly, 20: 260-271.
• Monge, R.P ve Contractor, S.N. (2001). The new handbook of organizational communication:advances in theory, research and methods, Sage Pub.
• Oh, H., Chung, M.H ve Labianca, G. (2004).“Group social capital and group effectiveness”, Academy of Management Journal, 47(68), 860–875.
• O'Leary, Virginia, E ve Jeannette R.I. (1992). "Cracking the glass ceiling: Overcoming isolation and alienation," In U, Sekaran and F, Leong (eds,), Womanpower: Managing in times of demographic turbulence: 7-30, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Parkhe, A., Wasserman, S. ve Ralston, A.D. (2006). “New frontiers in network development”, Academy of Management Review, 31 (3): 560-568.
• Pfeffer, J ve Langton, N. (1993). The effect of wage dispersionon satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively:Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 382–407.
• Purvis, L.J. ve Cropley, M. (2003). “The psychological contracts of national health service nurses”, Journal of Nursing Management. 11: 107–120.
• Ragins, B, R ve Sundstrom E (1989). "Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective." Psychological Bulletin, 105: 51-88. Rangan, S. (2000). The problem of search and deliberation in economic action: When social networks really matter. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 813-828.
• Rice, R.E. ve Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly. 36: 219–44.
• Robinson, S.L. (1996).Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly. 41: 574–99. Robinson, S.L. ve Rousseau, D.M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 15: 245–59.
• Robinson, S.L., Kraatz, M.S ve Rousseau, D.M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal. 37: 137–52.
• Rousseau, D.M. (1989). “Psychological and implied contracts in organizations”. Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal. 2: 121-139.
• Rousseau, D.M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Rousseau, D.M. ve Tıjoriwala, S.A. (1998). “Assessing psychological contracts. Issues, alternatives and measures”, Journal of Organizational Behavior. 19: 679-695.
• Seibert, S.E., Kraimer, M.L. ve Liden, R.C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (2): 219-237.
• Selznick, P. (1949). Tva and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles.
• Sozen, C., Basim, N ve Hazir K. (2009). Social network analysis in organizational studies. International Journal of Business in Management. 1 (1) : 1309-8047.
• Thomas, H.D. ve Anderson, N. (1998). “Changes in newcomers' psychological contracts during organizational socialization, A study of recruits entering the British Army,” Journal of Organizational Behavior. 19: 745-767.
• Topçu, M, K. ve Basım, N. (2015). Kobi’lerde çalışanların kişilik özelliklerinin örgütsel özdeşleşme ve işten ayrılma niyeti üzerine etkisinde psikolojik sözleşme algısının rolü. Turkish Studies. 10 (10): 861-886.
• Tichy, N. M ve Fombrun, C. (1979). Network analysis in organizational settings. Social Science Research. 19: 113-131.
• Tüzün, İ.K ve Çağlar, İ. (2008). Örgütsel özdeşleşme kavramı ve iletişim etkinliği ilişkisi. Journal of Yasar University. 3(9): 1011-1027 Uzzi, B ve Lanchester, R. (2004). Embeddedness and price formation in the corporate law Market. American Sociological Review, 69: 319-344.
• Van Duijn, M. A ve Vermunt, J. K. (2006). What is special about social network analysis methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2- 6.