Sivil güç-realist oyuncu ikileminde Avrupa Birliği'nin küresel konumu üzerine tartışmalar

Bu çalışmada, ağırlıklı olarak Avrupa Birliği (AB) içerisinde dile getirilen, AB’nin nasıl bir küresel oyuncu olduğu ve olması gerektiğine ilişkinargümanlar analiz edilmeye çalışılmaktadır.Bir yandan AB’nin mevcut küresel konumunu ve takındığı genel tavrı pek fazla değiştirme den, esas olarak AB’nin “Normatif Güç Avrupa” modelini devam ettirme sini savunan görüşlere ve bunu gerektiren faktörlere, diğer yandan AB’nin küresel (sert) bir güç olmasını savunan görüşlere değinilmektedir. AB içindeki nispeten normatif düzenin devam ettirilmesini ve tüm kıtaya ya yılmasını savunanlara karşı çıkanlar, AB dışındaki dünyanın hala realist bir düzene sahip olduğunu belirtmektedirler. Avrupa çıkarlarını korumak için, hatta uzun vadede, kendi içinde oluşturduğu normatif düzeni küresel düzeyde koruyabilmek için, kendi dışındaki realist dünyayı görmezlikten gelmeye devam etmemelidir. Normatif modeli savunanlara göreyse, askeri güç ve zor kullanarak çevresinde istikrarı sağlamaya çalışmak veya çı karlarını korumaya kalkışmak AB için kendi temel felsefesine ihanet an lamına gelecektir. Şüphesiz bu Kantçı ve Hobbesyan AB vizyonlarının uzun vadede hangisinin galip geleceği Türkiye’yi de yakından ilgilendir mektedir.

Debating global of the European Union: Civilian power or realist player

This study tries to analyze the arguments about what kind of global player is and should the EU be, by predominantly focusing intra-EU debate. One side of the debate suggests by enumerating the compelling factors, that the current global attitude and positioning of the EU should not be changed much; the 'Normative Power Europe' model should continue. The opposite side suggests that the EU must transform itself to a global (hard) power; the world outside of the EU still has a realist order. The EU should stop overlooking the realist world in order to defend its interests and to globally protect its normative order which were created within, in the long run. According to those who defend the normative model, for the EU, trying to protect its interests and to stabilize its neighborhood by using military might mean nothing but betrayal to its founding philosophy. Therefore, the EU should try to continue the relatively normative order within and should try to spread it globally. Undoubtedly, the result of the debate, between these Kantian and Hobbesian EU visions, will concern Turkey too.

___

  • Ash, Timothy Garton, “The US Has Lost its Focus on Europe. It's Up to Us to Get Our Act Together”, guardian.co.uk, 7 Ekim 2009, (Erişim: 10. 3. 2011).
  • Ash, Timothy Garton, “With This Timid Choice of Leaders, the EU May Have the Faces it Deserves”, guardian.co.uk, 25 Kasım 2009,(Erişim: 10. 3. 2011).
  • Bailes, Alyson J. K., The European Security Strategy An Evolutionary History, SIPRI Policy Paper No. 10, 2005.
  • Bailes, Alyson J. K., “The EU and a ‘Better World’: What Role for the European Security and Defence Policy?”International Affairs, Vol.84, No. 1, 2008, s. 115–130.
  • Boyka, S., “The European Union as a Security Actor” , World Affairs,Vol. 168, No. 2, 2005 s. 51-66.
  • Brezinski, Zbigniew, “An Agenda for NATO: Toward a Global Security Web” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 88, No. 5, 2009, s. 2-21.
  • Bull, Hedley, “Civilian Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?”, JCMS, Vol. 21, No. 1-2, 1982, s. 149-170.
  • Cajal, Maximo, “The Alliance of Civilizations: A Spanish View”, Insight Turkey, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2009, pp. 45-55.
  • Calleo, D. P. “The Broken West”, Survival, Vol. 46, no. 3, 2004, s. 29–38.
  • Caşın, M. ve Özgöker, U., Avrupa Birliği’nin Siyasal ve Ekonomik Temelleri, (İstanbul, Arion Yay. 2008).
  • Carbone, Maurizio, “Italy in the European Union, between Prodi and Berlusconi” The International Spectator, Vol. 44, No. (3), 2009, s. 97-115
  • Cavatorta, F. &B.Tonra, “Normative Foundations in EU Foreign, Security and Defence Policy: The Case of the Middle East Peace Process—A View From The Field” Contemporary Politics, Vol. 13, No 4, 2007, s. 349-363.
  • Chaban, N. Et al, “The European Union As Others See It”, European Foreign Affairs Review Vol. 11, 2006, s. 245-262.
  • Cronin, David, “The 10-Year Term of the EU's Foreign Policy Chief Has Been Marked by Warmongering and Lack of Principle”, guardian.co.uk, 8 Temmuz 2009.
  • De Vasconcelos, A. (der), The European Security Strategy 2003-2008, ISIS Report No. 5, 2009.
  • [ESS 2003] “A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Securıty Strategy” (Javier Solana’nın sunduğu ve Avrupa Konseyi’nin Brüksel Zirvesinde kabul ettiği doküman, 12 Aralık 2003).
  • German, Tracey, “Visibly Invisible: EU Engagement in Conflict Resolution in the South Caucasus”, European Security, Vol. 16, No. 3-4, 2007, s. 357-374.
  • Fioretos, Orfeo, “Europe and the New Global Economic Order: Internal Diversity as Liability and Asset in Managing Globalization”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 17, No: 3, 2010, s. 383-399.
  • Fox J. ve F. Godement A Power Audit of EU-China Relations, (Londra: European Council on Foreign Relations, 2009).
  • [Further Enlargement 2006] Evidence Given to the House of Lords EU Select Committee, ‘The further enlargement of the EU: Threat or Opportunity?’, 2006, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldeucom/273/273.pdf (erişim 18.3.2010).
  • German Marshall Fund, The ‘Transatlantic Trends’ Opinion Poll for 2007 www.transatlantictrends.org/trends/index.cfm?id=54 (erişim 15. 02. 2010).
  • Gowan, R & Brantner,Franziska, A Global Force for Human Rights? An Audit of European Power at the UN- Policy Paper (Londra: European Council on Foreign Relations, 2008).
  • Hague, William, ‘How the UK's New Tory-Led Government Sees its EU Policy’, Europe's World, Summer 2010, www.europesworld.org (erişim 17. 5. 2010).
  • Howorth, J. ve A. Menon, ‘Still Not Pushing Back: Why the European Union is Not Balancing the United States’, Journal of Conflict Resolution,Vol. 53, No. 5, 2009, s. 727-744.
  • Hyde-Price, A., “European Security, Strategic Culture, and the Use of Force”, European Security, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2004 s. 323-34.
  • Jacoby, Wade & Christopher Jones, “The EU Battle Groups in Sweden and the Czech Republic: What National Defense Reforms Tell Us about European Rapid Reaction Capabilities”, European Security, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2008, s. 315-338.
  • Jones, Seth, “The European Union and the Security Dilemma”, Security Studies, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2003, s. 114-156.
  • Kagan, Robert “Power and Weakness” 2002 Policy Review, 2002, No. 113. (www.hoover.org/publications/policy-review/article/7107)(Erişim: 10. 4. 2011).
  • Kaldor M. et al., “Human Security: A New Strategic Narrative for Europe”, International Affairs,Vol. 83, No. 2, 2007, s. 273–288.
  • Kantner, C. ve A. Liberatore, “Security and Democracy in the European Union: An Introductory Framework”,European Security, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2006, s. 363-383.
  • Karabeshkin, Leonid A. ve Dina Spechler, “EU and NATO Enlargement: Russia's Expectations, Responses and Options for the Future”, European Security, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2007, s. 307- 328.
  • Keane, Rory, “European Security and Defence Policy: From Cologne to Sarajevo”, GlobalSociety, Vol. 19, No.1, 2005, s. 89- 103.
  • Khanna, P., “The Metrosexual Superpower”, Foreign Policy, No. 143, 2004, s 66–8.
  • King, Anthony, “The Future of the European Security and Defence Policy”, Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2005, s. 44-61.
  • King, Anthony, “Towards a European Military Culture?”, Defence Studies, Vol. 6, No.3, 2006, s. 257-277.
  • Kouchner, B., “Fransa NATO'ya Neden Geri Dönüyor?”, Le Monde, 17 Mart 2009.
  • Kupchan, C. A. “The End of the West” Atlantic Monthly, Kasım 2002, www.theatlantic.com/doc/200211/kupchan
  • Leonard, M. “Europe's Transformative Power”, CerBulletin, No. 40,2005
  • Lieber, K. ve G. Alexander ‘Waiting for Balancing: Why the World Is Not Pushing Back’, International Security, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2005, pp. 109–139.
  • Lindstrom, Gustav, Enter the EU Battlgroups. Chaillot Paper No. 97, (Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies, 2007).
  • Manners I., ‘European Union ‘Normative Power’ and the Security Challenge’, European Security, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2006, 405-421.
  • Manners I. “The Normative Ethics of the European Union” International Affairs,Vol.84, No 1, 2008, 45–60.
  • Maull, Hanns W. ‘Europe and the New Balance of Global Order’ International Affairs,Vol. 81, No. 4, 2005, s. 775 -799.
  • Mayer, Hartmut, “The Long Legacy of Dorian Gray: Why the European Union Needs to Redefine its Role in Global Affairs”, Journal of European Integration, Vol. 30, No.1, 2008, s. 7-25.
  • Meunier, S. & Nicolaidis, K. “The European Union as a Conflicted Trade Power”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 13, No. 6, 2006, s. 906-925.
  • Missiroli, A. (der), Bigger EU,CFSP, Stronger ESDP? The View from Central Europe, European Union Institute for Security Studies, Occasional papers, No. 34, 2002.
  • Nieto, W. A. S. Cornejo, “A Drop in the Ocean: Bulgaria's NATO Membership and Black Sea Geopolitics”, European Security, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2008, s. 517 -532.
  • Nuland, V., (United States Permanent Representative to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization) Speech to Presse Club and AmCham, 22.02.2008. www.america.gov/st /texttrans-English/2008/February/20080222183349 eaifas0.5647394.html (erişim: 13. 03. 2010).
  • Posen, B. “European Union Security and Defense Policy: Response to Unipolarity?”, Security Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2006, 149–186.
  • Rehn, Olli,“Europe's Smart Power in its Region and the World”, Speech at the European Studies Centre, St Antony's College, University of Oxford,(http://europa.eu/rapid/pre ssReleasesAction.do?)(Erişim: 1.5. 2010).
  • Rogers, J., “From ‘Civilian Power’ to ‘Global Power’: Explicating the European Union’s ‘Grand Strategy”, Through the Articulation of Discourse Theory’ JCMS,Vol. 47, No. 4, 2009, s. 831–862
  • Rynning, Sten, “Peripheral or Powerful? The European Union's Strategy to Combat the Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons”, European Security, Vol. 16, No.3, 2007, s. 267-288.
  • Salmon, Trevor, “United in its Diversity' (or disunited in adversary): That is the Question for the European Union and the European Security and Defence Policy’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2004, s. 447-468.
  • Sangiovanni, Mette Eilstrup, “Why a Common Security and Defence Policy is Bad for Europe”, Survival, Vol. 45, No. 3, s. 193-206.
  • Sauer, Tom, “Struggling on the World Scene: An Over-ambitious EU Versus a Committed Iran”, European Security, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2008, s. 273-293.
  • Sjursen, Helene, “What Kind of Power?”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2006, s. 169- 181.
  • Talbot, Brent J. “The Transatlantic Gap over Iraq”, European Security, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2008, s. 61– 84
  • Toje A., “The European Union as a Small Power, or Conceptualizing Europe’s Strategic Actorness”European Integration,Vol. 30, No. 2, 2008, s. 199–215.
  • Toje A. The EU, NATO and European Defence - A Slow Train Coming, EU Institute for Security Studies, Occasional Paper, No. 74, 2008.
  • Tsoukalis L. “The JCMS Lecture: Managing Diversity and Change in the European Union”, JCMS, 2006, Vol. 44. No. 1. s. 1–15.
  • Vogler J. F. ve Stephan H. “The European Union in Global Environmental Governance: Leadership in the Making?”, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2007, s. 389-413.
  • Wright, Joanne, “The Importance of Europe in the Global Campaign Against Terrorism”, Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2006, s. 281-299.
  • Yiagadeesen Samy, “China's Aid Policies in Africa: Opportunities and Challenges”, The Round Table, Vol. 99, No. 406, 2010, s. 75- 90.
  • Zielonka, J. “Plurilateral Governance in the Enlarged European Union”,JCMS, Vol. 45, No. 1. 2007, s. 187–209.