Democracy in the European Union from the perspective of representative democracy

Özet: Avrupa Birliği kurumsal yapısının ne ölçüde demokratik olduğu, özellikle son yıllarda, akademik araştırmalarda dikkat çeken bir konu haline gelmiştir. Avrupa Birliği'nde demokrasi konulu akademik çalışmalarda karşılaşılan asıl sorun ise, Birlik düzeyinde demokrasinin hangi kriterler ışığında değerlendirilebileceğidir. Makalede, temsili demokrasinin temel prensipleri olan temsili kurumlar, seçimler, siyasi partiler ve hesap verebilirlik ışığında, Birliğin kurumsal yapısının ne ölçüde demokratik olduğunun analiz edilmesi amaçlanmaktadır.

Temsili Demokrasi Perspektifinden Avrupa Birliği'nde Demokrasi

Abstract: To what extent the European Union's political system is democratic has been receiving increased attention in academic research in recent decades, but the main question facing scholars is concerned with how to analyze democracy at the EU level. This article seeks to analyze the extent to which the European Union's political system is democratic from the perspective of representative democracy, that is, this analysis of democracy in the European Union is grounded on the basic principles of representative democracy, representative institutions, elections, political parties and political accountability.

___

  • Andersen, S.S. and Eliassen, K.A. 'Introduction: Dilemmas, Contradictions and the Future of European Democracy', in S.S. Andersen and K.A Eliassen (ed.) The European Union: How Democratic Is It?, (London: Sage Publications, 1998), p.1-12.
  • Beukers, T. 'The Barroso Drama Enhancing Parliamentary Control Over the European Commission and the Member States; Constitutional Development Through Practice', European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 2, No.l, 2006, p. 21-53.
  • Bovens, M., 'Analysing and Assessing Public Accountability. A Conceptual Framework', European Governance Papers (EUROGOV), No.C-06-01,2006, http://www.connex-network.org/eurogov, (accessed February 2, 2010) •
  • Catt, H, Democracy, (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).
  • Christiano,T., 'The Authority of Democracy', The journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2004, p. 266-290.
  • Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Official Journal of the European Union, C 115, Vol. 51, 9 May 2008.
  • Coultrap, J. 'From Parliamentarism to Pluralism: Models of Democracy and the European Union's Democratic Deficit', Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1999, p. 107-135.
  • Council of the European Union, http://www.consilium.europa.eu, (accessed: February 10, 2010)
  • Dahi,- R.A. 'A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness versus Citizen Participation', Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 109, No. 1, 1994, p. 23-34.
  • Dahl, R.A. On Democracy, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998).
  • Druckman, J. N., 'Dynamic Approaches to Studying Parliamentary Coalitions', Political Research Quarterly, Vol.61, No.3, 2008, p. 479-483.
  • European Parliament, Report on the Moderation of Procedures for the Exercise of Implementing Powers-Comitology (Aglietta Report), Brussels, 1998, p. 6.
  • Follesdal A. and Hix, S., 'Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik', European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) No. C-05-02, http://www.connex-network.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-connex-C-05-02.pdf, (accessed: January 14, 2010)
  • Fouilleux, E., De Maillard, J. and Smith, A. 'Technical or Political? The Working Groups of the EU Council of Ministers', Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2005, p. 609-623.
  • Franchino, F., 'Experience and the Distribution of portfolio payoffs in the European Commission', European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 48, No.l, 2009, p. 1-30.
  • Framework Agreement between the Parliament and Commission, http:// www.europarl.europa.eu, (accessed: February 8, 2010)
  • Gerring, J., Thacker, S.C. and Moreno, C., 'Are Parliamentary Systems Better?' Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2009, p. 327-359.
  • Golub', J., 'In the Shadow of the Vote? Decision Making in the European Community,' International Organization, Vol. 53, No. 4, 1999, p. 733-764.
  • Hage, F.M. 'Who Decides in the Council of the European Union?', Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 46, No. 3., 2008, p. 533-558.
  • Hix, S", 'Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses', European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1999, p. 69-106.
  • Hix, S. Electoral institutions and legislative behavior: explaining voting defection in the European Parliament, London, 2004, LSE Research Online, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/archive/0000 0637, (accessed August 7, 2009)
  • Hix, S„ 'Possibilities for European Parties: 2004 and Beyond', Policy paper prepared for an on-line discussion on the future of EU democracy, organised by Open Democracy, 2004, www.lse.ac.uk, (accessed: August 7, 2009)
  • Hix, S. - Marsh, M.,'Punishment or Protest? Understanding European Parliament Elections', The Journal of Politics, Vol. 69, No. 2, 2007, p. 495-510.
  • Hix, S., Noury, A.G. and Roland, G., Democratic Politics in the European Parliament, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
  • Hix, S. What's Wrong with the European Union & How to Fix It, (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008).
  • Hix, S. and Hagemann, S.r 'Could Changing the Electoral Rules Fix European Parliament Elections', Politique Europeenne, No. 28, 2009, p. 27-41.
  • Hobolt, S.B., Spoon,J.J. and Tilley, J., 'A Vote Against Europe? Explaining Defection at the 1999 and 2004 European Parliament Elections', British journal of Political Science, Vol.39, No.l, 2008, p. 93-115.
  • Hobson,C., 'Revolution, Representation and the Foundations of Modern Democracy', European journal of Political Theory, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2008, p. 449-471.
  • Jolly,M.E., 'Debating Democracy in the European Union-Four Concurrent Paradigms', Paper delivered at the EUSA Eighth Biennial International Conference, 27-29 March 2003, Nashville, Tennessee, 2003.
  • Judge, D. and Earnshaw, D., 'The European Parliament and the Commission Crisis:A New Assertiveness?', Governance: An International journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, Vol. 15, No.3, 2002, p. 345-374.
  • Laver.M. and Shepsle, K.A., 'Government Accountability in Parliamentary Democracy', in A.- Przeworski, S.C. Stokes and B. Manin (ed.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 279-296.
  • Lijphart, A., Democracies-. Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984).
  • Lijphart, A., Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).
  • Lodge, J., 'The European Parliament', in S.S. Andersen and K.A Eliassen (ed.) The European Union-.How Democratic Is It?, (London: Sage Publications, 1998), p. 187-214.
  • Lodge, J. and Herman, V., Direct Elections to the European Parliament: A Community Perspective, (London: Macmillan, 1982).
  • Lord,C. and Harris, E., Democracy in the Nw Europe, (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).
  • Lord, C., 'Some Indicators of the Democratic Performance of the European Union and How They Might Relate to the RECON Models', RECON Online Working Paper 2008/11, www.reconproject.eu, (accessed December 12, 2009)
  • Mair, P., Political Parties and Democracy. What Sort of Future, www.ics.ul.pt, (accessed: November 12, 2009)
  • Mair, P. and Thomassen, 1., 'Electoral Democracy and Political Representation in the European Union', Paper prepared for the Conference on Representation, Immigration and the 2009 Election to the European Parliament, Indiana University, Bloomington, 2008.
  • Majone, G., 'The European Community: An "Independent Fourth Branch of Government"?', EUI Working Paper SPS No. 94/17, Florence, European University Institute, 1993.
  • Majone, G., 'The European Commission: The Limits of Centralization and the Perils of Parliamentarization', Governance: An International journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2002, p. 375-392.
  • Manin, B., The Principles of Representative Government, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
  • Manin, B„ Przeworski, A. and Stokes, S.C. 'Introduction', in A. Przeworski, S.C. Stokes and B. Manin (ed.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 1-26.
  • Manin, B., Przeworski, A. and Stokes, S.C., "Elections and Representation', in A. Przeworski, S.C. Stokes and B. Manin (ed.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 29-54.
  • Mansbridge, ]., "Rethinking Representation', American Political Science Review, Vol. 97, No.4, 2003, p. 515-528.
  • Mattila, M. and jane, J.E., "Why Unanimity in the Council? A Roll-Call Analysis of Council Voting', European Union Politics, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2001, p. 31 -53.
  • McGann, A., The Logic of Democracy, (USA: The University of Michigan, 2006).
  • MEPs by Member State and Political Group, 7th parliamentary term, www.europarl.europa.eu , (accessed: November 17, 2009)
  • Moravcsik, A., Another Angle: Few Voters Know or care about the European Union, 2008, www.princeton.edu, (accessed: August 13,2009)
  • Mülgan, R., Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies, (Basingstoke:Palgrave, 2003).
  • Pedersen, M.N., "Euro-parties and European Parties-.New Arenas, New Challenges and New Strategies', in S.S. Andersen and K.A Eliassen (ed.) The European Union-. How Democratic Is It? (London.- Sage Publications, 1998), p. 15-40.
  • Pitkin, H., The Concept of Representation, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967).
  • Pollack, J. et.al., 'On Political Representation: Myths and Challenges', RECON Online Working Paper 2009/03, www.reconproject.eu, (accessed: December 12, 2009)
  • Rasmussen, M. K., 'Another Side of the Story: A Qalitative Case Study of Voting Behaviour in the European Parliament', Politics, Vol.28, No.l, 2008, p. 11-18.
  • Reif, K. and Schmitt, H., 'Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results', European journal of Political Research, Vol.8, No.l, 1980, p. 3-44.
  • Runciman, D., 'The Paradox of Political Representation', T he journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2007, p. 93-114.
  • Sartori, G., 'Party Types, Organisation and Function', West European Politics, Vol. 28, No.l, 2005, p. 5-32.
  • Saward, M., 'Authorisation and Authenticity: Representation and the Unelected', journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 17, No.l, 2009, p. 1-22.
  • Siaroff,. A., 'Comparative Presidencies: The inadequacy of the presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary distinction', European journal of Political Research, Vol. 42, No.3, 2003, p. 287-312.
  • Urbinati, N., 'Condorcet's Democratic Theory of Representative Government', European journal of Political Theory, Vol. 3, No.l, 2004, p. 53-75.
  • Van Biezen,!., How Political Parties Shape Democracy, UC Irvine: Center for the Study of Democracy, 2004, http://escholarship org, (accessed: November 11, 2009)
  • Vieria, M.B. and Runciman, D., Representation, (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008).
  • Weale, A., Democracy, (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).
  • Weber, T. 'Campaign Effects and Second-Order Cycles: A Top-Down Approach to European Parliament Election', European Union Politics, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2007, p. 509-536.
  • Weiler, J.H.H., Haltern, U. and Mayer, F., European Democracy and Us Critique: Five Uneasy Pieces, The Jean Monnet Centre for International and Regional Economic Law & Justice, 1995, http://centers.law.nyu.edu, (accessed: November 12, 2009)
  • The Council of the European Union, http://europa.eu/institutions/inst/council/index_en.htm,(accessed: January 20, 2010)
  • Turnout at the European Elections (1979-2009), http://www.europa.eu/parliament/archive/ele ctions2009/en/turnout_en.html, (accessed: August 7, 2009).