A BOOTSTRAP PANEL GRANGER CAUSALITY ANALYSIS OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN POLITICAL INSTABILITY AND MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES / Politik İstikrarsızlık Ve Makroekonomik Değişkenler Arasındaki İlişkilerin Bootstrap Panel Nedensellik Testi İle Analizi

Bu çalışmada Türkiye, Hindistan, Rusya, Meksika ve Endonezya yükselen piyasa ekonomileri için, 1992 ve 2016 dönemleri arasındaki verilerle, panel bootstrap nedensellik testini kullanarak politik istikrarsızlık ve makroekonomik değişkenler arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisini analiz etmek amaçlanmıştır. Seçilmiş makroekonomik değişkenler büyüme, enflasyon ve döviz kurudur. Çalışmanın sonuçları paneldeki ülkeler arasında farklılık gösterip çok fazla nedensellik ilişkisi olmadığını işaret etmesine rağmen, politik istikrarsızlık ve bazı makroekonomik değişkenler arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisinin kanıtlarını sunmaktadır. Çalışmanın ana bulgularını örneklemdeki tüm ülkelere genellemek zor olsa da, beklentilerden farklı olarak makroekonomik değişkenlerin çoğundaki değişikliklerin politik istikrarsızlıktaki değişikliklere neden olduğu sonucuna varabiliriz. Dolayısıyla, elde edilen bulgulara göre, düşük enflasyon, yüksek büyüme ve istikrarlı döviz kuru açısından ekonomik istikrarın sağlanması, politik istikrarın sağlanmasında kilit faktörler olarak görülmektedir.

A BOOTSTRAP PANEL GRANGER CAUSALITY ANALYSIS OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN POLITICAL INSTABILITY AND MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES / Politik İstikrarsızlık Ve Makroekonomik Değişkenler Arasındaki İlişkilerin Bootstrap Panel Nedensellik Testi İle Analizi

In this study, we try to analyze the causal relationship between political instability and macroeconomic variables for selected emerging markets such as Turkey, India, Russia, Mexico and Indonesia by using panel bootstrap causality tests over the period of 1992 and 2016. Selected macroeconomic variables are growth, inflation and exchange rate. Even though the results of the study differ across nations in the panel and not indicating to many causal relations, they provide the evidences of causal relations between political instability and some macroeconomic variables. Although it is hard to generalize the major findings of the study to all countries in the sample, still we can conclude that unlike the expectations, changes in most of the macroeconomic variables do cause in changes in political instability. Thus, achieving economic stability in terms of low inflation, high growth and stable exchange rate seem to be key factors to achieve political stability. 

___

  • Aisen, A. and Veiga, F. J. (2013). How Does Political Instability Affect Economic Growth?. European Journal of Political Economy, 29, 151-167.
  • Alesina, A., Ozler, S., Roubini, N. and Swagel, P. (1996). Political Instability and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Growth. 1 (2) 189-211.
  • Alesina, A., Perotti, R., (1996). Income Distribution, Political Instability, and Investment. European Economic Review. 40, 1203- 1228.
  • Arslan, Ü. (2011). Siyasi İstikrarsızlık Ve Ekonomik Performans: Türkiye Örneği. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 11(1), 73-80.
  • Asteriou, D., S. Price, (2001). Political Instability and Economic Growth: UK Time Series Evidence. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48(4), 383-399.
  • Baltagi, B. H., Feng, Q., and Kao, C. (2012). A Lagrange Multiplier Test For Cross-Sectional Dependence In A Fixed Effects Panel Data Model. Journal of Econometrics, 170(1), 164-177.
  • Berthélemy, J., Kauffmann, C., Renard, L. and Wegner, L. (2000). Political Instability, Political Regimes and Economic Performance in African Countries. Draft Paper for African Economic Outlook, Paris.
  • Breusch, T., Pagan, A., (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test And Its Application To Model Specifications In Econometrics. Rev. Econ. Stud. 47 (1), 239–253.
  • Campos, N. F., and Nugent, J. B. (2002). Who Is Afraid Of Political Instability?. Journal of Development Economics, 67(1), 157-172.
  • Chen, B., Feng, Y., (1996). Some Political Determinants of Economic Growth: Theory and Empirical Implications. European Journal of Political Economy. 12, 609-627.
  • De Haan, J., Siermann, Clemens L. J., (1996). Political Instability, Freedom, and Economic Growth: Some Further Evidence, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 44(2), 339-350.
  • Demirgil, H. (2011). Politik İstikrarsızlık, Belirsizlik Ve Makroekonomi: Türkiye Örneği (1970-2006). İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 31(2), 123-144.
  • Devereux, M. B. and Wen, J. (1997). Political Instability, Capital Taxation and Growth. European Economic Review, 42, 1635-1651.
  • Edwards, S. and G. Tabellini (1991). Political Instability Political Weakness and Inflation: An Empirical Analysis. NBER Working Paper, 3721, 1–30.
  • Feng, Y. (2001). Political Freedom, Political Instability and Policy Uncertainty: A Study of Political Institutions and Private Investment in Developing Countries. International Studies Quarterly, 45, 271–294.
  • Jong-a-Pin, R., (2009). On The Measurement of Political Instability and Its Impact on Economic Growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 25, 15–29.
  • Khan, S. U., and Saqib, O. F. (2011). Political Instability and Inflation in Pakistan. Journal of Asian Economics, 22(6), 540-549.
  • Kirmanoglu, H. (2003). Political Freedom and Economic Well-Being: A Causality Analysis. International Conference on Policy Modelling. Istanbul, Turkey
  • Kónya, L., (2006). Exports and Growth: Granger Causality Analysis on OECD Countries with a Panel Data Approach. Econ. Model. 23 (6), 978–992.
  • Kuznets, S., S. (1966) Modern Economic Growth: Rate, Structure, and Spread. New Haven:Yale University Press.
  • Olson , M. (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities, New Hawen:Yale University Pres.
  • Olson, M. (1991). Autocracy, Democracy, and Prosperity. Strategy and Choice, 131(157), 131-157.
  • Pesaran, M.H., (2004). General Diagnostic Tests For Cross Section Dependence In Panels. CESifo Working Paper 1229. IZA Discussion Paper, 1240.
  • Pesaran, M.H., (2006). Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panel with A Multifactor Error Structure. Econometrica, 74 (4), 967–1012.
  • Pesaran, M.H., Ullah, A., Yamagata, T., (2008). A Bias-Adjusted LM Test Of Error Crosssection Independence. Econ. J. 11 (1), 105–127.
  • Şanlısoy, S. (2010). Politik İstikrarsızlık-Ekonomik Süreç Politikaları Etkileşimi. Sosyoekonomi, 13(13), 192-214.
  • Swamy, P.A.V.B., (1970). Efficient Inference In A Random Coefficient Regression Model. Econometrica, 38 (2), 311–323.
  • Telatar, E., Telatar, F., Cavusoglu, T., and Tosun, U. (2010). Political Instability, Political Freedom And Inflation. Applied Economics, 42(30), 3839-3847.
  • Zablotsky, Edgardo E.,(1996). Political Stability and Economic Growth. CEMA Working Papers 109, Universidad del CEMA.
  • Zureiqat, H., M. (2005). Political Instability and Economic Performance: A Panel Data Analysis. Available at: http://digitalcommons. macalester.edu/ econaward/1.
Uluslararası Ekonomi İşletme ve Politika Dergisi-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 2017
  • Yayıncı: Ali Rıza SANDALCILAR
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

A BOOTSTRAP PANEL GRANGER CAUSALITY ANALYSIS OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN POLITICAL INSTABILITY AND MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES / Politik İstikrarsızlık Ve Makroekonomik Değişkenler Arasındaki İlişkilerin Bootstrap Panel Nedensellik Testi İle Analizi

Mustafa ÖZER, Merve KOCAMAN

MARKANIN SATIN ALMA DAVRANIŞLARINA ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA: KİVİ ÖRNEĞİ / A Research On The Effect On Purchase Behaviors Of Brand: Example Of Kiwifruit

Mahmut KOÇAN, Erol USTAAHMETOĞLU

GİRİŞİMCİLİK VE İSTİHDAM ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: GEÇİŞ EKONOMİLERİ ÖRNEĞİ / The Relationship Between Entrepreneurship And Employment: The Case Of Transition Economies

Seyil NAJIMUDINOVA, Zamira ÖSKÖNBAEVA

İNOVASYON VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME İLİŞKİSİ: G7 ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNE PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ / The Relationship Between Innovation And Economic Growth: Panel Data Analysis On G7 Countries

İbrahim ÇÜTÇÜ, Turgay BOZAN

MANAGEMENT MODEL OF ZAKAT COLLECTION AND ITS DISTRIBUTION FOR ZAKAT AGENCY / Management Model of Zakat Collection and Its Distribution for Zakat Agency

Rizal FAHLEFI, Asyari HASAN, Alimin ALIMIN

ÖRGÜTSEL PERFORMANSIN ÖNCÜLLERİ OLARAK ETİK LİDERLİK VE KARİYERİZM ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA / A Research On Ethical Leadership And Careerism As Antecedents Of Organizational Performance

Anıl LİMAN, Meral ELÇİ, Gülay MURAT

THE EFFECT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON STOCK RETURNS BY PVAR: AN INVESTIGATION IN BIST / Kurumsal Yönetimin Hisse Senedi Getirisine Etkisinin PVAR Analizi İle Ölçülmesi: BIST’te Bir Araştırma

Seda TURNACIGİL, Hüseyin GÜLER, Hatice DOĞUKANLI

ENDÜSTRİ 4.0’IN MUHASEBE MESLEĞİNE OLASI ETKİLERİ / Possible Effects Of Industry 4.0 On The Accounting Profession

Salih TUTAR

MUHASEBE MESLEK MENSUPLARININ YARATICI MUHASEBE ALGI DÜZEYLERİNİN TESPİTİ: ÇORUM İLİ UYGULAMASI / Determination Of Creative Accounting Perception Levels Of Accounting Professionals: Çorum Province Application

Habib AKDOĞAN, Nurcan SÜKLÜM

ELEKTRİK TÜKETİMİNİN SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMAYA ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE ÜZERİNDE AMPİRİK VE DAVRANIŞSAL BİR İNCELEME / The Effect Of Electricity Consumption On Sustainable Development: An Empirical And Behavioural Investigation On Turkey

Mehmet ÇINAR, Fikret YETKİN, Selahattin BEKTAŞ