OKUL MÜDÜRÜNÜN LİD ERLİK UYGULAMALARININ MÜDÜR YARDIMCILARININ LİDERLİK ÖZ YETERLİĞİNE KATKISININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMES

AN EVALUATION OF PRINCIPALS’ LEADERSHIP PRACTICES ON ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS’ LEADERSHIP SELF-EFFICACY

The aim of the study was to evaluate the principles' leadership practices on the assistantprincipals’ leadership self-efficacy. The hypotheses of the qualitative research method were usedin the study. The data of the study were obtained through two semi-structured interview formswere developed. One was applied to the six principals and the other one was to ten assistantprincipals in the secondary school in Ankara. The data were analyzed by using content analysis. Inorder to increase the internal validity of the study, themes and codes and the data analysisprocess were conducted with the help of experts who had experience in assessment andevaluation of qualitative researches. When the opinions of the participants were examined, itwas seen that the strategies used by the principles in the development of the leadership role ofassistant principals were various. When these strategies were examined, it was determined thatthere were behaviors such as giving challenging tasks, giving feedback, giving autonomy to them,encouraging, and praising them about the tasks they had completed. Moreover, it wasunderstood that the assistant principals had an opportunity to co-learn with their colleagues ontheir daily tasks and these tasks supported their self-efficacy beliefs.

___

  • Akın, U. (2014). Okul Müdürlerinin İnisiyatif Alma Düzeyleri ile Öz-Yeterlikleri Arasındaki İlişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 20(2), 125-149.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward A Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). The Explanatory and Predictive Scope of Self-efficacy Theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373.
  • Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in Changing Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
  • Bandura, A., & Kupers, C. J. (1964). Transmission of Patterns of Self-reinforcement through Modeling. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69(1), 1-9.
  • Bandura, A., & Mischel, W. (1965). Modifications of Self-imposed Delay of Reward through Exposure to Live and Symbolic Models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(3), 698-705.
  • Bandura, A., & Whalen, C. K. (1966). The Influence of Antecedent Reinforcement and Divergent Modeling Cues on Patterns of Self-reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(4), 373-382.
  • Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
  • Black, L. T. (2003). The Development and the Validation of the Principal Efficacy Scale. (Ph.D. Thesis), Sam Houston State University, USA.
  • Bossert, S. T., Dwyer, D. C., Rowan, B., & Lee, G. V. (1982). The Instructional Management Role of the Principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34-64.
  • Bülbül, T., & Çuhadar, C. (2012). Okul Yöneticilerinin Teknoloji Liderliği Öz-yeterlik Algıları ile Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojilerine Yönelik Kabulleri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(23), 474-499.
  • Dimmock, C., & Hattie, J. (1996). School Principals’ Self‐efficacy and Its Measurement in a Context of Restructuring. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(1), 62-75.
  • Eden, D. (1990). Pygmalion in Management. Lexington: Lexington Books.
  • Fullan, M. (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Change (4 ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Gronn, P. (2003). The New Work of Educational Leaders: Changing Leadership Practice in an Era of School Reform. London: Sage Publications.
  • Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for Learning: Lessons from 40 Years of Empirical Research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142.
  • Harvey, M. J. (1994). The Deputy Principalship: Retrospect and Prospect. International Journal of Educational Management, 8(3), 15-25.
  • Hausman, C., Nebeker, A., McCreary, J., & Donaldson, G. (2002). The Worklife of the Assistant Principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(2), 136-157.
  • Hogben, M., & Byrne, D. (1998). Using Social Learning Theory to Explain Individual Differences in Human Sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 35(1), 58-71.
  • Işık, A., & Gümüş, E. (2017). Yönetici Öz-yeterliği ve Okul Etkililiği Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi [Investigation of Relationship between Principals’ Self Efficacy and School Effectiveness]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 25(1), 419-434.
  • Köybaşı, F., & Dönmez, B. (2017). Okul Yöneticilerinin Girişimcilik, Öz-yeterlik ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Algılarının Analizi [The Analysis of School Principals’ Perception of Entrepreneurship, Self Efficacy and Organizational Commitment]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 23(2), 249-280.
  • Kurbanoğlu, S. S. (2004). Öz Yeterlik İnancı ve Bilgi Profesyonelleri İçin Önemi. Bilgi Dünyası, 5(2), 137-152.
  • Kwan, P. (2009). The Vice-principal Experience as a Preparation for the Principalship. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(2), 191-205.
  • Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006). Seven Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership. Nottingham: National College of School Leadership.
  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking Leadership to Student Learning: The Contributions of Leader Efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496-528.
  • Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K., & Anderson, S. (2010). Investigating the Links to Improved Student Learning: Final Report of Research Findings. Twin Cities: University of Minnesota, Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement.
  • Malone, Y. (2002). Social Cognitive Theory and Choice Theory: A Compatibility Analysis. International Journal of Reality Therapy, 22(1), 10-13.
  • May, H., & Supovitz, J. A. (2011). The Scope of Principal Efforts to Improve Instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 332-352.
  • McCollum, D. L., Kajs, L. T., & Minter, N. (2006). School Administrators’ Efficacy: A Model and Measure. Education Leadership Review, 7(1), 42-48.
  • McDonald, T., & Siegall, M. (1992). The Effects of Technological Self-efficacy and Job Focus on Job Performance, Attitudes, and Withdrawal Behaviors. The Journal of Psychology, 126(5), 465-475.
  • Murphy, S. E., & Ensher, E. A. (1999). The Effects of Leader and Subordinate Characteristics in the Development of Leader-member Exchange Quality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(7), 1371-1394.
  • Oleszewski, A., Shoho, A., & Barnett, B. (2012). The Development of Assistant Principals: A Literature Review. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), 264-286.
  • Palmer, D. H. (2006). Sources of Self-efficacy in a Science Methods Course for Primary Teacher Education Students. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 337-353.
  • Prussia, G. E., Anderson, J. S., & Manz, C. C. (1998). Self-leadership and Performance Outcomes: The Mediating Influence of Self-efficacy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(5), 523-538.
  • Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Leadership Types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674.
  • Saldaña, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Schyns, B. (2001). The Relationship between Employees’ Self-monitoring and Occupational Self-efficacy and Transformational Leadership. Current Research in Social Psychology, 7(3), 30-42.
  • Schyns, B. (2004). The Influence of Occupational Self-efficacy on the Relationship of Leadership Behavior and Preparedness for Occupational Change. Journal of Career Development, 30(4), 247-261.
  • Schyns, B., & Von Collani, G. (2002). A New Occupational Self-efficacy Scale and Its Relation to Personality Constructs and Organizational Variables. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 219-241.
  • Senemoğlu, N. (2004). Gelişim, Öğrenme ve Öğretim. Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi.
  • Shea, C. M., & Howell, J. M. (1999). Charismatic Leadership and Task Feedback: A Laboratory Study of Their Effects on Self-efficacy and Task Performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 375-396.
  • Smith, W., Guarino, A. J., Strom, P., & Adams, O. (2006). Effective Teaching and Learning Environments and Principal Self-efficacy. Journal of Research for Educational Leaders, 3(2), 4-23.
  • Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. R. (2004). Principals’ Sense of Efficacy: Assessing a Promising Construct. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(4), 573-585.
  • Usher, E. L. (2009). Sources of Middle School Students’ Self Efficacy in Mathematics: A Qualitative Investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 275-314.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.
  • Yukl, G. A. (2006). Leadership in Organizations (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and Educational Development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in Changing Societies (pp. 202-232). New York: Cambridge University Press.