A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON EFL TEXTBOOKS IN TURKISH AND GERMAN SECONDARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

In foreign language educational systems of Turkey and Germany, as in most other countries in the world, textbooks are used as a primary source of instruction in public schools. The books in concern are selected by the Ministry of National Education (MoNE) in Turkey while they might vary across federal states in Germany which has its own education programme, schools and standards although overall educational policies are set by the Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). This study was motivated to compare EFL textbooks introduced public secondary schools in Turkey and the Federal State of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany to reveal whether reading comprehension texts in the two books significantly differ with regard to lexical density (complexity) and readability. Data were compiled from reading texts in these books, and quantitatively analysed through an online text analysis programme. The findings showed that both textbooks include reading texts with high lexical density and readability. Besides, EFL textbook used in Turkey contains comprehension texts with higher lexical density and readability than the one used in Germany. The study presents a couple of practical implications on these findings, and concludes with a few suggestions for further research.

PDF

___

Anwar, A. S. (2017). Lexical Density of Reading Material in English Textbooks for the Tenth Graders: Interlanguage and Pathway to English. Skripsi Sarjana Thesis, Universitas Muria Kudus.

Bond, S. (2017). Gonning Fox Index. Retreieved from: http://gunning-fog-index.com/index.html on 26 April 2017.

Bush, L. & Sanford-Moore, E. (2016). Primary and Secondary English Textbook Complexity in the Republic of Korea. MetaMetrics. Retrieved from https://metametrics.s3.amazonaw s.com/public/dynamic/international/pdfs/MM_Textbook_complexity_in_Korea_. Digital.pdf on 15 April 2017.

Camiciottoli, B. C. (2007). The Language of Business Studies Lectures: A Corpus-assisted Analysis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Davids, V. (2002). “Determining Text Difficulty”. Basehor-Linwood, Virtual School, 27: 1-3.

Davison, A. & Green, G. M. (Eds.) (1988). Linguistic Complexity and Text Comprehension: Readability Issues Reconsidered. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

DuBay, W. H. (2004). The Principles of Readability. Retrieved from: http://www.impact- information.com/impactinfo/readability02.pdf on 12 February 2017.

Economou, N. (1994). “Lexical Density as a Characteristic of the Discourse of History of Greek Textbooks.” In I. Philippaki-Warburton, K. Nicolaidis & M. Sifianou (Eds.) Themes in Greek Linguistics. 289-296.

English G. Lighthouse Band 2. (2017). Cornelsen Verlag GmbH, Berlin.

English Net 6. (2016). Evrensel İletişim Yayınları. Ankara.

Foltz, P. W. & Rosenstein, M. (2015). “Longitudinal Analysis of First Grade Texts Using the Reading Maturity Metric.” American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting.

Graves, K. (2000). Designing Language Course: A Guide for Teachers. Boston: Henley and Henly Thomson Learning.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Spoken and Written Language. Geelong Vict: Deakin University.

Harmer, J. (1998). How to Teach English. England: Addison Wesley Longman.

Hartnett S. G. (1998). “English Nominalization Paradoxes.” Presented at Linguistic Association of the South- West, Arizona State University.

Johnson, P. (1981). Effects on Reading Comprehension of Language Complexity and Cultural Background of a Text. TESOL Quarterly, 15(2): 169-181.

Johansson, V. (2008). Lexical Diversity and Lexical Density in Speech and Writing: a Developmental Perspective. Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics and Phonetics.

İj, D. & Zhang, R. (2015). “On Evaluation of Chinese College English Textbook from Learners’ Perspective.” In D. Tan (Ed.), Engineering Technology, Engineering Education and Engineering Management. 65-69.

Larki, Z. N. & Gorjian, B. (2015). “The Effect of Lexical Density Awareness (LDA) on Developing Reading Comprehension of Iranian EFL students: High Achievers Versus Low Achievers.” International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 8(4): 95-106.

Nesia, B. H.& Ginting, S.A. (2014). “Lexical Density Reading Texts for Senior High School.” Transform Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning of FBS UNIMED, 3(2): 1-14.

McNeill, A. (1994). What Makes Authentic Materials Different? The Case of English Language Materials for Educational Television. ERIC. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED386057.pdf ERIC database on 30 April 2017.

Ngan, N.N.T. & Thao, N T.T. (2016). “Lexical Density and Readability of Non-English Majored Freshmen’s Writing in Vietnamese Context.” 7 th International Conference on TESOL: Innovations in English Language Teaching and Learning, 11-13 August, Qui Nhon City, Vietnam. Retrieved from http://www.vnseameo.org/TESOLConference2016/materials/06_1.pdf on 20 April 2017.

Oakland, T. & Lane, H. B. (2004). “Language, Reading, and Readability Formulas: Implications for Developing and Adapting tests.” International Journal of Testing, 4(3): 239-252.

Owu-Ewie, C. (2014). “Readability of Comprehension Passages in Junior High School (JHS) English Textbooks in Ghana.” Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 3(2): 35-68.

Pratiwi, A. H. (2014). Lexical Density of English Textbook of Second Year of Senior High School. English Study Program Faculty of Humanities Dian Nuswantoro University.

Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1992). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching And Applied Linguistics. London: Longman.

Richards, J. C. (2018). Course Book Versus Textbook. Retrieved from: https://www.professorjackrichards.com/2075/ on 12 February 2018.

Berber Sardinha A.P. (1996). Review: WordSmith Tools. Computers and Texts No. 12. Retrieved from http://users.ox.ac.uk/~ctitext2/publish/comtxt/ct12/sardinha.html on 11 April 2017.

Sheldon, L.E. (1988). Evaluating ELT Textbooks and Materials. ELT Journal, 42(4):237-246.

Stephens, C. (2000). All about Readability. Retrieved from http://plainlanguage.com/newreadability on 10 April 2017.

Tabatabaei, E. & Bagheri, M. S. (2013). “Readability of Reading Comprehension Texts in Iranian Senior High Schools Regarding Students’ Background Knowledge and Interest.” Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(5): 1028-1035.

Textalyser (2004). Textalyser Online Text Analysis Tool. Retrieved from: http://textalyser.net/ on 21 March 2017.

To, Vinh, Fan, Si, & Thomas, Damon. (2013). “Lexical Density and Readability: A Case Study of English

Textbooks.” Internet Journal of Language, Culture, and Society, 37: 61-71.

Ure, J. (1971). “Lexical density and register differentiation.” In G.E. Perren & J.L.M. Trimm (Eds) Applications of Linguistics: selected papers of the 2nd International Congress of Applied Linguists, London: Cambridge University Press, 443-452.

Ventola, E. (1996). “Packing and Unpacking of Information in Academic Texts”. In: Ventola Eija & Anna Mauranen (Eds.). Academic Writing. Intercultural and Textual Issues. Amsterdam, Philadelphia. Benjamins. 153-194.

WYLIE (2017). The Gunning Fog index: Are you smart enough to write for a fifth-grader?. Retrieved from http://www.wyliecomm.com/2016/04/the-gunning-fog-index/, on 3 April 2017.