Küresel İslami Borsalarda Zayıf ve Yarı-Güçlü Piyasa Etkinliklerinin Geçerliliğinin Araştırılması: Doğrusal ve Doğrusal Olmayan Birim Kök Testleri ve Bootstrap Nedensellik Yaklaşımı ile Kanıtlar

Bu çalışmanın amacı, literatürde yer alan yeni ekonometrik yöntemler kullanılarak seçilmiş İslami endekslerde etkin piyasa hipotezinin zayıf ve yarı-güçlü formlarının geçerli olup olmadığını test etmektir. Bu amaçla, zayıf form etkinliği doğrusal ve doğrusal olmayan birim kök testleri kullanılarak, yarı-güçlü form etkinliği ise bootstrap nedensellik testi kullanılarakincelenmiştir. Birim kök testleri, zayıf form etkinliğinin İslami endekslerin çoğu için desteklendiğini ve hisse senedi fiyatlarının tüm tarihsel bilgileri tam olarak yansıttığını göstermiştir. Bootstrap nedensellik sonuçları, yarı güçlü formun FTSEBMI, KATLM ve ACWI olmak üzere üç borsada geçerli olduğunu göstermiştir. Genel olarak sonuçlar yatırımcının İslami borsalarda normalüstü kar elde etme şansının olmadığını göstermektedir. Borsaların etkinliklerinin arttırılması sermaye tahsisi, hisse senedi fiyat öngörülebilirliği ve uluslararası portföy çeşitlendirilmesi üzerinde önemli bir etkiye sahip olacaktır. Dolayısıyla, finansal piyasaların performansı etkin piyasa hipotezinin geçerliliğinden etkilendiği ve bu yönde politikaların geliştirilmesi gerektiği düşünülmektedir.

Examining the Validity of the Weak and Semi-Strong Market Efficiencies at the Global Islamic Stock Markets: Evidence Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests and Bootstrap Causality Approach

The objective of this paper is to test whether the validity of the weak and semi-strong form ofefficient market hypothesis in selected Islamic stock markets using new econometric methods inthe literature. To this end, the weak-form is examined employing linear and nonlinear unit roottests while the semi-strong form is examined employing bootstrap causality test. The unit roottests revealed that the weak form is supported for most of the Islamic stocks, indicating that stockprices fully reflect all historical information. The bootstrap causality results indicate that thesemi-strong form holds in the three stock markets, namely, FTSEBMI, KATLM, and the ACWI.The overall results suggest that the investor has not a chance to make an abnormal profit inIslamic stock markets. Enhancing the efficiency of the stock markets would have a significanteffect on capital allocation, equity price predictability and international portfolio diversification.Therefore, the performance of financial markets is affected by the validity of efficient markethypothesis and such kind of policies should be implemented.

___

  • Albaity, M., Ahmad, R., (2008). “Performance of Syariah and composite indices: evidence from Bursa Malaysia”, Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 4, No. 1, 23-43.
  • Ali, S., Shahzad, S. J. H., Raza, N., Al-Yahyaee, K. H., (2018). “Stock market efficiency: A comparative analysis of Islamic and conventional stock markets”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 503, 139-153.
  • Al-Khazali, O. A., Leduc, G., Alsayed, M. S., (2016). “A market efficiency comparison of Islamic and non-Islamic stock indices”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 52, No. 7, 1587-1605.
  • Al-Khazali, O., Lean, H. H., Samet, A., (2014). “Do Islamic stock indexes outperform conventional stock indexes? A stochastic dominance approach”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 28, No. C, 29-46.
  • Ardiansyah, M., Qoyum, A., (2011). “Testing the semi-strong form efficiency of islamic capital market with response to information content of divident announcement-a study in Jakarta”, International Conference on Management Proceeding, 011-094-374, Conference Master Resources.
  • Arouri, M. E., Emeur, H. B., Jawadi, N., Jawadi, F., Louhichi, W., (2013). “Are Islamic finance innovations enough for investors to escape from a financial downturn? Further evidence from portfolio simulations”, Applied Economics, Vol. 45, No. 24, 3412-3420.
  • Atakan, T., (2008). “Testing the day-of-the-week effect and January effect anomalies at Istanbul Stock Exchange with Arch-Garch models”, Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business Administration, Vol. 37, No. 2, 98-110.
  • Beik, I. S., Wardhana, W., (2011). “The relationship between Jakarta Islamic index and other selected markets: Evidence from impulse response function”, Majalah Ekonomi, Vol. XXI, No. 2, 100-109.
  • Ben Rejeb, A., Arfaoui, M., (2017). “Conventional and Islamic stock markets: What about financial performance?” Journal of Emerging Economics & Islamic Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, 45-62.
  • Ben Rejeb, A., Arfaoui, M., (2019). “Do Islamic stock indexes outperform conventional stock indexes? A state space modeling approach”, European Journal of Management and Business Economics, Vol. 28, No. 3, 301-322.
  • Bodie, Z., Kane, A., Marcus, A. J., (2009). Investments (8th ed.), McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. International 8. Edition, New York.
  • Bouchaud, J. P., Farmer, J. D., Lillo, F., (2009). “How Markets slowly digest changes in supply and demand”, Handbook of Financial Markets: Dynamics and Evolution, Chapter 2, pp. 57-160.
  • El Khamlichi, A., Kabir, S., Arouri, M., Teulon, F., (2014). “Are Islamic equity indices more efficient than their conventional counterparts? Evidence from major global index families”, Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 30, No. 4, 1137-1150.
  • Fama, E., (1970). “Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 25, No. 2, 383-417.
  • Fusthane, O., Kapingura, F., (2017). “Weak form market efficiency of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange: Pre, during and post the 2008 global financial crisis”, Journal of Economics and Behavoiral Studies, Vol. 9, No. 5, 29-42.
  • Gemici, E., Polat, M., (2018). “Random walk hypothesis in MIST stock markets”, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 1, 129-142.
  • Girard, E., Hassan, M. K., (2008). “Is there a cost to faith-based investing: Evidence from FTSE Islamic indices”, The Journal of Investing, Vol. 17, 112-121.
  • Guidi, F., Gupta, R., (2011). “Are ASEAN stock market efficient? Evidence from univariate and multivariate variance ratio tests,” Discussion Papers in Finance: 201113, Griffith University.
  • Guris, B., Yasgul, S., (2015). “Does the Fisher hypothesis hold for the G7 countries? Evidence from ADL threshold cointegration test”, Quality & Quantity, Vol. 49, No. 6, 2549-2557.
  • Guris, B., Yasgul, Y. S., Tirasoglu, M., (2016). “An empirical investigation of purchasing power parity (PPP) for NORDIC countries: Evidence from linear and nonlinear unit root tests”, International Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 10, No. 1, 131-137.
  • Guyot, A., (2011). “Efficiency and dynamics of Islamic investment: Evidence of geopolitical effects on Dow Jones Islamic Market indexes”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 47, No. 6, 24-45.
  • Hacker, R. S., Hatemi-J, A., (2006). “Tests for causality between integrated variables using asymptotic and bootstrap distributions: Theory and application”, Applied Economics, Vol. 38, No. 13, 1489-1500.
  • Hakim, S., Rashidian, M., (2004). Risk and Return of Islamic Stock Market Indexes, Proceedings of the International Seminar of Nonbank Financial Institutions: Islamic Alternatives, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Hamid, K., Suleman, M. T., Shah, S. Z. A., Akash, R. S. I., (2010). “Testing the weak form of efficient market hypothesis: Empirical evidence from Asia-Pacific markets”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Vol. 58, 121-133.
  • Harvey, D. I., Leybourne, S. J., (2007). “Testing for time series linearity”, Econometrics Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, 149-165.
  • Harvey, D. I., Leybourne, S. J., Xiao, B., (2008). “A powerful test for linearity when the order of integration is unknown”, Studies Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1-24.
  • Hassan, M. K., (2004). Risk, Return and Volatility of Faith-Based Investing: The Case of the Dow Jones Islamic Index, Proceedings of the Fifth Harvard University Forum on Islamic Finance, Dynamics and Development Cambridge, Massachusetts. Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Harvard University, 43-67.
  • Hoque, H., Jae, H. K., Pyun, C. S., (2007). “A comparison of variance ratio tests of random walk: a case of Asian emerging stock markets”, International Review of Economics & Finance, Vol. 16, No. 4, 488-502.
  • Investing.com, https://tr.investing.com/indices/global-indices
  • Jamaani, F., Roca, E., (2015). “Are the regional Gulf stock markets weak-form efficient as single stock markets and as a regional stock market?” Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 33, 221-246.
  • Jawadi, F., Jawadi, N., Cheffou, A., (2015). “Are Islamic stock markets efficient? A time-series analysis”, Applied Economics, Vol. 47, No. 16, 1686-1697.
  • Kabbani, A. L., (2016). Efficiency of Bursa Malaysia: Analysing Islamic Indices and Their Counterparties, Final Report in Master Dissertation, Universidade Catolica Portuguesa.
  • Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y., Snell, A., (2003). “Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 112, No. 2, 359-379
  • Kiyilar, M., (1997). Etkin Pazar Kuramı ve Etkin Pazar Kuramının İMKB’de İrdelenmesi, Sermaye Piyasası Publication, No.86, Ankara.
  • Kruse, R., (2011). “A new unit root test against ESTAR based on a class of modified statistics”, Statistic Papers, Vol. 52, No. 1, 71-85.
  • Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., Shin, Y., (1992). “Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 54, No. 1-3, 159-178.
  • Lean, H. H., Mishra, V., Smyth, R., (2015). Is Investing in Islamic Stocks Profitable? Evidence from the Dow Jones Islamic Market Indexes, Monash Business School Department of Economics Discussion Paper, 33/15, 1-30, Australia.
  • Lee, J., Strazicich, M. C., (2013). “Minimum LM unit root test with one structural break”, Economics Bulletin, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2483-2492.
  • Miah, M. D., Banik, S. L., (2013). “Measuring weak-form of market efficiency: The case of Dhaka stock exchange”, International Journal of Financial Services Management, Vol. 6, No. 3, 219-235.
  • Munir, Q., Mansur, K. M., (2009). “Is Malaysian stock market efficient? Evidence from threshold unit root tests”, Ecomomic Bulletin, Vol. 29, No. 2, 1359-1370.
  • Newey, W. K., West, K. D., (1987). “A Simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix”, Econometrica, Vol. 55, No. 3, 703-708.
  • Nurrachmi, R., (2018). “Movements of Islamic stock indices in selected OIC countries”, Jurnal Al-Muzara’ah, Vol. 6, No. 2, 77-90.
  • Obaidullah, M., (2001). “Ethics and efficiency in Islamic stock markets”, International Journal of Islamic Financial Services, Vol. 3, No. 2, 145-159.
  • Ocel, Y., Kaban, T., (2019). “Investigation of the relationship between Islamic marketing and Islamic finance of customers of participation banks”, Third Sector Social Economic Review, Vol. 54, No. 1, 377-393.
  • Ozmen, T., (1997). “Dünya borsalarında gözlemlenen anomaliler ve İstanbul menkul kıymetler borsası üzerine bir deneme”, SPK Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Phillips, P. C. B., Perron, P., (1988). “Testing for a unit root in time series regression”, Biometrika, Vol. 75, No. 2, 335-346.
  • Rehman, S., Chhapra, I. U., Kashif, M., Rehan, R., (2018). “Are stock prices a random walk? An empirical evidence of Asian stock markets”, Etikonomi, Vol. 17, No. 2, 237-252.
  • Reilly, F. K., (1989). Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management (3rd ed.), The Dryden Press., Orlando.
  • Rizvi, S. A. R., Dewandaru, G., Bacha, O. I., Masih, M., (2014). “An analysis of stock market efficiency: Developed vs Islamic stock markets using MF-DFA”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 407, 86-99.
  • Sakarya, S., Zeren, F., Akkus, H. T., (2018). “Testing the weak form market efficiency in participation indices: An application on Turkey”, Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 1, 101-113.
  • Sarili, S., Yidirtan, Z. D. C., (2016). “Comparative analysis of key performance indicators of Islamic index”, Marmara University Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Vol. 38, No. 2, 273-291.
  • Savasan, F., Yardimoglu, F., Besel, F., (2015). “The effect of exogenous shocks on participation index of Borsa Istanbul: Permanent or temporary?” International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 81-92.
  • Setianto, R. H., Manap, T. A. D., (2015). “Examining the Islamic stock market efficiency: Evidence from nonlinear ESTAR unit root tests”, Indonesian Capital Market Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, 15-24.
  • Simpson, J., Evans, J., (2004). Interdependence in Gulf Cooperation Stock Markets, Working Paper Series of the University of Wollongong, No.4.
  • Tari, R. (2008). Ekonometri (5th ed.), Kocaeli University Publication, No. 172, İstanbul.
  • Tunali, H. N., Pekcoskun, K., (2019). A panel data analysis for conventional and participation banks: An analysis based on Turkish banking sector, Third Sector Social Economic Review, Vol. 54, No. 4, 1583-1601.
  • Yilanci, V., (2013). Lecture Notes of Econometrics Seminar, Sakarya University, 1-104.
  • Zeren, F., Konuk, F., (2013). “Testing the random walk hypothesis for emerging markets: Evidence from linear and non-linear unit root tests”, Romanian Economic and Business Review, Vol. 8, No. 4, 61-71.
  • Zivot, E., Andrews, D. W. K., (1992). “Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Vol. 10, No. 3, 251-270.
Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-1237
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1941
  • Yayıncı: Türk Kooperatifçilik Kurumu