İnsanlar Bencil mi? Davranışsal İktisat Oyunlarından Hareketle Osmanlı’da Vâkıfların Yoksulluğu Azaltan Alturistik Davranışları

İnsanların var oldukları ilk günden beri aldıkları kararlarda sadece kendi faydalarını gözetmedikleri empati kurarak diğer insanları da düşündükleri bilinmektedir. Bu tarz olumlu sosyal davranışlar alturizm, empati ve başkalarını sevmek olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Alturizm olarak da kavramsallaştırılan ödül veya karşılık beklemeden sergilenen ve kişinin bir bedel ödeyebileceği alturistik davranış, diğerinin faydasını öncelemektedir. Ana akım iktisat bireylerin kendi çıkarlarını maksimize etmesinden bahsetmesine rağmen, çıkar gözetmeden diğerinin refahını arttıracak her türlü davranış da özünde iktisadi bir eylemdir. Çalışmanın amacı Osmanlı vakıf kurucularının başkalarının çıkarını gözeten veya bencil olmayan davranışlarını davranışsal iktisat oyunları ve kavramlarından yola çıkarak alturistik özellikler açısından araştırmaktır. Sonuç olarak, ültimatom, diktatör, güven ve kamu malı oyunlarında ortaya çıkan empatiye bağlı alturistik davranışın vakıf kurucularının alturistik davranışlarıyla aynı olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Are People Selfish? Based on the Behavioral Economics Games, the Altruistic Behaviors of Waqf Founder the Ottoman Empire to Reduce Poverty

It is known that people do not merely consider their interests but also have been thinking about other peoplewith empathy in making decisions since the very first day of their existence. This type of positive socialbehavior is considered as altruism, empathy and love toward others. Altruistic behaviors, exhibited withoutexpecting a reward or something in return, prioritize the benefit of the others. Although mainstreameconomics mentions individuals maximizing their own interests, any behavior that will increase the welfareof the other regardless of interest is essentially an economic action. The aim of the study is to investigatethe behaviors of Ottoman waqf founders in favor of others or non-selfish behaviors in terms of altruisticfeatures based on behavioral economics games and concepts. After all, it was determined that empathyinduced altruistic behavior that emerged in the ultimatum, dictator, trust and public good games, were thesame as the waqf founders’ altruistic behaviors.

___

  • Aktan, C. C., Bahçe, A. B., (2015). “A Critique of Altruism from the Perspectives of Public Choice and Game Theory”, Journal of Law and Economics Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 25-56. (in Turkish).
  • Andreoni, J., Bernheim, B. D., (2009). “Social image and the 50-50 norm: a theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects”, Econometrica, Vol. 77, pp. 1607-1636.
  • Ashraf, N., Camerer C. F., Loewenstein, G., (2005). “Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 131-145.
  • Barkan, O. L., (1939). "Les Problemes Fonciers dans l'Empire Ottoman au Temps de sa Fondation", 1 Annales d'Histoire Sociale, pp. 233-237.
  • Batson, C. D., (1987). “Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic?”, in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 20, pp. 65–122.
  • Batson, C. D., (1991). The Altruism Question: Toward a Social-Psychological Answer, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.
  • Batson, C. D., Bolen, M. H., Cross, J. A., Neuringer-Benefiel, H. E., (1986). “Where is the altruism in the altruistic personality?”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 212-220.
  • Batson. C. D., (1990). “How social an animal? The human capacity for caring”, American Psychologist, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 336-346.
  • Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K., (1995). “Trust reciprocity and social history”, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 122-142.
  • Bulut, M., Korkut, C., (2017). “A Look to The Ottoman Cash Waqfs As Altruistic Finance Model”, Philanthropy for Humanitarian Aid (CONPHA).
  • Bulut, M., Korkut, C., (2019). “A Look to Cash Waqfs as an Indicator of Ottoman Financial Mentality”, The Journal of Waqfs, Special Issue.
  • Bulut, M., (2015). “Ethics and Economics”, ADAM Academy Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 105-123. (in Turkish).
  • Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., Troyer, D., Switzer, G., Speer. A. L., (1991). “The altruistic personality: In what contexts is it apparent?”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 450–458.
  • Comte, A., (2017[1875]). System of Positive Polity, Forgotten Books, USA.
  • Cox, J., (2002). “Trust, Reciprocity, and Other-Regarding Preferences: Groups vs. Individuals and Males vs. Females,” in R. Zwick and A. Rapoport (eds.), Advances in Experimental Business Research, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
  • Dawes, R., Thaler, R., (1988). “Cooperation”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 2, N. 3, pp. 187-197.
  • De Waal, F. B., (2007). “Putting the Altruism Back into Altruism: The Evolution of Empathy”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 59, pp. 279-300.
  • Dubeski, N., (2001). “Durkheim’s Altruism as the Source of His Social Holism: A Discussion of the Viability of a Social Basis for Moral Principles”, Electronic Journal of Sociology, Vol. 5, No. 3. https://www.sociology.org/content/vol005.003/dubeski.html.
  • Edele, A., Dziobek, I., Keller, M., (2013). “Explaining altruistic sharing in the dictator game: The role of affective empathy, cognitive empathy, and justice sensitivity”, Learning and Individual Differences, Vol. 24, pp. 96–102.
  • Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A., (1987). “The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 101, No. 1, pp. 91-119.
  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., (1990). “Empathy: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior”, Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 14, pp. 131-149.
  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R., C. Shea., (1989). “Gender differences in empathy and prosocial moral reasoning: Empirical investigations”, in M. M. Brabeck (ed.), Who cares?: Theory, research, and educational implications of the ethic of care, Praeger Publishers, USA, pp. 127–143.
  • Engel. C., (2011). “Dictator games: a meta study”, Experimental Economics, Vol. 14, pp. 583- 610.
  • Evans, R., Ferguson, E., (2014). “Defining and measuring blood donor altruism: A theoretical approach from biology, economics and psychology”, Vox Sanguinis, Vol. 106, pp. 118– 126.
  • Fehr, E., Gächter, S., (2000). “Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments”, American Economic Review, Vol. 90, No. 4, pp. 980-994.
  • Fehr, E., Schmidt, K. M., (1999). “A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 114, No. 3, pp. 817-868.
  • Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin N. E., Sefton. M., (1994). “Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments”, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 347-369.
  • Günay, H. M., (2012[2019]). “Vakıf” Web Sitesi: TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi Yayımcı: TDV İslâm Araştırmaları Merkezi, Date of Access: 27.01.2020,
  • Güran, T., (2003). Osmanlı Malî İstatistikleri Bütçeler 1841-1981, DİE Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Gürsoy, Ç., (2020). “Neither Directly in the Sectors nor Entirely Out of Them within A State of Single Piece; It is in the Shatterless Flow of A Wide Area: From The Ottoman Cash Waqfs To Social Enterprises”, Third Sector Social Economic Review, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 76-92, (in Turkish).
  • Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., Schwarze, B., (1982). “An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 367-388.
  • Innocenti, A., Pazienza, M. G., (2006). “Altruism and Gender in the Trust Game”, SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 1-20.
  • İnalcık, H., (2009). Devlet-i Aliyye Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Üzerine Araştırmalar I, İş Bankası Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Isaac, R. M., McCue, K. F., Plott, C. R., (1985). “Public goods provision in an experimental environment,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 51-74.
  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch J. L., Thaler, R. H., (1990). “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 6, pp. 1325-1348.
  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch J. L., Thaler, R. H., (1991). “Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 193-206.
  • Kamilçelebi, H., (2019a). Davranışsal İktisat, London: IJOPEC Publication.
  • Kamilçelebi, H., (2019b). “Framing Effect and Decision-Making in the Market: A Research on Profit-Seeking and Religiousness in Turkey”, International Journal of Asian Social Science, Vol. 9, No. 7, pp. 417-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2019.97.417.425
  • Knetsch, Jack L., (1990). "Derived Indifference Curves," Simon Fraser University: Working Paper.
  • Koyunoğlu, H., (2008). Muhasebe Defterlerine Göre Vakıflar 1633-1731 Yılları İstanbul Örneği, Ahenk Yayınları.
  • Kütükoğlu, M. S., (1977). “1869’da Faal İstanbul Medreseleri”, İstanbul.
  • Ledyard, J. O., (1995). “Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research”, The Handbook of Experimental Economics, J. Kagel & A. Roth (eds.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 111-194.
  • Loewenstein, G., Kahneman, D., (1991). "Explaining the Endowment Effect," Carnegie Mellon University: Working Paper.
  • MacIntyre, A., (1967). “Egoism and Altruism”, P. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2, Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, pp. 462-466.
  • Mullainathan, S., (2016). “Psikoloji ve Kalkınma İktisadı”, Davranışsal İktisat ve Davranışsal İktisadın Uygulamaları, Hatime Kamilçelebi (ed.), Nobel Akademik Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Oliner, S. P., Oliner, P. M., (1992). The altruistic personality: Rescuers of Jews in Nazi Europe, MacMillan, New York.
  • Öztürk, N., (2005). İslâm ve Türk Kültüründe Vakıflar, Vakıflar Dergisi, XXIX, pp. 7-21.
  • Özvar, E., (2006). “Osmanlı Devleti’nin Bütçe Harcamaları (1509-1788)”, Osmanlı Maliyesi Kurumlar ve Bütçeler 1, Osmanlı Bankası Arşiv ve Araştırma Merkezi Yayınları, İstanbul, pp. 197-239.
  • Rilling, J. K., Gutman, D. A., Zeh, T. R., Pagnoni, G., Berns, G. S., Kilts, C. D., (2002). “A neural basis for social cooperation”, Neuron, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 395–405.
  • Smith, A., (2010[1759]). The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Harriman House Limited, United Kingdom.
  • Thaler, R. H., (2000). “From Homo Economicus to Homo Sapiens”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 133-141.
  • “Waqf” (2019). TRF Islamic Encyclopedia, https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/vakif#1, 27.01.2020. (in Turkish).
  • Van Boven, L., Dunning, D., Loewenstein, G., (2000). “Egocentric Empathy Gaps Between Owners and Buyers: Misperceptions of the Endowment Effect”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 66-76.
  • Van Boven, L., Loewenstein, G., Dunning, D., (2003). “Mispredicting the endowment effect: underestimation of owners’ selling prices by buyer’s agents”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 351–365.
  • Yağcı, M., Gürsoy, Ç., (2019). “Economic mentality Institutions and Cash Waqfs in the Ottoman State”, ADAM Academy Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 37-67. (in Turkish).
Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-1237
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1941
  • Yayıncı: Türk Kooperatifçilik Kurumu
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Çin Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlarının Küresel Ekonomideki Konumu ve Kuşak – Yol Projesinin Önündeki Engeller

Mustafa Emre AKBAŞ

Are People Selfish? Based on the Behavioral Economics Games, the Altruistic Behaviors of Waqf Founder the Ottoman Empire to Reduce Poverty

Hatime KAMİLÇELEBİ, Çiğdem GÜRSOY

İnsanlar Bencil mi? Davranışsal İktisat Oyunlarından Hareketle Osmanlı’da Vâkıfların Yoksulluğu Azaltan Alturistik Davranışları

Hatime KAMİLÇELEBİ, Çiğdem GÜRSOY

Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Anlayışına Yönelik Döngüsel Ekonomi Modeli

Mevhibe AY TÜRKMEN, Fulya KILIÇ

Examining the Validity of the Weak and Semi-Strong Market Efficiencies at the Global Islamic Stock Markets: Evidence Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests and Bootstrap Causality Approach

Mehmet Levent ERDAŞ

Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelere Yönelen Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlarda Enerji Kaynaklarının Verimli Kullanımının Önemi

Selin PURTUL, Orhan KANDEMİ

Algılanan Örgütsel Ayrımcılık İle Örgütsel Bağlılık Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: Bir Kamu Üniversitesi Örneği

Musa OZATA, Fatih Ferhat ÇETİNKAYA

Küreselleşme ve Beşeri Sermayenin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkileşim Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği

Uğur URSAVAŞ

The Relationship Between Bitcoin Trade Volume and Inflation Uncertainty: Evidence from Turkey

Ayşen SİVRİKAYA

OECD Ülkelerinde Cepten Yapilan Sağlik Harcamalarinin Belirleyicileri: Dinamik Panel Veri Analizi

Elvan HAYAT, Şaban ERTEKİN