A New Concept in Social Science: Organizational Abomination, Its Effects and Results

Today's organizations continue their activities in an intense competitive environment in the local and global context. The requirements of this competitive environment can push them to many different organizational applications. Especially the human element that can provide competitive advantage to the enterprises and the contributions attract the attention of the organizations. Under such intense and difficult competition conditions, organizations may have to employ some employees who are not compatible with their internal structures in order to gain advantage over their competitors and to carry the organization into the future. Such problematic employees, who may contradict organizational values but can make significant contributions to the organization, can be employed by organizations to provide stronger competitiveness and organizational benefits. In this research, statistical analyzes have been carried out and the results have been examined in order to identify those individuals that the organizations have to employ due to environmental conditions and to identify a new concept in this field. In order to reveal this concept, which has not been examined before, companies operating in the textile accessories sector were included in the research and the results obtained as a result of the scale created were explained deeply. In this context, findings that can be considered important in terms of organizational behavioral science regarding the determination of the concept were obtained. As a result of the analysis of the 304 questionnaire, which were analyzed in the SPSS.22 program and obtained from the sector, the findings related to the existence of the concept were reached. The existence of the concept, its effects on individuals and organizations, and in the light of the data obtained from the scale that developed to determine the concept of organizational abomination, has been presented in detail.

Sosyal Bilimlerde Yeni Bir Kavram: Örgütsel Abominasyon, Etkileri ve Sonuçları

Günümüz örgütleri bulundukları yerel ve global anlamda yoğun rekabet ortamında faaliyetlerine devam etmektedirler. Bu rekabetçi ortamın getirdiği gereksinimler onları birçok farklı örgütsel uygulamaya itebilmektedir. Özellikle işletmelere rekabet avantajı sağlayabilecek insan unsuru ve onun örgütlere sunacağı katkılar, örgütlerin fazlasıyla dikkatini çekmektedir. Böylesine yoğun ve zorlu rekabet koşulları altında örgütler, rakiplerine göre avantaj sağlamak ve örgütü geleceğe taşıyabilmek adına iç yapılarıyla uyumlu olmayan bazı çalışanları istihdam etmek durumunda kalabilmektedirler. Örgütsel değerlere ters düşse de örgüte önemli katkılarda bulunabilecek bu tür sorunlu çalışanlar örgütler tarafından salt daha güçlü rekabet edebilirlik ve örgütsel fayda sağlamak adına istihdam edilebilmektedir. Bu araştırmada, örgütün çevresel koşullar nedeniyle çalıştırmak zorunda kaldığı bu kişileri belirleyebilmek ve bu alanda yeni bir kavramın tespitini sağlamak adına istatistiksel analizler gerçekleştirilmiş, sonuçları irdelenmiştir. Daha önce incelenmemiş olan bu kavramın ortaya konulabilmesi adına tekstil aksesuarları sektöründe faaliyet gösteren şirketler araştırmaya dahil edilmiş ve oluşturulan ölçek sonucunda elde edilen sonuçlar detaylı bir biçimde açıklanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, kavramın tespit edilebilmesine ilişkin örgütsel davranış bilimi açısından önemli sayılabilecek bulgular elde edilmiştir. SPSS.22 programında analiz edilen ve sektörden elde edilen 304 anketin analizi sonucunda, kavramın varlığına ilişkin bulgulara ulaşılmıştır. Kavramın varlığı, birey ve örgütlere etkisi, örgütsel abominasyon kavramının tespit edilmesi için geliştirilen ölçeğin uygulanması sonucunda elde edilen veriler ışığında detaylı bir biçimde ortaya konulmuştur.

PDF

___

Amburgey, T. A., Kelley, D., Barnett, W. P., (1993), Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 51-73.

Abowd, J. M., Kramarz, F., Margolis, D. N., (1994), High wage workers and high wage firms, Nber Working Paper Series, 2-71.

Bagozzi, R. P., Phillips, L. W, (1982), Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construct, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 459-489.

Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y, (1988) On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.

Bartlett, C.A., & Ghoshal, S., (2002), Building competitive advantage through people, MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(2), 34-41.

Barney, J. B., (1991), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

Barney, J. B., (1995), Looking inside for competitive advantage, The Academy of Management Executive, 9(4): 49-61.

Bernard, B. B., (1966), Organizational goals and inmate organization, American Journal of Sociology, 71(5), 522-534.

Blanchflowe, D.G., Oswald, A. J., Sanfey, P., (1992), Wages, profits and rent-sharing, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambride.

Blau, P. M., (1964), Exchange and power in social life, New Yor: Wiley.

Buckingham, M., (2005), What great managers do. Harvard Business Review, 83, 70-79.

Buckingham, M., & Vosburgh, R. M., (2001), The 21st century human resources function: It's the talent, stupid! Human Resource Planning, 24, 17-23.

Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A. (1990), Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.

Cooper, R. & Slagmulder, R., (1997), Target Costing and Value Engineering, Portland, OR, Oregon, Productivity Press.

Cronbach, L. J., Shavelson, R. J, (2004), My Current Thoughts on Coeefficient Alpha and Successor Procedures, Educational and Psychological Measurement. 64(3), 391-418.

Etzioni, A., (1961), A comparative analysis of complex organizations, New York: Free Press.

Frank, F. D., Finnegan, R. P. & Taylor, C. R., (2004), The race for talent: retaining and engaging workers in the 21st century, Human Resource Planning, 27(3), 12-25.

Garver, M. S., Mentzer, J. T., (1999), Logistics research methods: Employing structural equation modelling to test for construct validity, Journal of Business Logistics, 20(1), 33-57.

Gould, S., (1979), An enquity-exchange model of organizational involvement, Academy of Management Review, 4, 53-62.

Harvey, D., (1989), Condition of postmodernity - an enquiry into the origins of cultural change, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

Hayden, C. M., Purser, R. J., (1995), Recursive Filter Objective Analysis of Meteorological Fields: Applications to NESDIS Operational Processing, Journal of Applied Meteorology, 34, 3-15.

Jackall, R., (1988), Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers, International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 1(4), 598-614.

Jansson, D., (1989), The pragmatic uses of what is taken for granted: Project leaders’ applications of investment calculations, International Studies of Management & Organization, 19(3), 47-62.

Liang, J., Farh, C.I.C. & Farh, J.L., (2012), Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave Examination. Academy Management, 55, 71-92.

Llusar, J. C. B., Zornoza, C. C., (2002), Development and validation of a perceived business quality measurement instrument, The Global Voice of Quality, 4(4), 585-588.

Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B., (1977), Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony, American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.

Monden, Y. & Sakurai, M., (1989), Japanese Management Accounting: A World Class Approach to Profit Management, Cambridge, MA, Productivity Press.

Nunnally, J. C, (1978), Psychometric Theory, McGraw Hill, New York.

Oxman, J. A., Smith, B. D., (2003), The Limits of Structural Change. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(1): 77-82.

Price, J. L., Mueller, C. W, (1986), Handbook of Organizational Measurement, Pitman, Marshfield MA.

Rao, S. S., Solis, L. E., Raghunathan, T. S, (1999), A Framework for International Quality Management Research: Development and Validation of a Measurement Instrument, Total Quality Management, 10(7), 1047-1075.

Richards, J. C., (2010), Competence and performance in language teaching, RELC Journal, 41(2), 1-28.

Schein, E. H., (1987), Process consultation, Vol:2, Addison-Wesley.

Tannenbaum, S. I., (2015), The Psychology of Training Development and Performance Improvement, Wiley Blackwell, UK.

Tarique, I. & Schuler, R., (2010), Global Talent Management: Literature review, integrative framework and suggestions for further research. Journal of World Business 45(2), 122-133.

Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., Jorseskog, K. G, (1974), Interclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 25-33

Wesley, F. & H. Vredenburg, (1996), Sustainability and the Corporation: Criteria for Aligning Economic Practice with Environmental Protection, Journal of Management Inquiry 5(2), 104–119.

ISSN: 2667-5617
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
Başlangıç: 2006
Yayıncı: ASOS Eğitim Bilişim Danışmanlık Otomasyon Yayıncılık Reklam Sanayi ve Ticaret LTD ŞTİ