OSMANLI İMPARATORLUĞU’NDA SİYASAL DÜŞÜNCENİN TEMEL UNSURLARI

Tarih boyunca tüm devletler, kendi tarihsel gerçeklerine uygun olarak belirli siyasal kurum ve mekanizmalar oluşturmuşlardır. Bu anlamda, hiçbir devletin yönetim modeli bir diğerine tam olarak benzemez. Diğer taraftan, belirli bir devletin tarih sahnesinde kalıcı olabilmesi, sahip olduğu kurumsallaşma kapasitesi ile yakından ilişkilidir. İmparatorluğu'nun, varlığının ve gücünün uzun dönemler sürmesinde kurumsallaşmış bir yapıya sahip olmasının önemli bir etkisi vardır. Osmanlı'da yönetim anlayışı, temelde İslam dininin inanç esasları üzerine oturur. Bunun yanında, İslamiyet öncesi Türk toplumlarının yönetim anlayışları da Osmanlı'yı önemli ölçüde etkilemiştir. Türk devlet anlayışında siyasal iktidarın sahibi ve kullanıcısı kağanın hükmetme yetkisini doğrudan Tanrı'dan aldığı kabul edilir. Bunun yanında Türk devlet geleneğinde hükümdar geçmişten gelen kurallar anlamında "töre" ile sınırlıdır. İslam dininin kapsamlı bir devlet teorisine sahip olup olmaması ise oldukça tartışmalıdır. Kur'an'da devlet yönetimine ilişkin yalnızca genel esaslar bulunduğu için bu konudaki yaklaşımlarından çıkarsanmıştır. Osmanlı yönetim anlayışı, İslam'ın siyaset ve devlet yönetimine ilişkin genel yaklaşımı ile eski Türk devletlerinde hâkim olan yönetim ilkelerinin bileşkesi durumundadır. Bu bağlamda, Osmanlı'nın uzun yıllar boyunca kalıcı olabilmesini güçlü bir devlet yönetimi anlayışı oluşturmasına borçlu olduğu söylenebilir. Söz konusu yönetim anlayışında, İslam'ın kuralları kadar, eski Türk hukukundan kaynaklanan, padişahın yasal düzenleme yapabilme yetkisine sahip olmasının büyük etkisi vardır. Bu bağlamda, Osmanlı, kendisinden önceki tüm Müslüman Türk devletlerini aşan, özgün bir yönetim modeli oluşturmayı başarmıştır

BASIC ELEMENTS OF POLITICAL THOUGHT IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE

Ottoman Empire, which reigned approximately for 600 centuries and became one of the most important political actors in the world during an important part of that time period, have had a strong administration mechanism, at the same time it also managed to place its legitimacy on a solid foundation. In this regard, it is seen that Ottoman Empire has increased its legal, political and administrative capacity simultaneously with the expansion of its boundaries. Under the display of state's permanent view, there was a major impact of the steps taken in the bureaucratic and legal fields besides its military success. One of the most important elements that make it possible for such a case is the Ottoman Empire's capability to commingle both Islam and traditions of the ancient Turkish government and thus, it was able to produce its own administration model. This article focuses on the basic understanding of the dynamics of Ottoman politics and administration. For this purpose, primarily existing understanding of administration philosophy and principles in the ancient Turks, then the general approach of Islam on these issues are discussed. Despite moving to the established culture a relatively late date in history, pre-Islamic Turks had a strong state tradition. It is clear that state tradition in question had an important impact on establishment and prolonged existence on of large states as Seljuq and Ottoman Empire. On the other hand, the most significant situation revealed by the moving to the established culture is the effect of everyday politics rather than abstract discussions about politics. With the mass adoption of Islam, Turks’ transition to established culture had accelerated. In this regard, it can be said that Islam has become one of the important factor in terms of determining the administrative principles of the Turkish state in a short time. However, in this process, administrative tradition from the past has not been completely abandoned as well. On the contrary, each element was united to certain extent and has shaped the basic principles of political power. It can be said that Islam’s institutionalization effort towards state began in the era of Prophet Mohammed. Especially Muslims who settled in Medina after the Hijra, entered into the effort of creating a unique mechanism under the leadership of Prophet Mohammed. After declaring his prophethood, Prophet Mohammed’s undertaking of some kind of presidential duties in the state which Muslims’ number has been increasing in a short time and constituted specific order starting from Medina, prevented the power debate that would be encountered at the beginning. Therefore, unlike Christianity, discussion of political power in Islam remained relatively low levels. At the same time, when there was a problem regarding the administrative process, Quran and Prophet Mohammed’s behavior and words were consulted. First discussion of political leadership and problem of selection of governor emerged after the death of Prophet Mohammed whose authority had been obeyed unconditionally. While there have been comprehensive regulations regarding many areas of life in Qur’an and Sunnah, including general principles relating to social order and institutions has become a complicated issue in determining the new executive. More specific issues such as shaping the administrative mechanisms and determination of the executive power in this context were left to the intellectuals’ jurisprudence and the studies on this subject. Correspondingly, caliphate debate that emerged after the death of Prophet Mohammed has begun and through these debates, concrete qualifications that the executive must have have tried to be put forward. Thus, the basic parameters that determine the relationship between the governor and the governed has emerged on an understanding of the executive power is limited. Characteristics of the executive were discussed within the framework of ‘justice, competence, safety, allegiance and consultation’ concepts. One of the most important factors behind the success of the Ottoman Empire, as being one of the largest state in history, is that it has created a unique administrative model than other states during the period. It can be said that basic principle of Islam, in other words Sharia, was the main element in the origin of understanding of governance in the Ottoman Empire. However, when it is recalled that religion’s main source of Qur’an has the general statements about politics and state administration, it can be better understood that there has not been ready to use formulas in terms of the solution of many problems encountered in everyday life. In this regard, apart from religious principles, the most important tools that were beneficial to the state are the former Turkish states’ administration principles. In this context, it is observed that the common law tradition has displayed fairly strong view alongside sharia that is directly based on principles of Islamic law in the Ottoman Empire. Sultans were sought to establish new regulations in line with current developments together with governance practices that were applied before them. It can be estimated that Ottoman Empire whose borders have expanded for a long time and this way it ruled more geographical area and people with different cultural backgrounds, faced with numerous problems in comparison to other Turkic and Muslim states. Therefore, to be able to react appropriately to new encountered situations, it was important to maintain the different nationalities of obedience. The importance of customary law rules revealed at this point. When the previously encountered problem does not occur, an appropriate solution to the objective conditions was found through arrangements made by the Sultan. In accordance with the logic of empire in general, the same situation has paved the way for the state to have a universal sovereignty claims. It is clear that military victories were one of the most important factors in Ottoman Empire’s historical success. However, it can be said that this alone does not be enough; success achieved using only force does not mean the persistence of the political system. The main reason that makes Ottoman Empire one of the most important actors in history, is demonstrating the ability of both legal regulations and institutionalization with its administrative structure. Ottoman Empire has been inspired by the former Muslim Turkish states, but it revealed a unique governance model that overcomes them all. In this sense, the understanding of Ottoman rule illustrates that it took the Islamic legal system on the center, but it benefited widely from the constituent elements of the Turkish state tradition in accordance with their preIslamic origin. Definitely, indirect contribution of governance understanding of Byzantine Empire that hold the territories of the Ottoman Empire in the past can be added. Unique character of governance understanding of the Ottoman Empire was a result of the combination of all these elements in accordance with their respective historical facts and putting forward a new model. In fact, this model has existed until the nation-state formation began to influence the entire world

___

  • ALTAY, A. (2011), “Klasik Dönem Osmanlı Siyasetname Geleneğine Genel Bir Bakış”, Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, Volume 6/3, Summer 2011, p. 1795-1809, ISSN: 1308-2140, www.turkishstudies.net, DOI Number: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.2251/TurkishStudies.8020, ANKARA-TURKEY.
  • BAYRAKDAR, M. (2011), İslam Felsefesine Giriş, 8. Baskı, TDV Yay., Ankara.
  • BERİŞ, H.E. (2012), “Siyaset Biliminin Doğuşu ve Gelişimi”, 21. Yüzyılda Prens: Devlet ve Siyaset Yönetimi, ed. Ümit Özdağ, Kripto Yay., İstanbul, 13-56.
  • CANATAN, K. (2009), “Geleneksel Siyaset ve Devlet Felsefesinin Bir Yorumu Olarak “Siyasetname” Büyük Devlet Adamı Nizamülmülk’ün Devlet Ve Siyaset Anlayışı Üzerine”, Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, Volume 4/7, Fall 2009, p. 194-220, ISSN: 1308-2140, www.turkishstudies.net, DOI Number: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.905/TurkishStudies.8020, ANKARA-TURKEY.
  • CRONE, P. (2007), Ortaçağ İslam Dünyasında Siyasi Düşünce, çev. Hakan Köni, Kapı Yay., İstanbul.
  • ÇAYLAK, A. (2015), “İslam’da Siyasi Akıl ve Düşüncenin Oluşumu”, Muhafazakar Düşünce, yıl 11, sayı 43, 15-71.
  • EBU NASR EL-FARABİ (2011), İdeal Devlet (El-Medinetü’l Fazıla), çev. Ahmet Arslan, Divan Kitap., Ankara.
  • GIRAUD, R. (1999), Gök Türk İmparatorluğu: İlteriş, Kapgan ve Bilge’nin Hükümdarlıkları, Çev. İsmail Mangaltepe, Ötüken Yay., İstanbul.
  • HASSAN, Ü. (2004), Osmanlı: Örgüt-İnanç-Davranış’tan Hukuk-İdeolojiye, 4. Baskı, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • İBN SİNA/İBN TUFEYL (2000), Hay bin Yakzan, çev. M. Şerefeddin Yaltkaya ve Babanzade Reşid, haz. N. Ahmet Özalp, 4. Baskı, Yapı Kredi Yay., İstanbul.
  • İBN TEYMİYE (1999), Siyaset (Es-Siyasetü’ş-Şeriyye), çev. Vecdi Akyüz, 2. Baskı, Dergah Yay., İstanbul.
  • İMAM GAZALİ (2008), Yöneticilere Tavsiyeler, çev. Osman Arpaçukuru, 2. Baskı, İlke Yay., İstanbul.
  • İNALCIK, H. (2000), Osmanlı’da Devlet, Hukuk, Adalet, Eren Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • KAHVECİ, N. (1996), İslam Siyaset Düşüncesi (XV. Asra Kadar), Türk Demokrasi Vakfı Yay., Ankara.
  • KECHICIAN, J. A. ve DEKMEJIAN, R. Hrair (2009), Adil Hükümdar: Sicilyalı İbn Zafer’in Ölümsüz Eseri, Çev. Barış Doğru, Kırmızı Kedi Yay., İstanbul.
  • KINALIZADE ALİ EFENDİ (2010), Devlet ve Aile Ahlakı, İlgi Yay., İstanbul.
  • KOÇİ BEY (2010), Koçi Bey Risaleleri, Çev. Zuhuri Danışman, Yay. Haz. Seda Çakmakcıoğlu, Kabalcı Yay., İstanbul.
  • KÖSE, H. M. (2009), “Siyaset”, TDV İslam Ansiklopedisi, cilt 37, TDV Yay., Ankara, 294-299.
  • KÖSOĞLU, N. (2004), Hukuka Bağlılık Açısından Eski Türklerde-İslam’da ve Osmanlı’da Devlet, 2. Baskı, Ötüken Yay., İstanbul
  • MARDİN, Ş. (1998), Yeni Osmanlı Düşüncesinin Doğuşu, çev. M. Türköne, F. Unan, İ. Erdoğan, 2. Baskı, İletişim Yay., İstanbul.
  • MÜCAHİD, H. T. (2005), Farabi’den Abduh’a Siyasi Düşünce, çev. Vecdi Akyüz, 2. Baskı, İz Yay., İstanbul.
  • NİYAZİ, M. (2011), Türk Devlet Felsefesi, 8. Baskı, Ötüken Yay., İstanbul.
  • NİZAMÜLMÜLK (1998), Siyasetname (Siyeru’l Müluk), Çev. Nurettin Bayburtlugil, 4. Baskı, Dergah Yay., İstanbul
  • MUMCU, A. (2007), Osmanlı Devletinde Siyaseten Katl, Phoenix Yay., Ankara.
  • OCAK, A. (2009), “Selçuklu Medreselerinin Mağrip ve Endülüs Üzerindeki Etkileri, Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, Volume 4/3, Spring 2009, p. 1622-1647, ISSN: 1308-2140, www.turkishstudies.net, DOI Number: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.746/TurkishStudies.8020, ANKARA-TURKEY.
  • ÖGEL, B. (1982), Türklerde Devlet Anlayışı (13. Yüzyıl Sonlarına Kadar), Başbakanlık Basımevi, Ankara.
  • ÖGEL, B. (2001), Türk Kültürünün Gelişme Çağları II, 4. Baskı, MEB Yay., İstanbul.
  • ÖZ, M. (1999), “Klasik Dönem Osmanlı Siyasal Düşüncesi: Tarihi Temeller ve Ana İlkeler”, İslami Araştırmalar, cilt 2, sayı 1, 27-33.
  • PAMİR, A. (1998), Batı’da Egemenlik Kavramının Gelişimi ve Eski Türk Egemenlik Anlayışı, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.
  • ŞULUL, C. (2009), İbn Rüşd’ün Siyaset Felsefesi: Eflatun’un Devlet’i ve İbn Rüşd’ün Yorumu, İnsan Yay., İstanbul.
  • ŞENEL, A. (2008), Siyasal Düşünceler Tarihi: Tarihöncesinde İlkçağda Ortaçağda ve Yeniçağda Toplum ve Siyasal Düşünüş, Bilim ve Sanat Yay., Ankara.
  • TÜRK, H. B. (2012), Çoban ve Kral: Siyasetnamelerde İdeal Yönetici İmgesi, İletişim Yay., İstanbul.
  • UĞUR, A. (2001), Osmanlı Siyaset-Nâmeleri, MEB Yay., İstanbul.
  • YAZICI, N. (2011), İlk Türk-İslam Devletleri Tarihi, 9. Baskı, Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yay., Ankara.
  • YILMAZ, C. (2009), “Siyasetname (Osmanlı Dönemi)”, TDV İslam Ansiklopedisi, cilt 37, TDV Yay., Ankara, 306-309.
  • YUSUF HAS HACİP (2005), Kutadgu Bilig, haz. Yaşar Çağbayır, Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yay., Ankara.