GENÇLERİN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NE BAKIŞI ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA; SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ

Türkiye'nin Avrupa Birliği'ne dâhil olma serüveni 50 yılı aşkın bir süredir devam etmektedir. Kimi zaman hızlanan, kimi zaman yavaşlayan, kimi zaman da durma noktasına gelen üyelik görüşmeleri bir türlü arzulanan seviyeye ulaşamamıştır. Sürecin bu zikzaklı seyri birçok kesim tarafından farklı yorumlanmış, ilişkilerde yaşanan bu istikrarsızlık ve belirsizlik tartışmalara neden olmuştur. Özellikle son zamanlarda Avrupa ülkelerinin Türkiye'ye karşı tutumları sebebiyle Türkiye'nin Avrupa Birliği üyeliği, kamuoyunda sıkça tartışılmakta ve gündemde kalmaktadır. Türkiye'nin Avrupa Birliği'ne üyeliği toplumun farklı kesimlerinde farklı anlamlar taşımaktadır. Ancak gençlerin, Türkiye'nin Avrupa Birliği'ne üyeliği ve üyelik süreci hakkındaki düşünceleri ayrıca önem taşımaktadır. Çalışmada, üniversite öğrencilerinin Avrupa Birliğine bakışını tespit etmek amacıyla Selçuk Üniversitesi öğrencileri üzerinde bir saha araştırması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın evrenini, Konya Selçuk Üniversitesi Alaeddin Keykubat yerleşkesinde bulunan fakülte ve yüksekokul öğrencileri oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmaya göre, katılımcıların yüzde desteklemektedir. Katılımcıların yarısına yakını ise Türkiye'nin Avrupa Birliği'ne hiçbir zaman üye olamayacağını düşünmektedir. Çalışma, gençlerin AB'ye bakışının tespiti açısından önem taşımaktadır

A SURVEY ON THE OPINIONS OF THE YOUTH TOWARDS THE EUROPEAN UNION: SELÇUK UNIVERSITY CASE

The journey of Turkey’s EU membership negotiations has been continuing for more than 50 years. The negotiations which sometimes speed up, sometimes slow down, and sometimes come to a halt have never reached the desired levels. This zigzag in negotiations has been evaluated differently by the public, and this instability and obscurity have caused discussions. Especially due to the stance of the European countries towards Turkey lately, the EU membership of Turkey is a hot debate in the public debates. The membership of Turkey has various meanings in different categories of the public. By the way, the opinions of the young people towards Turkey’s membership and negotiations have private place in the debates. In this study, a field research was carried out at Selçuk University to determine the opinions of the students towards EU. The population of the research are the faculties and the high schools in the Alaeddin Keykubat Campus of Selçuk Universty. According to the research, more than 55% of the participants support Turkey’s membership to EU. Almost half of the participants think that Turkey will never be accepted as a member of the EU. The study is important for the determination of the young people's point of view to the EU A field survey was conducted on Selçuk University students in order to determine the point of view of university students towards the European Union. The universe of the research consists of faculties and college students operating in Konya Selçuk University Alaeddin Keykubat settlement in the center of Konya. A face-to-face questionnaire was applied to 420 participants selected through random sampling; the preliminary reviewer was seemed eligible for the analysis of the 400 questionnaires. Data collection tools A questionnaire consisting of 35 questions was formed in order to determine the perspective of the participants on the European Union. In the study, participants used the five-point Likert-type question to determine the most important obstacles that participants have seen in the European Union process of Turkey, as well as why the supporters of the European Union support and those who do not support it. On the Likert scale type, there is a regular decrease and increase and the distances between them are equal. In order to measure the level of confidence in the EU in general and the level of knowledge in the EU, the table marking method between (1) and (10) was used in the questionnaire. The lowest level is set as (1) while the highest level is set as (10). The last part of the question paper consist of the questions that will reveal the social-demographic characteristics of the interviewees. Analysis of data and tests used Field research was conducted face-to-face with participants from 10 April to 20 May 2016. The obtained data were processed in electronic environment using SPSS 17.0 statistical program. It was subjected to appropriate statistical analyzes to find the answer for the research questions. In the analysis of the data, frequency analysis was used to determine the demographic characteristics of the participants. On the other hand, the data obtained in this research is limited by students of Selcuk University and the number of respondents from Selcuk University students Research questions Thanks to above the literature review, 8 basic questions were sought in this study: Research Question 1: How many years can Turkey become a member to the EU? Research Question 2: What is the level of knowledge of participants in the EU? Research Question 3: What is the level of confidence in the countries within the European Union? Research Question 4: Which country is the most unreliable in the European Union? Research Question 5: Does the European Union act sincere and neutral towards Turkey? Research Question 6: Is it enough that the government is working to join the EU? Research Question 7: What are the most important obstacles to Turkey's European Union process? Research Question 8: Do you think that even if Turkey meets all the requirements of the EU, it will not be taken to the EU? Research Question 9: Which is the most important unity for Turkey? Research Question 10: Could Cyprus be compromised in Turkey's EU membership process? Research Question 11: What is the reason for Turkey to support the EU in the process? Research Question 12: What is the reason for Turkey's opposition to the no-votes process in the EU process? The information on the method of this research is detailed above before revealing the findings of this field study conducted on Selçuk University students in Konya between 10 April and 20 May 2016. The findings of the fieldwork started with the examination of the sociodemographic characteristics of the participants who participated in the study. Participants' socio-demographic characteristics The distribution of socio-demographic characteristics of participants in the study was tried to be revealed by frequency analysis. 52.3 percent of the university students participating in the study are male and 47.8 percent are female. Although the results show a difference in favor of men; a very uneven distribution of the sample in terms of gender is not seen. When descriptive statistics of age distribution were examined, it was found that the participants were interviewed with the lowest 18 participants and the highest 26 participants. The average age of respondents who answered the questionnaire was calculated as 21,60 and the standard deviation of the distribution was calculated as 1,53. When we look at the descriptive statistical results of total monthly incomes of the participants' families, the lowest is 750 TL, the highest is 9.000 TL. According to these results; the average monthly income of the participants' families is TL 2,115. The standard deviation of the income level is 981.58 TL. Findings and comments (result) With this research, it has been tried to show how the desire and intention to enter the European Union, which Turkey has been pursuing for years, has been evaluated especially by young people. According to the answers given by the participants, the occupation of Turkey to join the Union will continue for many years. Once the responses of the participants to the study are evaluated, Turkey's inclusion in the European Union will be a positive situation. . According to the research participants, they are concerned that the Turkish people's culture will deteriorate if they are included in the European Union. When the research findings are evaluated in general, people participating in the research are among the most important obstacles that Turkey sees in the European Union process, including the Armenian genocide claims, the Cyprus problem and the terrorism problem. The obstacles that participants see as least important in the EU process are the surplus of Turkey's population and the other is geographical location. The most important obstacle in the European Union process is the Armenian genocide allegations, both in women and men. Within the scope of the research, the level of trust of the participants in the EU in general has been examined; As a result of the survey, the students in the university have confidence in the middle level (5.29) countries within the European Union. In this research, participants were asked which one is the most important unity for Turkey, and the findings are that a significant part of the participants (41.8%) is the European Union. Participants in the survey were asked about the most unreliable country in the European Union, and Cyprus, Greece, France and Belgium were among the top four countries as unreliable countries in the survey. In this study, participants were asked a question about whether they supported Turkey’s membership for European Union or not, and in the findings obtained, most of the participants (55.5%) came to the conclusion that they supported Turkey’s membership for European Union. The research also takes the top three ranks for the reason that Turkey's economic development will accelerate and the democracy of Turkey will further develop as the highest reasons for the arithmetic mean values supported by the EU-sponsored participant are raising living standards. Participants are least likely to be important as being a regional power from the reasons for European Union support, and the other choise is having the opportunity to work in European countries. When the participants who don’t support the membership were asked why they don’t support the Turkey’s membership for European Union, they think that the highest reasons in terms of arithmetic mean values will harm at the level of culture, the European Union is a Christian union and they don’t trust member countries in the European Union. They think that the country will benefit the economy is the least amount of protection, and they think that it will harm the territorial integrity of the country. When the research findings are evaluated in general, more than half of the respondents (57.5) think that Turkey will be taken to the European Union if it meets all the requirements of the European Union. A significant number of participants (44.0 percent) who responded to the survey questions stated that Turkey could never become a member of the European Union. Besides, the rate of those who can join between 11-20 years (32.5 percent) is also striking. According to the sex, in both women and men, highest percentage of people think that Turkey can never join in the European Union . Within the scope of the research, at another point, participants' knowledge levels of the European Union were examined; As a result of the review, the university students have a high level of knowledge about the European Union (7,10). As a result, it is stated with this research what the people living in Turkey think about the European Union and what are the thoughts and worries about the positive and negative effects of the membership of the European Union. When assessed from this aspect, the study is one of the small number of studies that reveal the views of the citizens of Turkey (especially young people) to the European Union and make their point of view on demographic variables.

___

  • Aktar, C. (2001). Avrupa Yol Ayrımında Türkiye, İstanbul: İletişim Yayıncılık
  • Aydın, N. (2009). Avrupa Birliği Nedir Ne Değildir ?, İstanbul: Kum Saati Yayın Dağıtım
  • Bozkurt, V. (2001). Avrupa Birliği Ve Türkiye Siyasal Kurumlar Çıkar Grupları Kamuoyu Ve Ortaklık Belgeleri, Bursa: Vipaş Yayın.
  • Çakmak, H. (2014). Türkiye Ve Avrupa Birliği İlişkileri, Ankara: Barış Kitap.
  • Çeçen, A. (2008). Türkiye’nin Avrupa Macerası, Ankara: Fark Yayınları.
  • Dartan, M. Nas, Ç. , Akman, M.S. , Canan, S. , Suner, S. (2004). Türkiye’nin Avrupa Birliği’ne Katılım Sürecinde Marmara Üniversitesi Öğrencilerinin Geleceğe ve Avrupa İle İlişkilere Bakışı, İstanbul: Lito Matbaa
  • Doğan, E. E. (2005). Avrupa’yla Dansımız, İstanbul: Emre Yayınları.
  • Ginsberg, Roy. H.(2001). The Europen Union in International Politics: Bastism by Fire, Lanham: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers.
  • Görel, E. , Özdemir, C. , Yurtkoru, E,S. , Dartan, M. (2014). Üniversite Gençliğinde Avrupa Birliği Algısı: Marmara Üniversitesi 2004-2014 Anketlerinin Bir Değerlendirmesi, İstanbul: Bilnet Matbaacılık.
  • Hale, William. (2013). Turkish Foreign Policy Since 1774, New York: Taylor&Francis Books. Heywood, A. (2013). Küresel Siyaset, Ankara: Adres Yayınları.
  • Hix, S ve Høylana, B.(2011). The Political System of The European Union, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Horvath, Z.(2007). Handbook On The European Union, Hungary: Hungarian National Assembly.
  • İlhan, S. (2003). Avrupa Birliği’ne Neden Hayır?, İstanbul: Ötüken Yayın.
  • Kaya, İ. , Kılıç, T ve Yıldırım, A. (2008). Dicle Üniversitesi Öğrencilerinin Türkiye’nin Avupa Birliği Üyeliğine İlişkin Görüş ve Beklentileri, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(23),.
  • Keleş, R. & M, A. (2013). Avrupa Birliğinin Bölge Politikaları, İstanbul: Cem Yayınevi.
  • Köktaş, A. (1999). Avrupa Birliğinde İşçilerin Serbest Dolaşım Hakkı Ve Türk Vatandaşların Durumu, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. Şti.
  • Leonard, D.(2005). Guide to the Europen Union the Definitive Guide To All Aspects of the EU, London: Profile Books Ltd.
  • Marsh, S ve Mackenstein, H.(2005). The International Relations of the European Union, Harlow: Pearson Longman.
  • Negri, A. (2005). Avrupa Ve İmparatorluk Kurucu Bir Süreç Üzerine Düşünceler, İstanbul: Otonom Yayıncılık.
  • Özey, R. (2007). Küresel Güçler Ve Politikalar, İstanbul: Aktif Yayınevi.
  • Poole. A. P.( 2003). Europe Unites The EU’s Eastern Enlargement, London: Greenwood Publishing Group.
  • Rocard, M. (2008). Avrupa Birliği Yolunda Türkiye’ye Evet, İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  • Şen, F.& Akkaya, Ç.& Güntürk, R. (1999). 2000 Yılının Eşliğinde Avrupa Ve Türkiye, İstanbul: Çağ Pazarlama
  • Uluç, G.(2009). Medya ve Oryantalizm Yabancı, Farklı ve Garip….Öteki, İstanbul: Anahtar Kitaplar Yayınevi.
  • Uysal, C.(2001). Türkiye-Avrupa Birliği İlişkilerinin Tarihsel Süreci ve Son Gelişmeler, Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, (1), 140-153.
  • Weber, W. (2006). Relations Between The State and Society in Turkey: Does The Make a Difference?, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Yamakoğlu, C. (1993). Türkler Yine Avrupa’da, Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları.
  • Yazgan, H ve Aktaş, A.(2012). Türkiye- Avrupa Birliği İlişkilerinde Kamuoyu Faktörü: Çankırı İli Örneği, Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, cilt:2, sayı:2, ss.1-23.