ANALYZING TEACHER CANDIDATES’ VIEWS ON NEW APPROACHES IN HISTORY TEACHING

Tarih, geçmişte yaşamış insan topluluklarının siyasi, sosyal, ekonomik ve kültürel faaliyetlerini yer ve zaman göstererek, sebep-sonuç ilişkisi içerisinde, belgelere dayanarak ve objektif olarak inceleyen sosyal bir bilim dalıdır. Locke'a göre eğitimin amacı, toplumun mutluluğunu ve refah düzeyini arttıracak insanlar yetiştirmektir. Bu görevi de taşıyarak tarih öğretiminin amaçları arasında ahlaki ilkelere sahip, milli bir şuur oluşturacak, kültürel aktarımı sağlayacak, geleceğe emin adımlarla ilerleyebilecek bireyler yetiştirmektir. Bu amaçları gerçekleştirebilmek

TARİH ÖĞRETİMİNDE YENİ YAKLAŞIMLARA İLİŞKİN ÖĞRETMEN ADAYI GÖRÜŞLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

History is a social science discipline that objectively examines the political, social, economic and cultural activities of past human communities in a causal relationship by indicating place and time and is based on documents. Locke states that the aim of the education is to educate people who will increase the happiness and well-being of the community. In addition to this task, the aim of history teaching is to educate individuals who have moral principles, will form a national consciousness, provide cultural transfer, and can take firm steps forward. In order to achieve these goals and to provide an effective learning environment for history lessons, new approaches must be used in accordance with the content of the topics. In this study, prospective teachers’ opinions on new approaches to history teaching were taken. Prospective teachers in the history section of the formation program at Mustafa Kemal University in the 2015-2016 academic year form the sample of the research in order to examine the opinions of the prospective teachers regarding the new approaches. In the study, the general survey model, which is one of the descriptive survey methods, and mixed method was used. The results of the study show that new approaches to history teaching do not change depending on the gender of the prospective teachers, the prospective teachers did not receive sufficient training on the new approaches in history teaching and they did not find themselves qualified. Considering the arithmetic mean of the high-grade responses given to the questionnaire items by the prospective teachers, it can be stated that the percentage of views and thoughts on the such topics as visual education is important in history teaching, they are open to new approaches, history teaching should be evaluated in line with the principles of new approaches, and skills to be acquired in history teaching should be improved are high

___

  • Akınoğlu, O. & Arslan, Y. (2007). Turkısh secondary school students’ attaınment of hıstory concepts and ıts evaluatıon. Sosyal Bilimler Journal, 18, 137-158.
  • Anderson, C. & Moore, A. (1994). Making history outside the classroom. In H. Bourdillon (Ed.), Teaching history. Devon: The Open University.
  • Arıkan, A. (2009). Vısual materıals ın the teachıng of lıterature: a short story applıcatıon. On dokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Journal, 27, 1-16.
  • Aslan, E. (2000). Definition, development and value of local history. In Z. A. Kızılyaprak (Ed.), New approaches to history writing. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Publishing.
  • Ata, B. (2002). "Teaching with documents" approach in history classes, Türk Yurdu, 175, 80-86.
  • Ata, B. (2002). Teaching history with museums and historical places; The views of history teachers on museum education (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Ata, B. (2004). A research on the influence of Piagetian and Brunerian approaches to history teaching at the Elementary Education in England. Türkiye Sanal Bilimler Library, Afyon Kocatepe University. Retrieved form: www.egitim.aku.edu.tr
  • Ata, B. (2007). The approaches of experienced history teachers and prospective history teachers towards a high school student who doesn’t like history. TSA, 2, 29-42.
  • Ata, B. (2008). "Teaching with documents" approach in history classes, Türk Yurdu, 22(175), 80- 86.
  • Atabek, S. & Gençoğlu, S. (1998). Logic. Ankara: Cem Web Ofset Ltd. Şti.
  • Aybek, B. (2006). The effect of content and skıll based crıtıcal thınkıng teachıng on prospectıve teachers’ dısposıtıon and level ın crıtıcal thınkıng (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
  • Baymur, F. (1945). Teaching history. Ankara: Maarif Matbaası Bayraktar, B. (2002) History, historian, society and university, Çanakkale Symposium. Retrieved from: http://sbe.erciyes.edu.tr/dergi/sayi:15/11,yildiz.pdf
  • Beyer, B. K. (1988). Developing a scope and sequence for thinking skill instruction. Educational Leadership, 7, 26-30.
  • Carr, E. H. (1996). What is history? İstanbul: İletişim Publishing.
  • Caunce, S. (2001). Oral history and local historian. Londra: Longman.
  • Cengiz, M. Ş., Sarıgöz, O. & Dönger, A. (2015). Evaluation of Pre-service Teachers’ Ideas About Brainstorming Method in Terms of Some Variables. The Journal of Academic Social Science. 3, 251-263.
  • Collingwood, R. G. (2000). Essays in philosophy of history (E. Özvar, Trans.). İstanbul: Ayışığı Kitapları.
  • Çalışkan, H. (2009). Effectıveness on critical thinking skills of inquiry-based learning approach in social studies teaching, Kastamonu Education Journal, 17(1), 57-70.
  • Çaplı, B. (2002). Media and Ethics, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  • Çilenti, K.(1979), Children and mass media. Ankara: Çocuk ve Eğitim Türk Eğitim Derneği Publishing.
  • Danker C. A. (2003). Multicultural Social Studies: The Local History Connection. The Social Studies, 94(3), 111-117.
  • Demiralay, R. & Sarıgöz, O. (2016, May). Qualitative examination of university students' information search behavior on the internet. XV. International Classroom Teacher Education Symposium, Muğla.
  • Demircioğlu, İ. H. (2007). The place and importance of films in history teaching. Bilig, 42, 77-93.
  • Dilek, D. (2001). Learning and thought Development in history lessons. Ankara: Nobel Publishing Dönger, A. (2016a, May). Foreign language anxiety of students studying in secondary education.
  • VIII. International Education Research Congress, Çanakkale Dönger, A. (2016b, May). Opinions of students studying at the faculty of education on the necessity of foreign language. VIII. International Education Research Congress, Çanakkale.
  • Doğan, Ö. (1994). Philosophy of history. İstanbul: Anahtar Publishing.
  • Elias, J. M. & Kress, J. S. (1994). Social decision-making and life-skills development: A critical thinking approach to health promotion in the middle school - Journal of School Health, 64(2), 62-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1994.tb06180.x
  • Ercan, O. (2004). Active learning as a learning process, The Journal of Bilim ve Aklın Aydınlığında Eğitim, 5, 54-55.
  • Halkin, E. L.(1999). Initiation a la critique historique. (B. Yediyıldız, Trans.). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Publishing
  • Hali, S. (2003). The effect of computer assısted ınstructıon on students’ motıvatıons towards lesson and attıtudes towards computer and lesson ın 8th grade hıstory of revolutıon ın Turkish republıc and Kemalism lesson (Unpublished master's thesis). Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Hali, S. (2013). Investigating sides of the history teachers related to new approaches on history education in terms of different variables e.g. Ankara (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Güleç, S. & Alkış, S. (2003). Communicative dimension of museum visits in teaching social studies. Thr Journa of Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi 12(1), 63-79.
  • İlyasoğlu, A. (1996). Method problems in the investigation of Turkish women's history and oral history method, human, society, science. İstanbul: Kavram Publishing.
  • Karataş, H. (2011). “Pazvandoğlu Folk Song” as the oral history text” Millî Folklor, 23(92), 131- 142.
  • Keleş, H., Ata, B. & Köksal, İ. (2006). The effect of teaching history with historical document upon the achievement of high school students. The journal of Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi, 2(26), 99-112.
  • Keskin, S. C. & Keskin, Y. (2009). Place of “Peace” as a value in primary school social studies curricula and the courses in the scope of social studies in Turkish Republican period. The journal of Değerler Eğitimi, 7(17), 69-92.
  • Köksal, H. (2002). Development of history teaching and critical thinking skills. Türk Yurdu 175, 87- 90.
  • Köksal, H. (2010). Discussions of history teaching in Turkey and cultural literacy in history teaching, teacher education and social peace. Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, 113-121.
  • Köksal, H. (2007). History teaching as citizenship education in the ancient times. The journal of Kastamonu Eğitim, 15(1), 271-278.
  • Köstüklü, N. (1997). Some thoughts on history teaching in England and a comparative evaluation of history teaching in Turkey. The journal of Selçuk Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, 8, 1-22.
  • Leech, N. L. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Qual Quant, 43, 265-275.
  • Mazman, F. (2007). A study on the application of trip-observation method in social studies education (Tokat example) (Unpublished master's thesis). Gazi Osmanpaşa University, Tokat, Turkey
  • MEB (2007). History Course Curriculum (9th Grade). Ankara: Ministry of Education Head Council of Education and Morality
  • Özbalkan, M. & İrik, O. (2003). History country Aydın: local history research guide. Aydın: Aydın Tarih Grubu Publishing
  • Özden, Y. (2002). Values in Education: Transformation in Education. (5th eds.). Ankara: Pegem Publishing
  • Özkartal, Z. (2016a, May). Evaluation of the opinions of elementary school teachers on the necessity of art education in primary education. XV. International Classroom Teacher Education Symposium, Muğla.
  • Özkartal, Z. (2016b, May). An analytical study on the art education of primary school teachers in elementary education. XV. International Classroom Teacher Education Symposium, Muğla.
  • Paykoç, F. (1991). History teaching. Eskişehir: Açık Öğretim Fakültesi Publishing.
  • Paul, R. W. (1984). Critical thinking fundamental to a free society. Educational Leadership, 1, 5-14.
  • Philley, J. (2005), Critical thinking concepts. Professional Safety, 50(3), 26-32.
  • Rogers, A. (1977). Approaches to Local History. New York: Longman.
  • Safran, M. (1996). How to organize history curriculum? The journal of Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi, 4, 16-27.
  • Safran, M. (2004). New approaches in primary education curriculum: Social Studies. The Journal of Bilim ve Aklın Aydınlığında Eğitim, 5, 54-55.
  • Safran, M. & Ata, B. (1998). Teaching history outside of school. The journal of Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi, 18(1), 87-94.
  • Sarıgöz, O. (2016). An Examination of vocational school students’ perceptions toward mobile learning. The Journal of International Social Research. 9, 1485-1491.
  • Sarıgöz, O. & Demiralay, R. (2015). Evaluation of attitudes of the students towards lifelong learning. The Journal of International Social Research. 8, 994-999.
  • Semerci, Ç. (1999). A scale for students’ attıtude towards the teachıng professıon, Eğitim ve Bilim, Retrieved from: egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr
  • Somersan, S. (1994). Participation in oral history, research and history writing. Ankara University Faculty of Language and History Geography, 3rd National Geography Symposium, Ankara.
  • Stradling, R. (2003). Teaching 20th-century European history (A. Ünal, Trans.). İstanbul: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı Publishing.
  • Şıvgın, H. (2009). The importance of national history education on the development of identity. Akademik Bakış, 2(4), 35-52.
  • Şimşek, A. (2003). The use of visual materials in history education. The Journal of Gazi Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 143-157.
  • Thompson, P. (1999). The voice of the past. (Ş. Layıkel, Trans). İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Publishing.
  • Tunç-Şahin, C. (2011). Local hıstory applıcatıons that success and student products on effect The Journal of Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar, 4(16), 453-462.
  • Uygun, S. (2011). Oral hıstory research ın turkey and the use of oral hıstory methods ın teacher educatıon. Journal of Academic Studies, 13, 95-112.
  • Yalın, H. İ. (2006). Teaching technologies and material development. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
  • Yeşilbursa, C. C. (2008). The use of historical places in teaching social studies. TÜBAR-XXIII Bahar, 23(23), 209-222.
  • Yurdusev, A. N. (2006). Political history and ideology. In Gökhan Erdem (Ed.) Proceedings books of symposium on the development and problems of political history in Turkey: Memorial to Professor Dr. Oral Sander. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Publishing
Turkish Studies (Elektronik)-Cover
  • ISSN: 1308-2140
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2006
  • Yayıncı: Mehmet Dursun Erdem