Investigation of propolis in terms of hygienic quality, some pathogenic bacteria and Nosema spp

Investigation of propolis in terms of hygienic quality, some pathogenic bacteria and Nosema spp

Propolis collected from plants by honeybees is used for the construction and protection of hives. In addition, propolis has been used in the treatment of many diseases since ancient times because of its antimicrobial, antiseptic, antiinflammatory and antioxidant properties. Despite all these positive health effects, propolis can be microbiologically risky for many reasons such as environmental contamination and insufficient personnel hygiene. Therefore, chemical, physical, antimicrobial properties as well as microbiological properties are among the parameters to be investigated. This study aims to explore propolis’s initial bacteriological and parasitological flora using 5 different parameters (total coliform group, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium botulinum and Nosema spp.). For this purpose, 100 propolis samples produced in Bolu and its districts were collected. Another objective is to determine the bacteriological/parasitological risk factors and contamination ways of the aforementioned pathogens in the propolis producing process. According to the results, 14 (14%) of total coliform group, 5 (5%) E. coli, 38 (38%) S. aureus, 11 (11%) C. botulinum and 8 (8%) Nosema spp. were found to be positive. The data obtained shows that propolis can be contaminated with some microorganisms and parasites during both production and collection processes.

___

  • 1. Ghisalberti EL. Propolis: a review. Bee World 1979; 60 (2): 59- 84. doi: 10.1080/0005772X.1979.11097738
  • 2. Burdock GA. Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis). Food and Chemical Toxicology 1998; 36 (4): 347-363. doi: 10.1016/S0278-6915(97)00145-2
  • 3. Marcucci MC. Propolis: chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. Apidologie 1995; 26 (2): 83-99. doi: 10.1051/apido:19950202
  • 4. Bankova V, De Castro S, Marcucci M. Propolis: recent advances in chemistry and plant origin. Apidologie 2000; 31 (1): 3-15. doi: 10.1051/apido:2000102
  • 5. Castaldo S, Capasso F. Propolis, an old remedy used in modern medicine. Fitoterapia 2002; 73 (1): 1-6. doi: 10.1016/S0367- 326X(02)00185-5
  • 6. Kuropatnicki AK, Szliszka E, Krol W. Historical aspects of propolis research in modern times. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2013; 1-11. doi: 10.1155/2013/964149
  • 7. Zabaiou N, Fouache A, Trousson A, Baron S, Zellagui A et al. Biological properties of propolis extracts: something new from an ancient product. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids 2017; 207: 214-222. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2017.04.005
  • 8. Kujumgiev A, Tsvetkova I, Serkedjieva Y, Bankova V, Christov R et al. Antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral activity of propolis of different geographic origin. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 1999; 64 (3): 235-240. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00131-7
  • 9. Banskota AH, Tezuka Y, Kadota S. Recent progress in pharmacological research of propolis. Phytotherapy Research 2001; 15: 561-571. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1029
  • 10. Pasupuleti VR, Sammugam L, Ramesh N, Gan SH. Honey, propolis, and royal jelly: a comprehensive review of their biological actions and health benefits. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2017; 2017: 1-21. doi: 10.1155/2017/1259510
  • 11. Oršolić N, Sirovina D, Končić MZ, Lacković G, Gregorović G. Effect of croatian propolis on diabetic nephropathy and liver toxicity in mice. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012; 12 (1): 117. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-117
  • 12. Miguel MG, Antunes MD. Is propolis safe as an alternative medicine? Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences 2011; 3 (4): 479-495. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.90101.
  • 13. Krell R. Value-added Products from Beekeeping. No. 124. Rome, Italy: Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1996.
  • 14. Woisky RG, Salatino A. Analysis of propolis: some parameters and procedures for chemical quality control. Journal of Apicultural Research 1998; 37 (2): 99-105. doi: 10.1080/00218839.1998.11100961
  • 15. Akkaya H. Bal Arılarının Bakımı, Beslenmesi, Üretimi, Hastalıkları ve Zararlıları. İstanbul, Turkey: İstanbul Global İlaç; 2019.
  • 16. Korkmaz A. Anlaşılabilir Arıcılık. 1st ed. Samsun, Turkey: Gıda Tarım ve Hayvancılık İl Müdürlüğü; 2013.
  • 17. Dümen E, Sezgin F. Microbiological contamination model of staff hands employed at bakeries due to staff ’s life style and individual parameters. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafkas University 2009; 15 (4): 491-498. doi: 10.9775/ kvfd.2009.018-A
  • 18. Le Loir Y, Baron F, Gautier M. Staphylococcus aureus and food poisoning. Genetics and Molecular Research 2003; 2 (1): 63-76.
  • 19. Feng PCS, Hartman PA. Fluorogenic assays for immediate confirmation of Escherichia coli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1982; 43 (6): 1320-1329.
  • 20. On S, Lake R, Wilson M. Risk Profıle: Clostrıdıum botulınum in Honey. Client Report. Christchurch, New Zealand: Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited; 2006.
  • 21. Bailey L. Honey bee pathology. Annual Review of Entomology 1968; 13: 191-212. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.13.010168.001203
  • 22. Traver BE, Fell RD. Prevalence and infection intensity of Nosema in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies in Virginia. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 2011; 107 (1): 43-49. doi: 10.1016/j. jip.2011.02.003
  • 23. Shumkova R, Georgieva A, Radoslavov G, Sirakova D, Dzhebir G et al. The first report of the prevalence of Nosema ceranae in Bulgaria. PeerJ – the Journal of Life and Environmental Sciences 2018; 6: 1-11. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4252
  • 24. Lancette GA, Bennet RW. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcal Enterotoxins. In: Downes FP, Ito K (editor). Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. 4th ed. Washington, USA: American Public Health Association; 2001. pp. 387-403.
  • 25. Feng P, Weagant SD, Grant MA, Burkhardt W. Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Chapter 4: Enumeration of Escherichia coli and the Coliform Bacteria. Silver Spring, MD, USA: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2002.
  • 26. ISO 16649‐2: 2001, E. G. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs‐Horizontal method for the enumeration of beta‐ glucuronidase‐positive Escherichia coli—Part 2: Colony‐count technique at 44 degrees C using 5‐bromo‐4‐chloro‐3‐indolyl beta‐D‐glucuronide. 2001.
  • 27. Solomon HM, Lilly T. Bacteriological Analytical Manual Chapter 17: Clostridium botulinum. Silver Spring, MD, USA: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2001.
  • 28. Paxton RJ, Klee J, Korpela S, Fries I. Nosema ceranae has infected Apis mellifera in Europe since at least 1998 and may be more virulent than Nosema apis. Apidologie 2007; 38 (6): 558-565. doi: 10.1051/apido:2007037
  • 29. Saral Ö, Kılıçarslan M, Şahin H, Yıldız O, Dinçer B. Evaluation of antioxidant activity of bee products of different bee races in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2019; 43 (4): 441-447. doi: 10.3906/vet-1901-3
  • 30. Azirun MSB. Antibacterial activity of propolis and honey against Staphylococcus Aureus and Escherichia Coli. African Journal of Microbiology Research 2010; 4 (16): 1872-1878.
  • 31. Keskin N, Hazir S, Baser KHC, Kürkçüoglu M. Antibacterial activity and chemical composition of Turkish propolis. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 2001; 56C: 1112-1115. doi: 10.1515/znc-2001-11-1231
  • 32. Popova M, Silici S, Kaftanoglu O, Bankova V. Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and its qualitative and quantitative chemical composition. Phytomedicine 2005; 12 (3): 221-228. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2003.09.007
  • 33. Silici S, Kutluca S. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of propolis collected by three different races of honeybees in the same region. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2005; 99 (1): 69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.01.046
  • 34. Kartal M, Yıldız S, Kaya S, Kurucu S, Topçu G. Antimicrobial activity of propolis samples from two different regions of Anatolia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2003; 86 (1): 69-73. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(03)00042-4
  • 35. Iurlina MO, Fritz R. Characterization of microorganisms in Argentinean honeys from different sources. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2005; 105 (3): 297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.03.017
  • 36. Saha S, Ahammad I, Barmon S. Isolation, detection and characterization of aerobic bacteria from honey samples of Bangladesh. bioRxiv 2018; 298695. doi: 10.1101/298695
  • 37. Snowdon JA, Cliver DO. Microorganisms in honey. International Journal of Food Microbiology 1996; 31 (1-3): 1-26. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(96)00970-1
  • 38. Wojtyczka RD, Dziedzic A, Idzik D, Kępa M, Kubina R et al. Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates to propolis extract alone or in combination with antimicrobial drugs. Molecules 2013; 18 (8): 9623-9640. doi: 10.3390/ molecules18089623
  • 39. Adebayo AA, Banjo AD. Microbiological examination of honey marketed in southwestern Nigeria. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research 2012; 2 (2): 1701-1705.
  • 40. Dümen E, Akkaya H, Öz GM, Sezgin FH. Microbiological and parasitological quality of honey produced in İstanbul. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2013; 37 (5): 602- 607. doi: 10.3906/vet-1301-46
  • 41. Brook I. Infant botulism. Journal of Perinatology 2007; 27 (3): 175-180. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211651
  • 42. Du SJ, Cheng CM, Lai HY, Chen LH. Combined methods of dialysis, cooked meat medium enrichment and laboratory animal toxicity for screening Clostridium botulinum spores in honey and infant food. Zhonghua Minguo wei sheng wu ji mian yi xue za zhi= Chinese Journal of Microbiology and İmmunology 1991; 24 (2): 240-247 (in Chinese).
  • 43. Nevas M, Hielm S, Lindström M, Horn H, Koivulehto K et al. High prevalence of Clostridium botulinum types A and B in honey samples detected by polymerase chain reaction. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2002; 72 (1-2): 45- 52. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00615-8
  • 44. Nevas M, Lindström M, Hörman A, Keto‐Timonen R, Korkeala H. Contamination routes of Clostridium botulinum in the honey production environment. Environmental Microbiology 2006; 8 (6): 1085-1094. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.001000.x
  • 45. Küplülü Ö, Göncüoğlu M, Özdemir H, Koluman A. Incidence of Clostridium botulinum spores in honey in Turkey. Food Control 2006; 17 (3): 222-224. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.10.004
  • 46. Koluman A, Gölcü BM, Derin O, Özkök S, Anniballi F. Clostridium botulinum in honey: prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of isolated strains. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2013; 37: 706-711. doi: 10.3906/vet-1209- 40
  • 47. Gücükoğlu A, Terzi G, Çadirci Ö, Alişarli M, Kevenk O et al. Detection of C. botulinum types in honey by mPCR. Journal of Food Science 2014; 79 (4): 600-603. doi: 10.1111/1750- 3841.12402
  • 48. Wojtacka J, Wysok B, Kabašinskienė A, WiszniewskaŁaszczych A, Gomółka-Pawlicka M et al. Prevalence of Clostridium botulinum type A, B, E and F isolated from directly sold honey in Lithuania. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2017; 19: 335-343.
  • 49. Wojtacka J, Wysok B, Lipiński Z, Gomółka-Pawlicka M, RybakChmielewska H et al. Clostridium botulinum spores found in honey from small apiaries in Poland. Journal of Apicultural Science 2016; 60 (2): 89-100. doi: 10.1515/jas-2016-0020
  • 50. Nevas M. Clostridium Botulinum in Honey Production with Respect to Infant Botulism. MSc, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, 2006.
  • 51. Shimanuki H, Knox DA. Diagnosis of Honey Bee Diseases Agriculture Handbook, Agricultural Research Service. US Department of Agriculture No. 690: 53. Washington, USA: US Department of Agriculture; 1991.
  • 52. Lotfi A, Jamshidi R, Shahryar HA, Yousefkhani M. The prevalence of Nosemosis in honey bee colonies in Arasbaran region (Northwestern Iran). American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences 2009; 5 (2): 255-257.
  • 53. Şimşek H. An investigation on some parasitic and fungal diseases in honey bee in Elazığ. Veterinary Journal of Ankara University 2005; 52: 123-126 (article in Turkish with an English abstract).
  • 54. Çakmak İ, Aydın L, Güleğen E. Honeybee pests and diseases in Southern Marmara region of Turkey. Uludağ Bee Journal 2003; (2): 33-35 (article in Turkish with an English abstract).
  • 55. Topçu B, Arslan MÖ. The prevalence of Nosemosis in honey bee in the province of Kars. Uludağ Bee Journal 2004; 4: 164- 170 (article in Turkish with an English abstract).
  • 56. Şahinler N, Gül A. Investigation of bee diseases in beekeeping enterprice in Hatay province. Uludağ Bee Journal 2005; 5: 27- 31 (article in Turkish with an English abstract).
  • 57. Traver BE, Fell RD. Prevalence and infection intensity of Nosema in honey bee (Apis Mellifera L.) colonies in Virginia. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 2011; 107 (1): 43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2011.02.003
  • 58. Varis AL, Ball B, Allen M. The incidence of pathogens in honey bee (Apis Mellifera L) colonies in Finland and Great Britain. Apidologie 1992; 23 (2): 133-137. doi: 10.1051/apido:19920205
  • 59. Chauzat MP, Higes M, Martín-Hernández R, Meana A, Cougoule N et al. Presence of Nosema ceranae in French honey bee colonies. Journal of Apicultural Research 2007; 46 (2): 127- 128. doi: 10.1080/00218839.2007.11101380
Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0128
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Assessment of changes in the saliva cortisol level of horses during different ways in recreational exploitation

Bogusława DŁUGOSZ, Tomasz PRÓCHNIAK, Monika STEFANIUK-SZMUKIER, Marta BASIAGA, Jarosław ŁUSZCZYŃŚK, Magdalena PIESZKA

Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESβL), AmpC and carbapenemase activities and colistin resistance of Salmonella spp. isolated from food poisoning cases in Turkey

Sibel KIZIL

Effects of activated charcoal and zeolite on serum lipopolysaccharides and some inflammatory biomarkers levels in experimentally induced subacute ruminal acidosis in lambs

Ali Abbas NIKVAND, Mohammad NOUR, Mohammad RAZI JALALI, Mohammad Reza TEIMORY AZADBAKHT

Evaluation of hemodynamic, hematological parameters and the clinical effects of dexmedetomidine-ketamine and xylazine-ketamine anesthesia in rabbits

Şükrü GÜRLER, Ünal YAVUZ, Esra KİRAZOĞLU

Possible ensiling of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) residues

Mahmut KALİBER, Yusuf KONCA, Selma BÜYÜKKILIÇ BEYZİ, İsmail ÜLGER

Comparing microbiological profiles, bioactivities, and physicochemical and sensory properties of donkey milk kefir and cow milk kefir

Burcu Emine TEFON ÖZTÜRK, Side Selin Su YİRMİBEŞOĞLU

Genetic polymorphism of alpha S1-casein in Bulgarian sheep breeds and its effect on milk composition

Petya VELEVA, Deyana GENCHEVA, Darina PAMUKOVA, Nikolina NAYDENOVA

In vitro investigation of NETosis reaction developing from dog polymorphonuclear neutrophils to Toxoplasma gondii

Kader YILDIZ, Güneş KARAKURT

Investigation of propolis in terms of hygienic quality, some pathogenic bacteria and Nosema spp

Hayrettin AKKAYA, Gülay Merve BAYRAKAL, Emek DÜMEN

An atypical localization of Bacillus anthracis in a cow’s milk and udder

Özgür ÇELEBİ, Fatih BÜYÜK, Mustafa Reha COŞKUN, Mitat ŞAHİN