Evaluation of larval culture and conventional PCR methods for the detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equines of Iran

Evaluation of larval culture and conventional PCR methods for the detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equines of Iran

Strongylus vulgaris (S. vulgaris) is known as the equine’s most pathogenic nematode due to the extraintestinal migration in mesenteric arterial vessels. Since a few kinds of S. vulgaris can threat the animals’ health and working efficiency, high precision and early detection of strongylid nematodes is essential. Traditionally, the larval coproculture method was used frequently for identification of strongylid species.The technique of larval culture is costly, time consuming, and does not have sufficient accuracy and reliability. Here, we critically evaluated the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with larval culture methods for the detection of S. vulgaris eggs in fecal samples. To this aim, fresh fecal samples were obtained from 42 horses and 71 donkeys in different provinces of Iran. All samples containing strongyle form eggs were individually cultured and third–stage (L3 ) S. vulgaris larvae were harvested from Baermann apparatus. The collected strongyle form eggs were individually kept in ethanol for molecular study. The L3 strongyle larvae were identified by morphological characteristics. The genomic DNA of strongyle eggs extracted and the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS-2) region was amplified using PCR technique. Then, the phylogenetic tree was drawn based on sequenced products. The results showed that the shedding eggs of strongylid nematodes were observed in 85%, 27.58%, and 50% of the donkeys in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Isfahan, and Khuzestan provinces and 12% of the horses in the Khuzestan province. Also, S. vulgaris was identified in 10 (8.85%) and 11 (9.73%) of the donkeys by larval culture and PCR methods, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis showed the Iranian S. vulgaris isolates found in clusters in other countries, and isolates of this parasite have recorded. Molecular findings of the PCR method are closer to the realistic values of S. vulgaris infection and detect a higher rate of positive samples. So, it can be applied for large scale screening programs of equine population

___

  • 1. Lichtenfels JR, Kharchenko VA, Dvojnos GM. Illustrated identification keys to strongylid parasites (Strongylidae: Nematoda) of horses, zebras and asses (Equidae). Veterinary Parasitology 2008; 156: 4-161. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.04.026
  • 2. Lichtenfels JR. Helminths of Domestic Equids: Illustrated keys to genera and species with emphasis on North American forms (Volume 42). Washington, DC, USA: The Helminthological Society of Washington; 1975.
  • 3. Hartwich G. On the Strongylus tetracanthus problem and the systematics of the Cyathostominea (Nematoda: Strongyloidea). Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 1986; 62: 61-102 (in Germany with an abstract in English). doi: 10.1002/mmnz.19860620107
  • 4. Zhang LP, K’ung FY. Parasitic Nematodes from Equus spp. Beijing, China: China Agriculture Press, 2002 (in Chinese).
  • 5. Tolliver SC, Lyons ET, Drudge JH. Prevalence of internal parasites in horses in critical tests of activity of parasiticides over a 28-year period (1956-1983) in Kentucky. Veterinary Parasitology 1987; 23 (3-4): 273-284. doi: 10.1016/0304- 4017(87)90013-6
  • 6. Lloyd S, Smith J, Connan RM, Hatcher MA, Hedges TR et al. Parasite control methods used by horse owners: factors predisposing to the development of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes. Veterinary Record 2000; 146 (17): 487-492. doi: 10.1136/vr.146.17.487
  • 7. O’Meara B, Mulcahy G. A survey of helminth control practices in equine establishments in Ireland. Veterinary Parasitology 2002; 109 (1-2): 101-110. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00249-2
  • 8. Matthee S, Dreyer FH, Hoffmann WA, Niekerk FE. An introductory survey of helminth control practices in South Africa and anthelmintic resistance on Thoroughbred study farms in the Western Cape Province. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 2002; 73 (4): 195-200.
  • 9. Hinney B, Wirtherle NC, Kyule M, Miethe N, Zessin K-H et al. A questionnaire survey on helminth control on horse farms in Brandenburg, Germany and the assessment of risks caused by different kinds of management. Parasitology Research 2011; 109 (6): 1625-1635. doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2362-z
  • 10. Krecek RC, Guthrie AJ. Alternative approaches to control of cyathostomes: an African perspective. Veterinary Parasitology 1999; 85: 151-162. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(99)000 95-3
  • 11. Matthee S, Krecek RC, Milne SA. Prevalence and biodiversity of helminth parasites in donkeys from South Africa. Journal of parasitology 2000; 86: 756-762. doi: 10.1645/0022- 3395(2000)086[0756PABOHP]2.0.CO;2
  • 12. Drudge JH. Clinical aspects of S. vulgaris infection in the horse. Veterinary clinics of North America. Large Animal Practice 1979; 1: 251-265. doi: 10.1016/s0196-9846(17)30183-0
  • 13. Nielsen MK, Olsen SN, Lyons ET, Monrad J, Thamsborg SM. Real-time PCR evaluation of S. vulgaris in horses on farms in Denmark and Central Kentucky. Veterinary Parasitology 2012; 190 (3-4): 461-466. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.07.018
  • 14. Duncan JL. S. vulgaris infection in the horse. Veterinary Record 1974; 95: 34-37. doi: 10.1136/vr.95.2.34
  • 15. Duncan JL, Pirie HM. The pathogenesis of single experimental infections with S. vulgaris in foals. Research in Veterinary Science 1975; 18: 82-93.
  • 16. McCraw BM, Slocombe JOD. S. vulgaris in the horse: a review. Canadian Veterinary Journal 1976; 17 (6): 150-155.
  • 17. Nielsen MK, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Pfister K, Reinemeyer CR, Molento MB et al. The appropriate antiparasitic treatment: coping with emerging threats from old adversaries. Equine Veterinary Journal 2016; 48 (3): 374-375. doi: 10.1111/evj.12550
  • 18. Schneider S, Pfister K, Becher A, Scheuerle MC. Strongyle infections and parasitic control strategies in German horses - a risk assessment. BMC Veterinary Research 2014; 10 (1): 262- 270. doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0262-z
  • 19. Nielsen MK, Pfister K, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Selective therapy in equine parasite control—application and limitations. Veterinary Parasitology 2014; 202 (3-4): 95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.03.020
  • 20. Menzel M, Becher AM, Greite L, Pfister K. Die einführung der methode der selektiven entwurmung in einem pferdebestand. Tierärztliche Umschau 2013; 68: 116-120 (in German).
  • 21. Tavassoli M, Dalir-Naghadeh B, Esmaeili-Sani S. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in working horses. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences 2010; 13 (2): 319-324.
  • 22. Tavassoli M, Arjmand Yamchi J, Hajipour NA. Survey on the prevalence of Strongyles species in working donkeys in NorthWest of Iran. Journal of Parasitic Diseases 2016; 40 (4): 1210- 1212. doi: 10.1007/s12639-015-0651-7
  • 23. Hosseini SH, Meshgi B, Eslami A, Bokai S, Sobhani M et al. Prevalence and biodiversity of helminth parasites in donkeys (Equus asinus) in Iran. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Medicine 2009; 3 (2): 95-99.
  • 24. Shabazi P, Tooloei M, Zamanzad Ghavidel E, Hassanzadeh A. Survey on gastrointestinal parasitic helminthes in club and rural horses of Ardabil city, Iran. Veterinary Clinical Pathology 2018; 12, 2 (46): 113-122.
  • 25. Campbell AJ, Gasser RB, Chilton NB. Differences in a ribosomal DNA sequence of Strongyle species allows identification of single eggs. International Journal for Parasitology 1995; 25 (3): 359-365. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(94)00116-6
  • 26. Van Wyk JA, Van Wyk L, Boomker JDF. Freezing of sheep faeces invalidates Haemonchus contortus faecal egg counts by the McMaster technique. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 2002; 69: 299-304.
  • 27. Nielsen MK, Baptiste KE, Tolliver SC, Collins SS, Lyons ET. Analysis of multiyear studies in horses in Kentucky to ascertain whether counts of eggs and larvae per gram of feces are reliable indicators of numbers of strongyles and ascarids present. Veterinary Parasitology 2010; 174 (1-2): 77-84. doi: 10.1016/j. vetpar.2010.08.007
  • 28. Bellaw JL, Nielsen MK. Evaluation of Baermann apparatus sedimentation time on recovery of S. vulgaris and S. edentatus third stage larvae from equine coprocultures. Veterinary Parasitology 2015; 211 (1-2): 99-101. doi: 10.1016/j. vetpar.2015.05.001
  • 29. Zajac AZ, Conboy GA. Veterinary Clinical Parasitology. 8th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
  • 30. Pfister K, Beelitz P, Hamel D. Parasitologische Diagnostik. In: Moritz A (editor). Klinische Labordiagnostik in der Tiermedizin. 7th ed. Stuttgart, German: Schattauer GmbH; 2013. pp. 628-699 (in German).
  • 31. Bowman D. Georgis’ Parasitology for Veterinarians.10th ed. St. Louis, MO, USA: Elsevier; 2013. pp. 371-372.
  • 32. Russell AF. The development of helminthiasis in thoroughbred foals. Journal of Comparative Pathology & Therapeutics 1948; 58: 107-127. doi: 10.1016/S0368-1742 (48)80009-3
  • 33. Harmon AF, Zarlenga DS, Hildreth MB. Improved methods for isolating DNA from Ostertagia ostertagi eggs in cattle feces. Veterinary Parasitology 2006; 135: 297-302. doi: 10.1016/j. vetpar.2005.10.014
  • 34. Nielsen MK, Peterson DS, Monrad J, Thamsborg ST, Olsen SN et al. Detection and semi-quantification of S. vulgaris DNA in equine faeces by real-time PCR. International Journal for Parasitology 2008; 38: 443-453. doi: 10.1016/j. ijpara.2007.07.014
  • 35. Tamura K. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G + C-content biases. Molecular Biology & Evolution 1992; 9: 678-687. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040752
  • 36. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology & Evolution 2018; 35: 1547-1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096
  • 37. Kaspar A, Pfister K, Silaghi C, Fink H, Scheuerle MC. Detection of Strongylus vulgaris in faecal samples of horses by molecular methods. BMC Veterinary Research 2017; 13: 19. doi: 10.1186/ s12917-016-0918-y
  • 38. Mfitilodze MW, Hutchinson GW. Prevalence and abundance of equine Strongyles (Nematoda: Strongyloidea) in tropical Australia. Journal of Parasitology 1990; 76 (4): 487-494. doi: 10.2307/3282826
  • 39. Buzatu MC, Mitrea IL, Gruianu A, Ionita M. Investigating the Strongyle populations, with emphasis on S. vulgaris (Nematoda: Strongylidae) in Romanian horses, based on larval cultures. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences & Veterinary Medicine 2017; 74 (2): 186-192. doi: 10.15835/buasvmcnvm:0026
  • 40. Postoli R, Robaj A, Ceroni V, Zalla P, Andoni E et al. Epidemiological study on the prevalence of endoparasites of equines in Albania. Veterinaria 2010; 59 (1-4): 37-45.
  • 41. Ibrahim N, Berhanu T, Deressa B, Tolosa T. Survey of prevalence of helminth parasites of donkeys in and around Hawassa town, Southern Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria 2011; 6 (3): 223-227.
  • 42. Disassa H, Alebachew A, Zenebe T, Kebede G. Prevalence of Strongyle infection in horses and donkeys in and around Dangila town, Northwest Ethiopia. Acta Parasitologica Globalis 2015; 6 (1): 14-19. doi: 10.5829/idosi.apg.2015.6.1.9159
  • 43. Tydén E, Enemark HL, Franko MA, Höglund J, OstermanLind E. Prevalence of S. vulgaris in horses after ten years of prescription usage of anthelmintics in Sweden. Veterinary Parasitology: X 2019; 2: 10001. doi: 10.1016/j.vpoa.2019.100013
  • 44. Bracken MK, Wøhlk CB, Petersen SL, Nielsen MK. Evaluation of conventional PCR for detection of S. vulgaris on horse farms. Veterinary Parasitology 2012; 184: 387-391. doi: 10.1016/j. vetpar.2011.08.015
  • 45. Nielsen MK, Monrad J, Olsen SN. Prescription-only anthelmintics a questionnaire survey on strategies for surveillance and control of equine Strongyles in Denmark. Veterinary Parasitology 2006; 135: 47-55. doi: 10.1016/j. vetpar.2005.10.020
  • 46. Craven J, Bjørn H, Henriksen SA, Nansen P, Larsen M et al. Survey of anthelmintic resistance on Danish horse farms, using 5 different methods of calculating faecal egg count reduction. Equine veterinary journal 1998; 30: 289-293. doi: 10.1111/ j.2042-3306.1998.tb04099.x
  • 47. Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Fritzen B, Demeler J, Schürmann S, Rohn K et al. Cases of reduced cyathostomin egg-reappearance period and failure of Parascaris equorum egg count reduction following ivermectin treatment as well as survey on Pyrantel efficacy on German horse farms. Veterinary Parasitology 2007; 144: 74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.036
  • 48. Traversa D, Iorio R, Klei TR, Kharchenko VA, Gawor J et al. New method for simultaneous species-specific identification of equine Strongyles (Nematoda, Strongylida) by reverse line blot hybridization. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2007; 45: 2937- 2942. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00714-07
  • 49. Hodgkinson JE, Lichtenfels JR, Mair TS, Cripps P, Freeman KL et al. A PCR-ELISA for the identification of cyathostomin fourth-stage larvae from clinical cases of larval cyathostominosis. International Journal for Parasitology 2003; 33: 1427-1435. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(03)00140-1
Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0128
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Visual outcome evaluation of complicated perforating corneal injuries after surgical repair in 45 cats

Marwa H. HASSAN, Khaled M. ALI

Comparing microbiological profiles, bioactivities, and physicochemical and sensory properties of donkey milk kefir and cow milk kefir

Burcu Emine TEFON ÖZTÜRK, Side Selin Su YİRMİBEŞOĞLU

Surgical management of infectious and noninfectious melting corneal ulcers in cats

Aynur DEMİR, Gülşen SEVİM KARAGÖZOĞLU, Yusuf ALTUNDAĞ

The effects of hatching time and feed access time on chick quality, organ development, blood parameters, and intestinal morphology in broilers

Volkan İPEK, Arda SÖZCÜ, Aydın İPEK, Müjdat Müfit KAHRAMAN

Genetic polymorphism of alpha S1-casein in Bulgarian sheep breeds and its effect on milk composition

Petya VELEVA, Deyana GENCHEVA, Darina PAMUKOVA, Nikolina NAYDENOVA

Determination of nutritional value of some quinoa varieties

Tugay AYAŞAN

A phylogenetic analysis of Mycoplasma strains circulating in sheep pneumonia in the Kars region of Turkey

Salih OTLU, Olcay ÖZTÜRKLER

Evaluation of animal models for genetic analysis of growth performance in Landlly pigs

Nihar Ranjan SAHOO, Snehasmita PANDA, Pruthviraj DEVAMMA RAMACHANDRAPPA, Gyanendra Kumar GAUR, Sheikh Firdous AHMAD, Panch Kishore BHARTI

Assessment of genetic gain and its simulation for performance traits in Sahiwal cattle

Atish Kumar CHAKRAVARTY, Poonam RATWAN, Manoj KUMAR

An atypical localization of Bacillus anthracis in a cow’s milk and udder

Özgür ÇELEBİ, Fatih BÜYÜK, Mustafa Reha COŞKUN, Mitat ŞAHİN