Impact of short compensatory growth periods on performance,carcass traits, fat deposition, and meat properties of Najdi lambs

Forty-eight Najdi male lambs weighing 33.1 ± 0.06 kg and approximately 4.5 months old were divided into three groups (16 lambs in each) to study the impact of compensatory growth on performance, carcass traits, fat deposition, tissue distribution, and lean chemical composition. The control group was fed ad libitum throughout the entire 12 weeks of the trial period. The other two groups were feed-restricted by 20% and 40% of the ad libitum group intake. Lambs in restricted treatments were feed-restricted for 3 weeks followed by 4 weeks of ad libitum feeding (compensatory) and then 2 weeks of feed restriction followed by 3 weeks ad libitum. No significant differences were detected among the three groups in overall average daily gain (g/day). During the two compensatory phases, the 40% group was more efficient (P < 0.05) in converting feed to gain, followed by the 20% group and finally by the 0% group. In general, feed restriction regimes did not affect (P > 0.05) carcass traits, fat deposition, meat properties, and chemical composition. It is concluded that feed restriction up to 40% can be an important tool to improve the growth efficiency and reduce the cost of meat production from growing Najdi lambs.

PDF

___

1. Abouheif MA, Al-Owaimer A, Kraidees M, Metwally H, Shafey T. Effect of restricted feeding and realimentation on feed performance and carcass characteristics of growing lambs. Rev Bras Zootecn 2013; 42: 95-101.
2. Suryanarayana MVAN, Siva Prasad B. Impact of feed restriction and compensatory growth in sheep. Int J Food Agric Vet Sci 2014; 4: 28-32.
3. Lawrence TLJ, Fowler V. Growth of Farm Animals. 2nd ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 2002.
4. Homem Junior AC, Silva Sobrinho AG, Yamamoto SM, Pinheiro RSB, Buzzulini C, Lima CSA. Ganho compensatório em cordeiras na fase de recria: desempenho e medidas biométricas. Rev Bras Zootecn 2007; 36: 111-119 (in Portuguese).
5. Dashtizadeh M, Zamiri MJ, Kamalzadeh A, Kamali A. Effect of feed restriction on compensatory growth response of young male goats. Iran J Vet Res 2008;9: 109-120.
6. Shadnoush G R, Alikhani M, Rahmani HR, Edriss MA, Kamalzadeh A, Zahedifar M. Effects of restricted feeding and re-feeding in growing lambs: intake, growth and body organs development. J Anim Vet Adv 2011; 10: 280-285.
7. Abouheif M, Al-Sornokh H, Swelum A, Yaqoob H, Al-Owaimer A. Effect of different feed restriction on lamb performance and carcass traits. Rev Bras Zootecn 2015; 44: 76-82.
8. Rompala RE, Jones SDM, Buchanan-Smith JG, Bayley HS. Feedlot performance and composition of gain in late maturing steers exhibiting normal and compensatory growth. J Anim Sci 1985; 61: 637-646.
9. Marais PG, Van der Merwe HJ, Du Toit JE. The effect of compensatory growth on feed intake, growth rate, body composition and efficiency of feed utilization in Dorper sheep. S Afr J Anim Sci 1991; 21: 80-88.
10. Drouillard JS, Klopfenstein TJ, Britton RA, Bauer ML, Gramlich SM, Webster TJ, Ferrell CL. Growth, body composition and visceral organ mass and metabolism in lambs after protein or net energy restrictions. J Anim Sci 1991; 69: 3357-3375.
11. Atti N, Ben Salem H. Compensatory growth and carcass composition of Barbarine lambs receiving different levels of feeding with partial replacement of the concentrate with feed blocks. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2008; 147: 265-277.
12. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Washington, DC, USA: AOAC; 1995.
13. SAS. Users Guide. Cary, NC, USA: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute; 1999.
14. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep. 7th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy of Sciences; 1987.
15. Mahouachi M, Atti N. Effects of restricted feeding and re-feeding of Barbarine lambs: intake, growth and non-carcass components. Anim Sci 2005; 81: 305-312.
16. Kamalzadeh A, Koops WJ, A. Kiasat A. Effect of qualitative feed restriction on energy metabolism and nitrogen retention in sheep. S Afr J Anim Sci 2009; 39: 30-39.
17. Gonzaga Neto S, Bezerra LR, Medeiros AN, Ferreira MA, Pimenta Filho EC, Cândido EP, Oliveira RL. Feed restriction and compensatory growth in Guzera females. Asian Austral J Anim Sci 2011; 24: 791-799.
18. Yambayamba ESK, Price MA, Foxcroft GR. Hormonal status, metabolic changes and resting metabolic rate in beef heifers undergoing compensatory growth. J Anim Sci 1996; 74: 57-69.
19. Murphy TA, Loerch SC, McClure KE, Solomon MB. Effects of restricted feeding on growth performance and carcass composition of lambs. J Anim Sci 1994; 72: 3131-3137.
20. Sami A, Shafey T, Abouheif MA. Growth rate of carcass, non-carcass and chemical components of restricted fed and realimented growing lambs. Int J Agric Bio 2013; 15: 307-312.
21. Kabbali A, Johnson WL, Johnson DW, Goodrich RD, Allen CE. Effects of compensatory growth on some body component weights and on carcass and noncarcass composition of growing lambs. J Anim Sci 1992; 70: 2852-2858.
22. Wright IA, Russel AJF. Changes in the body composition of beef cattle during compensatory growth. Anim Prod 1991;52: 105-113.
23. Turgeon OA, Brink DR, Bartle SJ, Klopfenstein TJ, Ferrell CL. Effects of growth rate and compensatory growth on body composition in lambs. J Anim Sci 1986; 63: 770-780.
24. Hornick JL, Van Eanaeme C, Gerard O, Dufrashe I, Istasse L. 2000. Mechanisms of reduced and compensatory growth. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2000; 19: 121-132.
25. Al-Selbood BA, Effect of feeding program on performance and carcass characteristics of Najdi lambs. PhD, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2009.