Agnieszka ZIEMIAŃSKA, Maciej TROJAN, Konrad BAZEWICZ, Justyna WOJTAŚ, Tomasz PRÓCHNIAK, Iwona ROZEMPOLSKA-RUCIŃSKA

Do horses learn how to reach for feed depending on the time of day?

The aim of the study was to assess the ability of horses to learn how to open feeder boxes in a direction associated with the time of day. The study involved 10 horses. The first stage of the study consisted in learning how to complete the task. The second stage involved the test and was followed by a control stage. The results indicated the highest number of failed attempts in the leftward movement test. The mean time required by the horses to complete the task of the leftward opening (10.27 s) was twofold longer than in the rightward direction test (5.06 s). It was observed that horses did not learn to open their feeder boxes in the correct direction according to feeding time. Although the results confirm that horses learn new tasks easily, the method employed does not facilitate examination of the problem of the impact of the memory of past events on the modification of behaviour depending on the time of day

PDF

___

1. Hanggi EB. Categorization learning in horses (Equus caballus). Journal of Comparative Psychology 1999; 113: 243-252. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.113.3.243
2. Starling M, McLean A, McGreevy P. The Contribution of Equitation Science to Minimising Horse-Related Risks to Humans. Animals 2016; 6: 15. doi: 10.3390/ani6030015
3. McLean AN, Christensen JW. The application of learning theory in horse training. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2017; 190: 18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.020
4. Lansade L, Simon F. Horses’ learning performances are under the influence of several temperamental dimensions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2010; 125: 30-37. doi: 10.1016/j. applanim.2010.02.010
5. Visser EK, van Reenen CG, Schilder MBH, Barneveld A, Blokhuis HJ. Learning performances in young horses using two different learning tests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2003; 80: 311-326. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00235-6
6. Dere E, Kart-Teke E, Huston JP, De Souza Silva MA. The case for episodic memory in animals. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2006; 30: 1206-1224. doi: 10.1016/j. neubiorev.2006.09.005
7. Squire LR, Zola SM. Episodic memory, semantic memory, and amnesia. Hippocampus 1998; 8: 205-211. doi: 10.1002/ (SICI)1098-1063(1998)8:3<205::AID-HIPO3>3.0.CO; 2-I
8. Corballis MC. Mental time travel, language, and evolution. Neuropsychologia 2019; 134: 107202. doi: 10.1016/j. neuropsychologia.2019.107202
9. Dere D, Zlomuzica A, Dere E. Fellow travellers in cognitive evolution: Co-evolution of working memory and mental time travel? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2019; 105: 94- 105. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.016
10. Redshaw J. Does metarepresentation make human mental time travel unique? WIREs Cognitive Science 2014; 5: 519-531. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1308
11. Zentall TR. Mental time travel in animals: A challenging question. Behavioural Processes 2006; 72: 173-183. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.01.009
12. Cheke LG, Clayton NS. Mental time travel in animals. WIREs Cognitive Science 2010; 1: 915-930. doi: 10.1002/wcs.59
13. Mulder C, Gerkema M, Van Der Zee E. Circadian clocks and memory: time-place learning. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 2013; 6: 8. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2013.00008
14. Boulos Z, Logothetis DE. Rats anticipate and discriminate between two daily feeding times. Physiology & Behavior 1990; 48: 523-529. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(90)90294-E
15. Esch L, Wöhr C, Erhard M, Krüger K. Horses’ (Equus Caballus) Laterality, Stress Hormones, and Task Related Behavior in Innovative Problem-Solving. Animals 2019; 9: 265. doi: 10.3390/ani9050265
16. Komárková M, Bartošová J. Lateralized suckling in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 2013; 16: 343-349. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0575-x
17. Karenina K, Giljov A, Malashichev Y. Lateralization of motherinfant interactions in wild horses. Behavioural Processes 2018; 148: 49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.01.010
18. Baragli P, Vitale V, Paoletti E, Sighieri C, Reddon AR. Detour behaviour in horses (Equus caballus). Journal of Ethology 2011; 29: 227-234. doi: 10.1007/s10164-010-0246-9
19. Sikorska J, Trojan M, Jakucińska A, Farley D. Sensitivity to Measurement Errors in Studies on Prosocial Choice using a Two-Choice Paradigm. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 2016; 48: 231-239. doi: 10.1515/slgr-2016-0064
20. Inglis I. Review: The central role of uncertainty reduction in determining behaviour. Behaviour 2000; 137: 1567-1599. doi: 10.1163/156853900502727
21. Leliveld LMC, Langbein J, Puppe B. The emergence of emotional lateralization: Evidence in non-human vertebrates and implications for farm animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2013; 145: 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.02.002
22. Visser EK, Van Reenen CG, Engel B, Schilder MBH, Barneveld A et al. The association between performance in show-jumping and personality traits earlier in life. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2003; 82: 279-295. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00083-2
23. Bonnell MK, McDonnell SM. Evidence for Sire, Dam, and Family Influence on Operant Learning in Horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2016; 36: 69-76. doi: 10.1016/j. jevs.2015.10.013
24. Krueger K, Flauger B. Social learning in horses from a novel perspective. Behavioural Processes 2007; 76: 37-39. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.08.010