Determination of nutritional value of some quinoa varieties

The purpose of this study was to determine the nutritive value of 5 quinoa varieties (Inia431- Altiplano, White, Titicaca, Illpa Inia, and Carmen). As a result of the study, it was found that there were statistically significant differences between the quinoa varieties in terms of dry matter (DM), crude ash (CA), crude protein (CP), crude fat (CF), neutral-detergent fiber (NDF), acid-detergent fiber (ADF), crude cellulose (CC), hemicellulose (HC), total digestible nutrients (TDN), digestible energy (DE), metabolizable energy (ME), and net energy lactation (NEL) (P < 0.05). This is a preliminary study. In vivo and vitro studies are required.

PDF

___

1. Demir MK, Kılınç M. Quinoa: Nutritional and anti-nutritional characteristics. Journal of Food and Health Science 2016; 2 (3): 104-111. doi: 10.3153/jfhs16011
2. İnan S, Ayaşan T. Anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer effects of kinoa as future food. In: International Eurasian Congress on Natural Nutrition and Healthy Life; Ankara, Turkey; 2018. pp. 143-14
3. Geren H, Güre E. A preliminary study on the effect of different N and P levels on the grain yield and other yield components of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.). Ege University Agricultural Faculty Journal 2017; 54 (1): 1-8.
4. Sharma G, Lakhawat S. Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa), an ancient Andean grain: A review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017; 6 (4): 1488-1489.
5. Dağ ŞRO, Özkan AMG. A review on quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) Journal of Faculty Pharmacy of Ankara University 2019; 43 (3): 309-333. doi: 10.33483/jfpau.487757
6. Ayaşan Ş, Ayaşan T. Using quinoa in human and animal nutrition. In: Central Anatolia Region 3rd Agriculture and Food Congress; Sivas, Turkey; 2017. pp. 409-410.
7. James LEA. Quinoa composition, chemistry, nutritional and functional properties. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research 2009; 58 (1): 1-31. doi: 10.1016/s1043-4526(09)58001-1
8. Kaya E, Karaer M. Kinoa growing and the importance of health. Turkish Journal of Scientific Reviews 2017; 10 (2): 21- 26.
9. Turp GY, Sucu Ç. Köfte üretiminde gluten içermeyen bir katkı olarak kinoa kullanımı. In: Türkiye 12. Gıda Kongresi; Edirne, Turkey; 2016. pp. 1-26 (in Turkish).
10. Geren H, Kavut YT, Topçu GD, Ekren S, İştipliler D. Effects of different sowing dates on the grain yield and some yield components of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) grown under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Ege University Agricultural Faculty Journal 2014; 51 (3): 297-305.
11. Sezen SM, Tekin S, Yıldız M. Water-yield relations and economic evaluation of quinoa irrigated with drainage water in the Cukurova Region. Derim 2018; 35 (2): 173-185.
12. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Washington, DC: Association Official Analytical Chemists; 1990.
13. Van-Soest PJ, Robertson JD, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 1991; 74 (10): 3583-3597.
14. Pinkerton B. Forage quality. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service. Forage Fact Sheet; 2005.
15. Tekce E, Gül M. The importance of NDF and ADF in ruminant nutrition. Atatürk University Journal of Veterinary Sciences 2014; 9 (1): 63-73.
16. MAFF. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. London, UK: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office; 1984.
17. SAS Institute. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. Version 3.5. Copyright 2012-2016 SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA; 2016.
18. Gül M, Tekce E. Quinoa: A new feedstuff in animal nutrition. Feed Magazine 2016; 76: 29-35.
19. Repo Carrasco Valencia RAM, Serna LA. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa, willd.) as a source of dietary fiber and other functional components. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos 2011; 31 (1): 225-230. doi: 10.1590/S0101-20612011000100035
20. Miranda M, Vega-Gálvez A, Quispe-Fuentes I, Rodríguez MJ, Maureira H et al. Nutritional aspects of six quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) ecotypes from three geographical areas of Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 2012; 72 (2): 175-181.
21. Villa DYG, Russo L, Kerbab K, Landi M, Rastrelli L. Chemical and nutritional characterization of Chenopodium pallidicaule (cañ ihua) and Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa) seeds. Emirates Journal of Food Agriculture 2014; 26 (7): 609-615. doi: 10.9755/ ejfa.v26i7.18187
22. Bhargava A, Shukla S, Ohri D. Implications of direct and indirect selection parameters for improvement of grain yield and quality components in Chenopodium quinoa willd. International Journal of Plant Production 2008; 2 (3): 183-191.
23. Shams AS. Combat degradation in rain fed areas by introducing new drought tolerant crops in Egypt. International Journal of Water Resources and Arid Environments 2011; 1 (5): 318-325.
24. Dumanlıoğlu Z, Işık D, Geren H. Effect of different salt (NaCl) concentrations on the grain yield and some yield components of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.). Ege University Agricultural Faculty Journal 2016; 53 (2): 153-159.
25. Kır AE, Temel S. Determination of seed yield and some agronomical characteristics of different quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) variety and populations under dry conditions of Iğdır plain. Iğdır University Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 2016; 6 (4): 145-154. doi: 10.21597/ jist.2016624166
26. Kır AE, Temel S. Determination of seed yield and some agronomical characteristics of different quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) genotypes under irrigated conditions. Iğdır University Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 2017; 7 (1): 353-361. doi: 10.21597/jist.2017127448.
27. Üke Ö, Kale H, Kaplan M, Kamalak A. Effects of maturity stages on hay yield and quality, gas and methane production of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.). Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Journal of Nature Sciences 2017; 20 (1): 42- 46. doi: 10.18016/ksujns.51209
28. Miranda M, Vega-Gálvez A, Martínez EA, López J, Marín R et al. Influence of contrasting environments on seed composition of two quinoa genotypes: nutritional and functional properties. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 2013; 73 (2): 108-116.
29. Zülkadir G, İdikut L, Çölkesen M. Farklı ekim zamanlarının kinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) bitkisinin kalite özellikleri üzerine etkisinin araştırılması. In: 2nd International Science Symposium Status; Tbilisi, Georgia; 2017. pp. 329-338.
30. Kozioł M. Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation of Quinoa. (Chenopodium quinoa willd.). Journal of Food Composition Analysis 1992; 5 (2): 35-68.
31. Vega-Galvez A, Miranda B, Vergara J, Uribe E, Puente L et al. Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.), an ancient Andean grain: A review. Journal of Science Food Agriculture 2010; 90 (15): 2541-2547.