Can obstructive apnea and hypopnea during sleep be diff erentiated by using electroencephalographic frequency bands? Statistical analysis of receiver-operator curve characteristics

Amaç: Elektroensefalografik (EEG) frekans bandlarının uyku apneli hastalarda obstrüktif apne ve hipopne gibi anormal solunum olaylarını ayırt etmede kullanılıp kullanılamayacağını belirlemek üzere bu çalışmayı planladık. Yöntem ve gereç: 20 hastanın polisomnografik kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. EEG kayıtları C4-A1 ve C3-A2 kanallarından alınarak dijital sinyal işleme yöntemlerini kullanan ve çalışma ekibi tarafından geliştirilen bir yazılım ile incelendi. Delta, teta, alfa ve beta frekans bandlarının yüzde değerleri apne ve hipopneleri ayırt edebilmek amacıyla diskriminant ve ROC analizleri kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: C4-A1 delta (%) frekans düzeyi en yüksek diskriminatif değeri sağladı (AUC = 0,563; P < 0,001), ancak C4-A1 alfa (%) düzeyi en düşük diskriminatif değeri verdi (AUC = 0,519; P = 0,041). Benzer şekilde, C4-A2 delta (%) frekans düzeyi en yüksek diskriminatif değeri sağlarken (AUC = 0,565; P < 0,001), C4-A2 alfa (%) düzeyi en düşük diskriminatif değeri verdi (AUC = 0,501; P = 0,943). Sonuç: Diskriminant analiz sonucunda, hipopnelerin doğru sınıfl andırılma oranı % 44,8 ve obstrüktif olguların doğru sınıflandırılma oranı % 63,5 oldu. Dört farklı frekans bandı içinde en anlamlı frekans delta idi. Ancak, prediktif değerler anlamlı derecede yüksek değildi.

Obstrüktif apne ve hipopne uyku esnasında elektroensefalografik frekans bandları kullanılarak birbirinden ayırt edilebilir mi? Karakteristik işlem eğrisi (receiveroperator curve, ROC) analizi

Aim: To investigate whether electroencephalographic (EEG) frequency bands are applicable in distinguishing abnormal respiratory events such as obstructive apnea and hypopnea in patients with sleep apnea. Materials and methods: Th e polysomnographic recordings of 20 patients were examined retrospectively. EEG record segments were taken from C4-A1 and C3-A2 channels and were analyzed with soft ware that uses digital signal processing methods, developed by the study team. Percentage values of delta, theta, alpha, and beta frequency bands were evaluated through discriminant and receiver-operator curve (ROC) analysis to distinguish between apneas and hypopneas. Results: For the C4-A1 channel, delta (%) provided the highest discriminative value (AUC = 0.563; P < 0.001); on the other hand, alpha (%) gave the lowest discriminative value (AUC = 0.519; P = 0.041). Likewise, whereas for the C3-A2 channel delta (%) gave the highest discriminative value (AUC = 0.565; P < 0.001), alpha produced the lowest discriminative value (AUC = 0.501; P = 0.943). Conclusion: As a result of discriminant analysis, the accurate classifi cation rate of hypopneas was 44.8% and the accurate classifi cation of obstructive apneas was 63.5%. Of the 4 frequency bands, the most signifi cant was delta. Th e predictive values were not at signifi cance level.

___

  • 1. American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) Task Force. Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome defi nition and measurement techniques in clinical research. Sleep 1999; 22: 667-89.
  • 2. Rechtschaff en A, K ales AA. A manual of standardized terminology, techniques and scoring for sleep stages of human subjects. Washington, DC: Government Printing Offi ce; 1968.
  • 3. Flamer HE. Sleep problems. Med J 1995; 162: 603-7.
  • 4. Morrissey M, Duntley S, Anch A, Nonneman R. Active sleep and its role in the prevention of apoptosis in the developing brain. Med Hypotheses 2004; 62: 876-9.
  • 5. Luo YM, Tang J, Jolley C, Steier J, Zhong N, Moxham J et al. Distinguishing obstructive from central sleep apnea events: diaphragm electromyogram and esophageal pressure compared. Chest 2009; 135: 1133-1141.
  • 6. Adrian ED, Yamagiwa K. Th e origin of the Berger rhythm. Brain 1935; 58: 323-351.
  • 7 . Ba-Karait NOS, Shamsuddin SM, Sudirman R. Swarm negative selection algorithm for electroencephalogram signal classifi cation. J Comput Sci 2009; 5: 998-1005.
  • 8. Jasper HH. Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol 1958; 10: 370-375.
  • 9. Goldberger AL, Amaral LAN, Glass L, Hausdor JM, Ivanov PCh, Mark RG et al. PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and Physionet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation 1999; 101: 215-220.
  • 10. Kaiser JF. On Teager’s energy algorithm and its generalization to continuous signals. IEEE Proc 1990; ICASSP-90.
  • 11. Nakamura M, Shibasaki H. Elimination of EKG artifacts from EEG records: a new method of non-cephalic referential EEG recording. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol 1987; 66: 89-92.
  • 12. Lee JM, Kim DJ, Kim IY, Park KS, Kim SI. Detrended fl uctuation analysis of EEG in sleep apnea using MIT/BIH polysomnography data. Comput Biol Med 2002; 32: 37-47.
  • 13. Duman F, Erdamar A, Erogul O, Telatar Z, Yetkin S. Effi cient sleep spindle detection algorithm with decision tree. Expert Systems with Application 2009; 36: 9980-5.
  • 14. Hamila R, Astola J, Alaya CF, Gabbouj M, Renfors M. Teager energy and the ambiguity function. IEEE Trans Signal Process 1999; 47: 260-262.
  • 15. Grap A. An introduction to wavelet analysis. 2nd ed. IEEE Press Series in Computational Science and Engineering; 1995.
  • 16. Percival DB, Walden AT. Wavelet methods for time series analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
  • 17. Akay M. Time frequency and wavelets in biomedical signal processing. IEEE Press Series in Biomedical Engineering; 1998.
  • 18. Bergen SWA, Antoniou A. Design of ultraspherical window functions with prescribed spectral characteristics. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing 2004; 13: 2053-65.
  • 19. Harris FJ. On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform. Proceedings of the IEEE 1978; 66: 51-83.
  • 20. Smith SW. Th e scientist and engineer’s guide to digital signal processing. 2nd ed. San Diego (CA): California Technical Publishing; 1996.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Can obstructive apnea and hypopnea during sleep be diff erentiated by using electroencephalographic frequency bands? Statistical analysis of receiver-operator curve characteristics

Levent ÖZTÜRK, İlhan UMUT, Erdem UÇAR, Tevfik GÜLYAŞAR, Nejdet SÜT

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): outcomes of 3136 cases over 10 years

Sabri Selçuk ATAMANALP, Abdulmecit KANTARCI, Mehmet İlhan YILDIRGAN

Anti-diabetic effects of an alcoholic extract of Juglans regia in an animal model

Jamshid MOHAMMADI, Khalil SAADIPOUR, Hamdollah DELAVIZ, Bahram MOHAMMADI

The effects of p53 inhibition using pifithrin-a on acute necrotizing pancreatitis in rats

Akif CİNEL, Deniz FİLİNTE, Serdar TÜRKYILMAZ, Murat ALPER, Ethem ALHAN, Mehmet Cengiz ERÇİN, Birgül KURAL VANİZOR

The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Faisalabad, Pakistan: a population-based study

mohammad ARIF, Fatma HUSSAIN, Munir AHMAD

The effect of epidural top-up technique with saline in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: a prospective study

Mahmut Deniz GÖKÇE, Birsen KARACİ EKŞİOĞLU, Ulviye Hale DOBRUCALI, Gülçihan Ulufer SİVRİKAYA, Ayşe HANCI

Aksiller, supraklavikular ve interskalen yaklaşımlar ile uygulanan brakiyal pleksus bloğunun yayılımı

Ahmet MAHLİ, Demet COŞKUN

Psychosocial evaluation of physicians receiving adaptation training in family practice

Sevsen CEBECİ, Olgun GÖKTAŞ, Oğuz TEKİN

Development and validation of the Turkish version of the MNREAD visual acuity charts

Deniz ÇALIŞKAN, Şefay Aysun İDİL, Namık Barış İDİL

First trimester maternal serum PAPP-A levels and macrosomia in nondiabetic mothers

Servet Özden HACIVELİOĞLU, Tayfun ÇOK, Halil Tayfun BAĞIŞ, Ebru TARIM