Development and validation of the Turkish version of the MNREAD visual acuity charts
To design and validate a Turkish version of the MNREAD acuity charts. Materials and methods: A vocabulary was created using high-frequency words that appear in Turkish schoolbooks used by 8-year-old children in the third grade. In total, 125 sentences were generated. The sentences were read by 2 groups (20 adults and 20 primary school students), and reading time and verbal mistakes were recorded. Thereafter, persistent verbal mistakes and sentences with extreme high and low mean reading speeds were excluded. Finally, the validity of the participants' reading speed as measured with the MNREAD Turkish version was determined by comparing it to their reading speed for daily reading tasks. Results: Reading speed for text of 1.6 M print size (logMAR 0.6) was 185.10 ± 20.46 words/min, reading speed for text of 1 M print size (logMAR 0.4) was 185.45 ± 27.27 words/min, and the maximum reading speeds calculated using the MNREAD Turkish version were 191.50 ± 32.19 words/min for chart 1 and 190.55 ± 27.35 words/min for chart 2. As expected, correlations were observed between chart 1 and chart 2 (r = 0.88, P < 0.01), between chart 1 and logMAR 0.6 text (r = 0.74, P < 0.01), between chart 1 and logMAR 0.4 text (r = 0.67, P < 0.01), between chart 2 and logMAR 0.6 text (r = 0.63, P < 0.01), and between chart 2 and logMAR 0.4 text (r = 0.59, P < 0.01). Conclusion: The MNREAD Turkish version was tested using persons with normal vision and results were obtained from similar groups using daily reading material. The MNREAD acuity charts are logarithmic and continuous-text reading acuity charts for people in Turkey with normal and low vision.
Development and validation of the Turkish version of the MNREAD visual acuity charts
To design and validate a Turkish version of the MNREAD acuity charts. Materials and methods: A vocabulary was created using high-frequency words that appear in Turkish schoolbooks used by 8-year-old children in the third grade. In total, 125 sentences were generated. The sentences were read by 2 groups (20 adults and 20 primary school students), and reading time and verbal mistakes were recorded. Thereafter, persistent verbal mistakes and sentences with extreme high and low mean reading speeds were excluded. Finally, the validity of the participants' reading speed as measured with the MNREAD Turkish version was determined by comparing it to their reading speed for daily reading tasks. Results: Reading speed for text of 1.6 M print size (logMAR 0.6) was 185.10 ± 20.46 words/min, reading speed for text of 1 M print size (logMAR 0.4) was 185.45 ± 27.27 words/min, and the maximum reading speeds calculated using the MNREAD Turkish version were 191.50 ± 32.19 words/min for chart 1 and 190.55 ± 27.35 words/min for chart 2. As expected, correlations were observed between chart 1 and chart 2 (r = 0.88, P < 0.01), between chart 1 and logMAR 0.6 text (r = 0.74, P < 0.01), between chart 1 and logMAR 0.4 text (r = 0.67, P < 0.01), between chart 2 and logMAR 0.6 text (r = 0.63, P < 0.01), and between chart 2 and logMAR 0.4 text (r = 0.59, P < 0.01). Conclusion: The MNREAD Turkish version was tested using persons with normal vision and results were obtained from similar groups using daily reading material. The MNREAD acuity charts are logarithmic and continuous-text reading acuity charts for people in Turkey with normal and low vision.
___
- Legge GE, Pelli DG, Rubin GS, Schleske MM. Psychophysics of reading. I. Normal vision. Vision Res 1985; 25: 239-52. 2. Legge GE, Rubin GS, Pelli DG, Schleske MM. Psychophysics of reading. II. Low vision. Vision Res 1985; 25: 253-65.
- Soytürk MK, Küçüksezer F, Beştaş H. Bir yakın görme eşeli örneği. In: Kural G, Duman S, editors. Turkish Ophthalmology Society XXX. National Congress Bulletin. Antalya: 1996; 1005- 6 (in Turkish).
- Eğrilmez S, Eğrilmez ED, Akkın C, Kaşkaloğlu M, Yağcı A. Uluslararası standartlara uygun bir Türkçe yakın okuma eşeli. Türk Oft Gaz 2004; 34: 404-12 (in Turkish).
- Mansfi eld JS, Ahn SJ, Legge GE, Leubaker A. A new reading acuity chart for normal and low vision. Ophthalmic Visual Optics/Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System Technical Digest 1993; 3: 232-5. 6. Castro CT, Kallie CS, Salomão SR. Development and validation of the MNREAD reading acuity chart in Portuguese. Arq Bras Oft almol 2005; 68: 777-83.
- Nakamura H, Oda K, Fujita K, Yuzawa M. Th e prescription of reading aids with the MNREAD-J reading acuity chart for low vision patients with AMD. Jpn Orthopt 2000; 28: 253-61.
- http://gandalf.psych.umn.edu/groups/gellab/MNREAD2000/ mntest.html (last accessed 20 February 2007).
- Wolff sohn JS, Anderson SJ, Mitchell J, Woodcock A, Rubinstein M, Ffytche T et al. Eff ect of age related macular degeneration on the Eger macular stressometer photostress recovery time. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 432-4.
- Chung ST, Jarvis SH, Cheung SH. Th e eff ect of dioptric blur on reading performance. Vision Res 2007; 47: 1584-94.
- Braswell J, Rine RM. Evidence that vestibular hypofunction aff ects reading acuity in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 70: 1957-65.
- Fujikado T, Asonuma S, Ohji M, Kusaka S, Hayashi A, Ikuno Y et al. Reading ability aft er macular translocation surgery with 360-degree retinotomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 134: 849-56.
- Mruthyunjaya P, Stinnett SS, Toth CA. Change in visual function aft er macular translocation with 360 degrees retinectomy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 1715-24.
- Tejeria L, Harper RA, Artes PH, Dickinson JM. Face recognition in age related macular degeneration: perceived disability, measured disability and performance with a bioptic device. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 1019-26.
- Virgili G, Cordaro C, Bigoni A, Crovato S, Cecchini P, Menchini U. Reading acuity in children: evaluation and reliability using MNREAD charts. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2004; 45: 3349-54.