Cemal TURAN, DENİZ ERGÜDEN, MEVLÜT GÜRLEK, CEM ÇEVİK, FUNDA TURAN

Molecular Systematic Analysis of Shad Species (Alosa spp.) from Turkish Marine Waters using mtDNA Genes

Türk deniz sularından beş tirsi türünün (Alosa caspia, A. fallax nilotica, Alosa maeotica, Alosa immaculata, Alosa tanaica) filogenetik ilişkisi mitokondriyal DNA polimeraz zincir reaksyionu-restriksiyon parça uzunluk polimorfizmi ile araştırılmıştır. PCR ile uygulamaya tabi tutulmuş altı gen bölgesi; NADH 5/6, NADH 3/4 cytochrom b, COX, 16 S rRNA ve D-Loop, yedi restriksiyon enzimi ile (BsurI, AluI, EheI, Hin6I, RsaI, XhoI Bsh1236I) sırasıyla kesilmiştir. Filogenetik analiz için bir araya getirilmiş altı genden toplam 45 haplotip beş tirsi türünden tespit edilmiş ve ortalama haplotip çeşitliliği ile türler içerisindeki nükleotit çeşitliliği sırasıyla 0,8809 ve 0,0022 olarak bulunmuştur. En yüksek genetik farklılık A. caspia ve A. maeotica (0,013727) arasında, en düşük A. immaculata ve A. tanaica (0,003073) arasında gözlenmiştir. Monte Carlo (X 2 ) ikili genetik karşılaştırma sonucunda tüm türler arasında yüksek derecede önemli farklılıklar ortaya çıkmıştır (P

MtDNA Genleri Kullanarak Türk Deniz Sularında Tirsi Türlerinin (Alosa spp.) Moleküler Sistematik Analizi

The phylogenetic relationship among five shad species (Alosa caspia, A. fallax nilotica, Alosa maeotica, Alosa immaculata, Alosa tanaica) from Turkish marine waters was investigated with mitochondrial DNA polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism.The six genesegments, NADH 5/6, NADH 3/4cytochrome b, COX, 16 SrRNA and D-Loop, of mtDNA amplified by PCR were digested with seven restriction enzymes, BsurI, AluI, EheI, Hin6I, RsaI, XhoI Bsh1236I, respectively.When all the six genes were combined together for phylogenetic analysis, a total of 45 haplotypes were detected from the five shad species, and the average haplotype diversity and nucleotide diversity within species were 0.8809 and 0.0022 respectively. The average nucleotide diversity and nucleotide divergence among species were 0.009248 and 0.007080 respectively. The highest genetic divergence was observed between A. caspia and A. maeotica (0.013727) and the lowest between A. immaculate and A. tanaica (0.003073). Monte Carlo (X 2 ) pairwise genetic comparison revealed highly significant differences between all species (P<0.001). In the Neighbour-joining tree, there were two main grouping, and in the first group, A. caspia and A. f. nilotica exhibited the closest genetic similarity which was the sister group to A. immaculata. A .tanaicaseems to be the most divergent in this grouping. Another group contained only A. maeotica which showed the highest genetic differentiation among Alosa genus.

PDF

___

Aksiray F.1987. Türkiye Deniz Balıkları ve Tayin Anahtarı. İ.Ü Rektörlüğü Yayınları, 2. Baskı, İstanbul, 811 pp. (in Turkish)
Bagliniere, J.L., Sabatie, M.R., Rochard, E., Alexandrino, P. and Aprahamian, C.D. 2003. The allis shad Alosa alosa: biology, ecology, range, and status of populations. In: K.E. Limburg and J.R. Waldman (Eds.), Biodiversity, Strategies, and Conservation of the Worlds Shads Bethesda, American Fisheries Society, MD: 85-102.
Bernatchez, L. and Wilson, C.C. 1998. Comparative phylogeography of Nearctic and palearctic fishes. Molecular Ecology, 7: 431-452. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00319.x
Bilecenoglu, M., Taskavak, E., Mater, S. and Kaya, M. 2002. Checklist of the marine fishes of Turkey. Zootaxa, 113: 1-194.
Bowen, B.R., Kreiser, B.R., Mickle, P.F., Schaefer, J.F. and Adams, S.B. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships among North American Alosa species (Clupeidae). Journal of Fish Biology, 72: 1188-1201. doi: 10.1111/j.1095- 8649.2007.01785.x
Demirsoy A. 1998. Yaşamın Temel Kuralları (Böcekler dışında omurgasızlar). Metaksan A.S., Cilt 2, Kısım I, Ankara, 1210 pp. (in Turkish)
Durand, J.D., Tsigenopoulos, C.S., Unlu, E., Berrebi, P. 2002. Phylogeny and biogeography of the family Cyprinidae in the Middle East inferred from cytochrome b DNA-evolutionary significance of this region. Molecular Phylogenetic and Evolution, 22: 91-100. doi:10.1006/mpev.2001.1040
Erguden, D., Turan, C. and Cevik, C. 2007. The growth features of Pontic shad Alosa pontica (Eichwald, 1838) in the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. Journal of Biological Science, 7: 686-688. doi: 10.3923/jbs.2007.685.688
Eschmeyer, W.N. 2014. Catalog of fishes: Genera, species, references. www. research.calacademy.org/research/ ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp (accessed May 25, 2014).
Faria, R., Weiss, S. and Alexandrino, P. 2006. A molecular phylogenetic perspective on the evolutionary history of Alosa spp. (Clupeidae). Molecular Phylogenetic and Evolution, 40: 298-304. doi:10.1016/j.ympev. 2006.02.008
Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39:783-791. doi: 10.2307/2408678
Geldiay, R. and Balık, S. 1996. Türkiye Tatlı Su Balıkları. Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ege Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Yayın No: 46, II. Baskı, İzmir, 519 pp. (in Turkish)
Kocher, T.D. and Stepien, C.A. 1997. Molecular Systematics of Fishes. San Diego Academic Press, California, 314 pp.
Kottelat, M. 1997. European freshwater Fishes. An heuristic checklist of the freshwater fishes of Europe (exclusive of former USSR), with an introduction for nonsystematics and comments on nomenclature and conservation. Biology, 52: 1-271.
Kuru, M. 1980. Key to inland water fishes of Turkey. Hacettepe University, Bulletin of Nature Faculty, 9: 103-133.
Kuru, M. 2004. Recent systematic status of inland water fishes of Turkey. G.U. Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 24:1-21.
Mater, S. and Bilecenoglu, M. 1999. Türkiye Deniz Balıkları. In: A. Demirsoy (Ed.), Genel Zoocoğrafya ve Türkiye Zoocoğrafyası, Ankara: 790-808.
McElroy, D., Moran, P., Bermingham, E. and Kornfield, I. 1992. REAP: An integrated environment for the manipulation and phylogenetic analysis of restriction data. Journal of Heredity, 83: 157-158.
Meyer, A., Kocher, T.D., Basassibwaki, P. and Wilson, A.C. 1990. Monophyletic origin of Lake Victoria cichlid fishes suggested by mitochondrial DNA sequences. Nature, 347: 550-553. doi:10.1038/347550a0
Meyer, A. 1993. Evolution of mitochondrial DNA in fishes. In: P.W. Hochachka and T.P. Mommsen (Eds.), Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Fishes, Vol. 2, Elsevier Science Publishers, London: 1-38.
Roff, D.A. and Bentzen, P. 1989.The statistical analysis of mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms: X2 and the problem of small samples. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 6: 539-545.
Saitou, N. and Nei, M. 1987. The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4: 406-425.
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F. and Maniatis, T. 1989. Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, New York, 238 pp.
Semina, A.V., Polyakova, N.E., Makhotkin, M.A., Brykov, V.A. 2007. Mitochondrial DNA divergence and phylogenetic relationships in mullets (Pisces: Mugilidae) of the Sea of Japan and the Sea of Azov revealed by PCR-RFLP-analysis. Russian Journal of Marine Biology, 3: 187-192. doi: 10.1134/S1063074007030078
Shaw, P., Turan, C., Wrigth, J., Oconnell, M. and Carvalho, G.R. 1999. Microsatellite DNA analysis of population structure in Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus), with direct comparison to allozyme and mtDNA RFLP analyses. Heredity, 83: 490-499. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6885860
Slastenenko, E. 1956. Karadeniz Havzası Balıkları (Fishes of Black Sea Basin). Et ve Balık Kurumu Yayınları, İstanbul, 711 pp. (in Turkish)
Svetovidov, A.N. 1963. Clupeidae, Fauna of the U.S.S.R., fishes. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 428 pp.
Svetovidov, A.N. 1964. Systematics of North America anadromous Clupeoid fishes of the genera Alosa, Caspiolasa and Pomolobus. Copeia, 196: 118-130.
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M. and Kumar, S. 2011. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28: 2731-2739.
Tegelström, H. 1987. Genetic variability in mitochondrial DNA in a regional population of the great lit (Pagrus major). Biochemical Genetics, 25: 95-110.
Turan, C and Basusta, N. 2001. Comparison of morphometric characters of twaite shad (Alosa fallax nilotica, Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1808) among three areas in Turkish Seas. Bulletin Francais Peche Piscic (Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems). 362/363: 1027-1035. doi: 10.1051/kmae:2001034
Turan, C., Ozturk, B., Erguden, D., Gurlek, M., Yaglioglu, D. and Uygur, N. 2007. Atlas of Marine Bony Fishes of Turkey. In: C. Turan (Ed.), Atlas and Systematic of Marine Bony Fishes of Turkey, Nobel Publishing House, Adana: 121-134.
Turan, C., Gurlek, M. and Ozturk, B. 2009a. Genetic differentiation of Mediterranean horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) populations as revealed by mtDNA PCR-RFLP analysis. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 25:142-147. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426. 2009.01223.x
Turan, C., Ozturk, B., Caliskan, M., Duzgunes, E., Gurlek, M., Yaglioglu, D., Hazar, D. and Sevenler, S. 2009b. Genetic and morphological variation of Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in the Turkish waters. CBM - Cahiers De BiologieMarine, 50: 207-213.
Wallace, D.C. 1986. Mitochondrial genes and diseases. Hospital Practice, 21: 77-92.
Whitehead, P.J.P. 1984. Clupeidae. In: P.J.P. Whitehead, M.L. Bauchot, J.C. Hureau, J. Nielsen, E. Tortonese (Eds.), Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, UNESCO, Paris: 1-510.
Whitehead, P.J.P. 1985. FAO Species Catalogue. Clupeoid Fishes of the World (suborder Clupeiodei). An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of the Herrings, Sardines, Pilchards, Sprats, Anchovies and Wolfherrings. Part 1: Chirocentridae, Clupeidae and Pristigasteridae. FAO Fisheries Synopsis, Rome, 303 pp.