Mobility and load aware radio resource management in OFDMA femtocell networks

Mobility and load aware radio resource management in OFDMA femtocell networks

Recent evolutions in mobile networks have led to increased resource demands, especially from indoor users. Although recent technologies such as LTE have an important role in providing higher capacity, indoor users are not satisfied adequately. Femtocell networks are one of the proposed solutions that support high data rates as well as better indoor coverage without imposing heavy costs to network providers. However, interference management is a challenging issue in femtocell networks, mainly due to dense and random deployment of femto access points (FAPs). Therefore, distinct radio resource management (RRM) methods are employed to ensure acceptable levels of call dropping/blocking probability and spectral efficiency. However, the mobility of mobile users is an important issue in resource management of femtocell networks that has not been considered adequately. In this paper, we propose an algorithm that predicts the resource requirements of FAPs regarding mobility of their users and allocates the resources to the FAPs based on an extended load-based RRM algorithm that prioritizes handoff calls to incoming calls. Simulation results illustrate that the proposed method has shown lower call dropping probability and higher spectral efficiency compared to the benchmark algorithms.

___

  • [1] Andrews JG, Claussen H, Dohler M, Rangan S, Reed MC. Femtocells: past, present, and future. IEEE J Sel Area Comm 2012; 30: 497-508.
  • [2] Liang YS, Chung WH, Ni GK, Chen IY, Zhang H, Kuo SY. Resource allocation with interference avoidance in OFDMA femtocell networks. IEEE T Veh Technol 2012; 61: 2243-2255.
  • [3] Arslan MY, Yoon J, Sundaresan K, Krishnamurthy SV, Banerjee S. A resource management system for interference mitigation in enterprise OFDMA femtocells. IEEE ACM T Network 2013; 21: 1447-1460.
  • [4] Li H, Xu X, Hu D, Qu X, Tao X, Zhang P. Graph method based clustering strategy for femtocell interference management and spectrum efficiency improvement. In: IEEE 2010 Wireless Communications Networking and Mobile Computing Conference; 23–25 September 2010; Chengdu, China. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-5.
  • [5] Xenakis D, Passas N, Merakos L, Verikoukis C. Mobility management for femtocells in LTE-advanced: key aspects and survey of handover decision algorithms. IEEE Commun Surv Tut 2014; 16: 64-91.
  • [6] Le LB, Hossain E, Niyato D, Kim DI. Mobility-aware admission control with QoS guarantees in OFDMA femtocell networks. In: IEEE 2013 International Communication Conference; 9–13 June 2013; Budapest, Hungary. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 2217-2222.
  • [7] Estrada R, Otrok H, Dziong Z, Barada H. Joint BS selection and resource allocation model for OFDMA macrofemtocell networks incorporating mobility. In: IEEE 2013 International Selected Topics in Mobile and Wireless Networking Conference; 19–21 August 2013; Montreal, Canada. pp. 42-47.
  • [8] Xiao Z, Chen J, Wang D, Li R, Yi K. Interference management via access control and mobility prediction in two-tier heterogeneous networks. J Cent South Univ T 2014; 21: 3169-3177.
  • [9] Sung NW, Pham NT, Huynh T, Hwang WJ. Predictive association control for frequent handover avoidance in femtocell networks. IEEE Commun Lett 2013; 17: 924-927.
  • [10] Li H, Ci S, Wang Z. Prediction handover trigger scheme for reducing handover latency in two-tier femtocell networks. In: IEEE 2012 Global Communications Conference; 3–7 December 2012; Anaheim, CA, USA. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 5130-5135.
  • [11] Jeong B, Shin S, Jang I, Sung NW, Yoon H. A smart handover decision algorithm using location prediction for hierarchical macro/femto-cell networks. In: IEEE 2011 Vehicular Technology Conference; 5–8 September 2011; San Francisco, CA, USA. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-5.
  • [12] Yousefi S, Shayesteh MG, Kalbkhani H. Adaptive handover algorithm in heterogeneous femtocellular networks based on received signal strength and signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio prediction. IET Commun 2014; 8: 3061-3071.
  • [13] Salhi M, Trabelsi S, Boudriga N. Mobility-assisted and QoS-aware resource allocation for video streaming over LTE femtocell networks. ECTI Trans Electr Eng Electron Commun 2015; 13: 42-53.
  • [14] Huang CJ, Chen PC, Guan CT, Liao JJ, Lee YW, Wu YC, Chen IF, Hu KW, Chen HX, Chen YJ. A probabilistic mobility prediction based resource management scheme for WiMAX femtocells. In: IEEE 2010 International Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation Conference; 13–14 March 2010; Changsha, China. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 295-300.
  • [15] Hatoum A, Langar R, Aitsaadi N, Boutaba R, Pujolle G. Cluster-based resource management in OFDMA femtocell networks with QoS guarantees. IEEE T Veh Technol 2014; 63: 2378-2391.
  • [16] Barth D, Bellahsene S, Kloul L. Mobility prediction using mobile user profiles. In: IEEE 2011 International Modeling, Analysis & Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems Symposium; 25–27 July 2011; Singapore. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 286-294.
  • [17] Bellahsene S, Kloul L. A new Markov-based mobility prediction algorithm for mobile networks. In: Aldini A, Bernardo M, Bononi L, Cortellessa V, editors. Computer Performance Engineering. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2010. pp. 37-50.
  • [18] Berry A, Blair JRS, Heggernes P, Peyton BW. Maximum cardinality search for computing minimal triangulations of graphs. Algorithmica 2004; 39: 287-298.
  • [19] ETSI. 3GPP T 36. 92. v. 11. 0. Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); FDD Home eNode B (HeNB) Radio Frequency (RF) Requirements Analysis. Sophia Antipolis, France: ETSI, 2012.
  • [20] Rhee I, Shin, M, Hong S, Lee K, Kim S, Chong S. CRAWDAD Data Set, 2009. Available online at http://crawdad.org/.
  • [21] Guo J, Liu F, Zhu Z. Estimate the call duration distribution parameters in GSM system based on K-L divergence method. In: IEEE 2007 International Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing Conference; 21–25 September 2007; Shanghai, China. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 2988-2991.
  • [22] Mogensen P, Na W, Kov´aes IZ, Frederiksen F, Pokhariyal A, Pedersen KI, Kolding T, Hugl K, Kuusela M. LTE capacity compared to the Shannon bound. In: IEEE 2007 Vehicular Technology Conference; 22–25 April 2007; Dublin, Ireland. New York, NY, USA. pp. 1234-1238.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK