A pseudo spot price of electricity algorithm applied to environmental economic active power dispatch problem

In this study, an environmental economic active power dispatch problem is transformed into an optimization problem with a single-objective function by applying the weighted sum method (WSM) and the conic scalarization method (CSM). A pseudo spot price of electricity algorithm (PSPA) is used to solve the transformed problem. This is demonstrated on an example problem, which is a lossy electrical power system having only thermal units The WSM and CSM methods are applied to the example problem, and the weight factor values of these methods is increased from 0 to 1 by a step size of 0.1. For each possible value of the coefficient, a different total generation cost rate that is to be minimized is obtained, and an optimal solution is also calculated for it (Pareto optimal solutions). Solutions obtained from both methods are not onlycompared with each other, but also compared with other solutions obtained using different methods such as the first order gradient method, the lambda iteration method, nonlinear programming, linear programming, and fuzzy linear programming. In this study, the CSM is used for the first time in the transformation of an environmental economic active power dispatch problem into a single-objective optimization problem. Thus, it is shown that the PSPA can also be used in the solution of the environmental economic power dispatch problem.

A pseudo spot price of electricity algorithm applied to environmental economic active power dispatch problem

In this study, an environmental economic active power dispatch problem is transformed into an optimization problem with a single-objective function by applying the weighted sum method (WSM) and the conic scalarization method (CSM). A pseudo spot price of electricity algorithm (PSPA) is used to solve the transformed problem. This is demonstrated on an example problem, which is a lossy electrical power system having only thermal units The WSM and CSM methods are applied to the example problem, and the weight factor values of these methods is increased from 0 to 1 by a step size of 0.1. For each possible value of the coefficient, a different total generation cost rate that is to be minimized is obtained, and an optimal solution is also calculated for it (Pareto optimal solutions). Solutions obtained from both methods are not onlycompared with each other, but also compared with other solutions obtained using different methods such as the first order gradient method, the lambda iteration method, nonlinear programming, linear programming, and fuzzy linear programming. In this study, the CSM is used for the first time in the transformation of an environmental economic active power dispatch problem into a single-objective optimization problem. Thus, it is shown that the PSPA can also be used in the solution of the environmental economic power dispatch problem.

___

  • P.X. Zhang, B. Zhao, Y.J. Cao, S.J. Cheng, “A novel multi-objective genetic algorithm for economic power dispatch”, 39th International Universities Power Engineering Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 422-426, 2004.
  • Y.L. Hu, W.G. Wee, “A hierarchical system for economic dispatch with environmental constraints”, IEEE Trans- actions on Power Systems, Vol. 9, pp. 1076-1082, 1994.
  • L. Wang, C. Singh, “Environmental/economic power dispatch using a fuzziŞed multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 77, pp. 1654-1664, 2007.
  • J.H. Talaq, F. El-Hawary, M.E. El-Hawary, “A summary of environmental/economic dispatch algorithms”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 9, pp. 1508-1516, 1994.
  • E. Zitzler, L. Thiele, “Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms - a comparative case study”, Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, pp. 292-301, 1998.
  • R.N. Gasimov, “Characterization of the Benson proper efficiency and scalarization in nonconvex vector optimiza- tion”, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 507, pp. 189-198, 2001.
  • R.N. Gasimov, A. Sipahioglu, T. Sara¸c, “A multi-objective programming approach to 1.5-dimensional assortment problem”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 179, pp. 64-79, 2007.
  • N.A. Ismayilova, M.S. ¨Ozdemir, R.N. Gasimov, “A multiobjective faculty-course-time slot assignment problem with preferences”, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 46, pp. 1017-1029, 2007.
  • M.S. ¨Ozdemir, R.N. Gasimov, “The analytic hierarchy process and multiobjective 0-1 faculty course assignment”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 157, pp. 398-408, 2004.
  • T. Yalcinoz, H. Altun, “Environmentally constrained economic dispatch via a genetic algorithm with arithmetic crossover”, IEEE 6th Africon Conference in Africa, Vol. 2, pp. 923-928, 2002.
  • R.T.F.A. King, H.C.S. Rughooputh, “Elitist multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for environmental/economic dispatch”, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 2, pp. 1108-1114, 2003.
  • A. Farag, S. Al-Baiyat, T.C. Cheng, “Economic load dispatch multiobjective optimization procedures using linear programming techniques”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 10, pp. 731-738, 1995.
  • J.F. Chen, S.D. Chen, “Multiobjective power dispatch with line flow constraints using the fast Newton-Raphson method”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 12, pp. 86-93, 1997.
  • H.T. Yang, C.M. Huang, H.M. Lee, C.L. Huang, “Multiobjective power dispatch using fuzzy linear programming”, IEEE International Conference on Energy Management and Power Delivery, Vol. 2, pp. 738-743, 1995.
  • C. Ya¸sar, S. Fadıl, “Solution to environmental/economic dispatch problem by using Şrst order gradient method”, 5th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, pp. 91-95, 2007.
  • M.A. Abido, “Environmental/economic power dispatch using multiobjective evolutionary algorithms”, IEEE Trans- actions on Power Systems, Vol. 18, pp. 1529-1537, 2003.
  • J.P.S. Catal˜ao, S.J.P.S. Mariano, V.M.F. Mendes, L.A.F.M. Ferreira, “Short-term scheduling of thermal units: emission constraints and trade-off curves”, European Transactions on Electrical Power, Vol. 18, pp. 1-14, 2008.
  • S. Fadil, G.R. Sarioglu, “An active and reactive power dispatch technique for a power system area using spot price of electricity”, Electric Machines and Power Systems, Vol. 26, pp. 399-413, 1998.
  • S. Fadıl, C. Ya¸sar, “A pseudo spot price algorithm applied to the pumped-storage hydraulic unit scheduling problem”, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, Vol. 8, pp. 93-109, 2000.
  • S. Fadil, C. Ya¸sar, “A pseudo spot price algorithm applied to short-term hydrothermal scheduling problem”, Electric Power Components and Systems, Vol. 29, pp. 977-995, 2001.
  • S. Fadil, C. Yasar, “An active power dispatch technique using pseudo spot price of electricity for a power system area including limited energy supply thermal units”, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 24, pp. 87-95, 2002. [22] C. Ya¸sar, S. Fadıl, M. Babada˘gı, “A spot price of electricity algorithm applied to lossy short-term hydrothermal scheduling problem with limited energy supply thermal units”, European Transactions on Electrical Power , Vol. 18, pp. 296-312, 2008.
  • A.J. Wood, B.F. Wollenberg, Power Generation Operation and Control, New York, Wiley, 1996.