The distribution of centric diatoms in different river catchments in the Anatolian Peninsula, Turkey

The distribution of centric diatoms in different river catchments in the Anatolian Peninsula, Turkey

The diatoms are one of the most important groups of organisms for biomonitoring studies. In Turkey, most previousapplications of diatoms to water quality monitoring have focused on the pennate diatoms, with almost no attention given to the centricforms. The paper presents the centric diatoms in some river catchments in Central Anatolia (Konya closed catchment and Kızılırmak)and Western Anatolia (Marmara, Sakarya, Susurluk, Akarçay, Küçük Menderes, and Meriç-Ergene in the Marmara and Aegean regions).The survey of these catchments is based on samples collected between 2009 and 2013 from 33 different locations, including some springsfrom Türkmen Mountain and Domaniç forest, as well as small streams and big rivers of the Anatolian Peninsula. Altogether 30 taxa werefound, of which 14 are new records for the freshwater diatom flora of Turkey.

___

  • Ács É, Ari E, Duleba M, Dressler M, Genkal SI, Jakó É, Rimet F, Ector L, Kiss KT (2016). Pantocsekiella , a new centric diatom genus based on morphological and genetic studies. Fottea 16: 56-78.
  • Ács É, Szabó K, Tóth B, Kiss KT (2004). Investigation of benthic algal communities, especially diatoms of some Hungarian streams in connection with reference conditions of the Water Framework Directives. Acta Bot Hung 46: 225-278.
  • Akın M, Akın G (2007). Importance of water, water potential in Turkey, water basins and water pollution. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi 47: 105-118 (in Turkish with abstract in English).
  • Aysel V (2005). Check-list of the freshwater algae of Turkey. Journal of Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment 11: 1-124.
  • Bąk M, Witkowski A, Żelazna-Wieczorek J, Wojtal, AZ, Szczepocka E, Szulc K, Szulc B (2012). Klucz do Oznaczania Okrzemek w Fitobentosie na Potrzeby Oceny Stanu Ekologicznego wód Powierzchniowych w Polsce. Warsaw, Poland: Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska (in Polish).
  • Bey MY, Ector L (2013). Atlas des diatomées des cours d’eau de la région Rhône-Alpes. Tome 1. Vincennes, France: Agence Française pour la Biodiversité (in French).
  • Budzyńska A, Wojtal AZ (2011). The centric diatom Puncticulata balatonis (Pantocsek) Wojtal et Budzyńska, comb. nov., in the plankton of eutrophic-hypertrophic Rusalka Lake (Western Poland). Nova Hedwigia 93: 509-524.
  • Cavalcante KP, Tremarin PI, Ludwig TAV (2013). Taxonomic studies of centric diatoms (Diatomeae): unusual nanoplanktonic forms and new records for Brazil. Acta Bot Bras 27: 237-251.
  • Cremer H, Koolmees H (2010). Common diatoms (Centrales and Fragilariaceae, Bacillariophyta of modern and fossil freshwater environments in the Netherlands. Nova Hedwigia 90: 343-381.
  • Crawford RM, Likhoshway YV, Jahn R (2003). Morphology and identity of Aulacoseira italica and typification of Aulacoseira (Bacillariophyta). Diatom Res 18: 1-19.
  • Gillett ND, Pan Y, Manoylov KM, Stancheva R, Weilhoefer CL (2011). The potential indicator value of rare taxa richness in diatom-based stream bioassessment. J Phycol 47: 471-482.
  • Gönülol A (2016). Türkiye Algleri. Samsun, Turkey: Ondokuz Mayıs University. Available online at http://turkiyealgleri.omu.edu.tr (in Turkish).
  • Håkansson H (2002). A compilation and evaluation of species in the general Stephanodiscus, Cyclostephanos and Cyclotella with a new genus in the family Stephanodiscaceae. Diatom Res 17: 1-139.
  • Hartley B, Barber HG, Carter JR, Sims PA (1996). An Atlas of British Diatoms. Bristol, UK: Biopress.
  • Houk V, Klee R, Tanaka H (2010). Atlas of freshwater centric diatoms with a brief key and descriptions. Part III. Stephanodiscaceae A: Cyclotella , Te r t i a r i u s , Discostella . Fottea 10: 1-498.
  • Houk V, Klee R, Tanaka H (2014). Atlas of freshwater centric diatoms with a brief key and descriptions. Part IV. Stephanodiscaceae B. Fottea 14: 1-530.
  • Karthick B, Kociolek JP (2011). Four new centric diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) from the Western Ghats, South India. Phytotaxa 22: 25-40.
  • Kheiri S, Nejadsattari T, Asri Y, Hamdi SMM, Spaulding S, Edlund MB (2013). Cyclotella iranica sp. nov. (Bacillariophyta: Coscinodiscophyceae), a new diatom from the Karaj River, Iran. Phytotaxa 104: 35-42.
  • Khursevich G, Kociolek JP (2012). A preliminary, worldwide inventory of the extinct, freshwater fossil diatoms from the orders Thalassiosirales, Stephanodiscales, Paraliales, Aulacoseirales, Melosirales, Coscinodiscales, and Biddulphiales. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 141: 315-364.
  • Kiss KT, Klee R, Ector L, Ács É (2012). Centric diatoms of large rivers and tributaries in Hungary. Morphology and biogeographic distribution. Acta Bot Croat 71: 311-363.
  • Kolkwitz R, Marsson M (1909). Okologie der tierische Saprobien. Beiträige zur Lehre yon der biologische Gewäserbeurteilung. Int Rev Hydrobiol 2: 126-152 (in German).
  • Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1991). Bacillariophyceae 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. Stuttgart, Germany: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
  • Nakov T, Guillory WX, Julius MW, Theriot EC, Alverson AJ (2015). Towards a phylogenetic classification of species belonging to the diatom genus Cyclotella (Bacillariophyceae): transfer of species formerly placed in Puncticulata , Handmannia , Pliocaenicus and Cyclotella to the genus Lindavia. Phytotaxa 217: 249-264.
  • Podani J, Miklós I (2002). Resemblance coefficients and the horseshoe effect in principal coordinates analysis. Ecology 83: 3331-3343.
  • Podani J, Schmera D (2011). A new conceptual and methodological framework for exploring and explaining pattern in presence- absence data. Oikos 120: 1625-1638.
  • Potapova MG, Bixby RJ, Charles DF, Edlund MB, Enache ME, Furey P, Hamilton PB, Lowe RL, Manoylov KM, Ognjanova- Rumenova N et al. (2007). Representatives of the Genus Aulacoseira Thwaites in NAWQA samples. The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Eighteenth NAWQA Workshop on Harmonization of Algal Taxonomy, Report No: 08-07. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.
  • Rimet F (2012). Recent views on river pollution and diatoms. Hydrobiologia 638: 1-24.
  • Semple EC (1921). The regional geography of Turkey: a review of Banse’s work. Geogr Rev 11: 338-350.
  • Solak CN, Ector L, Wojtal AZ, Ács É, Morales E (2012). A review of investigations on diatoms (Bacillariophyta) in Turkish inland waters. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 141: 431-462.
  • Solak CN, Kulikovskiy M (2013). Species composition and distribution of centric diatoms from Türkmen Mountain (Sakarya River Basin/Turkey). Turk J Bot 37: 589-596.
  • Soylu EN, Gönülol A (2003). Phytoplankton and seasonal variations of the River Yeşilırmak, Amasya, Turkey. Turk J Fish Aquat Sc 3: 17-24.
  • Stevenson RJ, Pan YD, Van Dam H (2010). Assessing environmental conditions in rivers and streams with diatoms. In: Smol JP, Stoermer EF, editors. The Diatoms. Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57-85.
  • Tuji A (2015). Distribution and taxonomy of the Aulacoseiradistans species complex found in Japanese harmonic artificial reservoirs. Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science Series B (Botany) 41: 53-60.
  • Wo j t a l AZ (2009). The diatoms of Kobylanka stream near Kraków (Wyżyna Krakowsko-Częstochowska, S Poland). Polish Botanical Journal 54: 129-330.
  • Wojtal AZ, Kwandrans J (2006). Diatoms of the Wyżyna Krakowsko Częstochowska Upland (S Poland) – Coscinodiscophyceae (Thalassiosirophycidae). Polish Botanical Journal 51: 177-207.