A comparison of logistic regression and maximum entropy for distribution modeling of range plant species (a case study in rangelands of western Taftan, southeastern Iran)

A comparison of logistic regression and maximum entropy for distribution modeling of range plant species (a case study in rangelands of western Taftan, southeastern Iran)

This study aimed to compare the efficiency of logistic regression and maximum entropy models for distribution modellingof plant species habitats in the rangelands of western Taftan, southeastern Iran. Vegetation cover was sampled using a systematic- randomized method. Soils were sampled at 0 30 and 30 60 cm depths through digging of eight soil profiles. The agreement betweenpredictive maps generated by models with documented maps of habitats indicated that logistic regression was able to predict thedistribution ofArtemisia aucheriandArtemisia sieberihabitats at excellent (kappa value = 0.95) and weak (kappa value = 0.39) levels,respectively. On the other hand, the agreement between predicted maps generated by maximum entropy with documented maps wasvery good forAmygdalus scopariaandArtemisia aucherihabitats (kappa value = 0.82 and 0.76, respectively), and weak forArtemisiaucheri(kappa value = 0.55). This study indicates that logistic regression and maximum entropy methods had the same efficiency indistribution modelling of plant species with a limited ecological niche. However, the maximum entropy model can receive priority indistribution prediction of plant species with a limited ecological niche because it uses only presence data of plants and a small dataset.

___

  • Abd El-Ghani M, Abo El-Kheir M, Abdel-Dayem M, Abd El-Hamid, M (2011). Vegetation analysis and soil characteristics of five common desert climbing plants in Egypt. Turk J Bot 35: 561- 580.
  • Abdel Khalik K, El-Sheikh M, El-Aidarous A (2013). Floristic diversity and vegetation analysis of Wadi Al-Noman, Holy Mecca, Saudi Arabia. Turk J Bot 37: 894-907.
  • Araujo MB, Guisan A (2006). Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modeling. J Biogeogr 33: 1677-1688.
  • Ardestani EG, Tarkesh M, Bassiri M, Vahabi MR (2015). Potential habitat modeling for reintroduction of three native plant species in central Iran. Journal of Arid Land 7: 381-390.
  • Baldwin RA (2009). Use of maximum entropy modeling in wild life research. Entropy 11: 854-866.
  • Buehler EC, Ungar LH (2001). Maximum entropy methods for biological sequence modeling. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Data Mining in Bioinformatics, BIOKDD 01: 60-64.
  • Ebrahimi M, Masoodipour A, Rigi M (2015). Role of soil and topographic features in distribution of plant species (Case study: Sanib Taftan watershed). Ecopersia 3: 917-932.
  • Elith J, Graham CH (2009). Do they? How do they? Why do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography 32: 66-77.
  • Evangelista P, Kumar H, Stohlgren TJ (2008). Modelling invasion for a habitat generalist and a specialist plant species. Divers Distrib 14: 808-817.
  • Guisan A, Weiss SB, Weiss AD (1999). GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distribution. Plant Ecol 143: 107-122.
  • Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000). Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135: 147-186.
  • Hernandez PA, Franke I, Herzog SK, Pacheco V, Paniagua L, Quintana HL, Soto A, Swenson JJ, Tovar C, Valqui TH et al (2008). Predicting species distributions in poorly-studied landscapes. Biodivers Conserv 17: 1353-1366.
  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000). Applied Logistic Regression. 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.
  • Hosseini SZ, Kappas M, Zare Chahouki MA, Gerold G, Erasmi S, Rafiei Emam A (2013). Modelling potential habitats for Artemisia sieberi and Artemisia aucheri in Poshtkouh area, central Iran using the maximum entropy model and geostatistics. Ecol Inform 18: 61-68.
  • Keating KA, Cherry S (2004). Use and interpretation of logistic regression in habitat-selection studies. J Wildlife Manage 68: 774-789.
  • Kumar S, Stohlgren TJ (2009). Maxent modeling for predicting suitable habitat for threatened and endangered tree Canacomyrica monticola in New Caledonia. Journal of Ecology and Natural Environment 1: 94-98.
  • Luoto M, Hjort J (2005). Downscaling of coarse-grained geomorphological data. Earth Surf Proc Land 33: 75-89.
  • Maltez-Mouro S, Garcia LV, Maranon T, Freitas H (2005). The combined role of topography and over story tree composition in promoting edaphic and floristic variation in a Mediterranean forest. Ecol Res 20: 668-677.
  • Miller J, Franklin J (2002). Modeling the distribution of four vegetation alliances using generalized linear models and classification trees with spatial dependence. Ecol Model 157: 227-247.
  • Pearce J, Ferrier S (2000). Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol Model 133: 225-245.
  • Phillips SJ, Dudik M (2008). Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31: 161-175.
  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190: 231-259.
  • Piri Sahragard H, Zare Chahouki MA (2015). An evaluation of predictive habitat models performance of plant species in Hoze-soltan rangelands of Qom province. Ecol Model 309- 310: 64-71.
  • Piri Sahragard H, Zare Chahouki MA (2016a). Modeling of Artemisia sieberi Besser habitat distribution using maximum entropy method in desert rangelands. Journal of Rangeland Science 6: 93-101.
  • Piri Sahragard H, Zare Chahouki MA (2016b). Comparison of logistic regression and machine learning techniques in prediction of habitat distribution of plant species. Range Manag Agrofor 37: 21-26.
  • Piri Sahragard H, Ajorlo M (2016). Predicting the distribution of plant species habitats using maximum entropy model (A case study in rangelands of western Taftan, southeastern Iran). Soil Environm 35: 224-234.
  • Rossiter DG, Loza A (2010). Analyzing land cover change with logistic regression in R [online]. Website http://www.css. cornell.edu/faculty/dgr2/teach/R/R_lcc.pdf [accessed 20 September 2016].
  • Rushton SP, Ormerod SJ, Kerby G (2004). New paradigms for modelling species distributions? J Appl Ecol 41: 193-200.
  • Swets JA (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240: 1285-1293.
  • Tarkesh M, Jetshcke G (2012). Comparison of six correlative models in predictive vegetation mapping on a local scale. Environ Ecol Stat 19: 437-457.
  • Tatian MR, Zabihi A, Tamartash R, Shabani M (2011). Determination of indicator species of some soil characteristics by ordination method in Kooh-e-Namak rangelands, Qom. Journal of Environmental Studies 37: 34-52.
  • Yang XQ, Kushwaha SPS, Saran S (2013). Maxent modeling for predicting the potential distribution of medicinal plant, Justicia adhatoda L. in Lesser Himalayan foothills. Ecol Eng 51: 83-87.
  • Zare Chahouki MA (2010). Data analysis in natural resources research using SPSS software. 1st ed. Tehran, Iran: Jahat Press.
  • Zare Chahouki MA, Azarnivand H, Jafari M, Tavili A (2010). Multivariate statistical methods as a tool for model based prediction of vegetation types. Russ J Ecol+ 41: 84-94.
  • Zare Chahouki MA, Khalasi Ahvazi L (2012). Predicting potential distributions of Zygophyllum eurypterum by three modeling techniques (ENFA, ANN and logistic) in North East of Semnan, Iran. Range Manag Agrofor 2: 68-82.
  • Zare Chahouki MA, Piri Sahragard H (2016). Maxent modelling for distribution of plant species habitats of rangelands (Iran). Pol J Ecol 64: 453-467.
Turkish Journal of Botany-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-008X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK