Morphology, development, and transplant potential of Prunus avium and Cornus sanguinea seedlings growing under different LED lights

Morphology, development, and transplant potential of Prunus avium and Cornus sanguinea seedlings growing under different LED lights

The objective of the present study was to investigate the impact of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) on the morphological and developmental characteristics of wild cherry (Prunus avium) and common dogwood (Cornus sanguinea). The LEDs used were L20AP67 (moderate blue, red and far-red, high green), AP673L (moderate blue, high red), G2 (low blue, high red and far-red), AP67 (moderate blue, red and far-red), and NS1 (high blue and green, low red, high red:far-red, 1% ultraviolet). Fluorescent light [FL (high blue and green, low red)] tubes served as the control treatment. The growth rate and subsequently the shoot height of Cornus sanguinea were greater under FL. Root length of Prunus avium was longer under NS1. Prunus avium produced more biomass under NS1 and AP67, while Cornus sanguinea was favored under G2 and AP67. Greater root:shoot ratio was found under NS1 for Prunus avium and under NS1, AP67, G2, and AP673L for Cornus sanguinea. Root growth capacity (RGC) was also assessed in order to evaluate the transplanting response. RGC of Prunus avium and Cornus sanguinea was favored after precultivation under G2 and AP67, and under NS1 and AP67, respectively. Our study demonstrated that LEDs were more efficient in promoting a number of morphological characteristics than conventional FL in Prunus avium and Cornus sanguinea.

___

  • Astolfi S, Marianello C, Grego S, Bellarosa R (2012). Preliminary investigation of LED lighting as growth light for seedlings from different tree species in growth chambers. Not Bot Horti Agrobot 40: 31-38.
  • Bantis F, Ouzounis T, Radoglou K (2016). Artificial LED lighting enhances growth characteristics and total phenolic content of Ocimum basilicum, but variably affects transplant success. Sci Hortic 198: 277-283.
  • Chiatante D, Di Iorio A, Sarnataro M, Scippa GS (2002). Improving vigour assessment of pine (Pinus nigra  Arnold) seedlings before their use in reforestation. Plant Biosyst 136: 209-216.
  • Ciccarese L, Anders M, Pettenella D (2012). Ecosystem services from forest restoration: thinking ahead. New For 43: 543-560.
  • de Carbonnel M, Davis P, Roelfsema MRG, Inoue S, Schepens I, Lariguet P, Geisler M, Shimazaki K, Hangarter R, Fankhauser C (2010). The Arabidopsis PHYTOCHROME KINASE SUBSTRATE2 protein is a phototropin signaling element that regulates leaf flattening and leaf positioning. Plant Physiol 152: 1391-1405.
  • Dougher TA, Bugbee BG (1998). Is blue light good or bad for plants? Life Support Biosph Sci 5: 129-136.
  • Dougher TA, Bugbee BG (2004). Long-term blue light effects on the histology of lettuce and soybean leaves and stems. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 129: 467-472.
  • Folta KM, Lieg EJ, Durham T, Spalding EP (2003). Primary inhibition of hypocotyl growth and phototropism depend differently on phototropin-mediated increases in cytoplasmic calcium induced by blue light. Plant Physiol 133: 1464-1470.
  • Franklin KA, Whitelam GC (2005). Phytochromes and shadeavoidance responses in plants. Ann Bot 96: 169-175.
  • Grossnickle SC (2005). Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New For 30: 273-294.
  • Hernández R, Kubota C (2016). Physiological responses of cucumber seedlings under different blue and red photon flux ratios using LEDs. Environ Exp Bot 121: 66-74.
  • Hoenecke ME, Bula RJ, Tibbitts TW (1992). Importance of ‘blue’ photon levels for lettuce seedlings grown under red-lightemitting diodes. HortScience 27: 427-430.
  • Iakovoglou V, Radoglou K (2015). Breaking seed dormancy of three orthodox Mediterranean Rosaceae species. J Environ Biol 36: 345-349.
  • Kostopoulou P, Dini-Papanastasi O, Radoglou K (2010). Density and substrate effects on morphological and physiological parameters of plant stock material of four forest species grown in mini-plugs. Scand J For Res 25: 10-17.
  • Kozuka T, Suetsugu N, Wada M, Nagatani A (2013). Antagonistic regulation of leaf flattening by phytochrome and phototropin in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 54: 69-79.
  • Massa GD, Kim HH, Wheeler RM, Mitchell CA (2008). Plant productivity in response to LED lighting. HortScience 43: 1951-1956.
  • Mattsson A (1986). Seasonal variation in root growth capacity during cultivation of container grown Pinus sylvestris seedlings. Scand J For Res 1: 473-482.
  • Mattsson A (1996). Predicting field performance using seedling quality assessment. New For 13: 223-248.
  • Mohr H (1986). Coaction between pigment systems. In: Kendrick RE, Kronenberg GHM, editors. Photomorphogenesis in Plants. Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus-Nijhoff, pp. 547-564.
  • Morrow RC (2008). LED lighting in horticulture. HortScience 43: 1947-1950.
  • Navarro RM, Retamosa MJ, Lopez J, Del Campo A, Ceaceros C, Salmoral L (2006). Nursery practices and field performance for the endangered Mediterranean species Abies pinsapo Boiss. Eco Eng 27: 93-99.
  • Ouzounis T, Fretté X, Ottosen CO, Rosenqvist E (2014). Spectral effects of LEDs on chlorophyll fluorescence and pigmentation in Phalaenopsis ‘Vivien’ and ‘Purple Star’. Physiol Plant 154: 314-327.
  • Petrokas R (2010). Prerequisites for the reproduction of wild cherry (Prunus avium L.). Balt For 16: 139-153.
  • Radoglou K, Kostopoulou P, Raftoyannis Y, Dini-Papanastasi O, Spyroglou G (2011). The physiological and morphological quality of Pinus brutia container seedlings produced from mini-plug transplants. Plant Biosyst 145: 216-223.
  • Radoglou K, Raftoyannis Y, Halyvopoulos G (2003). The effect of planting date and seedling quality on field performance of Castanea sativa Mill. and Quercus frainetto Ten. seedlings. Forestry 76: 569-578.
  • Riikonen J (2016). Pre-cultivation of Scots pine and Norway spruce transplant seedlings under four different light spectra did not affect their field performance. New For 47: 607.
  • Sager JC, McFarlane JC (1997). Radiation. In: Langhans RW, Tibbits TW, editors. Plant Growth Chamber Handbook. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press, pp. 1-29.
  • Schalk PH (1990). Prunus in forest and landscape in the Netherlands. Ned Bosb-Tijdschr 62: 144-151.
  • Schuerger AC, Brown C, Stryjewski EC (1997). Anatomical features of pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.) grown under lightemitting diodes supplemented with blue or far-red light. Ann Bot 79: 273-282.
  • Shen YZ, Guo SS, Ai WD, Tang YK (2014). Effects of illuminants and illumination time on lettuce growth, yield and nutritional quality in a controlled environment. Life Sci Space Res 2: 38- 42.
  • Sims DA, Gamon JA (2002). Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages. Remote Sens Environ 81: 337-354.
  • Smirnakou S, Ouzounis T, Radoglou K (2016). Effects of continuous spectrum LEDs used in indoor cultivation of two coniferous species Pinus sylvestris L. and Abies borisii-regis Mattf. Scand J For Res 31: 115-122.
  • Stanković MS, Topuzović MD (2012). In vitro antioxidant activity of extracts from leaves and fruits of common dogwood (Cornus sanguinea L.). Acta Bot Gall 159: 79-83.
  • Wilson BC, Jacobs DF (2006). Quality assessment of temperate zone deciduous hardwood seedlings. New For 31: 417-433.
  • Zimmermann H (1988). The importance and management of wild cherry. Allg Forst Z Waldwirtsch Umweltvorsorge 20: 538-540.