Genetic integrity assessment of cryopreserved tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes

Shoot tips of five tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes were successfully cryopreserved by droplet vitrification. Recovered plants were studied for genetic stability by two different assays: amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) using 4 primer combinations and sequencing of lycopene $\beta$-cyclase gene (LCY-B) from leaves. The highest shoot regeneration after cryopreservation was 70% (Pontica) following 24 h osmoprotection in 0.5 M sucrose and 30 min dehydration in plant vitrification solution 2 (PVS2). The data inferred from AFLP showed no genetic dissimilarities between in vitro regenerants derived from cryopreserved tissues compared with the noncryopreserved controls. Although a single nucleotide polymorphism, a G→T transversion, was identified in position 1139 in Capriciu and Darsirius, this was not due to the cryopreservation process itself, since it was detected in both cryopreserved and control samples. Thus, sequencing of LCY-B gene from leaves revealed no DNA damages after cryopreservation and subsequent in vitro regeneration. Our results indicate that cryostorage by droplet vitrification is an efficient and reliable technique to preserve the selected tomato genotypes and to regenerate true-to-type plants

Genetic integrity assessment of cryopreserved tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes

Shoot tips of five tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes were successfully cryopreserved by droplet vitrification. Recovered plants were studied for genetic stability by two different assays: amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) using 4 primer combinations and sequencing of lycopene $\beta$-cyclase gene (LCY-B) from leaves. The highest shoot regeneration after cryopreservation was 70% (Pontica) following 24 h osmoprotection in 0.5 M sucrose and 30 min dehydration in plant vitrification solution 2 (PVS2). The data inferred from AFLP showed no genetic dissimilarities between in vitro regenerants derived from cryopreserved tissues compared with the noncryopreserved controls. Although a single nucleotide polymorphism, a G→T transversion, was identified in position 1139 in Capriciu and Darsirius, this was not due to the cryopreservation process itself, since it was detected in both cryopreserved and control samples. Thus, sequencing of LCY-B gene from leaves revealed no DNA damages after cryopreservation and subsequent in vitro regeneration. Our results indicate that cryostorage by droplet vitrification is an efficient and reliable technique to preserve the selected tomato genotypes and to regenerate true-to-type plants

___

  • Antony JJJ, Poobathy R, Danial M, Sinniah UR, Subramaniam S (2012). Polymorphism analysis of cryopreserved Dendrobium Bobby Messina protocorm-like bodies (PLBs) using RAPD markers. Plant Omics Journal 5: 427‒431.
  • Barraco G, Sylvestre I, Engelmann F (2011). Comparing encapsulation-dehydration and droplet-vitrification for cryopreservation of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) shoot tips. Sci Hortic 130: 320‒324.
  • Benelli C, De Carlo A, Engelmann F (2013). Recent advances in the cryopreservation of shoot-derived germplasm of economically important fruit trees of Actinidia, Malus, Olea, Prunus, Pyrus and Vitis. Biotechnol Adv 31: 175‒185.
  • Benson EE (2008). Cryopreservation of phytodiversity: A critical appraisal of theory and practice. Crit Rev Plant Sci 27: 141‒219.
  • Bhatia P, Ashwath N, Senaratna T, Krauss SL (2005). Genetic analysis of cotyledon derived regenerants of tomato using AFLP markers. Curr Sci 82: 280‒284.
  • Bhatia P, Ashwath N, Senaratna T, Midmore D (2004). Tissue culture studies of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 78: 1‒21.
  • Bonin A, Bellemain E, Bronken Eidesen P, Pompanon F, Brochmann C, Taberlet P (2004). How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies. Mol Ecol 13: 3261‒3273.
  • Castillo N, Reed B, Graham J, Fernandez-Fernandez F, Bassil NV (2010). Microsatellite markers for raspberry and blackberry. J Am Soc Hort Sci 135: 271‒278.
  • Cejas I, Méndez R, Villalobos A, Palau F, Aragón C, Engelmann F, Carputo D, Aversano R, Martínez M, Lorenzo J (2013). Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Phaseolus vulgaris plants from non-cryopreserved and cryopre-served seeds. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 4: 844‒849.
  • Coste A, Deliu C, Vălimăreanu S, Halmagyi A (2014). Cryopreservation and acclimatization of Lycopersicon esculentum (Mill.) genotypes. Not Bot Horti Agrobo 42: 466‒471.
  • Dalal M, Chinnusamy V, Bansal KC (2010). Isolation and functional characterization of lycopene β-cyclase (CYC-B) promoter from Solanum habrochaites. BMC Plant Biol 10: 61‒76.
  • Demeulemeester MAC, Panis BJ, De Proft MP (1992). Cryopreservation of in vitro shoot tips of chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). Cryo Letters 13: 165‒174.
  • Ellis RH, Roberts EH (1981). The quantification of ageing and survival in orthodox seeds. Seed Sci Technol 9: 373‒409.
  • Engelmann F, Ramanatha R (2012). Major research challenges and directions for future research. In: Normah MN, Chin HF, Reed BM, editors. Conservation of Tropical Plant Species. New York, NY, USA: Springer, pp. 511‒526.
  • Gady ALF, Vriezen WH, Van de Wal MHBJ, Huang P, Bovy AG, Visser RGF, Bachem CWB (2012). Induced point mutations in the phytoene synthase 1 gene cause differences in carotenoid content during tomato fruit ripening. Mol Breed 29: 801‒812.
  • Grout BWW, Crisp PC (1995). Cryopreservation of germplasm of tomato. In: Bajaj YPS, editor. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. Volume 32. Cryopreservation of Plant Germplasm I. New York, NY, USA: Springer, pp. 371‒380.
  • Grout BWW, Westcott RJ, Henshaw GG (1978). Survival of shoot meristems of tomato seedlings frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology 15: 478‒483.
  • Hall TA (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucleic Acids Symp 41: 95‒98.
  • Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontol Electronica 4: 9.
  • Harding K (2004). Genetic integrity of cryopreserved plant cells: a review. CryoLetters 25: 3‒22.
  • Helliot B, Madur D, Dirlewanger E, De Boucaud MT (2002). Evaluation of genetic stability in cryopreserved Prunus. In vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 38: 493‒500.
  • Huson DH, Bryant D (2006). Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23: 254‒267.
  • Kaczmarczyk A, Funnekotter B, Menon A, Phang PY, Al-Hanbali A, Bunn E, Mancera RL (2012). Current issues in plant cryopreservation. In: Katkov I, editor. Current Frontiers in Cryobiology. InTech, pp. 416‒438.
  • Kaczmarczyk A, Houben A, Keller ER, Mette MF (2010). Influence of cryopreservation on the cytosine methylation state of potato genomic DNA. Cryo Letters 3: 380‒391.
  • Karipidis Ch, Douma D (2011). Tomato pollen storage at freeze and cryogenic temperature - effects on viability and fecundity. Acta Hort (ISHS) 908: 257‒263.
  • Kartha KK, Leung NL, Mroginski LA (1982). In-vitro grown responses and plant regeneration from cryopreserved meristems of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Z Pflanzenphysiol 107: 133‒140.
  • Kaviani B (2011). Conservation of plant genetic resources by cryopreservation. Aust J Crop Sci 5: 778‒800.
  • Keller ERJ, Senula A, Kaczmarczyk A (2008). Cryopreservation of herbaceous dicots. In: Reed BM, editor. Plant Cryopreservation: A Practical Guide. New York, NY, USA: Springer, pp. 281‒332.
  • Kim HH, Lee SC (2012). ‘Personalisation’ of droplet-vitrification protocols for plant cells: a systematic approach to optimizing chemical and osmotic effects. Cryo Letters 33: 271‒279.
  • Lambardi M, Fabbri A, Caccavale A (2000). Cryopreservation of white poplar (Populus alba L.) by vitrification of in vitro grown shoot tips. Plant Cell Rep 19: 213‒218.
  • Li Z, Ahn TK, Avenson TJ, Ballottari M, Cruz JA, Kramer DM, Bassi R, Fleming GR, Keasling JD, Niyogi KK (2009). Lutein accumulation in the absence of zeaxanthin restores non- photochemical quenching in the Arabidopsis thaliana npq1 mutant. Plant Cell 21: 1798–1812.
  • Liu YG, Wang XY, Liu LX (2004). Analysis of genetic variation in surviving apple shoots following cryopreservation by vitrification. Plant Sci 166: 677‒685.
  • Marshall OJ (2004). PearlPrimer: cross-platform, graphical primer design for standard, bisulphite and real-time PCR. Bioinformatics 20: 2471‒2472.
  • Martin C, Cervera MT, Gonzalez-Benito ME (2011). Genetic stability analysis of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum × morifolium Ramat) after different stages of an encapsulation-dehydration cryopreservation protocol. J Plant Physiol 168: 158‒166.
  • Miao L, Shou S, Cai J, Jiang F, Zhu Z, Li H (2009). Identification of two AFLP markers linked to bacterial wilt resistance in tomato and conversion to SCAR markers. Mol Biol Rep 36: 479‒486.
  • Moreno JC, Pizarro L, Fuentes P, Handford M, Cifuentes V, Stange C (2013). Levels of lycopene β-Cyclase 1 modulate carotenoid gene expression and accumulation in Daucus carota. PLoS ONE 8: e58144.
  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473‒497.
  • Nair DS, Reghunath BR (2009). Cryoconservation and regeneration of axillary shoot meristems of Indigofera tinctoria (L.) by encapsulation-dehydration technique. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 45: 565‒573.
  • Passam HC, Karapanos IC, Bebeli PJ, Savvas D (2007). A review of recent research on tomato nutrition, breeding and post- harvest technology with reference to fruit quality. Eur J Plant Sci Biotech 1: 1‒21.
  • Pearce RS (2004). Adaptation of higher plants to freezing. In: Fuller B, Lane N, Benson E, editors. Life in the Frozen State. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, pp. 171‒203.
  • Peredo EL, Arroyo-García R, Reed BM, Revilla MÁ (2008). Genetic and epigenetic stability of cryopreserved and cold-stored hops (Humulus lupulus L.). Cryobiology 57: 234‒241.
  • Pritchard H (1995). Cryopreservation of seeds. In: Day J, McLellan M, editors. Cryopreservation and Freeze-Drying Protocols. Totowa, NJ, USA: Humana Press Inc., pp. 133‒144.
  • Rao A, Agarwal S (2000). Role of antioxidant lycopene in cancer and heart disease. J Am College Nutr 19: 563‒569.
  • Riesco MF, Robles V (2013). Cryopreservation causes genetic and epigenetic changes in zebrafish genital ridges. PLoS One. 8: e67614.
  • Roberts EH, Ellis RH (1984). The implications of the deterioration of orthodox seeds during storage for genetic resources conservation. In: Holden JHW, Williams JT, editors. Crop Genetic Resources and Evaluation. London, UK: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., pp. 18‒35.
  • Sacks EJ, St Clair DA (1996). Cryogenic storage of tomato pollen: Effect on fecundity. Hort Sci 31: 447‒448.
  • Sakai A, Engelmann F (2007). Vitrification, encapsulation- vitrification and droplet-vitrification: a review. Cryo Letters 28: 151‒172.
  • Sakai A, Kobayashi S, Oiyama I (1990). Cryopreservation of nucellar cells of navel orange (Citrus sinensis Osb. var. brasiliensis Tanaka) by vitrification. Plant Cell Rep 9: 30‒33.
  • Stanwood PC (1985). Cryopreservation of seed germplasm for genetic conservation. In: Kartha KK, editor. Cryopreservation of Plant Cells and Organs. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, pp. 199‒226.
  • Suzuki M, Ishikawa M, Okuda H, Noda K, Kishimoto T, Nakamura T, Ogiwara I, Shimura I, Akihama T (2006). Physiological changes in gentian axillary buds during two-step preculture with sucrose that conferred high levels of tolerance to desiccation and cryopreservation. Ann Bot 97: 1073‒1081.
  • Terry KL, Missmer SA, Hankinson SE, Willett WC, De Vivo I (2008). Lycopene and other carotenoid intake in relation to risk of uterine leiomyoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198: 37.e1‒37.e8.
  • Volk GM, Walters C (2006). Plant vitrification solution 2 lowers water content and alters freezing behavior in shoot tips during cryoprotection. Cryobiology 52: 48‒61.
  • Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M (1995). AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23: 4407‒4441.
  • Walters C, Wheeler L, Standwood P (2004). Longevity of cryogenically stored seeds. Cryobiology 48: 229‒244.
  • Wang QC, Panis B, Engelmann F, Lambardi M, Valkonen JPT (2009). Cryotherapy of shoot tips: a technique for pathogen eradication to produce healthy planting materials and prepare healthy plant genetic resources for cryopreservation. Ann Appl Biol 154: 351‒363.
  • Wang ZC, Lei JS, Zhang CW, He YX (2013). Analysis genetic stability in Prunus humilis Bunge plants after cryopreservation twice. Adv Forestry Lett 2: 67‒75.
  • Zarghami R, Pirseyedi M, Hasrak S, Sardrood BP (2008). Evaluation of genetic stability in cryopreserved Solanum tuberosum. Afr J Biotechnol 7: 2798‒2802.
  • Zevallos B, Cejas I, Valle B, Yabor Y, Aragón C, Engelmann F, Martínez ME, Lorenzo JC (2013). Short-term liquid nitrogen storage of wild tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) seeds modifies the levels of phenolics in 7 day-old seedlings. Sci Hortic 160: 264‒267.
  • Zevallos B, Cejas I, Engelmann F, Carputo D, Aversano R, Scarano MT, Yanes E, Martínez-Montero M, Lorenzo JC (2014). Phenotypic and molecular characterization of plants regenerated from non-cryopreserved and cryopreserved wild Solanum lycopersicum (Mill.) seeds. Cryo Letters 35: 216‒225.
  • Zhai Z, Wu Y, Engelmann F, Chen R, Zhao Y (2003). Genetic stability assessments of plantlets regenerated from cryopreserved in vitro cultured grape and kiwi shoot tips using RAPD. Cryo Letters 24: 315‒322.
Turkish Journal of Biology-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0152
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Genetic integrity assessment of cryopreserved tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes

ANA COSTE, DANA SUTEU, IOAN BACILA, CONSTANTIN DELIU, SERGIU VALIMAREANU, ADELA HALMAGYI

Optimization of multiplex RT-PCR for M1, M23, and M23X splice variants of AQP4 and ß-actin transcripts in Dalton?s lymphoma mouse tissues

RAJANEESH KUMAR GUPTA, SUKALA PRASAD

Effects of gradual soil drought stress on the growth, biomass partitioning, and chlorophyll fluorescence of Prunus mongolica seedlings

YOUYAN GUO, Hongyuan YU, Dongsheng KONG, Fang YAN, Donghua LIU, YAJUAN ZHANG

Expression, purification, and characterization of recombinant human paraoxonase 1 (rhPON1) in Pichia pastoris

YAĞMUR ÜNVER, ESABİ BAŞARAN KURBANOĞLU, ORHAN ERDOĞAN

Storage temperature of boar semen and its relationship to changes in sperm plasma membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, and oxidoreductive capability

DARIUSZ GACZARZEWICZ, JAN UDALA, MALGORZATA PIASECKA, BARBARA BLASZCZYK, TOMASZ STANKIEWICZ

Biological synthesis of silver nanoparticles and evaluation of antibacterial and antifungal properties of silver and copper nanoparticles

AZAM JAFARI, LATIFEH POURAKBAR, KHALIL FARHADI, Lida MOHAMMAD GHOLIZAD, YOBERT GOOSTA

Effect of sodium nitroprusside on micropropagation and biochemical parameters of CAB-6P and Gisela 6 cherry rootstocks

VIRGINIA SARROPOULOU, KORTESSA DIMASSI-THERIOU, IOANNIS THERIOS

Optimization of multiplex RT-PCR for M1, M23, and M23X splice variants of AQP4 and β-actin transcripts in Dalton's lymphoma mouse tissues

Rajaneesh Kumar GUPTA, Sukala PRASAD

Antioxidant activity of heme oxygenase 1 in Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.(Indian mustard) under salt stress

KHUSHBU VERMA, SHUBHAM DIXIT, GYAN SINGH SHEKHAWAT, AFROZ ALAM

Designing a bacterial biosensor for detection of mercury in water solutions

AMIR ROOINTAN, NOOSHIN SHABAB, JAMSHID KARIMI, ALIREZA RAHMANI, MOHAMMAD YOUSEF ALIKHANI, MASSOUD SAIDIJAM